“But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing.”
From “The Rights of Man”, by Thomas Paine, 1791
This article, while in development, is ground-breaking enough that I want to get it out there immediately.
The age record for the Tiger Shark increased 100%, or doubled, from some obfuscated prior date to 2016.
Dana Bethea, a NOAA research ecologist,…admitted she was in total disbelief when she researched the tagging date. It would set an all-time “at liberty” record for NOAA’s tagging program. Stunned, she called other staff members into her office to confirm the findings.”
‘It’s a big deal’, Bethea said in a NOAA report.
The age record for the bigmouth buffalo fish increased 330%, or more than quadrupled, from some obfuscated prior date to 2019.
" 'A fish that lives over 100 years? That’s a big deal,’ said Solomon David, assistant professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana, who was not involved in the study.”
LONGEVITY RECORDS ARE BEING BROKEN BY EXPONENTIAL MARGINS REGARDLESS OF SPECIES OR GEOGRAPHY
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that longevity records are being broken regardless of species or geography.
That’s because the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In August 2011, M.L. Mallory published “New Longevity Record for Ivory Gulls (Pagophilaeburnea) and Evidence of Natal Philopatry”.
I’m sure you noticed that “new longevity record” is general. M.L. Mallory knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The article goes on to say “ABSTRACT. Ivory gulls (Pagophila eburnea) have been listed as “endangered” in Canada and “near threatened” interna-tionally. In June 2010, we visited Seymour Island, Nunavut, Canada, where gulls were banded in the 1970s and 1980s. We recaptured and released two breeding gulls banded as chicks in 1983, confirming natal philopatry to this breeding colony. These gulls are more than 28 years old, making the ivory gull one of the longest-living marine bird species known in North America.
Eleven bands attached to chicks at Seymour Island, including the two reported here, are known to have been recovered; the mean survival age of these 11 birds was 10.4 ± 9.9 SD years. Lyngs (2003) reported a bird in Greenland that was at least 15 years old. On the basis of work con-ducted in the 1970s and 1980s, Thomas and MacDonald (1987) suggested that ivory gulls could live more than 15 years, and their oldest recorded bird was about 17 years old. More recent analyses indicate that adult apparent sur-vival of ivory gulls is 0.86 ± 0.04 SE, with a mean adult life expectancy of 6.9 ± 1.4 yr (Stenhouse et al., 2004). However, three (12%) of the 25 birds used in that survival analysis lived 9.2 – 19.2 years. Since then, one other bird, banded after hatch year, was reported deceased after 23.9 years (Lutmerding and Love, 2010), meaning that it was…”
Can you see how almost every single bird year has a decimal point after it? The people who banded the new record holder as a chick in 1983 estimated its age when they banded it…but M.L. Mallory, who loves them some birds like it’s their job, obfuscated the age, to shave a few percentage points off the margin between the records.
Can you see how the author used the Mil-speak “was reported deceased” in place of plainly stating “the previous longevity record holder”?
M.L. Mallory shook the doll of another non-record-breaking 2010 Ivory gull to distract you from noticing that “Thomas and MacDonald (1987) suggested that ivory gulls could live more than 15 years, and their oldest recorded bird was about 17 years old.”
Where Mallory suddenly forgot to put on his science hat and ran with “about 17 years old”. Yet, despite that careful hedging, we’ve learned that the world’s oldest Ivory Gull, from some obfuscated date prior to 2010, was 23.9 years old, and was 65% older than a prior “about 17-year-old” record holder from 1987.
Wait, what? According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from Mark Mallory, who, I must remind the reader, loves them some birds like it’s his job.
Here’s Mark’s picture:
[image]
(Mark Mallory, with Ivory Gull. Mark’s scholarly paper on the species made no suggestion as to why or how the world’s oldest Ivory Gull, from 2010, which was at least 28 years old, was 65% older than a prior “about 17-year-old” record holder from 1987.)
I’ve includes Mark’s photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all genetically-related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
In 2011, the National Shellfisheries Association’s ID Ridgeway published “New Species Longevity Record for the Northern Quahog (=Hard Clam), Mercenaria mercenaria” on Woods Hole Oceonographic Institute’s Open Access Server.
I’m sure you noticed that “new species longevity record”, while accurate, is general. It obfuscates the fact that the new longevity record is more than double that of the old record. The propagandist from Woods Hole knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The article goes on to say “Twenty-two large shells (>90 mm shell height) from a sample of live collected hard shell clams, Mercenaria mercenaria, from Buzzards Bay, Woods Hole, Cape Cod, MA, were subjected to sclerochronological analysis. Annually resolved growth lines in the hinge region and margin of the shell were identified and counted; the age of the oldest clam shell was determined to be at least 106 y. This age represents a considerable increase in the known maximum life span for M. mercenaria, more than doubling the maximum recorded life span of the species (46 y). More than 85% of the clam shells aged had more than 46 annual increments, the previous known maximum life span for the species.”
Where the author has provided the old and new records, but carefully hedged by using the general hedges “considerable increase” and “more than doubling” in place of the far more impactful statistic that I was forced to do the math to learn. The longevity record for the Northern Quahog (=Hard Clam), from 2018, is 106 years, 131% older than the previous record of 46 years from some obfuscated previous date.
For those keeping score, in journalism, a 131% increase of any kind would be called “well more than doubling” if it were generalized, as opposed to the incorrect, hedging “more than doubling” used in the scientific article from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute.
As a bonus, the author used the Mil-speak “had more than 46 annual increments”, to gymnastically avoid plainly stating “were older than the previous age record of 46 years”.
[image]
(The 106-year-old Northern Quahog (=Hard Clam), the oldest in history, from 2011, 131% older than the previous 46 year-old record holder from some obfuscated previous date. Figure 1.
Micrograph of the annual growth increments in an acetate peel replica of the shell of the oldest Mercenaria mercenaria obtained from Buzzards Bay. The positions of the annually resolved growth increments (10, 20, 40, and 75) are indicated. Disturbance lines deposited during the early phase of growth are marked by black arrows. Scale bar = 1 mm.)
The article goes on to say “The lifespan of the Northern Qahog has more than doubled. And not just in one lone specimen. 85% of the shells under discussion were past the previous age record.”
It is instructive to note that the unscientifically-described “more than 85%” of the shells collected by the earnest researchers at Woods Hole were above the previous 46-year record. So the “one genetic freak” argument cannot be used to explain away the sudden, exponential, simultaneous increase in the lifespan of the entirety of the Northern Quahog population off Cape Cod, Massachusetts in 2011. Did you notice how, in a once-again unscientific way, the author loves them some shellfish like it’s their job said that all those clams were “past the previous age record”, albeit by some unspecified degree?”
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article, who, I must remind the reader, loves them some shellfish like it’s their job. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Clearly, the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment, and there has been a major positive change in the marine environment in the Atlantic Ocean off New England.
In 2012, a 27 pound lobster was caught in Maine, the largest in the history of the state.
The article in the U.K.’s Telegraph was headlined “Lobster ‘the size of a small child’ caught in Maine”.
Where “the size of a small child”, while lurid, is general. The hedging generality omits the 27 pound weight of the record holder, and also omits mention of the fact that it was a record.
Those are both examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. “The size of a small child” is a second hedge.
[image]
(The largest and therefore oldest lobster ever caught in Maine, 2012)
It’s not just a size record, it’s a de facto longevity record. That’s why a bbc.com article from 2015 said “In other words, American lobster cells apparently don’t age in a normal way, making the lobsters biologically immortal.”
In 2013, Smithsonian Magazine tried to prop up the collapse of mean-spirited Western materialism with “Don’t Listen to the Buzz: Lobsters Aren’t Actually Immortal”.
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the lobsters.
In February 2014, seychellesseabirdgroup.wordpress.com said “New longevity record for the Bridled-Tern Sterna anaethetus”.
I’m sure you noticed that “new longevity record” is general. The propagandist from the Seychelles Seabird Group knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the general increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything.
That’s why the article goes on to say “The lives of birds are mysteries especially for the adventurous and long-ranging seabirds. There is only so much actual knowledge that you can gain about a species that spends most of its time in the air above the sea. Neither place is well suited for human beings.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. Two of those many variants are “astonishing” and the exclamation point. That’s why the article goes on to say “One such bird-a Bridled-Tern Sterna anaethetus – was caught in a mist net in 2012 by a researcher (Sjouke Anne Kingma) hoping to catch the Seychelles Warbler. The bird had a ring and a contact address ,which the researcher being a keen bird man decided to investigate. By contacting the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and providing them with the ring details he received back some astonishing news; This bird, which had unwittingly flown into his mist net was an old great grandfather bird, a bird that had been around for at least 19 years***!*** After finding this out we contacted the Seychelles Bird Records Committee and they confirmed that this was indeed the oldest on record for this species***!***”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. Two of those many variants are “astonishing” and the exclamation point. That’s why the article goes on to say “It often astonishes me how something so small with a life so treacherous can have lived this long, feeding itself on surface swimming fish and rearing young each year. The answer is simply that this bird is a perfect design by nature, a perfect example of this species in all its glory***!***”
There’s no mention in the article as to what the previous record was, or when it was set. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The steady pattern of obfuscation seen in fish records is also present here in longevity records because the same subject is being obfuscated. Namely, that the size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
I had to look up a separate article, and then do the math, to learn that the world’s oldest Bridled Tern, from 2012, was 19 years, eight months old, and was 4% older than the previous 19 year old record holder from 2007 or earlier.
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article, who, I must remind the reader, loves them some seabirds like it’s their job. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In August 2015, a flandersnews.be article said “Record oyster shell on Knokke beach”.
Where “RECORD oyster shell” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Under the false guise of familiarity, the headline omits “Belgium” and “Flanders”, and uses only the local “Knokke beach”, to further compartmentalize the information. “Record OYSTER shell” is a hedge back from “Japanese oyster”. The more general, the less searchable.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “surprised” and “exceptional”.
That’s why the article goes on to say “Our North Sea coast is full of surprises. So, imagine the excitement this week when holidaymakers from the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg made an exceptional find: an oyster shell measuring 38 centimetres. Girls Alice and Clémentine Lechat were playing on the beach at the jet-set resort of Knokke when they came across the record-breaking shell near the Zwin nature reserve. The shell measures 2.5 cm more than the largest oyster shell encountered so far.”
Where “the largest oyster shell encountered so far” is Mil-speak for “world record oyster shell”.
[image]
(The world’s oldest Oyster, Belgium, 2015, 7% older than the previous record holder from some obfuscated prior date)
[image]
(The world’s oldest Oyster, Belgium, 2015, 7% older than the previous record holder from some obfuscated prior date)
The author hedged again by allowing that the record shell was “2.5 cm more” than the previous record holder, but carefully withheld the far more impactful percentage increase between them. So, I had to do the math.
The new record shell is 7% longer than the old. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as organisms grow to a genetically-programmed maximum length, and grow in smaller and smaller increments down through time. Or so goes the rapidly collapsing Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, which holds that “there is no such thing as the ether”.
The size, fertility and longevity of any organism vary directly directly with the health of its etheric environment.
There’s clearly been some great positive change in the marine environment in Belgium.
In November 2016, floridatoday.com said “Sargent: Tagged shark catch sets longevityrecord”.
I’m sure you noticed that “sets longevity record” is general. The propagandist from USA Today who wrote the headline knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The editor from Florida Today who wrote the headline is referring to Bill Sargent, the guy who wrote the story. They wrote “Sargent:” on the front end of the headline to weaken the impact, and give the subonscious of the Coindicence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, that Bill Sargent will say anything!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. Two of those many variants are “marvelous” and “amazing. That’s why the article goes on to say ”When surf fisherman Zack Wolk landed an 11-foot, 5-inch tiger shark on the beach at Cape San Blas near Apalachicola in northwest Florida recently, it was photographed, heralded on television news, and marveled as an amazing catch for a shore bound angler.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. One of those many variants is “astounded”. That’s why the article goes on to say “What followed not only astounded Wolk, but also marine scientists.”
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. Two of those many variants are “unbelievable” and “stunned”. That’s why the article goes on to say “The shark was a mere 32-inch pup when it was recorded and tagged on Oct. 25, 2006, exactly 10 years to the day that Wolk landed it. Dana Bethea, a NOAA research ecologist, processed Wolk’s tag data and admitted she was in total disbelief when she researched the tagging date. It would set an all-time “at liberty” record for NOAA’s tagging program. Stunned, she called other staff members into her office to confirm the findings.”
Did you notice the shout-out of the important Illuminist number 32?
The article goes on to say “ ‘It’s a big deal’, Bethea said in a NOAA report. ‘This is the first data we have for a tiger shark from practically birth to maturity.’ She said NOAA’s database contains information on more than 19,000 animals dating back to 1993 and several recaptures are recorded each year by Bethea said the 10-year recapture is significant because it gives scientists a better understanding of the growth rate for the species. The previous longest liberty period was a little over five years.”
Wait, what? I guess being serially astounded, stunned and in total disbelief led NOAA research biologist Dana Bethea directly into bald-faced lying, because there is, indeed, another example of data for a tiger shark practically from birth to maturity - namely “a little over five years”. For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership thinking “but that shark wasn’t mature!”, I had to look up a separate article to learn “this species matures at between 4 to 6 years old”.
Even thought she loves her some sharks like it’s her job, Dana called a stunning, astounding 100% increase in longevity in the tiger shark that left her in total disbelief as merely “a big deal”.
That’s instructive, in that, in another example within this chapter, from 2019, we read “ ‘A fish that lives over 100 years? That’s a big deal’, said Solomon David, assistant professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana, who was not involved in the study.” Where David Solomon, the Assistant Professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana who, wait for it, loves him some fish like it’s his job, called the sudden, unexplained, 330% increase in longevity of the bigmouth buffalo merely “a big deal”.
But I’ll caution the reader not to show successive examples of identical propaganda to a practicing Coincidence theorist as evidence that there is, indeed, a Great Big Conspiracy.
Neither Dana, nor Bill - who, I must remind the reader, also loves him some sharks like it’s his job, as Dana does - offers any suggestion as to why the longevity of the tiger shark just suddenly doubled.
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article, or NOAA’s research analyst. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
As a bonus, we don’t know when the previous record was set, or the exact age of that record holder, because Bill and Dana both carefully obfuscated those points. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
[image]
(Zack Wolk with suddenly-twice-as-long-lived tiger shark, Florida, 2016)
Here’s a picture of NOAA research biologist Dana Bethea, who, despite loving her some sharks like it’s her job, called a stunning, astounding 100% increase in longevity in the tiger shark that left her in total disbelief as merely “a big deal”, and didn’t offer any suggestion as to why it had occurred:
[image]
(NOAA research biologist Dana Bethea, in a Satanic purple shirt, who, despite loving her some sharks like it’s her job, called a stunning, astounding 100% increase in longevity in the tiger shark that left her in total disbelief as merely “a big deal”, and didn’t offer any suggestion as to why or how it had occurred.)
[image]
(NOAA research biologist Dana Bethea, in a Satanic green shirt, who, despite loving her some sharks like it’s her job, called a stunning, astounding 100% increase in longevity in the tiger shark that left her in total disbelief as merely “a big deal”, and didn’t offer any suggestion as to why or how it had occurred.)
I’ve included Dana’s picture (wearing coincidental Satanic green and purple shirts for her photo ops) to give you a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all genetically related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
In July 2017, xinhau.net said “Beijing’s average life expectancy hits record high”. Which implies that it reached that height, but dropped right back down again.
The author didn’t mention that record life expectancy in China mapped against that being seen in other nations, such as Russia, Taiwan and the United States. That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “compartmentalization”.
In July 2017 Nature said “Average life expectancy for Japanese women and men reached a new domestic record high in 2016”. Which implies that it reached that height, but dropped right back down again.
The author didn’t mention that record life expectancy in Japan mapped against that being seen in other nations, such as China, Russia, Taiwan and the United States. That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “compartmentalization.”
In 2018, canadianfieldnaturalist.ca published “Record longevity of a Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata)”
I’m sure you noticed that “record longevity”, while accurate, is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. One of those many variants is “unknown”. That’s why author David Seburn goes on to say “Turtles are known for their longevity, but the maximum life span for many species remains unknown.”
Wait, what? Why is that the leadoff sentence for an article documenting a new longevity record for THE Spotted Turtle (vs. the minimizing “A Spotted Turtle in the headline, which implies that it’s a one-off, a “genetic freak”?
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. That’s why David goes on to say “Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata) can live for more than 30 years in the wild, but typical or maximum longevity has not been confirmed.”
Wait, what? David Seburn, who loves him some turtles like it’s his job, just said that the maximum longevity of the Spooted turtle has not been confirmed, in an article on the confirmation of the maximum longevity of the Spotted Turtle. It’s an example of what I have called, variously, a Satanic Inversion, or a Trumpian Mind-Fuck. And it’s the kind of thing that academics eat for breakfast, lunch and dinner, I’m sorry to say.
The article confirming the maximum longevity of the Spotted Turtle continues: “As part of a long-term mark–recapture project in Ottawa, Ontario, near the species’ northern limit, an adult female was captured on 27 April 2017. It had first been marked on 11 June 1983, when it was an adult with 17 growth rings on its plastron. Based on the number of growth rings at first capture, and the intervening time, this turtle is a minimum of 51 years old, setting a longevityrecord for the species. Ten individuals in this population were at least 30 years old when last captured, including a male at least 41 years old. Few of these turtles have grown measurably since being marked in 1983, and it is likely that these minimum ages are underestimates of actual ages.”
Did you notice how David carefully said that it was the setting of A longevity record, versus he truthful, correct, setting THE longevity record for the species?” He’s doing what little he can to hedge and defray.
“It is likely that these minimum ages are understatements of actual ages” is him pretending to be scientific about it, when in fact he’s definitely skewing it as far downward as he can without being blatantly obvious, albeit by some unspecified degree. If he were on the level, he’d say how much he thought they might be underestimated.
Most magnificently, to add to that smoke cloud of misdirection and innuendo, David somehow thought it inconvenient or uninstructive to mention what the previous record was, or when it was set. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. He’s doing his best to blunt any specific insight into the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well basically anything. That’s why a separate article I looked up on research gate said “the Spotted Turtle (Clemmys guttata) can live for more than 30 years in the wild, but typical or maximum longevity has not been confirmed.”
Wait, what? We learned previously that, in 1983, a 41 year-old Spotted turtle was captured. Thus, contrary to David Suburb and Research Gate’s blatantly false claims that the maximum longevity of the Spotted Turtle has not been confirmed, said maximum longevity was confirmed in 1987 as “at least 41 years”.
So I had to do the math to learn that the world’s oldest Spotted Turtle, from 2017, was 51 years old, and was 24% older than the previous 41-year-old record holder from 1987.
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin, with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Here’s David’s picture:
[image]
(David Seburn, Turtle Scientist, Canadian Wildlife Federation, who said that “the maximum longevity of the Spotted Turtle has not been confirmed” in an article that he wrote confirming the previous and current maximum longevity records for the Spotted Turtle, whose longevityincreased 103% from 1987 to 2018, without any comment from David, who loves him some turtles like it’s his job.)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like. They’re all related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “parasites fear exposure above all else”.
In August 2019, National Geographic said “112-year-old fish has broken a longevity record.”
I’m sure you noticed that “longevity record” is general. The propagandist from National Geographic knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here. As a bonus, “112-year-old fish” is also general. It makes the subject virtually unsearchable.
The article is now behind a paywall. That’s another example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. So I’ve got “According to radiocarbon dating, when the bigmouth buffalo was born, World War I had not…”
So we now know that the only-generally-referenced “fish” in the headline is the bigmouth buffalo.
[image]
(The suddenly and inexplicably over-four-times older bigmouth buffalo, 2019)
I was able to copy this before the paywall lockdown engaged: “This bigmouth buffalo (Ictiobus cyprinellus) was photographed at Gavins Point National Fish Hatchery and Aquarium, in South Dakota. Carbon dating has validated that the species is the longest-lived freshwater fish known.
Scientists just added a large, sucker-mouthed fish to the growing list of centenarian animals that will likely outlive you and me.”
A new study using bomb radiocarbon dating describes a bigmouth buffalo that lived to a whopping 112 years, crushing the previous known maximum age for the species—26—by more than fourfold.”
Wait, what? The author did their best to hedge by describing the sudden, unexplained, 330% increase that I was forced to do the math to learn the only-general “more than fourfold”. As a bonus, the propagandist from the National Geographic said that the fish that would definitively outlive you and me “will likely outlive you and me”.
The article goes on to say “That makes the bigmouth buffalo, which is native to North America and capable of reaching nearly 80 pounds, the oldest age-validated freshwater bony fish—a group that comprises roughly 12,000 species.
‘A fish that lives over 100 years? That’s a big deal,’ said Solomon David, assistant professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana, who was not involved in the study.”
David Solomon, the Assistant Professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana who loves him some fish like it’s his job, called the sudden, unexplained, 330% increase in longevity of the bigmouth buffalo merely “a big deal”.
Neither David nor the author from National Geographic offered any explanation as to how, or why a species could suddenly increase in longevity by, er, “more than fourfold”. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Here’s David’s picture:
[image]
(David Solomon, the Assistant Professor at Nicholls State University in Louisiana, who called the sudden, unexplained, 330% increase in longevity of the bigmouth buffalo merely “a big deal”, and who offered no explanation as to how, or why a species could suddenly increase in longevity by 330%)
I’ve included his photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They’re all genetically-related to one another by bloodline. It’s how the few have controlled the many, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
In April 2021, doi.org said “Longevity record verified in an Egyptian vulture”.
I’m sure you noticed that “longevity record” is general. The propagandist knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the speed and magnitude of the increase in longevity I’m documenting here.
The article goes on to say “To the best of our knowledge, the age of this bird, 29 years, sets the known record for a vulture in the wild. Males are suspected to live longer than females. In the population of vultures to which this individual belongs, annual survival rates for adults are sex-biased (0.91 males; 0.82 females); indeed, of nine birds in this population that are known to exceed two decades of age, six were males, with two 28-year-old males still alive in 2020”.
The author has carefully omitted mention of what the age record was prior to 2021. Wikipedia says “Egyptian vultures have been known to live for up to 37 years in captivity and at least 21 years in the wild.” The insertion of the other 2021 age records is an example of the propaganda technique known as the “bait and switch”.
Thus, I’ve had to look up a separate article, and do the math to learn that the world’s oldest wild Egyptian vulture, from 2021, was 29 years old, and was 38% older than the previous 21 year old record holder from some obfuscated prior date.
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article, who, I must remind the reader, loves them some vultures like it’s their job. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
In 2021, bioone.org said “Doubling the longevity record of the American Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides dorsalis)”
It’s a careful bit of tradecraft, in which the author, M.A. Villard, has studiously avoided saying “Longevity of the American Three-toed Woodpecker longevity doubles to new record”. It’s a bizzarity in which the author walks the record from the bird executing that record, back to an act on the part of the human who is merely recording that record. Or even imply that the doubling hasn’t happened yet, but could. The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why the article goes on to say “The American Three-toed Woodpecker (Picoides dorsalis) is a relatively poorly known species due to its remote northern distribution, the low density of its populations, and its cryptic behavior.”
The article goes on to say “In this article, we report the observation of an 11-year-old individual, nearly 2 times older than the previous record for the species. This longevity is similar to values reported for the closely related Eurasian Three-toed Woodpecker (P. tridactylus). We report on the observation of a male that was captured, aged, color-banded, and photographed in 2010, and photographed again when it was resighted in 2019. This finding has potential implications for the modeling of population viability and the possibility of extinction debt in marginal habitat.”
The journal that professes to love biological, ecological, and environmental sciences like it’s their job calls the concrete documentation of the sudden, unexplained doubling of the lifespan of the American Three-toed Woodpecker in 2021 as having nothing firm to suggest, but rather only “potential implications for the modeling of population viability and the possibility of extinction debt in marginal habitat.”
That’s an example of the propaganda technique I have named “the Trumpian Mind-Fuck”. It’s almost exactly like when Otter yells “point of Parliamentary procedure!” in the courtroom scene in the Movie “Animal House”.
And what, precisely, is “extinction debt”? Is that Mil-speak for “species winking back into existence as the ether returns to a level of health where they can once again manifest there”?
Extinction debt: “any occurrence of delayed extinction.” Now that’s some Black magic, there! We wouldn’t want any occurrences of delayed extinction, now, would we?
Since it’s we must agree that the sudden, exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in longevity of the American Three-toed Woodpecker in 2021 improves population concretely does improve viability in the species, we can put aside M.A. Villard’s first false suggestion as to it’s potential implications upon same.
Essay: Describe how the sudden, exponential, historically-unprecedented increase in longevity of the American Three-toed Woodpecker in 2021 might potentially exponentially-decrease the species to extinction.
Whatever it Extinction debt is, it is blatantly used as a misdirection here from the sudden, exponential increase in the lifespan of the American Three-toed Woodpecker in 2021.
An article from 2010 says that the maximum longevity in the wild of the three-toed woodpecker is six years. Another article from 2021 says the same thing. None of the articles on the 2021 record mention what the previous record was, or when it was set, or, heaven forfend, the margin between the records. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
According to the Orthodoxy of mean-spirited Western materialism, organisms grow to a genetically-determined maximum lifespan, and so longevity records should and would necessarily increase only by incremental margins. Yet, here, the record has increased by a quantum, historically-unprecedented margin…with no comment as to how or why that could be possible from the author of the article, who, I must remind the reader, loves them some woodpeckers like it’s their job. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, November 19, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at Positive Changes That Are Occurring - Orgones Discussion Forums
