The Breaking of the Great Artificial Drought in China, Europe, Iceland, Japan and Singapore

I grew up in Emmaus, Pennsylvania. It snowed beautifully when I was a child, every winter. Then, in around 4th Grade (1974), it began to snow less, and less. I noticed it, and so did everyone else. 


In 1975, our teacher took us to a glacial pond on South Mountain, and said that things were disappearing from it. He took classes to the pond every year.


I went to Camp Olympic in Emmaus for three summers, roughly '72, '73, '74. We were in the Little Lehigh creek a lot, with camp counselors telling about what lived in the stream. Turning over rocks, looking for what lived under them.


I could see the life disappearing, year by year.


When I was a kid, my friends and I dug up rocks to look for salamanders. The disappeared, year by year. A good friend and I collected butterflies. They disappeared, year by year.


I was a lifeguard at Meadow Pool from 1979 to 1982. It started to get droughty in 1981. They talked about it on the radio at that time. By 1982, at the end of High School, you could see the rocks in all the river bottoms. 


My long-winded point is "I noticed it was all happening". 


When the Great Artificial Drought was broken, I noticed that, too, and immediately began writing articles about it. I started writing the articles in 2013.


We just had one of the ten biggest snowstorms ever here in New York, which the shills at the National Weather Service were pooh-poohing as "no big deal".


I've got separate chapters going for the U.S., broken down by state. I'm searching for the format that will be most-impactful, versus simply presenting the entirety of the historical data.


Eventually, these articles will be fairly short, and all have great images, and quotes. They'll have a master documented appended at the end, with all the examples. You only need two or three examples to make a point, that is unless you are dealing with a committed Coincidence Theorist, who will be unmoved regardless of the number of examples they are confronted with.




THE BREAKING OF THE GREAT ARTIFICIAL DROUGHT IN CHINA, EUROPE, ICELAND, JAPAN AND SINGAPORE


Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled "Positive Changes That Are Occurring", in July of 2013.


These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich's work. 


Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.


One of those changes is that the Great Artificial Drought has been broken. That's because precipitation varies in direct proportion to the health of the ether.


Precipitation varies directly with the health of the Ether. 


The Great Artificial Drought has been broken by the slow, steady, widespread and ever-increasing distribution of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in the vicinity of the weather warfare infrastructure that many still mistakenly presume only carries cell phone traffic and weather radar data.  

 

In 2012, in Wes Anderson’s “Moonrise Kingdom”:


NARRATOR - The Black Beacon storm was considered by the U.S. Department of Inclement Weather to be the region's most destructive meteorological event of the second half of the twentieth century.

                            

EXT. WIDE MEADOW. DAY - One year later. The sky is blue. Wildflowers grow in the tall grass. The narrator, now in shirtsleeves, concludes:

                         

NARRATOR - But harvest yields the following autumn far exceeded any previously recorded, and the quality of the crops was said to be extraordinary.


Where Wes boldly and bald-fadedly lies that simply putting more water on crops will create record yields. And not in the year that the rainfall took place, but the year after.


It’s an enforced, Punch-and-Judy stupidity that demeans and abuses the viewer of the film, and the reader of the script.


It is, of course, careful propaganda on Mr. Anderson’s part to rebut the great climactic change that started in 2012, and has accelerated to this moment.  


The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “culprits” and “extreme”. That’s why a Phys.org article from In January 2017, Phys.org said “Scientists find culprits for extreme rainfall over Yangtze River in May”.


The article explains: “In May 2016, an extreme rainfall occurred in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River Valley. The area averaged anomaly of total precipitation over the region (117°-121°E, 26°-34°N) was the third wettest on record since 1961. There were 25 stations that broke 56-year maximum records. Meanwhile, the 2015-16 El Niño event was regarded as one of the strongest El Niño events in recorded history, bringing heavy rains and drought around the world.”


Where “El Nino”, a quasi-mythical, magical spot of slightly warmer than normal spot of water in the great vastness of the Pacific Ocean is straight-fadedly asserted to be the driver of the highest rainfall in history in China, but, via unexplained mechanism, also creates droughts elsewhere! Is there anything it can’t do?


While the author carefully omits mention of the record rainfall that is taking place in all the nations, regardless of geography. That’s an example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.


Li Chunxiang, the first author of the study, goes on to boldly and brazenly say “However, on smaller spatial scales we find that anthropogenic forcing has likely played a role in increasing the risk of extreme rainfall to the north of the Yangtze and decreasing it to the south."


Where the ensheepled reader gobbles down the doublethink that global warming both increases and decreases rainfall. Did it play a role, or did it not? What sort of role did it play, if so? Increasing to what extent? All the generalities of a desperately hedging Mouthpiece of the State.


Li is an Illuminist bloodline.


image

(David Rockefeller visits with his friend Li Chiang, one of Red China’s Government Trade Officials. From Fritz Springmeier’s “Bloodlines of the Illuminati”, Chapter 7, “The Li Bloodline)


Li is an Illuminist bloodline that is of the distinct and separate species of human we refer to as “Neanderthal”.


In February 2017, Iceland saw “the biggest snowfall for 80 years. Up to 51cm blanketed Reykjavík, the most snow to have ever fallen on the capital in February. “


Where “most” snow is general. The article omits what the previous record was, and when it was set, and further omits any mention of the margin between the old record and the new. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.


The author makes no mention of the fact that this record is part of a larger, wider trend. That’s another example of a propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.


There’s clearly been some great improvement in the environment in Iceland. 


The author makes no mention as to what might be driving the quantum increase in precipitation. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”. They’re desperate to keep you from recognizing that precipitation varies directly with the health of the ether.


In January 2018, globalvoices.org said “Chaos in the Capital: Photos of Record Snowfall in Tokyo”.


Where “record” snowfall is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.


Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. 


The propagandist from “global voices” kicks off the headline with “CHAOS”, which is the opposite emotion from what beautiful snow falling on Tokyo creates. This, my dear readers, is propaganda in a nutshell, at its most pure and obvious. Here’s a picture from the article:


image

(Record snowfall, Tokyo, Japan, January 2018)


To the wholly-credulous, mouth-breathing reader, this image depicts “Chaos in the Capital”. 


Actually, 60-70% of readers would just gobble down the headline, and keep moving, never making it to even the picture.


The great news is that the headline and the photo demonstrate that world is a much better place than the newspapers are telling you that it is. Don Croft would often say that the folks in charger were merely a “Paper Tiger” 


The only power that they have is that which we’ve been tricked over literally Millennia into giving away to them, for free.


The article continues:


At least one foot (30 centimeters) of snow accumulated in the Tokyo region over the weekend and into Monday, January 22. This is the most significant snowfall in Tokyo since 2014. Although this rare weather event shut down transportation networks, it also provided terrific photo opportunities for the nine million residents of Japan's capital region.”


Where “at LEAST one foot” and “MOST significant” are both general. And there’s carefully no mention of the previous record, as providing it would create a vehicle toward gaining specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.


The word “terrific” means “causing terror”. The Oxford English Dictionary presents that definition as “archaic”. That the because the folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the meaning of the word “terrific”.


The generational Satanist Intelligence operatives who write this stuff for a living call it "neurolinguistic programming".


It's the same "tradecraft" that they used when they named the Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added for improved transmissibility to humans "Covid". It's lifted from "Covin", a middle English word that means "fraud, deception; collusive agreement between two or more persons to the detriment of a third : conspiracy."


In January 2018, france24.com said “Paris museums, transportation on alert as record amounts of rain push Seine’s water levels higher”.


Where “record” amounts of rain is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.


Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. 


“Record AMOUNTS of rain” was used as a hedge in place of the stronger “record rainfall”.


The article continues: The December-January period is now the third-wettest on record since data collection began in 1900, according to Meteo France.


Many regions have seen double the rainfall than normal, including Paris where 183 mm (7.2 inches) have been dumped since Dec. 1. More rain was forecast to fall on Thursday.


The author doesn’t make any guess as to what’s driving the historically high levels of rainfall, nor do they mention that it’s part of a wider trend. Those are examples of what are respectively called “stonewalling” and “compartmentalization”.


In January 2018, The Local said “Sweden's snow depth sets new seasonal record”.


There are three hedges in play, to defray against “Sweden sets all time snow record”. Here, it’s “snow DEPTH”, not merely “snow”, and it’s a “new SEASONAL record”, vs. the stronger “new record”.


“Sets” record is general. You can’t get any idea of the margin between the old record and the new.


The article continues: “Most of Sweden, apart from the very far south and the west coast, was covered in snow on Monday morning – but meteorologists advised snow lovers to enjoy it while it lasts.”


Where “COVERED in snow” is, once again, general.


Mountain ski resort Kittelfjäll in Vilhelmina municipality recorded weekend snow depths of more than 150 centimetres – the deepest snow cover so far this winter, according to national weather agency SMHI. Further north, the town of Jokkmokk, currently busy preparing for its annual Sami winter market which gets under way on February 1st, boasted 135 centimetres of the white stuff. The central Svealand region, which includes Stockholm, recorded its deepest snow cover in Lillhamra in Dalarna where 102 centimetres of snow had fallen by Sunday, according to SMHI.”


In all three cases, great care is taken to omit the previous records, so you can’t get any insight into the margins between the old records and the new.


There’s also no suggestion as to what might be driving the most snow in the history of Sweden, or that the increase is taking place regardless of geography.


Those are, respectively, examples of the propaganda techniques known as “stonewalling” and “compartmentalization”.


In January 2018, InTheSnow said “Resorts in the Alps Head Towards Record Snowfall Stats”.


Where “RECORD snowfall” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.


Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. 


Resorts who have already had record amounts of snow are said to only be heading TOWARD them, and where it’s hedged back another step with “record snowfall STATS”. That gives the subconscious the green light to say “oh, you can make statistics say anything!”


The article continues: “January snowfall totals are getting so big that resorts in the Alps are getting close to record snow depths and snowfall totals. Resorts reported up to 3.3m (11 feet) of snow in the 7 days to Sunday and the number of resorts passing the 4m snow depth total on upper slopes has…”


The trigger word “reports” is used to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, someone must have recorded that incorrectly!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.


Care is taken not to discuss previous records, as that would create the ability to gain specific insight into the magnitude of the phenomenon I’m documenting here. 


There’s also no suggestion as to what might be driving the most snow in the history of Europe, or that the increase is taking place regardless of geography.


Those are, respectively, examples of the propaganda techniques known as “stonewalling” and “compartmentalization”.


In January 2018, in a spectacular example of Mil-Speak insanity, the U.K.’s Telegraph asked “Could too much snow spell disaster for the ski season?


The article continues:


“Storms and heavy snow spell frustration for skiers as slopes across Europe stay closed”. Where the heaviest snow in all history is described merely as “heavy”.


There are generational Satanists at the top of all the control pyramids, and that includes the Corporations that run the ski resorts. Who closed the resorts “ACROSS Europe” in response to the highest snow levels ever seen in Europe.


But they couldn’t keep them closed long, or villagers with torches in their hands would begin forming in mobs. Or at least that’s how it was in the good old days.


But be of good cheer, in that the mob understands at the very least that the Great Artificial Drought has been broken, and that “heavy” snow does not spell “disaster for the ski season”.





Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, December 18, 2020


If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]