DECREASING SODA CONSUMPTION
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft fabricated the first simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices in 2000, their widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that the populace has recognized that soft drinks have been weaponized against it.
That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
Now, I need to level-set by saying that I grew up drinking soda. It was not the case of a hippy-dippy family keeping me from soft drinks. Far from it - our family had cases of it in the garage, and was the envy of the neighborhood.
At the suburban swimming pool where I lifeguarded during the summer while I was in High School, we drank literally gallons per day, from sunup to sundown.
I had Mexican Coke’s stocked in my fridge up until about ten years ago or so.
But, now, I hardly ever drink soda, anymore.
SODA IS EVIL - THE DATA
It doesn’t say these things on the can, but I think it will be helpful if review some data on soda, and diet soda.
Drinking one soda per day increases stroke and dementia by 300% compared to drinking less than one soda a week.
Drinking soda causes an 87% increase of pancreatic cancer compared to individuals consuming no soda.
Among men, drinking one soda per day is associated with a 66% increase of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Among regular soda drinkers during In Vitro Fertilization, the formation of morphologies known as blastocysts increased by 39%.
Among those who drank more than seven servings of soda per week, fertility was reduced by 33% in males and by 25% in males.
Depression is 30% greater among soda drinkers than it is among non soda drinkers.
Women who drank two or more sodas every day were 29% more likely to develop heart disease.
Women who drank two or more sodas per day were 23% more likely to have a stroke.
Consumption of seven servings or less of soda per week reduces fertility by 22% in males and by 19% in females.
Consumption of one soda daily is associated with a 14% increase of type 2 diabetes compared to those who drink water, coffee or tea.
Drinking soda causes the ends of chromosomes, known as telomeres, to shorten. The shorter the telomere, the less a cell can regenerate thus aging the body, and raising the risk of disease and early death.
Depression is 10% lower among coffee drinkers.
DIET SODA IS EVIL - THE DATA
Diet soda drinkers have a 378% higher risk of diabetes than regular soda drinkers.
Among men, drinking one diet soda a day is associated with a 202% increase of multiple myeloma, compared with non diet soda drinkers. There was no increase among regular soda drinkers. Thus, aspartame triples multiple myeloma.
Diet soda increases the risk of deadly stroke by 200%.
The 55% increase in depression among diet soda drinkers is 83% greater than the 30% increase in depression among soda drinkers.
Diet soda causes a 67% increase in type 2 diabetes compared with not consuming any.
Depression is 55% greater among diet soda drinkers than it is among non soda drinkers.
Among diet soda drinkers, the formation of morphologies known as blastocysts during In Vitro Fertilization was 53% greater than it was among non soda drinkers.
Women Drinking Two Diet Sodas Per Day Are 50% More Likely to Die from Heart-Related Disease.
High diet soda intake has a 42% higher risk of leukemia than low diet soda intake.
During in vitro fertilization, the formation of morphologies known as blastocysts is 36% greater among diet soda drinkers than it is among soda drinkers (53% vs. 39%).
Among men, drinking one diet soda per day is associated with a 31% increase of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Diet Soda builds desire and decreases satisfaction. Splenda flies ate 30% more calories than the control, and when they took away the artificially sweetened food, the effect vanished.
Diet soda increases heart disease by 29%.
Diet soda drinkers are 26% more likely to die prematurely than non diet soda drinkers. That’s because erinking soda causes the ends of chromosomes, known as telomeres, to shorten. The shorter the telomere, the less a cell can regenerate thus aging the body, and raising the risk of disease and early death.
Diet soda drinkers are 16% to 26% more likely to die from any cause.
Depression is 10% lower among coffee drinkers.
Water consumption is accompanied by a 70% decrease in psychological distress.
Vegetables, fruits, water and milk are all negatively associated with moderate and severe psychological distress.
SODA - THE GREAT BIG CONSPIRACY
“In keeping silent about evil, in burying it so deep within us that no sign of it appears on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousand fold in the future. When we neither punish nor reproach evildoers, we are not simply protecting their trivial old age, we are thereby ripping the foundations of justice from beneath new generations.”
― From “The Gulag Archipeligo”, by Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn, 1973
The creators of Dr. Pepper, Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Canada Dry Ginger Ale and 7-Up were all Freemasons.
Charles Alderton, who invented Dr. Pepper in 1885, was a Freemason.
[image]
(Charles Alderton)
Charles Courtice Alderton (1857-1941), who created Dr Pepper soda, became a Mason at Waco Lodge June 25, 1908 Elected as Master June 1911.
John Stith Pemberton, who invented Coca-Cola in 1886, was a Freemason.
[image]
(John Smith Pemberton)
Wikipedia - “his service in the Confederate Army and his membership as a Freemason…”
Caleb Bradham, who invented Pepsi Cola in 1898, was a Freemason.
[image]
(Caleb Bradham)
Caleb Bradham was elected steward of St. John’s (Masons’) Lodge No. 3 in 1895; he was later elected or appointed junior warden in 1898, senior warden in 1899, and Worshipful Master in 1900, 1901, and again in 1927. By the time of his death, Bradham had attained the 32nd degree of Scottish Rite, acted as grand commander in the York Rite, served as provincial grand master of the Order of Colonial Masters of North America, recorder and treasurer of the Sudan Shrine Temple, eminent commander of St. John’s Commandery, and master kadosh of Carolina Consistory No. 3. He also served as an exalted ruler of the New Bern Elks Lodge.
John J. McLaughlin, who invented Canada Dry Pale Ginger Ale in 1904, was a Freemason.
[image]
(John J… McLaughlin)
Member - Cedar Lodge No. 270, Oshawa, Ontario
Charles Lieper Grigg, who invented 7-up in 1929, was a Freemason.
[image]
(Charles Leiper Grigg)
Charles Leiper Grigg was born in 1868 in Prices Branch, Missouri to Charles L. S. Grigg (1822–1883) and Mary Elizabeth Leiper Grigg (1839–1890).
1859 Proceedings - Grand Lodge of Missouri - C. L. S. Grigg
DECREASING SODA CONSUMPTION - THE DATA, AND THE TIMELINE
From 1998 to 2015, per-capita soda consumption in the United States decreased by 23%, from 53 gallons to 41 gallons.
In 1998, per-capita consumption for carbonated soft drinks peaked in the United States at nearly 53 gallons.
From 2002 to 2014, the percentage of Americans trying to avoid soda increased by 35%, from from 41% to 63%.
In September 2010, Science-Based Medicine said “Aspartame – Truth vs Fiction”.
In April 2012, the moronically named popsop.com pretended that the were not, in fact an advertising agency and said “Diet Coke Unveils Jean Paul Gaultier Tattoo Bottle and ‘Night and Day’ Cans”.
[image]
[image]
(John Paul Gaultier Coke Cans)
The article continues:
“The provocative bottle is perfect for after dark – the lace and fishnet design highlights the female-like silhouette of the iconic bottle shape and adds a never-before-seen edginess to the Diet Coke limited edition collection. The ‘Day’ bottle is inspired by Jean Paul Gaultier’s signature Breton stripes and …”
In October 2012, NPR fought the brave but ultimately hopeless rearguard action with “Study Results Linking Diet Soda To Cancer Fall Into The 'Gray Zone’”
In 2013, the 3% decrease in overall soda volumes was 150% greater than their 1.2% decrease in 2012.
In 2012, overall soda volumes decreased by 1.2%, year-over-year.
In 2013, overall soda volumes decreased by 3%, year-over-year. It was the ninth straight yearly decrease.
In 2013, diet soda sales decreased by 6%, year-over-year.
In January 2013, the Smithsonian widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Could Diet Soda Cause Clinical Depression***?***”
Despite their stature as one of the nation’s premier Scientific organization’s, the Smithsonian is pretending that they don’t know that depression is 55% greater among diet soda drinkers. They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I have exposed the duplicity of author Jason Stromberg by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Here’s Jason Stromberg’s picture, in a Satanic purple shirt, where the image is constructed so that Jason’s left eye is featured:
[image]
(Jason Stromberg)
The image features his left eye, because, to generational Satanists like Jason, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”. He figured that she would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In March 2013, wholenewmom.com questioned “Nutrasweet in Milk but It’s Not on the Label***?***” Where they’ve phrased it as a question, to allow the subconscious of the Coincidence Theorist to reject the whole thing outright, as something in question.
The uncredited article continues: “Over the past week, there’s been a real buzz in the whole foodie blog realm about the government’s apparent push to add Nutrasweet (aspartame) to milk–with no labeling”.
For this unfamiliar, anytime an article is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The article continues: “The government is proposing that, in the case of flavored dairy products (like Strawberry, Chocolate, and such), if the sweetener used is a non-nutritive one (like aspartame), then they want to be able to add it without writing “Reduced Calorie” on the label.
The government’s reasoning:
-
The sweet taste will get more kids to drink milk.
-
Children are “put off” by labels such as “Reduced Calorie” and would likely pass up this kind of beverage/food in favor of sugar-laden items that can cause weight gain.
-
Flavored milks and dairy products with sugar and honey, etc., in them are not labeled in any special way, so why should things be different for these alternative sweeteners.
-
Children will be less likely to become obese by drinking flavored milks with low calorie sweeteners.”
As you can see, the Feds definitively want to put Aspartame in flavored milk with no labeling whatsoever. The mouth-breathing mom reading the article gets to trust the authority figure, not feel kind of like a fool, and walk away believing the Feds are great people.
And it’s not even the ignorance of that mom that’s to blame, but rather their subconscious desire to avoid personal responsibility at any cost that keeps the felons in power.
Mouth-breather-mom believes that diet soda (and diet milk!) will help you lose weight, when in fact Aspartame makes you crave empty calories, and has been scientifically proven to in fact make the consumer fatter, not thinner.
In July 2013, the State propaganda organ known as Nutrishop CDA said “Don’t Believe the Anti-Sweetener Propaganda”.
In July 2013, Coca-Cola’s North American soda sales decreased by 4%.
From 2014 to 2018, Coca-Cola’s annual revenue decreased by 38%, year-over-year.
From 2014 to 2020 calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 11.8%, year-over-year.
From 2014 to 2015, Coca-Cola’s annual revenue decreased by 3.7%, year-over-year.
In 2014, 63% of Americans were trying to avoid soda.
From mid-February 2014 to mid-March 2014, diet soda sales in the U.S. decreased by 7.3%, year-over-year.
In April 2014, ABC News narrowed its eyes bitterly and said “Soda Losing Its Grip on America”.
Where, by “grip”, author Jim Avila means “Death grip”. Did I mention that it’s a completely general statement? The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
The article continues: “A possible reason for the decline in consumption of diet sodas is that consumers don’t seem to be convinced that Aspartame and other artificial sweeteners are safe, even though there is no scientific evidence that they cause any harm.”
For ABC, a Trusted Authority Figure, to claim “there is no scientific evidence that they cause any harm” is outrageous, ribald. They’re using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. I must beg the reader to recall that a single diet soda per day triples the risk of stroke and dementia, and increases metabolic syndrome by a third. Focus with me, people.
Here’s Jim Avila’s picture, wearing a Satanic purple tie:
[image]
(Jim Avila)
The image is off center so that his left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like Jim, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”. He figured that she would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In April 2014, Vox.com’s German Lopez lied psychotically and promised “Don’t worry, soda. America still loves you”. This directly in the face of the fact that Coca-Cola’s annual revenue decreased by 38% from 2014 to 2018.
I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Here’s German Lopez’s picture, where his arms are crossed in a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”.
[image]
(German Lopez)
The image is off center so that his left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like German, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”. He figured that she would never notice the coded visual imagery.
“Singing with arms crossed and hands joined was a parting ritual at many Masonic lodges.”
- bbc.com, December 31, 2021
From 2015 to 2016, per-capita soda consumption in the United States decreased by 6%, year-over-year, from 41 gallons to 38.5 gallons.
From 2015 to 2016, Coca-Cola’s annual revenue decreased by 5.49%, year-over-year.
From 2015 to 2016, the 5.49% decrease in Coca-Cola’s annual revenue was 48.4% greater than its 3.7% decrease from 2014 to 2015.
In 2015, healthline.com said “8 Studies That Prove Diet Soda Is Actually Making You Fat, Not Helping You Lose Weight”.
In March 2015, mysanantonio.com said “San Antonio-based study links diet soda consumption to increased abdominal fat in seniors”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “tremendous”.
That’s why the article goes on to say: “Sharon Fowler, an author of the study and adjunct assistant professor at UTHSC at San Antonio, pointed out that the study is observational and therefore cannot prove causation but did say there was a “tremendous increase in waist circumferences.”
Tremendous! That’s some brave, deviant positive spin right there.
The article continues:
“Fowler delved deeper into the findings and shared that the abdominal girth of participants who never drank diet sodas increased by 0.8 inches throughout the span of the study. Occasional diet soda drinkers also saw a 1.8 increase in their waistline circumference. Lastly, participants who drank diet sodas daily saw an increase of over 3 inches on their waist.”
Sharon “delved deeper” and “shared”, hot! Then she used more hedging generalities, namely listing increases without a note of what the baseline was, so that you can’t calculate a percentage increase. In two cases, the author says “saw” an increase, which, in propaganda terms, walks it back a step from actually experiencing it.
Did you notice that Sharon mentioned “waist circumferences”, but carefully omitted any mention of weight? Did you notice that she used the hedging generality “tremendous” in place of a specific statistic? It’s all very careful. She and her fellow conspirators refer to it as “tradecraft”.
The article continues: “I think acidity (of the drinks) is a big problem,” Fowler added. “Each of us has our own private rainforests within our bodies, what we eat and drink affects the organisms in the rainforest.”
Wait, what? We learned previously in a HuffPost article from 2014 that Diet Soda builds desire and decreases satisfaction, and that Splenda flies ate 30% more calories than the control, and when they took away the artificially sweetened food, the effect vanished.
What’s with adjunct assistant professor Sharon Fowler’s middle-ages, Punch and Judy “Rainforest” and “acidity” explanation? Orange juice is very acidic, but does not make you fat.
She’s blowing smoke. She’s a generational Satanist shill, being quoted in a mainstream news article.
In April 2015, the Los Angeles Times said “Diabetes rises with daily soda – including diet soda – consumption”.
Where they used “rises” because it’s softer than “increases”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. But the most important reason it was used is because it is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “A comprehensive study of European adults has found that compared with people who drink a single sugar-sweetened drink daily, those who drink water, coffee or tea instead are at 14% lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes.”
Can you see how they Satanically inverted it? They bent over backwards to avoid saying “those who drank soda had a 14% higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “surprised”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “The new research, published in Diabetologia, the journal of the European Assn. for the Study of Diabetes, offered another surprise as well: consumption of fruit juice and sweetened tea or coffee was not associated with diabetes.”
The pathologically-lying authors of the study, and the author from the Los Angeles times have wildly downplayed the main driver of type 2 diabetes, namely the Aspartame.
Here’s Daniela Braga, 2nd Author on the study. I used her because her picture was the only one there:
[image]
(Daniela Braga, 2nd Author, “Artificial Sweeteners - do they bear an infertility risk?”, Fertility and Sterility, September 2016)
The image is off center so that her left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like Daniela, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
From 2016 to 2017, Coca-Cola’s annual revenue decreased by 15.41%.
From 2016 to 2017, the 15.41% decrease in Coca-Cola’s annual revenue was 180% greater than its 5.49% decrease from 2015 to 2016.
From 2016 to 2017, the 180% greater year-over-year decrease in Coca-Cola’s annual revenue was 272% greater, or almost quadruple it’s 48.4%-greater year-over-year decrease from 2015 to 2016.
The great positive societal change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
In 2016, Boston Magazine said “mice who were given aspartame in their drinking water gained more weight than those on a similar diet, but without the sweetener.”
In 2016, U.S. soda sales decreased for the 12th straight year.
Soda consumption decreased to an all time low in the U.S. in 2016.
In February 2016, takepart.com said “Beverage Companies Want the Developing World to Drink a Whole Lot More Soda”.
Where the headline pumps the “drink a whole lot more soda” thought form, even though the article is about a see-the-needle-moving, going-out-of business decrease in soda sales. It’s pure Mil-Speak.
Prices increase when supply increases, demand decreases, or both. That’s why a money.com article from October 2016 is headlined “Coke Raised Prices to Make Up for Lower Soda Consumption”. They’re driving on, jacking up the price to juice the remaining addicts that much harder. But you can see how their position is being inexorably washed away.
It’s all over but the crying for these people…it’s just that I’m the only person talking about it at the moment.
In October 2016, Food and Wine said “Research Finds Drinking Diet Soda Decreases Fertility”.
Where “decreases fertility” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author put “Research finds” on the front end to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that must have been faulty research!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.”
I had to look up the study to learn that consumption of seven servings or less of sugar sweetened beverages reduced fertility by 19% in females and by 22% in males. Among those who drank more than seven servings a week of sugar sweetened beverages, fertility was reduced by 25% in females and by 33% in males.
And, lo, I’ve just learned that the story about diet soda decreasing fertility links to a study that was on sugar sweetened beverages. I had to look up a completely separate study, from October 2016, entitled “Artificial sweeteners - do they bear an infertility risk***?***” to learn that the formation of foetal morphologies known as blastocysts increased 39% among regular soda consumers and by 53% among diet soda consumers.
Can you see how the people who wrote the study which proved that diet soda drinkers have 53% more damaged oocytes than those who did not consume diet soda asked if diet soda even presented a risk?
In November 2016, the U.K.’s Telegraphed dragged its heels and allowed “Diet drinks may be preventing you from losing weight”.
They’re a Trusted Authority Figure, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. Where “preventing you from losing weight” is Mil-speak for “are in fact making you fatter”.
In November 2016, medicalxpress.com said “Sugary drink sales drop nearly 20 percent after multi-faceted campaign”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State has put forward the false plausible-deniability excuse at the local level that a “campaign” made people give up the poison, when it was a general increase in awareness across the populace, regardless of culture or geography, that did so.
In Australia, sugars contributed by soft drinks decreased 27% in children aged 2-18 years,15% in adult men and 13% in adult women from 2017 to 2018.
In January 2017, Complex assured “Don’t Believe All the Bad Sht* People Say About Diet Coke”.
In February 2017, Marketing week pretended it wasn’t running a paid ad by saying “Coca-Cola preps Diet Coke push with advertising shift”, about a product where consuming just one 11 oz. can week triples your risk of stroke and dementia, and doubles your risk of pancreatic cancer. PUSH, SHIFT, so sexy!
In February 2017, the American Beverage Association asked only-generally “Did You Fall for an Internet Hoax?” They know that sixty to seventy percent of readers will only read the headline, and thus learn nothing. The remaining minority will take the click-bait and read “Do you think it’s “common knowledge” that aspartame causes cancer? If so, you’ve fallen for a decades old internet hoax”.
“Decades old internet hoax”, ah, mirth. Many or most readers are eager to grasp any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility, and this one is so fat and tasty to the wholly-credulous Coincidence Theorist that it is virtually irresistible. As we learned previously, men who drink one or more diet sodas per day get 31% more non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a tripling of multiple myeloma.
In March 2017, Sydney.au.edu said “Soft drink and added sugar consumption on the decline in Australia”.
In March 2017, the abusively named “Motley Fool” pretended they were not in fact an advertising agency by saying “Coca-Cola Has a Plan to Improve Soft-Drink Sales.”
In April, 2017 jjvirgin.com said “Deadly News Confirmed: Diet Soda Linked to Strokes and Dementia”.
It’s not deadly SODA, you see, but only rather deadly NEWS. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “hedging”. The author has used the general, neutral “LINKED to” as a description of a tripling of stroke and dementia.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “shocked”.
That’s why the author goes on to say “The results were shocking: those who drank diet soda were nearly three times as likely to experience strokes and dementia as people who skipped the diet soft drinks.”
In April 2017, WebMD widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Do Diet Sodas Pose Health Risks***?”***
This about a product where drinking one a week triples your risk of stroke and dementia. There are Russian soldiers out there who can attest that anti-freeze is less toxic.
In April 2017, Bloomberg said “Drinking Too Much Soda May Be Linked to Alzheimer’s”.
The author used “TOO MUCH diet soda” to describe drinking one can per day. And then they used “linked to” as a description for a three hundred percent increase. Say what you will about them, there’s no quit in these people.
The article continues: “People drinking diet soda daily were almost three times as likely to develop stroke and dementia,” said study author Matthew Pase, PhD, fellow in the department of neurology at BUSM.”
You can see how the author from the Trust Authority Figure Bloomberg.com “compartmentalized” the knowledge of the tripling of stroke and dementia by “burying it” in the body copy.
In July 2017, Fox News said “Diet drinks may cause weight gain, new research suggests”.
Diet Soda builds desire and decreases satisfaction. Splenda flies ate 30 percent more calories than the control, and when they took away the artificially sweetened food, the effect vanished.
The author put “new research suggests” on the end to give your subconscious the green light to say “oh, but that research must have been faulty!” The propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In August 2017, popsugar Middle East pretended that it was not, in fact, an advertising agency and explained “Why Diet Coke Is Hard to Pour on Planes”.
Author Lauren Levy did not, however, go on to explain how diet soda triples stroke and dementia, and increases metabolic syndrome by a third.
Here’s Lauren Levy’s picture, in a Satanic purple top, with a Satanic green background:
[image]
(Lauren Levy)
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In August 2017, Livestrong.com sowed the seed of doubt by asking “Does Soda Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer ?” It’s a pretty brazen question to ask, when you learn in that very article that people who drank two or more soft drinks a week had an 87% increased risk – or nearly twice the risk – of pancreatic cancer compared to individuals consuming no soft drinks. The general “increase” was used to cover a near-doubling of pancreatic cancer.
Just about as brazen as Lance unrepentantly continuing on with his “Livestrong” website and brand after being busted as a doper and a ‘roider, and then using it to play the plausible-deniability card for the soda industry.
Here’s Lance showing his support of the Texas Longhorns football team, or saying that he wants to “rock on”, or “I Love you!” In American Sign Language:
[image]
(Lance Armstrong showing his support of the Texas Longhorns football team, or saying that he wants to “rock on”, or “I Love you!” In American Sign Language, or saying “hail, Satan”, depending upon your point of view)
The picture has been scrubbed from the web - I couldn’t easily find it, as I used to be able to. Glad I grabbed a copy!
Here’s his ex-wife flashing the sign of Satan, in front of a Satanic green background:
[image]
(Sheryl Crow showing her support of the Texas Longhorns football team, or saying that he wants to “rock on”, or “I Love you, God!” In American Sign Language, or saying “hail, Satan”, depending upon your point of view)
The image is off center so that her left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like Sheryl, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
For any lingering Coincidence theorists huffing and puffing in the readership, here’s an image of a couple of Scottish Rite Freemasons from the 1700’s, greeting one another with purportedly-secret “signs of recognition”, one of which is the “Texas Longhorns” hand signal that Sheryl and Lance are both flashing in the two photo’s immediately above:
[image]
(Detail from frontispiece of The Builder’s Dictionary, 1734 ©Museum of Freemasonry, London)
Sheryl and Lance figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included their photographs so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanists in positions of formerly significant influence look like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
From September 2017 to September 2018, Coca-Cola’s net income decreased by 38%. Seekingalpha.com said “Coca-Cola stock ready for 2018 run after impressive diversification”.
From September 2017 to September 2018, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 13.4%.
In the 4th Quarter of 2017, Diet Coke sales decreased by 6%, year over year.
In October 2017, directly in the face of exponentially decreasing soda sales, the Trusted Authority Figure “The Washington Post” crowed about “How Coca-Cola got Americans to drink diet soda again”. Author Abha Bhattarai said it with a completely straight face during a year in which Diet Cokes sales decreased by 3.7%.
The Washington Post is a State propaganda outlet, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
I have exposed their duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In October 2017, Marketplace.org said “Diet soda sales fizzle as health-conscious consumers turn to other drinks”.
Where “fizzle”, while cloying, is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author continues: “Demand for diet drinks surged for decades, peaking in 2006. But since then, diet soda sales have dropped more than 30 percent.”
Where “more than 30%” is general. I’d note as a side bar that 2006 was the high-water mark of the storm steering and augmentation program, with hurricane Katrina being driven around like a bumper car straight into New Orleans. The death energy level in the Ether having since come back down to a place where the technology is now inoperable at best, and ineffectual at worst.
The article continues: “That’s because there’s been some negative evidence about diet sodas messing up your metabolism, and that’s been something people have noticed in the news,” said Tufts University food economist William Masters. Today’s consumers are looking for naturalness and simplicity. “Clean food,” he said. “Food that has only ingredients you can pronounce.”
Bill took care not to say “there’s evidence OF diet sodas messing up your metabolism”. Instead, he went with “evidence ABOUT your metabolism”.
[image]
Bill Masters, Food Economist, Tufts University)
The image is off center so that her left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like Bill, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
He figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
I’m unsure if Bill wrote the careful, devious copy himself, or whether it was handed to him by his up-line in the Organization.
In October 2017, FoodNavigator-USA’s Elaine Watson put her fist in the air and cried “Coca-Cola blasts ‘meritless’ diet soda lawsuit”.
The cola beverage whose packaging is in the colors of the Nazi flag was hilarious being sued “because they knew Diet Soda makes you fat, and called it “diet”, anyway”.
Diet Soda builds desire and decreases satisfaction. Splenda flies ate 30 percent more calories than the control, and when they took away the artificially sweetened food, the effect vanished.
In a U.S. News story from January 2020, you can see how another similar case had to be pushed all the way up to a Federal appeals court to get its just verdict overturned:
January 1, 2020 - ’Diet’ soda doesn’t have to lead to weight loss, court rules - A federal appeals court sided with the makers of Diet Dr Pepper against allegations of false advertising, saying "no reasonable consumer" expects to lose weight from drinking diet soda”.
As you can see, there are bloodline-related generational Satanists up at the top of all the control pyramids, including the legal system.
In November 2017, lifestartseminars.com said “Bravo! U.S. Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption Dropping”.
Where “dropping” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author doesn’t offer any suggestion as to why the great societal change was taking place. The duplicitous “U.S.” sugar consumption dropping is a ruse to keep you from recognizing that the phenomenon is taking place regardless of culture or geography.
In December 2017, Grub Street pretended not to be an advertising agency and said “President Trump Reportedly Drinks 12 Diet Cokes Per Day”.
Hey, that’s the same 12 diet cokes a day that Parkinson’s-afflicted Michael J. Fox used to drink! Or perhaps he still does.
Aspartame is made up of two amino acids, phenylalanine and aspartic acid, and methyl alcohol. It’s a dry-drunk thing - Trump is a recovering alcoholic. And it’s not even the good ethyl alcohol. It’s the make-you-go-blind, wood-stump-water Methyl alcohol. Because that’s how generational Satanists roll.
Author Marwa Eltagouri threw “reportedly” in there to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone must have reported that incorrectly!” or, “oh, but that was just one report!”. As a propagandist, Marwa knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
Here’s In January 2018, popsugar.com apologized with “Sorry, but Here Are 5 Important Reasons You Should Stop Drinking Diet Soda”.
In January 2018, cheatsheet.com pretended that it was not, in fact, an advertising agency and said “2 of the 3 Richest People in the World Drink This First Thing in the Morning”.
That click-bait headline from the Fascist lapdog “cheatsheet” is referring to Diet Coke:
“Worth $90.3 billion, Buffett just barely falls short of Gates’ fortune (if there is a way for a billionaire to “fall short,” that is). The 87-year-old … He used his Diet Coke consumption as an example of why increasing efficiency allows us to consume more (soda, in this instance) rather than less.”
You might have noticed that the outgoing Teleprompter-reader known as “our President” is also addicted to it.
In January 2018, an article I can no longer locate said “The Real Reason You Should Be Worried About The New Diet Coke”.
“The Diet Coke you’re used to is going to be the exact stuff you’re drinking now, with one exception: the new can. The new Diet Coke can is going to be taller and slimmer. I actually like the idea because that should make it a little grippier, but there’s one problem; how will it fit in your drink holders?
Since a programmed sociopath will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how, er, slim, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility, the author doesn’t trouble them with statistics like “drinking one artificially sweetened beverage a day increases your risk of stroke and dementia by three-fold compared to drinking less than one a week, while sugar-sweetened beverages are not associated with stroke or dementia.”
In the future, grade school children will marvel that a beverage that tripled stroke and dementia was even legal for sale, let alone happily consumed by the general populace despite that knowledge. Yet such are the times in which we live.
In January 2018, the U.K.’s Daily Mail said “Lord Falconer: my diet left me addicted to diet coke”.
That click-bait headline covers this ruse:
“Lord Falconer (pictured after his diet in 2016) has been left with a much trimmer figure after his crash diet - but he revealed that it has also left him ‘completely addicted’ to Diet Coke and drinking vast quantities of the caffeinated drink.”
They’re telling a Big Lie with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty, pretending that drinking diet soda does not, in fact, make you fatter - which it does.
In January 2018, Fortune said “Diet Coke Is In Decline. And the Latest Revamp Might Not Help”.
Where they used “decline” because it’s softer than “drop”, and because it’s general, and because it echoes the word “recline”. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: “More than a decade after soda consumption’s peak, Diet Coke demand is declining especially sharply.”
Where “especially” sharply makes the dim, childlike subconscious think “special!” They repeated the use of “decline” because it’s softer than “drop”, and because it’s general, and because it echoes the word “recline”.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
“Sharply” is also general, despite the deceptive and childish “especially” taped onto its front end.
In January 2018, the moronically named delish.com pretended that they were not, in fact an advertising agency with “Lime-A-Rita Shades Diet Coke on Twitter Over Their New Flavors”.
Author Eileen Reslen went on to say “Lime-A-Rita tweeted Diet Coke Thursday complimenting the popular soda company over their new beverage, but also implied the brand was copying them.”
“Delish.com” is, with a straight face, calling a company whose sales are dropping at free-fall speeds “popular”. Say what you will about our literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist friends, there is simply no quit in them.
In January 2018, Patch.com, bravely pretending they’re not advertising copywriters, said “Diet Coke, Facing Sales Drop, Tries Out New Flavors, Sleek Can.”
Where “facing” sales drop is a lie, in that the catastrophic sales drop began long previously. Sales “drop” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“Sleek can” is another treacly lie, in that your ass will become fatter, not sleeker, if you consume diet soda.
trea·cle - noun
1.BRITISH
a thick, sticky dark syrup made from partly refined sugar; molasses.
- cloying sentimentality or flattery.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “befuddled”.
That’s why a HuffPost article from January 2018 is headlined “Diet Coke’s Millennial-Inspired Makeover Leaves People Befuddled”.
HuffPost is bravely pretending they have no idea that consuming just one diet soda per day triples your risk of stroke and dementia, and that the public has awakened to that fact.
In January 2018, bevindustry.com said “Although the fizzy drink still dominates the zero-calorie soda drinks category, Diet Coke’s dollar sales fell by 3.7% in 2017”.
Where the author hedged “sells fell by 3.7%” back to “DOLLAR sales fell by 3.7%”. It’s the sort of detail most people don’t notice.
The author said “FELL by 3.7%” because “fell” is softer than “dropped”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
[image]
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost”, by John Milton, 1667)
In January 2018, the Satanically named “hellogiggles.com” pretended they were not in fact an advertising agency by writing “Diet Coke’s new flavors and makeover have a total La Croix vibe”.
“Hellogiggles” contains the word “hell”, and three Masonic g’s, with two in succession. They’re pretending they have no idea that consuming one diet soda per day triples rise of stroke and dementia.
Here’s a picture of author Madison Vanderberg, in a Satanic purple dress, with a Satanic green Kabbalist “tree of life” carefully included in the background, and where her arms are crossed in a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”:
[image]
(Madison Vanderberg)
The image is off center so that her left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like Madison, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
She figured that she would never notice all of the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In January 2018, The Herald Review pretended they were not in fact an advertising agency by saying “104-year old woman owes it all to Diet Coke”.
They’re pretending that they don’t know that consumption of diet soda at least daily is associated with a 36 percent increased risk of metabolic syndrome compared with not consuming any.
In January 2018, the U.K.’s Independent ran the same commercial, with a slightly different headline, to keep the wholly-credulous, mouth-breathing rubes over I the U.K. from catching on: “Key to long life is drinking lots of Diet Coke, says 104-year-old woman”.
They’re a generational Satanist propaganda organ, using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty. To the top of its organization, the Independent has no idea about the tripling of stroke and dementia, or the 36% increased risk of metabolic syndrome, a product far, far deadlier than government-controlled beer, wine and liquor.
In March 2018, “tasteofhome” ran the same commercial, with a slightly different headline, to keep the wholly-credulous, mouth-breathing rubes back over in the U.S. from catching on: “104-Year-Old Woman Says Diet Coke Is Key to Longevity”. Remember, we learned previously that diet soda drinkers are 26% more likely to die prematurely than non diet soda drinkers.
Here’s a picture of 104-year-old generational Satanist shill Theresa Rowley, in a Satanic purple and green blouse:
[image]
(Theresa Rowley)
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
Can you see how she’s widening her eyes to retain the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty?
The image is off center so that her left eye is the focal point, because, to generational Satanists like the aged Ms. Rowley, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
She figured that she would never notice the coded visual imagery.
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
January 2018 - ‘Because I Can’: Diet Coke Launches Campaign to Support Rebrand
The soda company’s new TV spots send a youthful, libertarian and, even, audacious message
The new commercial features a young woman, the actress Gillian Jacobs who stars in “Love” on Netflix buying a new tall, slim Diet Coke. Jacobs buys a Diet Coke and speaks directly to the camera. “Look, here’s the thing about Diet Coke. It’s delicious. It makes me feel good. Life is short. If you want to live in a yurt, yurt it up. If you want to run in a marathon, I mean, that sounds super hard, but OK. I mean, just do you…”
“Satanism was never about worshipping the devil. It’s about man being his own god on earth. You do not worship anything except yourself.”
Marilyn Manson
[image]
(Mr. Manson is giving a stiff and obvious sign with his left hand because he’s a Satanist, a follower of the left hand path.
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”)
I’ve included Marilyn Manson’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of fairly significant influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Now, here’s a picture of Gillian Jacobs:
[image]
(Gillian Jacobs, February 2018, in a Satanic green jacket with Satanic purple flowers over her left shoulder, drinking a Diet Coke. The image blatantly features her left eye, because, to generational Satanists like Gillian, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”. Everyone figured that she would never notice all the coded visual imagery.
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From ““Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Ms. Jacobs exhortation of “you do you” is Satanism, pure and simple. As Mr. Manson said “you do not worship anything except yourself.”
In February 2018, CMO said “Reversing Course, Diet Pepsi Goes All-In on Aspartame”.
Here we can clearly see the madness of the collapsing Empire. But, say what you will about our literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist friends, there’s simply no quit in them.
In May 2018, money.usnews.com widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “The Coca-Cola Company (KO) Stock Will Make a Comeback in 2019”.
Well, if that’s true, why is a seekingalpha.com article from November 2019 headlined “Moody’s drops Coca-Cola a notch”?
It’s not true. U.S. News is lying bald-facedly. I have exposed their duplicity through what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Can you see how “drops Coca-Cola a notch” is general? As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the positive change I’m documenting here.
For the record, it was a 1.9% decrease.
In May 2018, seekingalpha.com widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “Coca-Cola Stock Ready For 2018 Run After Impressive Diversification”. Since we just learned that Coca Cola’s net income decreased 38% from September 2017 to September 2018, we know that seekingalpha.com is lying bald-facedly. I’ve exposed their duplicity through what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
Their hilarious “Impressive diversification” is Mil-Speak for “forced to sell less-deadly drinks or go out of business”.
In July 2018, investopedia.com said “Coca-Cola Seen Falling 14% Despite Strong Results”.
The word “falling” was used because it’s it’s softer than “dropping”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
[image]
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Led Zeppelin’s “Presence”)
I hate to break this to you, but a 14% decrease in stock price has never and will never be produced by “strong results”.
Diet Soda makes you fat. That’s why an inc.com article from August 2018 explains “Here’s the Science That Explains Why Drinking Diet Soda Makes You Gain Weight”.
The article goes on to say “It makes you feel entitled to eat more. But since drinking the diet soda has fooled your body into expecting sugar, it’s changed the way you metabolize those other calories–you may store more of them as fat and use fewer of them as energy–which could leave you hungry and wanting even more food.”
It’s a scam that only a literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist Freemason could think up. You know, generational Satanists like Scottish Right Freemasons like the creators of Dr. Pepper, Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Canada Dry Ginger Ale and 7-Up.
In November 2018, the U.K.’s Daily Mail pretended it was not, in fact an advertising agency with “Diet Coke cans that are near empty are worth thousands on eBay.”
From 2019 to 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%, year-over-year. Pymnts.com said it was because of “COVID resurgences and lockdown measures”.
As of January 2019, soda consumption in the U.S. had decreased for 13 straight years.
Diet Soda makes you fat. That’s why an mtlfitness.com article from January 2019 reads “But diet soda packs on the pounds as well—it’s just more passive-aggressive about it.” It’s not in any way passive-aggressive. That is, other than the name of the product, “Diet Soda”.
Rest assured, the controlled press does what it can to prop up the lie, as seen in an insider.com article from January 2019 headlined “Drinking Diet Coke will help you lose weight, sports nutritionist claims”. The propagandist from mtlfitness.com knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how, er, thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In January 2019, yahoo.com pretended that it was not an advertising agency with “Diet Coke releases two new flavors to make you forget it’s winter”.
In January 2019, USA Today pretended that it was not an advertising agency with “Strawberry Guava Diet Coke? Yes, that’s now a thing”.
In February 2019, cbsnews.com pretended it was not an advertising agency with “Delta and Coca-Cola apologize for napkins some passengers call ‘creepy’.”
Creepy – adjective (informal) - Causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.
Wikipedia: The state of creepiness has been associated with “feeling scared, nervous, anxious or worried”, “awkward or uncomfortable”, “vulnerable or violated” in a study conducted by Watt et al.
The word goes back to Old Engl. crēopel and its doublet crypel (with y by umlaut from u, as in crupon, above). Obviously, in the remote past, creep had a broader meaning than it has today. Eorþcrypel meant “paralyzed person” (eorþ “earth”), someone unable to rise from the “earth.”
The article continues: “Delta and Coca-Cola are apologizing for napkins that encourage passengers to give fellow flyers their phone numbers. The Diet Coke-branded napkins read, “because you are on a plane full of interesting people and hey … you never know.” On the back of each napkin are spaces to write a name and phone number. The backs also include a suggestion: “be a little old school. write down your number and give it your plane crush. you never know …”
People took to social media calling the napkins creepy and urging the airline to drop them. One user called the napkins a "swing and a miss.”
In 2020, the 5.5% decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 133% greater, or well more than double its long-term average annual decrease of 2.36% from 2014 through 2020.
The great positive societal change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
In 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%, year-over-year. Foodbev.com’s Emma Upshall said it was because of “pandemic pressure”.
In 2020, calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 5.5%. Beverage Daily’s Rachel Arthur omitted the percentage from the headline, where she referred to it only-generally as “significant”. It was the largest decrease in history. Rachel did what little she could to hedge by saying it was “the largest since the start of the BCI”.
In the 4th Quarter of 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 5%, year-over-year.
In 2021, Coca-Cola’s brand value decreased by 13%, year-over-year.
On February 10, 2021, foodbev.com said “Coca-Cola posts 11% drop in 2020 amid pandemic pressure”.
Where author Emma Upshall bravely said “posts 11% drop” to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone at Coca-Cola most have posted that incorrectly!” As a propagandist, Emma knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
She said “drop” because it’s softer than “decreased”, but mostly as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
[image]
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost’, by John Milton, 1667)
The article goes on to say “The Coca-Cola Company has recorded a 11% decline in net revenue for the full-year, following ‘incremental pressure’ amid the pandemic during Q4.”
Where Emma brazenly tweaked it from “posts 11% decrease” to “recorded a 11% decline” to to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone at Coca-Cola most have recorded that incorrectly!” It’s a smorgasbord, you see. One of the hooks will be bitten upon.
As a propagandist, Emma knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
As a bonus, she walked the “pandemic pressure” from the headline back to merely “incremental pressure”.
In 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%. Foodbev.com’s Emma Upshall said it was because of “pandemic pressure”.
In April 2021, in the midst of Coca-Cola’s exponentially decreasing revenue, the Motley Fool lied bald-facedly with “Coca-Cola Is Back to Growth. But Will It Last***?***” Remember, we just learned that Coca-Cola’s brand value decreased by 13% in 2021.
I have exposed the duplicity of the Motley Fool by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
On October 14, 2021, beveragedaily.com said “ ‘Significant reduction’ in consumer calories from beverages in the US”.
Where author Rachel Arthur said “significant reduction” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential decrease in soda consumption which she is attempting to obfuscate. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
She put “significant reduction” into quotes to call it into question. Then she said “beverages” to redact the word “soda”, to make the subject almost unsearchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Then, lastly, she said “in the US” to imply that everyone in all the other nations was still drinking lots of, er, beverages. As a propagandist, she’s attempting to “compartmentalize” the damage merely to the U.S.
In journalistic parlance, she “buried” this in the body text below: “calories per person from soda declined by 5.5% in 2020, leading to a total reduction of 11.8% since 2014.”
Then, for good measure, she “buried” this another few paragraphs lower down “it was the largest single-year reduction since the start of the BCI”. Where Rachel bravely did what little she could to hedge by saying “since the start of the BCI”, all to avoid plainly stating “In 2020, calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 5.5%. It was the largest decrease in history.”
From 2014 to 2020 calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 11.8%.
From 2014 to 2020, the average annual decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 2.36%.
In 2020, the 5.5% decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 133% greater, or well more than double its long-term average annual decrease of 2.36% from 2014 through 2020.
The great societal positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
Here’s Rachel Arthur’s picture, in a Satanic purple blouse:
[image]
(Beverage Daily’s Rachel Arthur, in a Satanic purple blouse. She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In the 4th Quarter of 2021, Coca-Cola’s pre-tax income decreased by 75%. The curiously-uncredited author from seekingalpha.com said that it was because of “a one-time non-cash expense”, that “there’s no reason to be alarmed” and that it was “an opportunity”.
Prices increase either when supply decreases, demand increases, or both. In the first nine months of 2022, in the face of exponentially decreasing demand, soft drink prices increased by 14%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest said it was because of an “elasticity bonanza”. Oh, it’s a Bonanza, all right.
As you can see, the law of supply-and-demand as it has been described to you does not, in fact, exist.
Say what you will about them, only literally-blood-drinking Illuminists could turn the screws to their dwindling pool of remaining addicts like this.
On February 4, 2022, seekingalpha.com said “Coca-Cola Consolidated: The Post-Earnings Drop Is An Opportunity”.
Where the uncredited author from seekingalpha.com said “post-earnings drop” because, as a propagandist, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and their hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential decrease in soda consumption which they are attempting to obfuscate. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
In journalistic parlance, they’ve “buried” this in the body text below:
“The Q4 results showed a pre-tax income drop of 75%. But there’s no reason to be alarmed as this was caused by a one-time non-cash expense.”
In the 4th Quarter of 2021, Coca-Cola’s pre-tax income decreased by 75%. The curiously-uncredited author from seeking alpha said that it was because of “a one-time non-cash expense”, that “there’s no reason to be alarmed” and that it was “an opportunity”.
In the first nine months of 2022, Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 2.3%, while Diet Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 1%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest didn’t offer any suggestion as to what might have caused the decreases. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
“I am a traditionalist when it comes to Diet Coke…I prefer it the way God made it: cold, fizzy, gently acidic at the tip of your tongue building to a vigorous spark at the back of your throat.”
Elamin Abdelmahmoud, buzzfeed.com, August 12, 2022
“I’m a Diet Coke addict like Elon Musk: ‘I love the burning down my esophagus’ “
Jeanette Settembre, the New York Post, January 21, 2023
-
“Horizontal propaganda thus is very hard to make (particularly because it needs so many instructors), but it is exceptionally efficient through its meticulous encirclement of everybody, through the effective participation of all present, and through their public declarations of adherence. It is peculiarly a system that seems to coincide perfectly with egalitarian societies claiming to be based on the will of the people and calling themselves democratic: each group is composed of persons who are alike, and one actually can formulate the will of such a group. But all this is ultimately much more stringent and totalitarian than explosive propaganda. Thanks to this system Mao has succeeded in passing from subversive propaganda to integration propaganda.”
― From “Propaganda: the Formation of Men’s Attitudes”, by Jacques Ellul, 1973
“Propaganda works best when those who are being manipulated are confident they are acting on their own free will.”
- Joseph Goebbels
On August 12, 2022, buzzfeednews.com said “I’ll Be Drinking Diet Coke Till I Die”
Buzzfeed author Elamin Abdelmahmoud has written what is known in the propaganda trade as a “hit-piece”. Where, with “Till I Die”, he’s fighting a brave but ultimately hopeless rearguard action, rebutting the fact that Diet soda increases the risk of deadly stroke by 200%.
The subhead reads “Ben Affleck’s favorite soda is 40 years old this week.” For grade school children studying the subject in the future, I will note that this is, poignantly, as good as it gets for a populace that utterly lacks any sort of spiritual life.
Elamin’s article goes on to say “I’m a Diet Coke person. This is an immutable truth about me, as unchangeable as my height or my name. It is an unsentimental truth: The Delaware runs through Philadelphia; I’m a Diet Coke guy. I relish the sound of a can opening, the ahhh, the fizzzz when the drink meets cubes of ice. That shit is like ASMR to me. When I order Diet Coke at a restaurant and I am offered Diet Pepsi as a substitute, I grimace in displeasure. I’d much rather be drinking Diet Coke than any other drink.”
This insane refusal to abandon a compromised position is a microcosm of the larger situation that the generational Satanist cabal finds itself trapped within.
Here’s a picture of Saint Affleck from the article:
[image]
(Ben Affleck and Matt Damon are seen carrying cans of Diet Coke on the set of “Untitled Nike Movie” on June 28, 2022, in Los Angeles.)
“I am a traditionalist when it comes to Diet Coke, which is to say: No, I have not tried the DIY Diet Coke trend that is going around right now, where TikTokers are encouraged to mix sparkling water and balsamic vinegar, because I do not want to DIY my Diet Coke. I prefer it the way God made it: cold, fizzy, gently acidic at the tip of your tongue building to a vigorous spark at the back of your throat.”
The in-your-face blasphemy of “the way God made it”.
The esophageal cancer meme of “building to a vigorous spark at the back of your throat”.
On November 9, 2022, beverage-digest.com said “Soft Drinks at Retail: Pricing Up +14% Amid Elasticity Bonanza. Volume Drops -2.0%”.
In the first nine months of 2022, as manufacturers turned the screws to their steadily-dwindling pool of addicts, soft drink prices increased by 14%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest said it was “amid elasticity bonanza”.
In the first nine months of 2022, Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 2.3%, while Diet Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 1%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest didn’t offer any suggestion as to what might have caused the decreases. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
On January 21, 2023, the New York Post said “I’m a Diet Coke addict like Elon Musk: ‘I love the burning down my esophagus’
Where author Jeanette Settembre is rubbing the unrepentant, incorrigible American-Asshole thing right in your incredulous face.
And she has brazenly repeated the “esophageal cancer” meme that Buzzfeed’s Elamin Abdelmahmoud did in the article that we just reviewed previously. It’s an instructive example of the minutea within what is known as “horizontal propaganda”.
The article goes on to say “Diet Coke is a vice Theresa Amrhein can’t seem to quit.” And the New York Post thought that she deserved a feature article in a major newspaper.
incorrigible - adjective - (of a person or their tendencies) not able to be corrected, improved, or reformed.
unrepentant - adjective - showing no regret for one’s wrongdoings
brazen - adjective - bold and without shame.
asshole - noun - a stupid, irritating, or contemptible person.
The hit-piece staggers on, like an undead zombie:
“The 33-year-old Upper East Sider tries to follow a healthy lifestyle. She walks up to 10 miles a day, goes meat-free at lunch and does intermittent fasting — resulting in her losing 20 pounds. But, try as she might, she’s still hooked on Diet Coke. Though she bought a SodaStream to kick her artificially flavored, zero-calorie habit, she’s only managed to wean herself down from four 12-ounce cans per day to two.
“I am a Diet Coke addict,” Amrhein told The Post. “First step is admitting you have a problem.”
She keeps her pantry stocked with mini-cans to satisfy her cravings, her apartment walls are adorned with old Diet Coke ads and even her Christmas tree is hung with a glittery can. Once or twice a week, she’ll head to McDonald’s for some fizz on tap: “Fountain Diet Coke is truly life,” she enthused.”
And, now, here’s the girl who deserves to have her picture in a feature article in one of the nation’s major newspapers:
[image]
Diet Coke addict Theresa Amrhein, who said “I love the burning down my esophagus”. Can you see how the photo features her left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Theresa, the Left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the Eye of Horus”.)
I have included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist shill of marginal influence looks like.
Shill - noun - an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
The article goes on to say “On Monday, Elon Musk posted a photo on Twitter of his ring-stained night stand littered with four cans of caffeine-free Diet Coke. “Diet Coke is amazing, especially the soda fountain version at movie theaters with salt & butter popcorn,” he tweeted in June.
Here’s one of the pictures from the New York Post article, of Elon Musk’s nightstand, with Diet Coke cans…and a revolver:
[image]
(Photo of Elon Musk’s nightstand, with Diet Coke cans and revolver. Can you see how the photo features his left eye? That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like Elon, the Left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the Eye of Horus”. The photo editors at the New York Post figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
Elon (and the New York Post) threw the revolver in there to maximize the “unrepentant, incorrigible American Asshole” meme. Did you notice how, with “his ring-stained night stand littered with four cans of caffeine-free Diet Coke” the New York Post’s Jeanette Settembre scrupulously redacted the inflammatory, ridiculous revolver?
I have included Elon’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist of rapidly-decreasing influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.Jeanette soldiers on:
“Four cans is child’s play against Donald Trump’s reported 12 Diet Cokes per day habit; he even summoned the cans to the Oval Office with the push of a red button. Late Chanel fashion designer Karl Lagerfeld reportedly downed up to 10 Diet Cokes — served in a Lalique crystal goblet — in a day, telling Harper’s Bazaar in 2012: “I drink Diet Coke from the minute I get up to the minute I go to bed. I can even drink it in the middle of the night and I can sleep.” Supermodel Kate Moss was even anointed the creative director of Diet Coke in July (“I’ve always loved coke,” she joked at the launch).”
Trump, the psychotic, drinking 12 Diet Cokes a day when one’s enough to kill you. Lagerfeld, the psychotic, drinking a caffeinated beverage to induce sleep. Kate, the psychotic coke-head, smirking in code talk.
They’re all psychotics, all sociopaths.
Here’s the picture of Donald Trump that the New York Post used in the article, where he’s wearing a Satanic purple tie, and where the image is carefully crafted so that his left eye is the focal point. That’s because, to followers of the Left-hand path like the Donald, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”. They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
[image]
(Donald Trump, in a Satanic purple tie, eating McDonalds French fries and drinking a Diet Coke. The image is carefully crafted so that his left eye is the focal point.)
I have included the Donald’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist of rapidly-decreasing influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Now here’s author Jeanette Settembre’s picture, where she’s making a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”, and where her left eye is the focal point of the image:
[image]
(Jeanette Settembre)
That’s because, to barely-closeted Illuminists like Jeanette, the left eye is “the eye of Will” or “the eye of Horus”.
She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
And, now, for any lingering Coincidence theorists huffing and puffing in the readership, here’s an historical depiction of purportedly-secret Masonic “gestures” of recognition:
[image]
(Historic depiction of purportedly-secret Masonic “gestures of recognition”.
Can you see how, in the image immediately above, the person depicted in the mid right is using a gesture that’s identical to the one that Jeanette is in preceding photo?
I have included Jeanette’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How much time do you think that they have left in power, now?
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, January 23, 2023
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
