"One mark of a great soldier is that he fight on his own terms or fights not at all.”
From “The Art of War”, by Sun Tzu, 5th Century B.C.
(image)
(Bruce Lee, blindfolded Chi Sao. Chi Sao (Chi Sau) or “sticking hands” is unique to Wing Chun. This technique helps students to develop their reflexes, sensitivity, structure and form)
Though hordes of devils fill the land
All threatening to devour us,
We tremble not, unmoved we stand;
They cannot overpower us.
Let this world’s tyrant rage;
In battle we’ll engage!
His might is doomed to fail;
God’s judgment must prevail!
One little word subdues him.
From “A Mighty Fortress is our God”, by Martin Luther, 1531
“The best fighter is never angry.”
― From “Tao Te Ching”, by Lao Tzu, 6th Century B.C.
[image]
**(**Michelle Yeoh as Shu Lien from “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon”, 2000)
Water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; the soldier works out his victory in relation to the foe whom he is facing.”
― From “The Art of War”, by Sun Tzu, 5th Century B.C.
SHOVELNOSE STURGEON
In June 2007, on in-depthoutdoor.com, Keymaster Brian Klawitter said "Here’s the new MN State Record Shovelnose Sturgeon that was caught out of Everts Resort near Redwing, MN. The info I have so far follows:
Nelia Rhose, 5 pounds, 9 oz, 36″ long, 11 7/8 Girth. Here’s the old record…Sturgeon, Shovelnose: 5–5, Mississippi River (Goodhue)."
Did you notice how, despite loving him some fish that it’s his side job, agent Klawitter blew the smoke of "the info I have so far ", then carefully omitted the date of the previous record?
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
He also took care not to mention the margin between the records, which is another example of, wait for it, “compartmentalization”.
I had to look up a separate article to learn that it was set in 1996. Then I was forced to do the math to learn that, in 2007, the Minnesota state record for shovelnose sturgeon, set in 1996, was broken by 4.7%, increasing from 5 pounds, 5 ounces to 5 pounds, 9 ounces.
That’s an average annual increase in size of .29% over each of those 16 years.
In May 2012, the Mankato Free Press said “Cross: For Mankato man, hauling inshovelnose sturgeon comes with a catch”.
Where, spectacularly, the name of the state (Minnesota), the word “state” and the world “record” are all omitted, to make the subject far less searchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The article goes on to say “The fish measured 40 inches long and tipped Michel’s fairly accurate digital scale at 8 pounds, 3 ounces.”
Where agent Cross called the hyper-accurate digital scale “fairly accurate”, to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist the green light to say “oh, but that scale was innacurrate!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article goes on to say “According to Lee Sundmark, the supervisor of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Hutchinson Fisheries Office, a shovelnose sturgeon of that size truly is a big one. Indeed, the current state record listed in the 2012 Minnesota Fishing Regulations booklet is a 5-pound, 9-ounce fish caught from the Mississippi River.”
Where Lee Sundmark, the supervisor of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Hutchinson Fisheries Office, called by far the biggest shovelnose sturgeon ever seen in Minnesota merely “big”. As a bonus, he put a little Mayonnaise on it with “truly big”.
The article goes on to say "But the catch to Waugh’s catch is that with the exception of the Mississippi River downstream from Red Wing, shovelnose sturgeon are protected in Minnesota waters as a species of special concern. To qualify for a state record, a fish must be weighed on a certified scale. Such scales are usually found in a butcher shop, a grocery store, a bait shop. Rarely in a fishing boat.
Taking the fish to such a place, even with the intent of eventually returning the fishing into the river, would have been illegal. So after a few quick photographs, the state record fish was slipped back into the Minnesota River."
Cross, who, like Sundmark, professes to loves him some fish like it’s his job, omits any mention of the margin betweent the old record and this new record. Or, it would be, unless the Feds threw it out on a technicality.
So I had to do the math to learn that the largest shovelnose sturgeon ever caught in Minnesota, from 2012, unofficially broke the Minnestoa state record from 2007 by 43.5%, increasing from 5 pounds, 9 ounces to 8 pounds, 3 ounces.
That’s an average annual increase in size of 8.7% per year over each of those five years.
The 5% average annual increase in size of the shovelnose sturgeon in Minnesota from 2007 to 2012 is 2,900% greater than the .29% average annual increase in size of the Minnesota state record shovelnose sturgeon from 1996 to 2007.
The growth rate of the shovelnose sturgeon in Minnesota is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
That’s not supposed to be scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organism increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size.
Further, I believe it is proof that it is the longevity of the largemouth bass that is increasing, as fish continue to grow until they die.
That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In March 2014, outdoornews.com said “Book it: New state record fish pulled from the Rock ”. For the record, they’re talking about Illinois.
Where, under the false guise of familiarity, author Javier Serna omitted the name of the state, the name of the fish, and the word “river”, all to make the subject far less searchable. Those are three different examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Larry Morine caught a 9.51-pound shovelnose sturgeon on the Rock River in Whiteside County on Aug. 31, setting a new record fairly close to where the last record shovelnose sturgeon was caught in 2003.
The author carefully omits mention of the weight of the previous record holder. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s a photo of Javier, in which he’s using purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gestures that he figures the rubes will never notice:
[image]
(Javier Serna, Outdoor News, purportedly-secret Illuminist “thumb’s up” hand gestures that he figures the rubes will never notice)
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “incredible”. That’s why a fox2now.com article from January 2022 said “The IDNR reports that Marty Gustafson caught, weighed, and released a 10.51-pound shovelnose sturgeon on Dec. 12. This will likely set a new Illinois record for the species. Incredibly, this fish betters a 9.88-pound state-record shovelnose sturgeon that Gustafson’s nephew, Troy Gustafson, caught on Nov. 16 from the same Rock River. The previous record was a 9.51-pound shovelnose caught in 2013 from the Rock River.”
The author, Outdoor Life’s Bob McNally, is shaking the doll of the nephew to distract you from the margin between the records, which they’ve described with the hedging generality “betters”, in lieu of the far more impactful, specific statistic documenting the margin between the records, which statistic I was forced to do the math to learn. That’s an example of the propaganda technique called “compartmentalization”.
Here’s Bob McNally’s picture, where he’s using the same purportedly-secret “thumb’s up” hand gesture that his fellow conspirator Javier Serna is in the photo immediately preceding this one:
[image]
(Outdoor Life’s Bob McNally using a purportedly-secret “thumb’s-up” hand gesture that he figures the rubes will never notice)
In 2021, the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon from 2013 was broken by 10.5%, increasing from 9.51 pounds to 10.51 pounds.
Yes, the 2013 record was broken in November 2021, and was broken again in December 2021 by the Uncle of the kid who caught the record the month previous. That’s remarkable, not so much because they’re related, but because there are obviously suddenly a bunch of much larger shovelnose sturgeon swimming around.
The size of the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon increased by 10.5% from August 2013 to December 2021. That’s an average annual increase in size of .106% per month over each of those 99 months.
In November 2021, the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon from August 2013 was broken by 3.89%, increasing from 9.51 pounds to 9.88 pounds. That’s an average monthly increase in size of .036% over each of those 98 months.
In December 2021, the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon from November 2021 was broken by 6.4%, increasing from 9.88 pounds to 10.51 pounds.
The 6.4% increase in size of the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon from November 2021 to December 2021 is 17,667% greater than the .036% baseline average monthly increase in size of the species there from August 2013 to December 2021.
The 6.4% increase in size of the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon from November 2021 to December 2021 is 64% greater than the 3.89% increase in size of the species there from August 2013 to November 2021.
The growth rate of the Illinois state record shovelnose sturgeon is increasing exponentially going forward in time. That’s not supposed to be scientifically possible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organism increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically programmed maximum size.
Further, I believe it is proof that it is the longevity of the largemouth bass that is increasing, as fish continue to grow until they die.
That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
And these examples from Illinois and Minnesota show that the growth rate of the shovelnose sturgeon is increasing exponentially, going forward in time, regardless of geography.