"Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined for oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of
the universe without recognizing the evidence of the ether and the indispensable function in the phenomena. My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages
for a long time without the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment."

**- Nicola Tesla**

The words "mystery", "baffled" and "puzzled" are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of
those variants is "riddle".

That's why a Scientific American article from 1934 that I've appended below is headlined "The Ether:

**of the Ages".***Riddle*
("Daybreak", by Maxfield Parrish, 1922)

Mean-spirited Western materialism has been steadfastly maintaining "there's no such thing as the Ether" for many hundreds of years. One
of the biggest threats to that dark religion was and is the work of a Scotsman named James C. Maxwell. From the 1850's to the 1870's, he published a series of papers that represent a comprehensive summary of electrodynamic principles.

Maxwell’s equations were written in the algebra of what he referred to as the quaternions, and made the electromagnetic potential the centerpiece of his theory.

In 1881, after Maxwell had passed on, his sociopathic associate Oliver Heaviside replaced Maxwell’s electromagnetic potential field with the not-smarter-than-a-5th-grader ‘force fields’ as the centerpiece of electromagnetic theory, and cut
Maxwell's 20-plus algebraic equations down to four differential equations.

Thus, what are put forward as "Maxwell’s equations" were not Maxwell's, but were rather produced by Heaviside after Maxwell’s death. According to Heaviside, the electromagnetic potential field was arbitrary and needed to be “murdered”.

Wikipedia helpfully supports the sociopath by saying "Heaviside

**of Maxwell’s theory down to four differential equations, known now collectively as Maxwell’s Laws or Maxwell’s equations."***reduced the complexity*Where "reduced complexity" is Mil-speak for "cut out the Ether and the Interdimensional Universe", or "murdered", for short. I'll have to look into Maxwell's death - they probably murdered him, too.

Heaviside, in reducing the equations from quaternions to vectors, eliminated an important and very real type of force/interaction from the field, namely the direct interaction of rotating bodies, such as Jupiter and its moons – which was
claimed to result in the specific latitude location of the Great Spot.

"The energy from the sun doesn’t come from nuclear fusion at the core, but from the angular momentum in hyperdimensional space. This accounts for the missing neutrinos from the sun that are expected from the nuclear fusion, but which are not observed as predicted."

"The Sun is a big nuclear furnace that will eventually burn out." That's an example of a Big Lie told with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.

Wikipedia once again helpfully says "Maxwell's equations also

**Albert Einstein in developing the theory of special relativity."***inspired*
After Heaviside robbed the recently-deceased Maxwell, Einstein brazenly took forward mean-spirited Western materialism with his "Theory of Relativity", continuing the ages-long confidence game that "there's no such thing as the Ether". Leaving
interdimensional travel, free energy and time travel to our Death-worshipping betters.

That's why it's such a big deal that a headline below from just last year reads "Einstein killed the aether. Now the idea is back to save relativity".

The author goes on to say that "The luminiferous aether

**. Now it is being revived to explain dark matter and dark energy, and***has become a byword for failed ideas***unify physics."***potentially*
Heaviside cut out the Hyperdimensional Universe and generalized the Ether down to the not-smarter-than-a-fifth-grader "force field", and then Einstein completely eliminated the Luminous Aether. And
now, because great positive changes are occurring at every level of our reality, the Ether is being revived to save the collapsing ruse of mean-spirited Western materialism.

You simply cannot make this shit up.

There's an article below from 1999 entitled "Electromagnetism in the Ether", by Guiseppe Cannata. Most of it is way beyond me (and by that I mean the math). But I pulled out his riffs on the Ether:

"We must therefore admit that

**vacuum has mass**and may be easily called ether again.The Ether is not absolute. Ether is not continuous. No one has been able to carry out observations of its stationarity in any part of the Universe.

**There is a thick layer of terrestrial Ether.**

Ether is composed of extremely small particles (ether monads), each one "insignificant", such perhaps as neutrinos, gravitons etc., however quanta of various kinds of aggregation.

The organized collectivity of these entities is what we observe.

Ether is able to transmit all perturbations from the electromagnetic to the nuclear, to the gravitational, without even excluding pressure and temperature."

Research of Gigantopithecus and the creatures euphemistically referred to as "Lake Monsters" are forbidden because those species both exhibit Interdimensional behavior/abilities.

The folks in charge have had the Interdimensional Universe to themselves for a very long time, and I think it's about time we took it back.

WHAT WE KNOW ABOUT ETHER

Ether is composed of extremely small particles (ether monads), each one "insignificant", such perhaps as neutrinos, gravitons etc., however quanta of various kinds of aggregation. The organized collectivity of these entities is what we observe.

Ether is able to transmit all perturbations from the electromagnetic to the nuclear, to the gravitational, without even excluding pressure and temperature.

Ether is not absolute. Ether is not continuous. No one has been able to carry out observations of its stationarity in any
part of the Universe.

Vacuum has mass and may be easily called ether.

There is a thick layer of terrestrial Ether.

Heaviside, in reducing Maxwell's equations from quaternions to vectors, eliminated ether from the field. The equations that Heaviside eliminated had to do with the direct interaction of rotating bodies, such as Jupiter and its moons – which was claimed
to result in the specific latitude location of the Great Spot.

Only the existence of a field of force known as ether can account for the motions of the bodies observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature.

All matter comes from a primary substance, the Luminiferous Ether. There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.

Electric and magnetic phenomena are attributable to ether. The effects of static electricity are effects to ether under strain. Dynamic electricity and electromagnetism are effects of ether in motion.

The energy from the sun doesn’t come from nuclear fusion at the core, but from the angular momentum in hyperdimensional space. This accounts for the missing neutrinos from the sun that are expected from the nuclear fusion, but which are not observed as
predicted.

**Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, October 3, 2020**

1934 - The Ether:

**of the Ages - Scientific American***Riddle*
1999 - ELECTROMAGNETISM IN THE ETHER

(Giuseppe Cannata)

To attribute an inertia to free space is not an option. It is soundly consistent with the fundamental laws of physics. The mechanical interpretation of electromagnetic phenomena would supply a concrete way of simplicity and unification. Consequently, the
revised quantum theory could become without any contrast a modern chapter of a renewed classical physics. Here it is proposed a new elementary charge model, which would simplify the interpretation of many phenomena, including the controlled nuclear fusion.

1 - Introduction

In the study of mechanics it is better to go from kinematics to dynamics by introducing an essential property of the body: mass or inertia. Momentum, force and energy ot the body have dimensions which contain always mass. The equations in which mass does
not appear are merely kinematic. Linear and angular momenta, force and energy, in electromagnetism. do not explicitly contain mass. Nevertheless, by not wanting to consider them distinct quantities from those introduced in mechanics, and used in other sections
of physics, they clearly must contain inertia, even when referring to vacuum localizations. We must therefore admit that vacuum has mass and may be easily called ether again.

Of course, the global and specific characteristics of the ether must be made clear, by eliminating some wrong interpretations of the past.

2- Global characteristics of the ether

a) It is no-sense to consider ether being absolute, since up to now none has been able to carry out observations of its stationarity in any part of the Universe.

b) Partial or total drag of the ether does not exist. Ether is an integral part inside and around a star or a particle, and extends itself with decreasing density up to a limit surface, beyond which it belongs to another star or particle. Our planet, for
example, as an ether-terraqueous system is not spheroid-shaped like the terraqueous nucleus, but it is like a huge drop, which is compressed on one side by solar wind, while in the opposite side it is extended with a long geomagnetic tail. Michelson and Morley
experiment does confirm the relative rest of the ether in the Earth's proximity, as the interferometer does not reveal a significant fringe shift. Bradley's stellar aberration has up to now been interpreted as an experience consistent only with an absolute
ether. The astronomical telescope, pointed to the zenith toward the nearest star, must be inclined, with respect to the vertical line, of an angle a , according to Earth's movement. This angle is such that: tg a = u/c , where u is Earth's orbital speed and
c light's speed. But the light coming from the star takes years to reach the Earth, that is to say, it travels only a few terrestrial diameters in which the ether belongs to the Earth, a distance which will always be negligible in respect to the star-Earth
distance. Thus, the phenomenon can still be interpreted in Bradley's way, the thick layer of terrestrial ether notwithstanding.

c) Ether is not continuous. The granularity or quantization of mass and energy is a universal characteristic. lt is evident that in acoustic phenomena the quantum of mass is a molecule of the substance which constitutes the medium of propagation. Ether
can be conceived as composed by extremely small particles (ether monads), each one "insignificant", such perhaps as neutrinos, gravitons etc., however quanta of various kinds of aggregation. The organized collectivity of these entities is what we observe.
The actual knowledge goes from the neutrino to the galactic clusters. In this huge range each system appears to be formed by subsystems, and so on. Each particle has a complex structure, determined by laws which are not always known, but which we often describe
as more complicated than they truly are.

d) Last century, light waves transversality made physicists assume an ether paradoxically gelatinous. In Maxwell synthesis, electric and magnetic fields are functions of transverse waves to be compared with shearing stress, existing only in solid bodies.
Intrinsic rotationality of both fields makes the resort to the paradox useless.

e) However, ether is able to transmit all perturbations from the electromagnetic to the nuclear, to the gravitational, without even excluding pressure and temperature ones. It would be enough to consider that volume variations require a variation of intermolecular
spaces, and that temperature varies with e.m. radiations through the interposed ether.

3 - Quantitative properties of the ether

Wave phenomena are based on contiguity of particles constituting the medium, for instance molecules in the air, and not on continuity. Continuity is adopted in physics only in the macroscopic vision of microphenomena, supported by the powerful differential
calculus.

We know that the speed c of e.m. waves in vacuo is:

(3.1) c = 1/(e 0m 0)

where e 0 = 8.85*10-12 farad/m is the permittivity of vacuum and

m 0 = 4p *10-7 henry/m is the permeability of vacuum.

If we compare (3.1) with the speed v of acoustic waves:

(3.2) v = (k/r )

where r is the mean density of the medium at rest, and k is its compression module, then e 0 can be interpreted as a mean density of the ether in rarefied air (in I.S. measures: Kg/m3).

We may obtain the same result by Coulomb's force:

(3.3) F = qq'/4p e 0r2

between point charges q and q' at a distance r. As a matter of fact:

1) The force at the right-hand side of (3.3) has a physical dimension which contains mass, and this has to appear in the left-hand side too.

2) As charges without mass have never been observed, it is reasonable to think to a mass square in the right-hand side of (3.3), wich should appear in the product of the two charges; consequently, one should think to the presence of mass in the constant
e 0 .

Remark 1 - Incidentally, we notice that the numerical value of e 0 , or possibly an even smaller value in the interplanetary and interstellar spaces, would support the astrophysicists view in the search of a dark matter (or missing mass) to close up the
Universe. Furthermore, the red-shift of spectral lines of stars, interpreted until now as a Doppler effect due to the recession of galaxies, of magnitude related to the distance of the star (cosmic expansion), would be caused instead by the attenuation of
the energy as the light travels through space, and would then increase with the increase of distance. In this way the hypotheses of big-bang, black holes, etc. would not stand any more. Ether inertia would also explain the gravitational cohesion of many galaxies,
which is another astrophysics puzzle.

Going back to (3.1), considering e 0 as a density, we have:

(3.4) 1/m 0 = 7.96*105 N/m2

which is a value comparable to air's compression module:

(3.4) k = (cp/cv)p0 = 1.4*105 N/m2

(cp and cv are molar heat capacities of biatomic gases, respectively at constant pressure and constant volume, and p0 is the standard pressure of the atmosphere).

4 - Origin of the electromagnetic field

From (3.3) the dimensions of a mass flow for the electric charge can be deduced as:

(4.1) q = dm/dt ( [q] = MT-1 ) .

Proton p and electron e are like ether line vortices, which in Helmholtz fluid dynamics maintain mass flow (l.6*10-19 Kg/s) and angular momentum. Two model symbols of p and e, and of the neutron, can be seen in the previous article written in Italian.
The proton consists in a tiny axial permanent jet of ether at a conservative velocity Er ("old" central electric field) with compensating vortex flows ("old" induced electric field Ei). On the contrary, electron aspirates ether axially, and spreads it out
by circular swirls. The recovery of the ether is accomplished by the contiguity of similar ether vortices.

The electric field has, in this way, kinematic dimensions of a local velocity of ether: E=LT-1 , which experimentally does not exceed 3*106 m/s ("old" dielectric strength in V/m) in the air, and about 2*108 m/s in mica, values which are however not exceeding
light's speed c = 3*108 m/s.

A distribution of elementary charges on the surface of a conductor, in equilibrium, produces externally a conservative velocity field Er . While the field Ei produces the attraction of similar parallel charges, according to Bernoulli's theorem on fluid
dynamics, and cancels the induction field B , which has opposite values between equally directed charges.

Thinking of a charge distribution on the two opposite sheets of a parallel-plate capacitor, the number of field lines is finite and equal to the number of elementary generating charges. Indeed, if paradoxically two or more field lines would come out from
a same single proton inclosed in a conducting shell, they would attract on the internal surface just as many electrons, and this would call on the outer surface of the shell just as many positive ions, clearly in excess of the inducing charge. And this would
be in contrast with experiments and with Gauss theorem. Thus, an elementary charge acts directly only on a single opposite charge, as it happens naturally in neutral atoms. The model of point charge in spherical distribution can be applied only on a large
scale.

Remark 2 - According to this new scheme, the elementary electric dipole differs substantially from the presently known one, which is formed by two small spheres wich opposite charges.

Today's model of dipole

New proposed model of dipole

The two schemes agree only in the straight line going between the two opposite charges. In the old model, the other lines are all radial, irrotational, conventionally coming out from the positive charge. In the new proposed model, the same lines are rotational,
opposite to the central field (straight line) and generating, in turn, a rotational magnetic field. An electric dipole, perturbed by either collisions of particles or by the incidence of e.m. radiations, does radiate in turn e.m. waves. Traditional dipole
and much less accelerating charges do not clearly explain this e.m. waves generation. Furthermore, a central field has never been indeed observed in the surrounding space. Our model shows instead that the central field exists only in the antenna circuit. Besides,
it locates the electric and magnetic fields, perpendicular and in time phase between themselves, and both transverse to the direction of propagation. In addition, the old model does not explain why the dipole cannot irradiate along its axis. By observing the
new scheme one can obtain answers in agreement with all experience.

5 - Mechanical interpretation of Maxwell equations

From a macroscopic Laplacian point of view, any point (elementary volume) of a fluid is located by a position vector, whose origin is in the center of a coordinate system, fixed in an inertial reference frame. We denote this vectorial function by A(x,y,z,t).

Any elementary displacement:

(5.1) dA = Ñ (dy ) + dq Ù A

is the vector sum of two components:

1) Ñ (dy ) is the radial component, when the position vector A changes only in absolute value (y is a potential surface scalar function);

2) dq Ù A is the rotational component, when A changes only in direction.

The (opposite of the) time rate change of A is given by:

(5.2) E = -¶ A/¶ t = -Ñ (¶ y /¶ t) - w Ù A

where E is a local velocity field. The first term in the right-hand side of (5.2) gives the radial component of the field, while the second term is its rotational component. ¶ y /¶ t = j is the velocity potential function; w the angular frequency. The
minus sign indicates that the terms of (5.2) are reactive and correlated to the principle of energy conservation. (5.2) expresses the Cauchy-Helmholtz theorem on the velocities in fluids.

We can write it again as:

(5.3) E = -Ñ (j ) - ¶ Ai/¶ t

where ¶ Ai/¶ t = rotational displacement.

Two Maxwell equations can be now immediately deduced:

I) by applying curl operator to both sides of (5.2):

(5.4) curl(E) = -¶ curl(A)/¶ t = -¶ B/¶ t

[where, as usual, B = curl(A) ; of course, when one decomposes E in the two components Er and Ei , respectively radial and rotational, since the first component Er is conservative, then one has:

curl(E) = curl(Ei) = -curl(¶ Ai/¶ t) , in force of (5.3) - the equation (5.4) is obviously concerning e.m. induction phenomena].

II) by applying div operator to B = curl(A) :

(5.5) div(B) = 0 ,

which states that B is a solenoidal field.

In Maxwell theory A is obviously the magnetic vector potential, B is the magnetic induction vector, j is the electric potential.

The charge density s (x,y,z,t) in coulomb/m3 can be interpreted in this model as:

(5.6) s (x,y,z,t) = ¶ e (x,y,z,t)/¶ t [ s has physical dimension L-3MT-1 ]

We notice that the mass density e (x,y,z,t) of the ether is surely variable where an electric charge is localized.

The second law of dynamics applied to a unit volume of a fluid, whose density is r and whose velocity is v , and consequently its momentum density is r v , can be written as:

(5.7) Fu = ¶ (r v)/¶ t = r ¶ v/¶ t + v¶ r /¶ t .

In the same way as the time derivative of momentum density e E is proportional, according to Hooke's law, to curl(B) , the module of elasticity 1/m 0 can be written as:

(5.8) ¶ (e E)/¶ t = e ¶ E/¶ t + E¶ e /¶ t = (1/m 0)curl(B) .

The term e ¶ E/¶ t does refer to the boundary of the unit volume where e does not vary (as e 0 in vacuo), and so we can write it as e 0¶ E/¶ t . In the term E¶ e /¶ t the unit volume is supposed instead to contain charges.

Introducing (5.6) into (5.8) gives:

(5.9) curl(B) = m 0e 0¶ E/¶ t + m 0s E = m 0(e 0¶ E/¶ t + j)

which does coincide with another Maxwell equation (one defines:

j = s E the vector field density current).

By applying div operator to both member of (5.9), we get:

(5.10) div(j) = -¶ (div(e 0E))/¶ t ,

and, if we put:

(5.11) div(e 0E) = s = ¶ e /¶ t ,

we obtain at last:

(5.12) div(j) = -¶ s /¶ t .

(5.11) and (5.12) are both continuity equations, and express respectively mass conservation and consequently charge conservation. (5.11) is Maxwell's fourth equation, local expression of Gauss theorem.

6 - The magnetic field

The magnetic field vector H has the dimension L-1MT-2 of a volume vortex torque. The magnetic induction B is dimensionless as an angle. Hence the expression of energy density:

(6.1) w = H.dB = m 0H2/2

is similar to the rotational energy:

(6.2) W = t .dq ,

where t = torque; dq = rotation infinitesimal angle.

We can also mention that (6.1) is the energy density which is dissipated in an hysteresis loop by a ferromagnetic substance.

We have already asserted that the parallel elementary charges give rise to a magnetic field. The field B of each charge has concentric circular flow lines on planes, which are perpendicular to the rotation axis, the latter representing the direction of
the central field Er (see previous pictures of the proposed vortex models for proton, electron, and neutron). The neutron, as a close coupling between proton and electron, instable outside the nucleus, has the same field B of proton and electron. In the same
way, the atom of hydrogen is a steadier loose coupling of proton with electron. The molecule H2 of the hydrogen is the parallel coupling of two atoms with double field B. All these particles behave as diamagnetic elements, opposing their magnetic field to
an external one. The particle rotation is such that as to inclose an area from where its field B is going out. The stationary particles present a spin instead of an orbital angular momentum. All this is in accordance with Faraday's law and Lorentz force.

It should be noticed that the new interpretation attributes to these particles only an induced, and not a pre-existing, magnetic momentum. Furthermore it points out the presence of a magnetic reaction also in neutral particles, as it has been experimentally
confirmed. As a matter of fact, in our mechanical model even elementary charges have a spin, and for instance Stern-Gerlach experiment on the splitting of a narrow beam of atoms (for instance of Ag or H2), submitted to a non uniform but symmetric magnetic
field, can been easily explained under our hypotheses - without introducing at all a presumed directional quantization of a magnetic dipole momentum, which in our opinion does not exist.

7 - Energy of electromagnetic waves

Let's examine plane monochromatic linearly polarized e.m. waves. We first remark that energy densities of E and B are identical:

(7.1) w = e 0E02/2 = B02/2m 0

(E0 is the amplitude of the electric field, and B0 the amplitude of the induction field).

The same identity is found for acoustic waves:

(7.2) w = r w 2s02/2 = p02/2r v2

where r is the density of the medium, w the angular frequency, v the propagation velocity, s0 the amplitude of displacement, p0 the amplitude of pressure variation. We will come back again to this in the following.

We can now get the equation which rules e.m. waves propagation - in a chargeless and therefore currentless space, that is to say outside of conductors (Ñ (j ) = 0). Keeping in mind that in this case equation (5.11) yields curl(B) = e 0m 0¶ E/¶ t , and
that B = curl(A) , E = -¶ A/¶ t, we obtain, by means of simple substitutions in the first previous equation:

(7.3) e 0m 0¶ E/¶ t = curl(curl(A)) = e 0m 0¶ 2A/¶ t2 = Ñ 2(A) - Ñ (div(A)) .

We introduce now the well known "gauge condition":

(7.4) div(A) = 0 ,

and we get at last from (7.3) the wave equation:

(7.5) Ñ 2(A) - e 0m 0¶ 2A/¶ t2 = 0 .

The magnetic potential vector A, which is today usually introduced as a not univocally defined mathematical function, without any physical meaning, is now interpreted as an ether displacement, namely as a primary wave function, an observable physical quantity,
from which all the others electromagnetic quantities can be deduced.

Remark 3 - As far as (7.4) is concerning, a divergence different from zero of a vector function would paradoxically contrast the homogeneity of free space! The other commonly used (for instance by Landau) Lorentz gauge condition:

(7.6) div(A) = - e 0m 0¶ j /¶ t ,

which is invariant from the relativistic point of view, is not physically meaningful, since potential j is not a spatial wave function. The variable potential electric field only exists between two opposite distributions of charges in conductors, or between
the plates of a capacitor. No experiment has, up to now, located in free space any electric field, variable and conservative, acting in the direction of propagation, that is to say, a longitudinal electric field! Even this persisting confusion can be overcome
by the mechanicai tnterpretation of electromagnetism, according to the presently proposed model of elementary charge. Of course, when the function j is a constant in the time, then the equation (7.6) coincides with (7.4).

Coming back to our point, chosen the positive axis x as the propagation direction, and the plane xy as polarization plane, a displacement wave function solution of (7.5), which has now the following form:

(7.7) ¶ 2Ay/¶ x2 - e 0m 0¶ 2Ay/¶ t2 = 0 ,

is a function of the kind:

(7.8) Ay = A0sin(kx-w t)

where k = 2p /l is the wave number, l the wave length, and w = 2p n the angular frequency, l n = propagation speed = c , c2 = 1/e 0m 0 (see (3.1)).

The local velocity field is obtained by derivation of (7.8):

(7.9) Ey = -¶ Ay/¶ t = w A0cos(kx-w t) = E0cos(kx-w t)

while the rotational relative stress is:

(7.10) Bz = -¶ Ay/¶ x = kA0cos(kx-w t) = B0cos(kx-w t)

Taking into account (7.9) and (7.10), we obtain in fact the same energy densities, according to (7.1):

(7.11) e 0E02/2 = e 0w 2A02/2 = 2e 0p 2n 2A02

and

(7.12) B02/2m 0 = k2A02/2m 0 = 2p 2A02/l 2m 0 = 2p 2A02/(1/e 0n 2) .

March 27, 2017 - HyperDimensional Physics – Maxwell & Quaternions

¶ 18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 The author of HD makes claims about secret government inventions using this technology, which makes one wonder – but not enough to not give some consideration to the possible reality of these claims. The history of basic
physics described shows centuries of alternative perspectives. There is reference to an experiment by Bohm, and many other anomalous experimental results.

nuetMarch 28, 2017 0 Comments

¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Proposition: Technology is NOT applied Science.

Sci/Tech are sibling disciplines. That Tech uses empirical evidence, research, and math – doesn’t make them sciences. Science’s objectives and contexts are comprehensions. Tech’s objectives are designing/creating real systems. Science uses instrumentation
from Tech. Tech uses Science’s formulations of processes. One person can be both scientist and technologist (engineer). Smil’s article is primarily a History of Tech, which did get its start from Maxwell.

¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 James Clerk Maxwell was surely a genius, of whom I know almost nothing – need to read this Wikipedia biography. Yet, for me, Maxwell’s Equations are the Mona Lisa of Science, far superior in beauty than Einstein’s
(in my opinion).

¶ 3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 I learned Maxwell in two graduate courses at the University of Chicago, 1957-58, taught by Nobel winner & genius Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, which I have written about elsewhere. These were the two best classes in
my whole educational career. I have completely forgotten this physics/math.

¶ 4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 BELOW IS A RECORD OF MY MIND/BLOWING ADVENTURE

INTO INTERNET DOCUMENTS – ENJOY.

Very significant; don’t let the physics stop you.

¶ 5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 Maxwell’s equations were not his, but were produced by Heaviside after Maxwell’s death. Maxwell’s own equations were in quaternions:

¶ 6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 “Maxwell expressed electromagnetism in the algebra of quaternions and made the electromagnetic potential the centrepiece of his theory.. In 1881 Oliver Heaviside replaced Maxwell’s electromagnetic potential field by
‘force fields’ as the centrepiece of electromagnetic theory. Heaviside reduced the complexity of Maxwell’s theory down to four differential equations, known now collectively as Maxwell’s Laws or Maxwell’s equations. According to Heaviside, the electromagnetic
potential field was arbitrary and needed to be “murdered”.. The use of scalar and vector potentials is now standard in the solution of Maxwell’s equations.

¶ 7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 Somewhere, long ago, I read that Heaviside, in reducing the equations from quaternions to vectors, eliminated an important and very real type of force/interaction from the field. These had to do with the direct interaction
of rotating bodies, such as Jupiter and its moons – which was claimed to result in the specific latitude location of the Great Spot.

¶ 8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 Is this Fake Science, or a neglected phenomenon; seen today as just local/temporary specifics of a real system, not resulting from a deeper system of interactions? The great internet provides: I Googled “quaternions
Jupiter Great Spot“, which led to HYPERDIMENSIONAL PHYSICS: http://geomagnetics.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/onphysicsandmore-finished.pdf Now I have more to read, with less and less time! I just had to read – ignore the politics – I report below.

¶ 9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0 I don’t BELIEVE that any of the physics is valid. HyperDimensional Reality may be mathematical poetry. Not all of the phenomena reported need be true, while some might be. Scientists are known to have hobby interests
as well as those we know about. Newton had a strong interest in Astrology.

¶ 10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 Maxwell on “rotation”:

“There are physical quantities of another

kind [in the aether] which are

related to directions in space, but which are not vectors. Stresses and strains in

solid bodies are examples, and so are some of the properties of bodies

considered in the theory of elasticity and in the theory of double [rotated]

refraction. Quantities of this class require for their definition nine

[part of the “27-line”…]

numerical specifications. They are expressed in the language of

quaternions by linear and vector functions of a vector…”

[[Hyperdimensional Physics, Part 2 page 11]]

¶ 11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0

The Great Spot: Part 2 pp 18

¶ 12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0

Even now, Jupiter’s four major satellites

(which have collective masses

approximately 1/10,000th of Jupiter itself),

during the course of their complex orbital

interactions, are historically known to cause

time-altered behavior in a variety of well-known Jovian phenomena–

Including — “anomalous” latitude and longitude motions

of the Great Red Spot itself.

As we presented at the U.N. in 1992,

the Great Red Spot — a mysterious vortex

located for over 300 years at that

“infamous” 19.5 degrees S. Latitude, via

the circumscribed tetrahedral geometry of

the equally infamous “27 line problem” —

Is the classic “hyperdimensional signature”

of HyperDimensional physics operating within Jupiter?

The existence of decades of recorded “anomalous motions” of this Spot, neatly synchronized with the highly predictable motions

of Jupiter’s own moons,

are clearly NOT the result of conventional

“gravitational” or “tidal” interactions —

in view of the relatively insignificant masses of the moons

compared to Jupiter itself;

but, following Maxwell and Whittaker,

the hyperdimensional effects of these same moons

— via the long “lever” of angular momentum

on the constantly changing, vorticular scalar stress

potentials inside Jupiter — that is a very different story …

¶ 13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 THIS ARTICLE IS TURNING OUT TO BE A SUPER MIND BENDER, ADDITIONAL FEATURES OF HYPERDIMENSIONAL PHYSICS:

¶ 14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 1) The energy from the sun doesn’t come from nuclear fusion at the core, but from the angular momentum in hyperdimensional space. This accounts for the missing neutrinos from the sun that are expected from the nuclear
fusion, but which are not observed as predicted.

¶ 15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 2) There are predicted more large planets, far out, to account for some observations.

¶ 16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 3) Situations can arise that can explode a whole planet from hyperdimensional stress.

¶ 17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 4) HD plays a role in periodic climate change – not to replace greenhouse gases – but an additional factor.

2019 - Proof that the Ether Exists and that the Speed of Light is Anisotropic

The null result of the Michelson Morley interferometer experiment in 1887 has been widely regarded as proof that the aether does not exist, and that Relativity’s assertion that the speed of light is isotropic is all reference frames is the correct model. However,
a number of experiments have detected anisotropy in the speed of light by exploiting the effect known as Fresnel Dragging to reveal the different travel times by light in each direction between two points.

Declan Andrew Traill

Published 2019

Physics

viXra

If you'd like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].

You can access these articles online at
https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/