The average annual increase in size of the Wyoming state record freshwater drum peaked at 5.1% per year from 2012 to 2018.
The Lake Oconee, Georgia record flathead catfish increased in size by 7.3% from 2013 to 2016, from 45 pounds, 12 ounces to 49 pounds, 1.28 ounces. The average annual increase in size of the Lake Oconee Georgia record flathead catfish from 2013 to 2016 was 2.4%.
The Georgia state record red grouper increased in size by 36% from 2012 to 2021, from 19 pounds, 7 ounces to 26 pounds, 6.4 ounces.
Wait, what? Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as organisms grow in increasingly-smaller increments to a genetically-determined maximum size. Or so goes the false Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, which holds that “there is no such thing as the Ether”.
For those late to the party, the Ether is the 5th Element (along with Earth, Wind and Fire). It was written out of the history books by the Black magicians I’m taking to task, here, so they could have the playing field to themselves.
This sudden one-third increase in size of the red grouper in Georgia is also data proving that fish longevity is increasing. Fish continue growing until they die, this fish size records are de facto longevity records. For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, I’ve got a full-length article documenting 27 examples of exponentially-increasing longevity, and only two of those examples are fish. The list includes birds, turtles, shellfish, lobsters and humans.
2012 was the first year for the Red Grouper record in Georgia. In 2012, from our perspective, the red grouper literally “winked into existence” in the waters off Georgia.
In 2012, the Michigan state bow fishing record for black buffalo sucker was broken by 13%, increasing from 33.25 pounds to 37.5 pounds.
In 2012, the Michigan 2004 rod and reel state record for black buffalo was broken by 8.4%, increasing from 33.25 pounds to 37.06 pounds.
In 2012, the 2010 Iowa state record for yellow perch was broken by 3.8%, increasing from 2.6 pounds to 2.7 pounds.
The Texas state record marble grouper increased in size by 25.6% from 2012 to 2020, from 37.6 pounds to 47.25 pounds.
The Michigan state record black buffalo fish increased in size by 26% from 2012 to 2018, from 37.06 pounds to 46.54 pounds.
The West Virginia state record perch increased in size by 6% from 2012 to 2017, from 1.93 pounds to 2.04 pounds. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.2% per year over each of those 5 years.
The 1.2% average annual increase in size of the West Virginia state record perch from 2012 to 2017 is identical to the 1.2% average annual increase in size of the Pennsylvania state record perch from 2010 to 2016.
The Michigan rod and reel state record black buffalo increased in size by 11% from 2012 to 2015, from 37.06 pounds to 41.25 pounds.
The 11% increase in size of the Michigan rod and reel state black buffalo from 2012 to 2015 is 31% greater than its 8.4% increase in size from 2004 to 2012.
The growth rate of the Michigan rod and reel state record black buffalo is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the obviously-false, rapidly-collapsing Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-small increments to a genetically-determined maximum size.
The all time record salmon run on the Columbia river increased 17% from 2012 to 2014, from 516,000 to 605,860.
The Michigan bow fishing state record Black Buffalo increased in size by 11.4% from 2012 to 2014, over two years. The size increase averaged 5.7% per year from 2012 to 2014. That’s an average annual increase in size of 5.7% over each of those two years.
Washington’s State record bluefin tuna saw a 3.7% average annual increase in size from 2012-2014.
Virginia’s oyster harvest increased 58% from 2012 to 2013, from 257,395 bushels to 407,476 bushels.
The 58% increase in the oyster harvest in Virginia from 2012 to 2013 is 205% greater, or more than triple the 19% increase in the oyster harvest in Virginia from 2011 to 2012.
Oyster numbers in the Virginia are increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
The commercial oyster harvest on the Chesapeake bay increased 10% from 2012 to 2013, despite the Feds restricting 10,000 acres of the best oyster beds.
The Chesapeake Bay oyster spat count (young oysters of 1 inch or less) in 2012 was 200% above the 28-year average and the sixth highest since 1985. It was the second consecutive year the spat number was up.
In 2012, a blogger said “I grew up in the country and did a lot of hiking, camping, hunting, etc as a kid. 35 years later, there is so much more wildlife now. / We hear coyotes mostly every night. Black bear are coming back to the area and there are rumors of moose returning. I don’t think they have been in these parts in over a century. Are you having similar experiences in other parts of the country? / Now I live about as far east as you can get in Massachusetts. I’ve seen deer, turkey, coyote, fox, cottontails and hawks in my yard. There has even been a bear in the area lately and he had to swim a salt water canal to get here. In the spring, three towns north of me, you can see whales from the beach. The local seal population is booming so Great White Sharks have returned to the area.”
In August 2012, Science Daily said “New survey of ocean floor finds juvenile scallops are abundant in Mid-Atlantic”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a tampabay.com article from July 2012 reads “Violent dolphin deaths a mystery for scientists”.
It’s not in any way a “mystery”, you see. The truth is that, what we euphemistically refer to as “secret agents” are engaged in ongoing whale and dolphin-killing operations on behalf of the barely-closeted Death worshippers they work for in response to an unprecedented increase in their populations that is occurring regardless of geography.
”The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a savingseafood.com article from September 2012 is headlined “No Records Kept: The Potomac River Fisheries Commission’s Mysterious History on Menhaden”.
In the Fall of 2012, sturgeon “winked back into existence”, from our perspective, in downtown Richmond, Virginia, where they hadn’t been seen since the 1940’s.
“People were lining the bridge, taking pictures, bringing their kids,” recalls Director of Commonwealth University’s Center For Environmental Recovery’s Greg Garman.
Joseph Hightower of N.C. State University and the U.S. Geological Survey said “They are a hard-to-detect species unless they jump; they can be there but nobody knows it. They were obviously there and people just didn’t realize it.””
I’m hoping you can recall the people lining the bridge to point and stare down at the car-sized fish, floating just under the surface. And that you can see what a smoke-blowing charlatan that N.C. State and the USGS’s Joseph Hightower actually is.
In 2012, a 27 pound lobster was caught in Maine, the largest in the history of the state.
This size record is a de facto longevity record, as lobsters keep growing until they die.
(Insert lobster photo)
In 2013, the 2011 Texas state record for swordfish was broken by 45% (get weights).
In 2013, the 2011 Missouri alternative method state record gizzard for gizzard shad was broken by 25%, increasing from 1 pound, 8 ounces to 1 pound, 14 ounces. 2011 was the first year of the alternative method state record for gizzard shad in Missouri, which is Mil-speak for “gizzard shad suddenly winked into existence in Missouri in 2011, as the etheric environment reached a level of health where the species could manifest there”.
In 2013, the Ohio bowfishing state record for black buffalo from 1983 was broken by 10.2%, from 37 pounds to 40.8 pounds.
In 2013, the cod world record from 1969 was broken by 5%, from 98 pounds to 103 pounds.
In 2013, the 2010 world record for brown trout was broken by 1.3%, increasing from 41 pounds, 8 ounces to 42 pounds, 1 ounce.
In 2013, the rod and reel world record for northern snakehead (channus argus) was broken by .72% from 2004 to 2013 (get weights). The South Carolina state record gag grouper increased in size by 12.3% from 2013 to 2018, from 48 pounds, 5 ounces to 54 pounds, 4 ounces.
The Ohio state bowfishing record buffalo sucker increased in size by 5.4% from 2013 to 2018, from 40.8 pounds to 43 pounds. That’s an average annual increase in size of 1.08% per year over each of those five years.
The 1.08% average annual increase in size of the Ohio bowfishing state record buffalo sucker from 2013 to 2018 is 134% above, or well more than double its .46% baseline average annual increase in size documented from 1983 to 2018.
Wait, what? **The growth rate of the Ohio bowfishing state record buffalo sucker is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.**That’s not scientifically possible. The last data in the set should be the one farthest below the baseline, at least according to the obviously-false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms grow in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.
Witness the collapse of mean-spirited Western materialism, which holds that “there’s no such thing as the ether”.
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In 2013, the year I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, the white catfish suddenly “winked into existence in Maryland.
2013 marked the third straight summer of record loggerhead sea turtle nesting in Georgia.
In 2013, the 784,100 actual bright stock on the Columbia river was 81% higher than the forecast of 432,500.
The world record brown trout increased in size by 5% from 2013 to 2021.
The average annual increase in size of the world record brown trout from 2013 to 2021 was .625%
The .625% average annual increase in size of the world record brown trout from 2013 to 2021 is 44% greater than the .433% average annual increase in size documented in the world record brown trout from 2010 to 2013.
The 5% increase in size of the world record brown trout from 2013 to 2021 is 284% greater than the 1.3% increase in size of the world record brown trout from 2010 to 2013.
We’ve just learned that the growth rate of the world record brown trout is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not supposed to be scientifically possible, according to the Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in progressively smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size.
The Orthodoxy of mean-spirited western materialism is false. The truth is is that the size, fertility and longevity of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
Papua New Guinea’s tuna exports more than tripled from 2013 to 2019.
The Missouri alternative method state record gizzard shad increased in size by 27% from 2013 to 2017, from 1 pound, 14 ounces to 2 pounds, 6 ounces. That’s an average annual increase in size of 6.8% per year over each of those four years.
Virginia’s oyster harvest increased 30% from 2013 to 2014, from 407,476 bushels to 531,548 bushels.
The fall chinook salmon run on the Columbia river increased 26% from 2013 to 2014, from 1.26 million to 1.6 million, to the highest level in history.
In March 2013, the Boston Globe said “Right whales in the midst of a revival”.
The article goes on to say “For years, scientists have sounded a dirge for the North Atlantic right whale. Its population stalled around 300 in the 1990s, pushing some researchers to make mournful extinction predictions for the mysterious, 45-foot-long creatures that come to feed and frolic every spring off Cape Cod.
Now, the critically endangered population has hit 500 whales, probably for the first time in centuries — a poignant milestone for a marine mammal whose numbers dwindled to perhaps a few dozen after being hunted relentlessly for their oil and baleen from the 11th to the early 20th centuries. Researchers, while joyful, say that number is still tiny — and they remain deeply concerned about recent environmental changes, including global warming, that spell uncertainty for the creatures’ future.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say ““Five hundred whales make you want to sing,’’ said Charles “Stormy” Mayo, senior scientist at the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies, which studies the whales. “But you have to hold your breath when you sing. We have a substantially changing ocean. We don’t know what the future holds.”
And it’s why the article goes on to say “Scientists don’t know what a healthy right whale population even looks like, but they suspect it is in the thousands or even tens of thousands. Today, the population is increasing about 2.5 percent a year — far better than the 1990s — but hardly the 6 or 7 percent researchers would like to see.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those many examples are “myriad” and “dramatic”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “The reasons for the increase are likely myriad. Ships have slowed down and moved to avoid the creatures. Fishing lines have been developed that allow some whales to avoid being tangled. A number of good feeding years — the animals can consume tiny shrimplike plankton at a rate of 125 pounds an hour — probably helped with a dramatic increase in calves starting around 2001.”
The article goes on to say “Now, the animals are showing up in larger numbers in Cape Cod Bay — far more than can be explained by the population increase — and they are showing up earlier.”
This is proof that the Scientists are lying baldfacedly about the overall population numbers.
The article goes on to say “In 2012, whales began appearing in early December, the earliest in 30 years. They usually start appearing mid-January to May. In 2011, around 200 were spotted in the bay, including 127 during one survey — an unprecedented number. This year, a well-known right whale, dubbed Wart, appeared with a calf, prompting stunned researchers to conclude that she had given birth off New England instead of in the warm waters off Florida and Georgia where the whales normally calve.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say “We don’t know what is going on,’’ said Mayo in the cabin of the Shearwater, as Christy Hudak and Beth Larson took plankton samples to study the relationship between food and right whale behavior and health.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unclear”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Mayo said it is not yet clear if plankton is especially good in the bay and is luring more whales, or if it is declining somewhere else and driving the animals here.”
The spring 2013 gill net season produced the highest catch rate of speckled trout in Texas’ Sabine system since the surveys began in the bay in 1986.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those many variants are “amazed” and “astonished”. That’s why an article from July 2013 that I can no longer locate said “Fish numbers are in and they are amazing. The real bonus this summer has been the presence of Coho Salmon for the first time in 20 years and the creel survey tells the story. The running five-year average of retained hatchery origin Coho for Area 13 in June is 86 fish – in 2013 the assessed total is 5,186! In addition over 17,000 wild coho were released, compared to the previous five-year average of 263, an astonishing change. I’ve caught twice as many halibut in Campbell River this year compared to all the previous years combined that I’ve fished here.”
In October 2013, qz.com Satanically inverts a jellyfish population booming and burgeoning to unprecedented health regardless of species or geography as “Jellyfish are taking over the seas, and it might be too late to stop them”.
A Scientific American article from December 2013 said “Damaged Reefs Show Resiliency in Cayman Islands”. Did you notice how the author used the hedging generality “show resiliency” to blunt any specific awareness as to the scope of the great and sudden positive change then underway?
The article goes on to say “A 13-year study of coral reefs spontaneously recovering in the Cayman Islands offers hope of refuting often doomsday forecasts about the worldwide decline of the colorful marine habitat. Scientists monitoring the Cayman reefs noted a 40 percent decline in live coral cover between 1999 and 2004 during a period of warmer seas in the Caribbean.”
Where, hilariously, the Intelligence agent writing the article tried to convince you that a sudden, exponential increase in coral in fact took place over 13 Satanic years” There really is not quit in these guys, and of course gals.
Did you notice how coral reefs decreased 40% in the four years after the literal forest of what we collectively refer to as “wireless communications infrastructure” was thrown up virtually overnight in every city, town and village on Earth in the late 1990’s?
The article goes on to say “However, seven years later, the amount, size and density of the live coral had returned to 1999 levels as sea temperatures eased, according to Tom Frazer, professor of aquatic ecology at the University of Florida and part of the research team.”
Wait, what? The author is writing the article in 2013, which, to this moment, is straight-fadedly claimed to be the hottest in all history.
“People have said these systems don’t have a chance,” Frazer told Reuters. “What we are saying is: 'Hey, this is evidence they do have a chance.”
He’s saying they “have a chance” when they’ve returned to the level of health they’d seen previously.
Essay: Without saying “because the heat from global warming is hiding in the deep oceans”, explain how ocean temperatures could return back down to late 90’s levels during the hottest year in the Earth’s history.
In January 2013, Australia’s Adelaide Now described the best tuna catch in the history of Australia as “Best tuna catch in 30 years for SA”.
(Bluefin Tuna, Australia, 2013)
In February 2013, businessinsider.com said “7-Mile ‘Super Mega-Pod’ Of Dolphin Recorded Off California”. The author threw “recorded” in there to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist the green light to say “oh, but someone must have recorded that incorrectly!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article goes on to say “a ship captain spotted a group of 100,000 dolphins swimming together off the coast of San Diego. The trail of dolphins was seven miles long and five miles wide.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “unbelievable”. That’s why the article goes on to say ‘When you see something that is honestly truly beyond belief,’ the captain said.”
I don’t know if anyone’s ever told you, but people who say “honestly” are lying.
The only-generally-referred-to “captain” who is nonetheless quoted in a mainstream news article goes on “I’ve seen a lot of stuff out here… but this is the biggest I’ve ever seen, ever.”
It happened, he “recorded” it…it’s just that, as a card-carrying generational Satanist, he’s made sure they don’t mention his name, and postured it in the context of “unbelievability” to do what little he could to hedge.
Did you notice that neither he nor Business Insider offered any suggestion as to what he had led to the historically unprecedented volume of dolphins off San Diego? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In July 2013, NBC Los Angeles said “ ‘Rare’ Jellyfish With 25-Foot Long Tentacles ‘Appears’ in California”.
(Black Jellyfish, which winked into existence in Los Angeles in 2013)
Where the general “rare” is used as a hedge providing the name of the Jellyfish. Propagandists know that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, so this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information with an effectiveness shown by the spectacular, conditioned ignorance of the majority of the populace.
“Appears” is complex. One one level, it’s a Middle Ages, mouth-breather thing to say. Yet it may be the cold truth - that species are reappearing in our environment as the Ether continues to improve in health to a level where their lives can be sustained. Even to the point of “winking back into existence”, from our perspective. The mechanics of life in this dimension and others not being precisely as we’ve been told. But that’s just speculation.
The article continues: “Several swimmers at a Southern California beach were stung by the ‘rare’ Black Jellyfish, a marine animal who’s tentacles can grow up to 30 feet long. … A breed not seen since 1920 reemerges and ‘scientists’ link it to ‘global warming’ ‘?’
Where the general “scientists” is proof that no scientists were, in fact consulted for the article. Otherwise they’d have been quoted and named, according to strict journalistic rules. It’s just made up bluster from the generational Satanist propagandist at NBC Los Angeles. Not everyone at NBC Los Angeles is a generational Satanist, but all of them that write articles that get to the newswire.
We’ve also learned that ‘rare’ was used as a hedge a second time in the headline, in that something that shows up once every hundred years is beyond merely ‘rare’.
The fact that there’s a question mark behind the “global warming” plausible-deniability excuse is that the propaganda is well past its sell-by date, and is now back to trial-balloon status.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a Wired article from July 2013 said “Mysterious Manatee and Dolphin Deaths in Florida Confound Scientists”.
As hard as it is for the wholly-credulous and the NPR-addicted to conceive, the only-generally named “Scientists” are not in any way “confounded”, but are, rather, intimately involved in the dolphin-killing operations, themselves.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a National Geographic article from August 2013 reads “U.S. Dolphin Deaths Rise to 300; Cause Still a Mystery”.
It’s not in any way a “mystery”, you see. The truth is that, what we euphemistically refer to as “secret agents” are engaged in ongoing whale and dolphin-killing operations on behalf of the barely-closeted Death worshippers they work for in response to an unprecedented increase in their populations that is occurring regardless of geography.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “alarmed”. That’s why a National Geographic article from August 2013 wrung its hands and asked “Why Are Dolphins Dying on East Coast***?*** Experts Alarmed”.
National Geographic is widening their eyes to simulate honesty and pretending that they don’t know that what we euphemistically refer to as “secret agents” are engaged in ongoing whale and dolphin-killing operations on behalf of the barely-closeted Death worshippers they work for in response to an unprecedented increase in their populations that is occurring regardless of geography. They’re a State propaganda organ using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why a heraldnet.com article from August 2013 said “Dolphin deaths puzzle East Coast environmental officials”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why an nbcnews.com article from August 2013 said “Mysterious Dolphin Die-Off Puzzles Scientists”.
It’s not in any way a “mystery”, you see, nor are scientists in any way “puzzled”. The truth is that, what we euphemistically refer to as “secret agents” are engaged in ongoing whale and dolphin-killing operations on behalf of the barely-closeted Death worshippers they work for in response to an unprecedented increase in their populations that is occurring regardless of geography. NBC News is State propaganda organ using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In October 2013, directly in the face of wildlife of all stripes rebounding across Europe, the New York Times said “A Rebound for Some Wildlife in Europe”.
I’m sure you notice how “rebound” and “wildlife” are both general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
The article goes on to say “A few years ago, the Iberian imperial eagle, a huge tawny raptor, died out in Portugal. But birds from Spain, where the species’ numbers have increased thanks to conservation efforts, quickly moved west, and there are now 12 breeding pairs in central Portugal.”
That’s a lie. What specific “conservation efforts” led to the sudden appearance of those 12 breeding pairs? Eagle nest boxes, perhaps? No, the truth of the matter is that the etheric environment in Portugal once again reached a level of health where the Iberian imperial eagle could once again manifest there.
The article goes on to say “Ms. Nunes said that hunters, whose guns make the Portuguese hillsides crackle on weekends, are pitching in to help the Iberian lynx, a big cat that is one of Europe’s rarest animals. The lynx had vanished from the western part of the Iberian Peninsula, but individual lynxes from Spain are crossing the border, and a successful Portuguese captive-breeding program is preparing for reintroductions.”
As you can see, the Iberian lynx has already returned to the Iberian peninsula. The captive breeding program exists, and the physical carrying over of cats will be carried out, in a moment…however it’s a careful ruse covering the fact that the health of the ether on the Iberian Peninsula has once again reached a level where the Iberian lynx can once again manifest there.
The article goes on to say “The study found that nearly 40 species, including white storks, griffon vultures and ibex, have made strong comebacks from low numbers in the past century. The once rare Eurasian beaver, which now is thought to number more than 300,000 in Europe alone, showed the strongest recovery of all.”
Since you are studying this boring subject with me, you know that Beavers suddenly reappeared in England at this same moment. What “conservation efforts” led to the sudden reappearance of Beavers in Europe and the U.K.
The article goes on to say “When you eliminate threats, species are happy to come back,” said Monika Böhm, a researcher at the Zoological Society of London. “But you need to keep in mind that the big picture is not a good one.”
(Monika Bohm, Researcher, Zoological Society of London, in Satanic purple jacket against green Kabbalist tree of life background)
Monika Bohm is a generational Satanist shill, parroting the Party line of mean-spirited Western materialism. Most unfortunately for Monika and her fellow Conspirators, the big picture is a very good one, and life is booming and burgeoning to levels of health not seen in my lifetime, or anyone’s, going back for many generations.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those many variants are “unprecedented” and “whopper”. That’s why a nevern-pemprokeshire-holiday-cottage.co.uk article from August 2013 said “Cardigan fishermen enjoying unprecedented sea bass numbers.”
And it’s why the article goes on to say “Many people in the Cardigan area are enjoying the taste of sea bass after an unprecedented number of the fish entered the tidal region of the River Teifi. The fish have been so plentiful in recent weeks that anglers from various parts of West Wales have been fishing between the bypass bridge and Netpool. In one week there were reports of more than 200 bass caught, many of the fish weighing up to five pounds and a whopper landed from a boat near Cardigan Island weighed in at 10 ½ lbs.”
The propagandist from the U.K. makes no mention of the fact that the most sea bass ever seen in the Cardigan area maps against similar historically-high fish numbers being seen regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propagand technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The author also offers no suggestion as to what might have led to the highest sea bass population in the history of the Cardigan area. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In August 2013, the Chicago Tribune said “Booming lobster population pinches profits for Maine’s fishery”
The article goes on to say “Last year’s record haul of 126 million pounds (57 million kg), double that of just a decade ago, led some to wonder whether lobster might go the way of cheap, everyday foods like the chicken nugget or TV dinner. Prices paid to lobstermen at the dock plummeted and have not recovered. They are barely enough, says Train, to cover fuel and bait.”
In November 2013, the U.K.’s Daily Mail wrote of “The Cookii ‘monster’: Huge ‘deadly’ pink jellyfish has been ‘discovered’ “
(Crambione Cooki, which winked back into existence in the waters off Australia in 2013 for the first time since 2010)
The article continues: “A jellyfish with a powerfully toxic sting has been rediscovered more than 100 years after the last recorded sighting of it. The ‘incredibly rare’ Crambione Cookii has not been seen since 1910 but has been recently ‘spotted’ off the coast of Queensland, Australia, where it was captured.”
The servants of Death did what they could by immediately capturing and killing the creature, and the Mouthpiece of the State dubbed the jellyfish had been “spotted” and then “captured”. They falsely call it a “discovery” in the headline, then walk that back to “rediscovered”. They shook the “discovery” doll to distract you from the fact that it apparently winked back into existence.
Where the lurid-but-accurate “Incredibly rare”, is still a hedge back from “previously thought extinct”.
The rod and reel world record northern snakehead (Channa argus) increased in size by 2.1% from 2013 to 2014.
The 2.1% increase in size of the world record northern snakehead from 2013 to 2014 is 2,525% greater than the .08% average annual increase in size documented in the species from 2003 to 2013.
The growth rate of the northern snakehead is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the obviously-false Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism holds that organisms grow in ever-small increments to a genetically-determined maximum size.
The razor clam harvest in the Pacific Northwest in 2013 was the largest in history.
The Chesapeake Bay oyster harvest in 2013 was the largest since 1999. 1999 is right when the literal forest of what we collectively refer to as “wireless technology infrastructure” was thrown up literally overnight in every city, town and village on Earth.
In June 2013, a 7-foot, 250-pound Atlantic sturgeon was netted in the Saco River in Maine. It was the largest ever recorded in the Saco River and the first time an Atlantic sturgeon had been seen there in 60 years.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why University of New England associate professor James Sulikowski said in comment “much of the Atlantic sturgeon’s story still remains a mystery.” “We need to figure out why they’re here so we can protect them,” he said. “Are they using it as place to get stronger before they head out into an ocean migration or as a stopover on their way to another river***?***”
Wait, what? Sulikowski, who loves him some sturgeon because it actually is his job, is professing to be unaware that the Atlantic sturgeon is native to the Maine’s Saco River, and have returned there for the first time in over sixty years.
Professor Sulikowki, who has since gone on to relative fame on television shows such as “Shark Week”, didn’t make any comment on the fact that the sturgeon caught in the Saco in 2013 was the largest in history, there. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Dr. Sulikowski also didn’t mention that the sudden, exponential increase in sturgeon on Maine’s Saco river in 2013 mapped against similar increases being seen throughout the species range. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In June 2013, directly in the face of a scallop population that had already recovered in Florida’s Pine Island sound, Fox4Now questioned “Scallops making a comeback in Pine Island sound***?***”
The world record small fry tripletail increased in size by 22.8% from 2014 to 2021, from “just over 15 pounds” (I used 15 pounds, 1 ounce) to 17 pounds, 24 ounces.
The IGFA world record Pacific white snook increased in size by 7.3% from 2004 to 2021, from 47.8 pounds to 51.3 pounds.
The Washington state record bluefin tuna increased in size by 152% from 2012 to 2019. The species well more than doubled in size in just seven years.
(The current Washington state record bluefin tuna, from 2019 - well more than double the size of the previous record holder from 2012)
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “unusual” and “monster”. That’s why the headline of the outdoorline.com article on the subject reads “Lots of unusual fish being caught in the ocean off Washington including a monster-sized blue fin tuna.”
Where “MONSTER-sized”, while lurid, is general, and downplays against the stronger and more accurate “state record tuna”.
In the article, the author provided the weights of the old and new records, but carefully hedged by omitting the percentage increases between them. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So I had to do the math. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for almost a decade and then was broken by a gigantic, historically-unprecedented margin.
Specked trout in Texas were at record highs in 2014.
In 2014, the lake trout record for Lake Ontario, Canada from 1987 was broken by 30%, from 40 pounds to 52 pounds, 3 ounces.
In 2014, the South Carolina state record for white catfish from 1986 was broken by 22.5%, from 9 pounds, 15 ounces to 12 pounds, 2.9 ounces.
In 2014, the 2012 Michigan bow fishing state record for black buffalo was broken by 11.4% (get weights).
In 2014, the 2013 rod and reel world record for northern snakehead (Channa argus) was broken by 2.1% (get weights).
The tribal spring chinook salmon harvest record on the Hood river increased 70% from 2014 to 2017, from 409 to 697.
The 1.35% average annual increase in size of the world record yellowfin tuna from 2012 to 2016 is 1,250% greater than the .1% average annual increase in size documented in the species from 1977 to 2012.
The growth rate of the world record yellowfin tuna is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the obviously-false, rapidly-collapsing Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-small increments to a genetically-determined maximum size.
The Michigan state bowfishing record black buffalo sucker increased in size by 7.9% from 2014 to 2015.
The 7.9% increase in size of the Michigan state bowfishing record black buffalo sucker from 2014 to 2015 is 38% greater than its 5.7% average annual increase in size from 2012 to 2014. The 5.7% average annual increase from 2012 to 2014 is 256% greater, or well more than three times greater than its 1.6% average annual increase in size from 2004 to 2012.
The growth rate of the Michigan state bowfishing record rod black buffalo sucker is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s not scientifically possible, at least according to the obviously-false, rapidly-collapsing Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-small increments to a genetically-determined maximum size.
Virginia’s oyster harvest increased 13% from 2014 to 2015, from 531,548 bushels to 600,697 bushels.
In 2014, Atlantic sturgeon returned to the Chesapeake Bay for the first time in decades. Albert Spells, Virginia fisheries coordinator with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said in comment ““The thing is, you’ve got to look and nobody was looking at sturgeon. We just were not putting enough effort into this animal.”
It’s bold, it’s brazen, it’s ridiculous. To state that fish the size of a car, a fish that leaps from the water in a spectacular display known as “breaching”, could have been there, all along, only no one, including the scientific community, looked for them with the proper assiduousness, previously.
(Sturgeon breaching - Albert Spells, Virginia fisheries coordinator with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: “The thing is, you’ve got to look and nobody was looking at sturgeon. We just were not putting enough effort into this animal.”)
With the truth being that the etheric environment in the Chesapeake had returned to a level of health where the species could once again manifest there.
In April 2014, Outdoornews.com said “Walleyes thriving in Huron”.
In May 2014, Iowa’s Des Moines Register said “Iowa fish populations leap forward.”
In 2014, Atlantic sturgeon returned to the Connecticut river for the first time in decades.
An uncredited article from fishingnortheast.net said in comment “Native Connecticut River Atlantic Sturgeon Have Been Found”. Anytime an article is uncredited, you know that it came from an Intelligence agency.
Despite the fact that the Connecticut river is in a densely populated area, and the fish are the length of a small car, and leap from the water in a spectacular display known as “breaching”, the propagandist from Fishing Northeast bravely says that Atlantic Sturgeon “have been found” there, implying that they were there all along, only no one looked for them with the proper assiduousness, previously.
With the truth being that the etheric environment in the Connecticut river had returned to a level of health where the species could once again manifest there.
The razor clam harvest in the Pacific Northwest in 2014 was the largest in history, for the second year in a row.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why a National Fisherman article from January 2014 reads “If the past decade’s trend in pricing continued, this year’s first tuna would surely fetch more than a million dollars. But the Tsukiji fish market bucked tradition this weekend and sold its first tuna to Kimura, yet again, for a mere $70,000.”
The author is playing it like it’s a one-off…as if the Tsukiji fish market had acted alone. They’re trying to obscure the realization that tuna prices are dropping precipitously, regardless of geography, because of the unprecedented number of tuna at market.
Well, if that’s true, why does an Atlantic article from January 2014 read “Sushinomics: How Bluefin Tuna Became a Million-Dollar Fish”.
It is true. The Atlantic is using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty to take your eye off the fact that the tuna just sold for $70K at the big fish auction in Japan.
I’ve exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In July 2014, foxnews.com said “Gulf Coast charter captains say the feds are ruining their businesses by needlessly cutting their fishing season in response to complaints from commercial fishermen, and now their state lawmakers are stepping up to tackle the issue.
This year’s federal fishing season for red snapper was initially set at 40 days long, but then regulators slashed it to just 9 days. Recreational fishing captains say the federal policy is destroying their business for the year and has forced them to cancel hundreds of already-scheduled trips with customers who want to fish.
“I already had the boats sold out for the season and then I had to cancel those trips because I couldn’t provide the service,” Capt. Mark Hubbard, a recreational fishing captain out of Madeira Beach, Fla., told FoxNews.com.
Hubbard and other fishermen point out that the number of red snapper this year is the highest in decades, and say the regulation is purely bureaucratic and not really about protecting fish. The recreational fishing industry employs an estimated 150,000 people along the Gulf and pumps some $7 billion into the local economies, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA. In 2012, more than 3.1 million recreational anglers took 23 million fishing trips in the Gulf of Mexico region.
“I already had the boats sold out for the season and then I had to cancel those trips because I couldn’t provide the service,” Capt. Mark Hubbard, a recreational fishing captain out of Madeira Beach.
Fishermen question the accuracy of the government estimates that show fishing over the quota.
“But let’s assume it’s real – tell me what damage it did to the fishery? We have the highest mass of fish we’ve ever seen,” Zales said, adding that some people simply don’t like the idea of recreational fishing and want to stop it.
“Environmental organizations, who have infiltrated our federal government – they are hell-bent on reducing the fleet of fisherman,” Zales said.
In August 2014, sciencenordic.com said “Skagerrak prawn stocks on the rebound”.
The article goes on to say “On a voyage in 2013 oceanographers found plenty of year-old prawns, which should promise solid recruitment this year.”
Where a sudden, exponential and historically-unprecedented increase in prawns in Norway in 2013 is hidden behind the hedging generality “plenty of prawns”.
And where 2014’s highest prawn recruitment in history is hidden behind “should promise solid recruitment”
The article goes on to say “The Skagerrak is the prawn’s southern frontier. This makes it likely that warmer seas will put the crunch on the crustaceans and force them to move northwards.”
Well, if that’s true, then why does a peratonweather.com article from April 2016 say “Atlantic Ocean showing early signs of a significant long-term shift in temperatures from warm to cold”?
And why does that article go on to say “The comparison chart (above) of SST anomalies between August 2014 (top) and today (bottom) shows a big drop in temperatures across much of the northern Atlantic Ocean. The rather limited colder-than-normal (blue) patches from August 2014 have increased noticeably in areal extent when compared to the most recent measurements. Also, the well above-normal waters (orange) of August 2014 that existed east and south of Greenland have cooled off dramatically during this time period and there has even been a switch from well above-normal (orange) to below-normal (blue) in sections”?
(Maps documenting rapid, exponential cooling of the North Atlantic from 2014 to 2016. Peratonweather.com described the decreases as “significant” and “dramatic”.)
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “anomaly”. That’s why the caption of the images above in the peratonweather.com article reads “Sea surface temperature anomalies: August 2014 (top), Today (bottom) where above-normal is represented by yellows, oranges and reds, below-normal is represented by blues and purples; courtesy NOAA.
It’s not true. The oh-so-witty “warmer seas will put the crunch on the crustaceans and force them to move northwards” is made up out of whole cloth. It’s a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to cover up the sudden exponential expansion of the prawn population in Norway, said expansion driven by a return to health of the etheric environment to a point where the prawns could once again manifest in those new areas.
I have exposed the duplicity of sciencenordic.com by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In the headline, the author ran with the general “shift in temperatures” because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of the word “cold”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “dramatic”. That’s why the author said “he well above-normal waters (orange) of August 2014 that existed east and south of Greenland have cooled off dramatically”. They said “cooled off” because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of the word “cold”.
But back to the baldfacedly-lying “Scientists” at Science Nordic.
“In February the World Wildlife Fund in Sweden red-listed prawns on the Swedish West Coast. As a result, many supermarket chains in Sweden will stop buying Swedish prawns. In Norway, the WWF warns against fishing any more than international quota advisories recommend.”
Spectacularly, in the face of the sudden, exponential and historically-unprecedented increase in the prawn population on Sweden’s west coast in 2013, the Feds in Sweden claimed them to be endangered. That’s so that, a year later, when the prawn population has continued to expand exponentially, they can tell the mouth-breathing, NPR-addicted Coincidence theorists in Sweden that the gummint’s wise environmental policies have “saved the prawns”.
There is, indeed, a sucker born every minute, and Sweden is sadly no exception.
In July 2014, the Seattle Times said 2014 was “a boom year for razor clams”, and that “razor clamming is going to be epic”.
In terms of what’s driving the sudden historically-unprecedented bounty of razor clams in the Pacific Northwest in 2014, the Coastal Shellfish Manager, who loves him some clams like it’s his job, has given us the Punch and Judy “the ocean is very healthy”. Wait, what? Why is it healthy? What caused it to go from unhealthy to very healthy? The Coastal Shellfish Manager offers no clue. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
He also doesn’t mention that the sudden, exponential increase in razor clams in the Pacific Northwest in 2014 maps against similar historically-unprecedented, exponential increases in shellfish populations occurring regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Dan’s picture, using purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that he figures the rubes will never notice:
(Coastal Shellfish Manager Day Ayres using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that he figures the rubes will never notice)
Now here’s a historical representation of purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gestures, one of which is being used by Dan in the photo immediately above:
(Historical representation of purportedly-secret Illuminist hand and arm gestures)
I’ve included Dan’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all genetically related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “remarkable”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Making it more remarkable, the successful season occurred while the Kalaloch beaches were closed the entire season. Biologists at Olympic National Park, which manages the Kalaloch beaches, kept them closed for the second season in a row because of low population numbers.
Wait, what? During the all time largest razor clam season in history, the carefully-un-named “Biologists” at Olympic National Park closed the beaches “because of low population numbers”.
The author from the Seattle times called the largest razor clam harvest in history “successful”.
I’m sure you noticed that “low” population numbers is general. They’ve made an unsubstantiated claim in the face of facts that show the exact opposite. That’s an example of what’s known as “the Big Lie”, so favored by Hitler, Goebbels, and, in this case, biologists in the employ of our National Parks, who love them some razor clams like it’s their job.
Saying that there are very few clams when there are, in fact, historically-unprecedented numbers of clams is an example of what I’ve called, variously, a Satanic Inversion and a Trumpian Mind-Fuck.
It’s Black magic, pure and simple. It’s a spell.
Most fortunately for us all, such spells are easily broken by Truth, as I’m demonstrating here.
Neither the coastal shellfish manager for the Washington state Department of Fish and Wildlife nor the author of the News Tribune mentions that the sudden, exponential increase in razor clams in Washington in 2013, the the highest levels in history, mapped against simultaneous similar increases documented in bivalves regardless of subspecies or location that same year.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “remarkable”. That’s why Yale University published an article in 2015 headlined “A Remarkable Recovery for The Oysters of Chesapeake Bay”.
Maryland and Virginia had their best oyster harvests in three decades in 2014, gathering a combined 900,000 bushels.
In January 2014, the U.K.’s Guardian said “European Eels have been caught in record numbers for the third year running.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “unprecedented”. That’s why a corkwhalewatch.com article from June 2014 said “Unprecedented sand eel numbers great news for whale watching in West Cork”.
Did you notice how Colin Barnes, the author of the article said that the most sand eels, ever, in all history, was “great news for whale watching”, but that he carefully left unmentioned that it was great news for the marine environment? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “misdirection”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “incredible”. That’s why the article goes on to say “As predicted in my previous log, we now have an intense bloom of plankton in full swing, and the sea is green, far more than blue, with rich phytoplankton. Not predicted, is the incredible amount of lesser sand eels that have assembled to feed on the bloom in West Cork waters. I have never seen them so abundant at any time in the past 40 years.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “unexplained”. That’s why Colin goes on to say “Having looked at several samples of them, it is very clear that the vast majority of them are two year old fish, showing that the wet summer of 2012 must have suited their spawning activity very well, in some unexplained way. All fish species spawn annually, but very often there is no regeneration, and all the larval fish perish, with no survivors at all. Then, every now and again, all works according to plan, and there are millions of new recruits to add to the stock, such as there is this year.”
Wait, what? Colin firmly assures as that “the wet summer of 2012” caused the sudden, exponential increase in sea eels in Cork, to the highest levels ever seen, but he cannot explain why he’s assured us. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “lying out your ass”.
He’s assured the mouth-breathing readership “all worked according to plan”, and everyone in the audience at the Punch and Judy show nodded somberly at the wisdom of their better.
Did you notice how he obeyed the strictures of the international news blackout by using the term “wet summer”, instead of “rainy”?
While Colin helpfully let us know that the largest sand eel population in the history of West Cork was caused by abundant rainfall, albeit in some unexplained way, he carefully left unmentioned the fact that it was part of a wider trend of booming, burgeoning marine wildlife populations taking place simultaneously, regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Colin’s picture, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that he figures the rubes will never notice. With his left hand:
(Colin Barnes, of Cork Whale Watch, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that he figures the rubes will never notice. As a bonus he’s using his left hand. Colin is a follower of the Left Hand Path.
Now here’s a couple of LinkedIn profile pictures of rank-and-file generational Satanists using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture that Colin is in the photo immediately above. Like Colin, they figure the rubes will never notice:
(Software Engineer. Satanic green pillow. Purporteldly-secret Illuminist hand gesture to chin)
(Software Engineer. Purple jacket. Green hedge background. Purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gesture to chin. With her left hand.)
In January 2014, Nancy Black, a marine biologist and owner of Monterey Bay Whale Watch, who has been leading bay trips for 26 years, said “We’ve never seen so many whales,” she says, “and never this many anchovies.”
In January 2014, NOAA’s Kevin Hill said “So far there is no empirical evidence of an anchovy resurgence in California… I’ve heard reports of the anchovy fishery picking up in Monterey, but we’ve seen similar [even larger] upticks in the catch over the past 15 years.”
(NOAA’S Kevin Hill, who said that there were there were 378,120 metric tons of sardines when there were, in fact, 900,000 tons of them. Monterey County Kevin sandbagged by reducing the actual number by 138%, which the Organ of the State the Monterey Weekly hedged back to Weekly “more than double NOAA’s estimate”).
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “unbelievable”. That’s why a gowhales.com article from April 2014 said “Monterey Bay has become the richest marine region on the Pacific Coast. In the past three weeks, it has reached a new peak with unbelievable hordes of anchovies…”
Did you notice how the propagandist from gowhales.com used the term “hordes” of anchovies? It’s identical to the Los Angeles Times’ use of the term “swarms” of anchovies, above. For any mouth-breathing Coincidence theorists remaining in the readership, anchovies do not “swarm”, nor do they gather in “hordes”. They school.
In January 2014, the Monterey County Weekly said “The sardines have slid fast, however (in Monterey Bay - ed), since that 2006 peak, and their projected biomass for next January is 378,120 metric tons, a drop of more than 70 percent from 2006.”
In January 2014, “The sardines have really started to go,” says Chavez, adding that the abundance of anchovies in Monterey Bay this fall and winter can be seen as a sign. A regime change has come.”
In January 2014, Diane Pleschner-Steele, Executive Director California Wetfish Producers Association said that government acoustical surveys of sardines don’t include the ocean’s surface, where the species resides. ‘They’re missing the top 30-odd feet,’ she says, “which is where most of the sardines are.”
Industry surveys – using aerial spotting – put the number of sardines at 900,000 metric tons, more than double NOAA’s estimate.”
Boldly, brazenly, in the face of a rapidly-cooling Pacific Ocean, the fish Feds are claiming that the anchovies moved into Monterey Bay because they like warm water, and that the sardines - whom there are twice as many of as they are claiming - have left because they can’t stand the heat.
It’s the “Big Lie” so favored by Hitler, Goebbels, small town Mayors in the U.S., and ever last other political figure on God’s green Earth.
Directly in the face of the 900,000 ton’s-worth of the largest sardine schools in history, the Pacific Fishery Management Council (PFMC) widened their eyes to simulate honesty and said it was half that size, and reduced the U.S. Pacific catch by 100%. They’re using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In May 2014, Bolinas, California resident Burr Heneman wrote that he had only seen such a massive baitfish [sardines] event in Bolinas a few times in the past 40 years, and never in the spring—only in July or August, and only with anchovies.
A Point Reyes Light article from May 2014 said “Warmer ocean spurs feasting along coast”.
In July 2014, an article that I can not surprisingly no longer locate said “Each month in 2014 has experienced below normal average temperatures.”
In October 2014, nasa.gov said “Antarctic Sea Ice Reaches New Record Maximum”.
Essay: Without using “because that’s there”, “El Nino”, or the word “extreme”, describe the precise geophysical mechanisms by which the hottest year in recorded history could have the highest expanse of Antarctic sea ice in recorded history.
In May 2014, Avian Ecologist Dave Shuford said that the historically-unprecedented 2,600 pelicans at Bolinas Lagoon was “highly unusual for this time of year. That could reflect breeding failures elsewhere”.
Here’s Dave Shuford’s picture:
(Dave Shuford, the Avian Ecologist from Point Blue who said that a quasi-mythical spot of slightly warmer than normal water the Pacific Ocean known as “El Nino” caused an exponential increase in the pelican population in Bolinas Lagoon even prior to El Nino’s formation)
The photo is from when he received a “Science Excellence” award, probably for suggesting that a quasi-mythical spot of slightly warmer than normal water the Pacific Ocean known as “El Nino” caused an exponential increase in the pelican population in Bolinas Lagoon even prior to El Nino’s formation.
I’ve included Dave’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a pathologically-lying generational Satanist shill of moderate influence looks like.
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
In January 2014, I said “When I was a kid, in the '70’s, we went on a whale watch cruise off Provincetown, Mass. We saw, literally, one whale, and it was a huge event. Now literally hundreds are frolicking off the beaches of Provincetown, and scientists are ‘baffled’ and ‘puzzled’. When I was on the Big Island this past summer, where my wife grew up, a whale breached off Beach 69, where she’d gone since she was little. She’d never seen one there. Her dad said ‘that’s amazing, I never saw a whale out there.’
In the article that follows, I don’t know what’s better, the load of positive whale news, or how funny it is to watch the author and scientists fall all over themselves to try to spin it to the negative. I’m hoping that people who read this thread will see the media’s pattern of obfuscating the good news, and that they’ll wake up more quickly from the programming, no longer believing the Boy Who Cried Wolf.
In the article, you’ll note how far more Right whales are showing up in Provincetown than can be explained by the population increase. That’s either, A, cool and positive, or, B, shows the author and scientists are lying, and the Right whales’ numbers are even higher than the article allows. I’m going with ‘B’.
Note also how the whales are breeding in areas they didn’t used to – or more likely are breeding places they did throughout history, before the DOR matrix was so widely and deliberately expanded.
As you read you’ll see scientists bravely parrot how ‘global warming is causing it’!’ (despite the fact that the ocean is in fact cooling).
You would think a marine scientist would say something like ‘we’re seeing a boom in populations across the marine ecosystem, and strong growth in whale populations worldwide, which both map to this boom we’re seeing in the Right Whale population.’ But they don’t say that. Because they are the dupes of lying snake-oil salesmen, at best, and heartless, lying Machiavelles, at worst.
You’ll see how the article is riddled with neurolinguisting programming trigger words, to try to take the joy and hope out of the article. Like how they include ‘but face new threats!’ even in the subhead.
You’ll see how, when listing why the increase is occurring, how they hold the actual, real reason the population is increasing (“a number of good feeding years”) until the very last.
I’m happy to point out that the calving turnaround is 2001, just about exactly when orgonite began to be deployed in earnest.
Rejoice, I say – It’s 1, 2, 4, 16…with the whale population, and everything else – dropping crime rates, dropping murder rates, nature healing…
Farewell, Death-worshipping former masters…”
A newhope.com article from January 2014 is headlined “2013 Alaska salmon harvest breaks record”.
Hilariously, the article goes on to say “Researcher Johan Östergren says to Swedish radio the warmer weather may also have played a part, with a warm winter meaning more fish coming in to breed.”
Well, if that’s true, then why does an article from the Scientific journal Tellus from 2018 describe “Recent subsurface North Atlantic cooling trend in context of Atlantic decadal-to-multidecadal variability”?
It’s not true. Researcher Johan Ostergren is an Illuminist shill, using conscious deception while maintaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
Shill - noun - The word entered English via carny, originally denoting a carnival worker who pretends to be a member of the audience in an attempt to elicit interest in an attraction.
An extended form of German Schieber (“black marketeer, profiteer”) via *shi-la-ber.
Here’s Johan’s picture:
(Researcher Johan Ostergren)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like. I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In February 2014, an article that I can not surprisingly no longer locate said “Canadian haddock booming, New England haddock is a bust – yet fishing the same stock”.
I’m sure you noticed that “Canadian haddock booming” is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the great positive change I’m documenting here.
“Yet fishing the same stock” is scientific proof of the criminal regime that holds sway in the U.S.
The author widens their eyes to simulate honesty, wrings their hands and wails “Why can’t US fisheries managers accept solutions that fall into their lap***?*** The haddock stock on George’s Bank is a glaring example of US government failure to address easily solvable fisheries problems.”
“We have been struck by the success of the recent Canadian winter haddock season. In January, in just a few ports in Nova Scotia, Canadian boats landed more than 2,000 tons of haddock (nearly 4.5 million pounds). The newspapers were filled with stories of overloaded harbors, full processing plants, and higher revenue based on great market prices.
Meanwhile, the fisheries disaster in New England keeps unfolding. According to a recent letter from the chair of the New England council to the head of the Dept. of Commerce, 2013 groundfish landings in New England will be around 43.4 million lbs, with revenue of only $55.8 million. This represents a 38% reduction in revenue since 2011. No wonder New England fishing businesses outside of the scallop industry are facing extinction.”
They’re right where the Feds in the U.S. where they want them. Fishermen who aren’t in the club going out of business, and secret-handshake-club insiders who remain get the benefit of blatant price rigging.
The article continues: “In this context, there are some booming stocks. US Haddock quotas for 2013 on Georges Bank were over 26,000 tons (or nearly 60 million lbs.) If just 50% of this quota had been landed, New England groundfish landings would have exceeded 2011. Instead, with only a little of the fishing year left, only 1680 tons (3.7 million lbs) of haddock has been landed and the landings for the year will be around 10% of the quota.
The fishing disaster in New England is not just a matter of biology and low cod stocks; it is a failure of NMFS and the dept. of commerce to manage for economic success. Jim Odlin, a former member of the NE council and trawler owner in Maine, says in all his years of fishery management, “I’ve never gone into a meeting room where some one said how can we catch more fish.”
Where “failure to manage for economic success” is Mil-speak for “the obviously-deliberate destruction of New England fishing”
To my point: “For the US side, the situation is even worse – as the industry has sacrificed for years to rebuild stocks, and now is prevented from harvesting those stocks that have been rebuilt.
Alain De’ Entremont, who operates several vessels in the Canadian haddock fishery, pointed out some of the factors allowing them to catch higher levels of their quotas. First, the Canadians use a smaller mesh. This year a pilot project allowing vessels to try a 5.7 inch mesh in a diamond configuration, which scientific studies showed did not change the catch composition from their previous 5.1 inch mesh in a square configuration. Observer coverage was added to monitor the catch composition to ensure that the catch composition was not vastly changed and did not increase the catch of sensitive cod and yellowtail bycatch.
Second they use a trawl separator. The bottom meter of the trawl is left open – allowing cod to escape. In Nova Scotia, the ratio of cod by-catch to haddock this winter was around 78 to 1 with some variation depending on the vessels, meaning that they catch 78 pounds of haddock for each pound of cod. This allows haddock to be caught in volume, even when there are severe constraints on cod. The mobile gear’s ratio this season based on the current quotas is 70 to 1.
Third, they all use a system of ITQ’s and the boats with extra cod quotas trade with boats that need it to maximize haddock volumes.
Fourth, their fishery is 100% observed by independent observers who measure the bycatch rates and size composition of the haddock catch. These observers are paid by the industry at a cost of approximately $400 per day.”
We’ve just gotten to the punchline of the whole article. Some subset of actual honest Canadian citizens are making the call up in Canada, while in the U.S., those calls are being made by bloodline-linked generational Satanists, who figure the rubes will never notice.
The exposition of the great Confidence game continues:
“Even with these positive benefits, the trawl sector will likely only catch about 70% or so of their total allocation. In some years they have caught 90% or 95%. The US harvesters are well aware of this success, and have consistently pointed out the NMFS rules holding back a similar approach on the US side. One of the key issues is the closed areas. These were closed 20 years ago on the US side as a conservation measure; but now with hard TAC’s that rationale no longer exists. At some times of the year the Canadians fish on the nose of Georges Bank, right next to the US closed area.
On the US side, haddock vessels have to use 6.5 inch mesh; they have no access to closed areas without paying 100% of observer cost, and they must pay observer cost of $700 to $1000 per day if they are to use a separator trawl with a 6 inch mesh. For a haddock trip to Georges, this would add $7000 to $10,000 in expense.”
I say “some subset of honest Canadian citizens” because, in Canada, the also-rigged game still keeps the Canadian’s catching only 70% of their allocation. While in the U.S., fishermen are catching only 10%.
The great Confidence game continues: “The New England council voted to open the closed areas, but was attacked for doing so despite the fact that the rationale for the closures no longer existed. As a result the openings were subject to a range of restrictions. The council did vote to allow a smaller mesh (6 inches rather than 6.5 inches) with separator trawls. NMFS came back with a requirement for 100% industry funded observer coverage, that made these changes uneconomical for an experimental fishery.
The council had also warned NMFS that given the current reduction in revenue, the industry could not support an industry-funded observer requirement, and if that was included in the rule, it would kill the proposal.”
So the only observers available to the New England fishery are baldfacedly-lying Illuminist insiders, who add insult to injury by being priced so that the fishermen cannot afford them in any regard.
The great Confidence game continues: “Instead of working with the council, NMFS came back with requirements for 100% observer coverage, no allowance for experimental fishing or finding where the most appropriate haddock fishing areas might be, and no flexibility. Trawler owners said okay, if we can’t agree on observer payments, why don’t you let us try to fish haddock in the new area on the 30% of the trips we are assigned an observer. NMFS refused.”
The article concludes “This year, the US will land far less than 10% of the 26,000 ton quota of Haddock on Georges Bank, while the Canadians fishing the same stock will catch 70% to 80% of their quota. NMFS needs a tiger team to tackle all the regulations that are preventing access to New England’s largest healthy stock – and set a goal of landing 50% of the quota. This would go a long way towards nursing the industry outside of scallops back to health.
It is time to have meetings where the only question on the table is how can US fishermen catch more haddock.”
Where “tiger team”, “tackle” and “time to have meetings” and “catch” alliterate to get the aging NPR-addict all pumped up that, yes, something will be done!”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why an article from the U.K.’s Independent from February 2014 said “Increase in number of giant squid catches seen as omen by puzzled fishermen”.
Now we’re at the Punch and Judy show! The only-general “increase in number of giant squid catches” is a hedge against a far more impactful, specific percentage. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalization” awareness of the scope of the great positive change I’m documenting here. As a bonus, “increase in catches” bravely implies that it was more-assiduous squid fishing that led to the unspecified but ominous increase in giant squid in Japan.
The article goes on to say “Shigenori Goto, a 44-year-old fisherman, caught two squids off Sado Island in Niigata Prefecture. “I had seen no giant squid before in my 15-year fishing career,” he told The Japan Times.“I wonder whether it may be some kind of omen.”
Shigenori Goto is a generational Satanist shill from Japan, pretending that, as a career fisherman, he’s not excited and happy about the booming and burgeoning marine wildlife of Japan. And, thinking it through, he’s not happy. He’s pissing, shitting, hopping mad about the Orgonite-driven collapse of the ancient Death energy network built and expanded by his dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Remember, the word “occult” means hidden.
The propagandist from the U.K. makes no mention of the fact that the sudden appearance of giant squid off Sado Island in the Niigata prefecture of Japan maps against similar booming, burgeoning marine populations being seen regardless of geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The author also offers no suggestion as to what might have led to the sudden appearance of giant squid off Sao Island in the Niigata prefecture of Japan. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In April, 2014, National Geographic said “Japan Halts Whaling Program in Response to International Court Ruling”.
Japan’s program to take minke, fin, and humpback whales in the Southern Ocean is not based on sound science, says court.
Japan says it will abide by a Monday ruling from the United Nations’ International Court of Justice ordering the nation to stop hunting whales off Antarctica.
Japan had long claimed that its program to take minke, fin, and humpback whales in the Southern Ocean was aimed at collecting scientific data.
But the International Court of Justice (ICJ), headquartered at the Hague in the Netherlands, found that the program was not scientific in nature and that it could be considered commercial whaling.
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) banned commercial whaling in 1986, and most countries participating in the IWC, including Japan, have said they will follow that ban.
The article continues to drone on and on about the ban. But it’s pure theater. In the face of whale numbers that have suddenly increased exponentially, the miscreants are now going to say “see, we stopped Japan, and the whales bounce back!”
State-sponsored animal-killing operations and environmental terrorism kill far more whales each year than Japan does, and will continue to do so, I’m sure to an increased degree based upon fellow-conspirator Japan’s ouster from the racket.
We saw and continue to see the same technique used with the blowing of dams in the American west. With the truth being that rainfall levels have reached a point where the water drawdowns used to increase river temperature at the key moment of spawning could no longer be practiced, because the flow level was so high that if sufficient water isn’t let through, the dams would blow. So, since they’d lost the primary purpose of the dam - to mess with water flow at key times and kill as many salmon as possible - they folded that hand and claimed “we’re tearing down the dams to save the salmon!”
In April 2014, Idaho’s Spokesman said “Kokanee thriving in North Idaho”.
Where it’s bravely but falsely implied that Kokanee aren’t thriving all over Idaho, but rather only in North Idaho. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “incredible”. That’s why an article from April 2014 that I can no longer locate said “One stretch of Lake Pontchartrain Trestles holding incredible number of flounder”.
The author is playing like it’s just one, tiny part of Lake Pontchartrain where only the flounder are booming and burgeoning to an historically-unprecedented level. Versus the truth, that it’s the whole lake, and every species of fish in the lake. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “The calendar says April, and Halloween is in October, but the calendar is wrong. It’s got to be. Lake Pontchartrain is loaded to the gills with flounder, and that happens in the fall, not the spring.”
The author is playing like something’s amiss, to take your eye off the sudden, exponential and historically-unprecedented increase in the fish population that took place in 2013. As if flounder that were there in the fall would not be there the following spring, or vice versa.
It’s specious, it’s threadbare, but the propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In June 2014, an article I can no longer locate said “Fishing thriving around New England”.
I’m sure you noticed that “fishing thriving” is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope and speed of the great positive change I’m documenting here.
They’re playing like it’s only New England that’s experiencing the sudden, exponential increase in fish populations, versus the truth, that it is a phenomenon taking place sumultaneously regardless go geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “Fishing exploded right after Mother’s Day throughout New England’s saltwater fishery and has been hot since. Shad fishing has been excellent on the Merrimack and Connecticut rivers. More than 300,000 shad have passed over the Hadley Falls Fish Lift, along with at least 621 blueback herring, 195 gizzard shad, 10 striped bass, 5,540 sea lamprey and 12 Atlantic salmon.”
That’s all very well, but there’s nothing to compare the numbers to. “Fishing exploded”, while lurid, is general. The author has once again done whatever they could to “compartmentalize” awareness of the scope and speed of the great positive change I’m documenting here.
The author makes no suggestion as to what caused the sudden, exponential increase in fish populations across New England. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In July 2014, the Vancouver Sun said “Marine mammals coming back to the Salish Sea”. Where the author carefully omitted the word “suddenly” to obfuscated the sudden, exponential and historically-unprecedented in the marine mammal population of the Salish Sea that took place in 2012 and 2013.
Describing a Puget Sound that had already surpassed its former greatness, the article goes on to say “The shared inland waters of Juan de Fuca Strait, B.C.’s Strait of Georgia, and Washington state’s Puget Sound may once again approach its former greatness.”
Describing a Puget Sound that had already surpassed its former greatness, the article goes on to say “There are signs that the Salish Sea — the shared inland waters of Juan de Fuca Strait, B.C.’s Strait of Georgia, and Washington state’s Puget Sound — is stirring and, who knows, may once again approach its former greatness.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “dramatic”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Thanks to conservation efforts, one marine mammal after another is making a dramatic comeback, their presence providing the biggest reason for hope across an ecosystem spanning 7,000 square kilometres.”
The general “conservation efforts” is put forward at the local level as a plausible-deniability excuse, to obfuscated the sudden, simultaneous, exponential and historically-unprecedented increases in all of these only-generally-defined marine mammal populations in 2013.
The article continues: “Hundreds of Pacific white-sided dolphins now call the strait home, including Howe Sound — an area that is experiencing an ecological reawakening after the treatment of mine effluent, the closure of a pulp mill, and the restoration efforts of local streamkeepers.”
The author provides three bullshit plausible-deniability excuses to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist a smorgasbord to choose from. What only-generally reference “restoration efforts” of, hilariously, “local stream keepers”, led to the sudden, exponential increase in white-sided dolphins in the Salish Sea? Removing the occasional stray rubber duck? Beer can cleanups? “Local stream keepers” it’s so Punch and Judy, so Middle Ages.
Since this will be included in a larger article documenting dolphin populations simultaneously booming and burgeoning to unprecedented levels regardless of subspecies or geography, the baseless propaganda is exposed for what it is.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “dramatic”. That’s why the article goes on to say “The dramatic return of so many marine mammals at the top of the food chain also suggests good productivity at the bottom, for predators cannot thrive without the fish and smaller creatures upon which they prey.”
Hedging, always hedging. It doesn’t prove great productivity, but rather only suggests good productivity.
In July 2014, the Los Angeles Times said “Massive school of anchovies swarms off La Jolla”.
I’m sure you noticed that “massive school of anchovies” is general. The author added the fear-inducing “swarms” as a bonus. For any mouth-breathing Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, fish don’t “swarm”, they school.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say “A massive school of Northern anchovies could be seen migrating off the coast of La Jolla on Tuesday afternoon, baffling scientists who said they haven’t seen anything like it in more than 30 years.”
The propagandist from the Los Angeles Times ran with the general “more than 30 years” to avoid printing the inconvenient truth of “have never seen anything like it”.
(The largest school of anchovies ever seen, in all history, La Jolla, California, July 2014 )
The article goes on to say “A large crowd formed at the Scripps pier around mid-morning to watch the anchovies, said Robert Monroe, a communications officer with Scripps. Monroe ran down to the pier with a GoPro camera, initially thinking it was a red tide.”
(The caption of this photo is “an oil spill or a sea plague? It’s a massive school of anchovies!”)
Members of the Scripps Marine Vertibrate Collection didn’t have an estimate on how many anchovies were in the school, nor did they offer any suggestion as to what had led to the unprecedented gathering of anchovies. That’s another example of what what is known in the Intelligence trade as “stonewalling”.
In July 2014, the Vancouver Sun described a Salish Sea that had already been repopulated by marine mammals with “Marine mammals coming back to the Salish Sea”.
In July 2014, directly in the face of New England fish stocks at their highest levels in history, boston.cbslocal.com said “Booming New England Gray Seal Population Prompts Some To Call For Hunt”.
The article goes on to say “Decades after gray seals were all but wiped out in New England waters, the population has rebounded so much that some frustrated residents are calling for a controlled hunt. The once-thriving New England gray seal population was decimated by the mid-20th century because of hunting, with Massachusetts keeping a seal bounty on the books until the 1960s. But scientists say conservation efforts, an abundance of food and migration from Canada combined to revive the population.
Environmentalists cheer the resurgence, saying the gray seal boost is good for biodiversity and a boon for popular seal watch tours in coastal New England. But many fishermen say the seals interfere with fishing charters and steal catch. Beachgoers bemoan the 600-plus-pound seals taking over large stretches of shore, befouling beaches and attracting sharks, which feed on seals.
Some residents of Nantucket are so fed up over the huge seal population that now calls the affluent island home that they have suggested a controlled hunt, similar to the way states manage deer.
Nantucket resident and recreational fisherman Peter Krogh, whose Seal Abatement Coalition has collected 2,000 signatures asking federal officials to amend laws that prevent dispersion of gray seals, said gray seals are a threat to fishing and tourism on the island.
Asked if he supports a seal cull, Krogh said “all options” should be on the table for managing the population.
“This is a real threat to the traditional way of life on this island,” Krogh said.
For any mouth-breathing Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, here’s the greater Boston Fishing Report from November 7, 2013:
“Mackerel are pretty easy pickings off Hull, Boston Ledge and Graves Light. A jig under the Sabiki rig could result in a cod. Lisa from Fore River Bait and Tackle in Quincy told of tormented smelt fans who couldn’t get their smelt in on time before being gulped by ravenous stripers.”
And here’s Captain Jason Colby, with the Boston Flounder Report from July 2014: “Overall, the flounder fishing in 2014 has been very good. The fish today were so gangbusters today that we only killed a few deeply hooked fish under 15 inches with most in the 15 to 17 inch range. Adam’s fish went a bit over 21 inches and should win the State Derby in the winter flounder division.”
Despite being a Nantucket resident and a recreational fisherman, Peter obviously doesn’t find mackerel to be pretty easy pickings, nor is he able to catch ravenous stripers, nor is he able to take advantage of the very good flounder fishing.
He’s gotten 2,000 signatures from fellow generational Satanists around Nantucket, in much the same way someone upright might help their child sell Girl Scout cookies.
But back to the boston.cbslocal.com story: “Conservationists scoff at the idea of providing amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which protects seals. They say culling the herd would undo the results of the act, which allowed the species to recover in New England.
The seals’ burgeoning population is a blessing for at least one industry.
Business is booming for Keith Lincoln, who operates a seal watch ferry to Monomoy Island off Cape Cod. Seal sightings have skyrocketed from about 50 per trip in 1989 to about 2,000 per trip now, he said. The curious seals frequently come close to the boats, a thrill for gawking tourists, he said.
“Once the word spread out, the word spread quick,” Lincoln said. “The cuteness of them is what draws everybody.”
With “a blessing for at least one industry”, they’re playing like the seals are destroying the booming, burgeoning fishing industry.
The hit-piece from cbs.boston.com continues: “Some also believe the seals’ negative impact on fishing is overstated. Brian Sharp, the manager of marine mammal rescue for the Cape Cod-based International Fund for Animal Welfare, said gray seals feed mostly on fish species of little commercial value, like sand lance.
Others in the commercial fishing industry don’t see seals as a threat. Lobstermen off Rockland, Maine, where gray seals are often spotted, say the seals and fishery coexist with little strife.
“Culls of gray seals have not been shown to increase fish populations. It’s not that simple,” Sharp said. “What we’re seeing is a normal growth curve of seals repopulating an area.”
The gray seals, also called horsehead seals, can grow to more than 10 feet long and inhabit both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean. They are sometimes found in the same areas as their smaller cousins, harbor seals.
For now, the seal population is flourishing, and its ability to sustain seal watch businesses off Massachusetts and Maine is evidence that it can have an economic benefit, said Gordon Waring, fishery research biologist at the Northeast Fisheries Science Center in Woods Hole, Massachusetts.
“Seals are just another large marine predator, and they are part of the diversity of the marine environment,” he said. “And they are able to thrive and recover.”
As you can see, the professionals they consulted said that things were fine. Only one rabble-rouser - and 2,000 unnamed members of his rabble - are pressing for the State-sponsored seal-killing operations on Nantucket.
Peter is an example of what is known in the Intelligence trade as a “controlled-opposition stooge”.
Stooge - noun - a person who is used by somebody to do things that are unpleasant or dishonest.
Most interestingly, there are no photos available on the web of the high-profile, podium-pounding Peter Keogh. I also couldn’t locate him on LinkedIn.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “guesswork”.
That’s why a CBS local Baltimore article from August 2014 is headlined “Cause Of Floating Dead Fish In Maryland Waters Remains A Mystery”, and why the subhead goes on to say “Alex DeMetrick reports what triggered the sudden die-off is still guesswork”.
The city moved fast to remove the die-off, with skim boats collecting hauls more commonly seen on commercial fishing boats and as menhaden and shad died from the Inner Harbor out to the Key Bridge.
Maryland’s Department of the Environment says there are no signs of a toxic spill or a classic algae bloom. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s John Tapscott said “we didn’t really see any classic sign and even the oxygen yesterday, there was enough oxygen in the water for the fish to breathe.”
The University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science’s Dr. Donald Boesch said “I think it’s pretty certain some kind of combination of nutrients, runoff and organic matter. People fertilizing lawns and gardens, animal waste. Which the author, Alex DeMetrick, helpfully explains “takes rain to move off the hard surfaces into the harbor and bay.”
It’s like two kindly adults working with an elementary school student, when it is in actuality two sociopathic con artists, working with an elementary school student.
“Nutrients”, “runoff”, “organic matter”, “lawn fertilizer” and “organic waste” are a chaff spray of plausible deniability excuses, put forward because the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
”The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “everyone wants to know why” and “love to know why”.
That’s why the Chesapeake Bay Foundation’s John Tapscott went on to say “I think scientists are puzzled as to why. Everyone wants to know. I’d love to know why,” Tapscott said.
”The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why another press release on the same fish-killing Op (a Chesapeake Bay Living article, also from August 2014), headlined “Thousands of Fish Found Floating in the Chesapeake Bay — Without Heads or Tails” said “the mystery started in late June when lower Chesapeake Bay fishermen came upon the grisly sight — tens of thousands of dead menhaden floating on the greenish-brown swells of the Bay. Most of the small, silvery fish were missing their heads and tails.”
Did you notice that the first article that we reviewed on this fish-killing Op didn’t mention that they were missing their heads and tails? And did you notice that both article describe the State-sponsored environmental terrorism as a “mystery”?
In September 2014, directly in the face of Dogfish off the East Coast of the U.S. that were exponentially increasing in abundance, a vnews.com article from said “Dogfish still abundant off East Coast”.
I’m sure you noticed that “still abundant” is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the great positive change I’m documenting here.
Dogfish off the East Coast of the U.S. were exponentially increasing in abundance in 2014. That’s why the article goes on to say “Federal regulators say the fishes (Dogfish) are actually growing in abundance. James Armstrong, who manages the species for the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, said they are estimated to exceed their target level by 33 percent. And James Sulikowski, a biologist with the University of New England who studies the species, said there are about 230,000 metric tons of spawning dogfish in the Gulf of Maine, a nearly five-fold increase from ten years ago. “The guys are seeing a lot of dogfish out there,” said Bert Jongerden, general manager of the Portland Fish Exchange. “There’s no problem.”
James Sulikowski, a biologist with the University of New England that studies dogfish, carefully described the sudden, exponential increase in Dogfish off the East Coast of the U.S. in 2013 and 2014 as “a nearly five-fold increase from ten years ago.”
James doesn’t offer any suggestion as to what has caused a nearly 400% increase in the dogfish population off the East Coast of the U.S. from 2004 to 2014. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
And, even though he loves him some sharks like it’s his job, he also doesn’t mention that shark populations increased suddenly and exponentially in 2013 regardless of species or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s James Sulikowski’s picture:
(James Sulikowski, University of New England, in a Satanic purple sweatshirt)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist shill in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Shill - noun - The word entered English via carny, originally denoting a carnival worker who pretends to be a member of the audience in an attempt to elicit interest in an attraction.
An extended form of German Schieber (“black marketeer, profiteer”) via *shi-la-ber.
In September 2014, rcinet.ca said “Record Numbers for Swedish Wild Salmon”.
In September 2014, an article from Fremantle, Australia that I can no longer locate said “Squid have been active for most of the week and during the evening around Wilson Head anglers have been taking some beauties. They are big so when they are around they are cannibalising any bait in the water including squid strips. There are plenty of herring around the beaches and rocks of the bay, a float and some plastic tube for a lure and you are on to them. There’s been some smaller samsonfish off the rocks this week and there are still some salmon around. Ocean Beach and Salmon Holes have been producing salmon, along with tarwhine at night along the beach.
“Cannibalizing” is an insider-wink to the human sacrifice and cannibalism that the folks in charge have practiced without cease all the way back to the dawn of time.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “remarkable”. That’s why an article from October 2014 that I can no longer locate said “The article that follows tells all about how Hickory shad have made a remarkable comeback in the Roanoke River over the last decade.”
Where “over the last decade” is a smoke-screen to cover the sudden, exponential increase in shad in the Roanoke in 2012 and 2013.
In October 2014, landbigfish.com said “Hickory Shad are Making a Comeback in the Roanoke River”.
I’m sure you noticed that “making a comeback” is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the great positive change that I’m documenting here.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “remarkable”. That’s why the uncredited article from NC Wildlife goes on to say “Hickory shad, harbingers of spring fishing, have made a remarkable comeback over the last decade and are now one of the most popular fisheries along the Roanoke River from late-February through March.”
Wait, what? The headline said that Hickory Shad in North Carolina were only making a comeback - were in the midst of a comeback - when, in fact, they have already concretely made said comeback, which, as a bonus, was credited as being “remarkable”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “unclear”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Kent Nelson, coastal region fishery supervisor for the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, said the reasons for hickory shad’s comeback are not entirely clear, but a number of factors are possible.”
“We believe that favorable spring spawning and ocean conditions, as well as limited commercial fishing and harvest restrictions, have played major roles in rebounding hickory shad numbers,” Nelson said. “Also, anglers practicing proper catch-and-release techniques — where fish are landed quickly, handled little, if at all, and kept in the water while the hook is being removed — have had positive impacts on fish survival rates.”
Kent Nelson is coastal region fishery supervisor for the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission, and thus necessarily loves him some fish like it’s his job. Well, if that’s true, then why isn’t he going into any detail as to what “favorable spring spawning and ocean conditions” actually means? We’ve been told that Hickory Shad in North Carolina are in the process of making, I mean have already made a comeback that is admitted, only generally, to be “remarkable”, yet there’s no data whatsoever as to where the population was in the past, or where it is now.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the not-surprisingly unnamed author from NC Wildife went on to say “While specific reasons for their population explosion are elusive, early-bird anglers who have braved the cold winds of late February and March can attest that hickory shad are biting — and biting frequently on a variety of tackle.”
More smoke blowing, more hedging generalities. We now know that it’s a “population explosion” (oh, no!), and that hickory shad are biting “frequently”. Can you see how the propagandist walked hickory shad that were biting more frequently back to merely “biting frequently”?
The article goes on to say “Anglers typically fish for hickory shad on light spinning gear, although increasing numbers of anglers are trying their luck with flyrods,” Nelson advised. “Shad darts are a favored lure when fished by casting upstream into the current and retrieving as it sinks and drifts downstream.” Nelson also recommends that fly fishermen use miniature, Clouser-type lures, preferably with a touch of flash added to the tail. However, anglers should remember to sink their lines, to keep their lures, and their hopes for a bite, from being swept away by the Roanoke’s swift current.
The coastal region fishery supervisor for the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission just queasily implied that the still-unquantified increase in the hickory shad population in North Carolina, which has been allowed as “remarkable” and a “population explosion”, is the result of craftier fishing methods.
In the face of a sudden, unquantified, unexplained, exponential increase in the hickory shad population on the Roanoke, the coastal region fishery supervisor for the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission speaks of anglers’ “hopes for a bite”.
Neither Kent nor the uncredited author from NC Wildlife mentions that the sudden unquantified, exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in hickroy shad in North Carolina in 2013 mapped against similar such increases taking place regardless of fish species or geography. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Kent’s picture:
(Kent Nelson, the coastal region fishery supervisor for the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission - now retired - who said the the reasons for hickory shad’s sudden, unquantified, exponential increase on the Roanoke river in 2013 “are not entirely clear.”)
I’ve included Kent’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist shill in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice.
They’re all genetically related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “parasites fear exposure above all else.”
