Be careful if you share this with someone addicted to NPR, their head might explode like the aliens in that movie ‘Mars Attacks’:
[image]
(Alien whose head is about to explode, from “Mars Attacks”, 1996)
In January 2013, beechtreenews.com said “Record harvest in 2012-13 for Kentucky deer hunters”.
I’m sure you noticed how “record harvest” is terse, and general - there’s nothing to compare it to.
That’s quite deliberate, in that the author knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headline. It’s a hedging generality, put forward to blunt an specific awareness as to the quantum increase taking place in the deer population that I’m documenting here.
So you have to read the article to learn that “Hunters bagged 131,388 whitetails of which 56 percent were male and 44 percent female. Firearms hunters reported taking 95,612 deer while archers harvested 18,705 deer. Muzzleloader hunters took 14,583 deer and crossbow hunters, 2,488 deer.
The previous record harvest of 124,752 occurred during the 2004-05 season.”
If only thirty to forty percent of our original readers are left, what percentage of that remaining minority will be doing the math, here?
The presentation of figures without analysis is another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to do the math to learn that the record deer harvest in Kentucky in 2012-13 was 5% larger than the previous record from 2004-2005). Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. 5% is a see-the-needle-moving population increase.
The establishment explanation? “We had exceptionally good weather, with no rainouts over the three weekends of modern gun season this past November,” said David Yancy, deer biologist for the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. “Coupled with that, we had an average to below average mast (acorn) crop. Deer had to search for food and that made it more likely they would be seen by hunters.”
Wait, what? Well, if that’s true, that the acorn crop in Kentucky was average to below average in 2012, like the Kentucky State deer biologist said, then why was it “banner” year, and close to 40% above 2011 in Ohio, which shares a border with Kentucky?
“According to the DNR Division of Wildlife. The acorn mast of 2012 in Ohio nearly matched the banner year of 2010. The overall number of white oak trees producing acorns increased 36 percent from 2011, and the number of red oak trees producing acorns increased by 9 percent.”
I’ve just exposed the duplicity of the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources deer biologist David Nancy by using what was known in the old days as fact-checking”.
To maintain current programming levels, stop reading immediately, breathe through your mouth, and bitterly aver, “yeah, but that’s there.”
Here’s David Yancy’s picture:
[image]
(David Nancy, to right, deer biologist, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife, who described a banner mast harvest close to 40% above the previous year’s as “average to below average”)
I’ve included Mr. Yancy’s picture so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the mast harvest in Kentucky.
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, October 13, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at Positive Changes That Are Occurring - Orgones Discussion Forums
