TUNA
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that fish are growing to sizes never seen previously at rates that have increased exponentially, going forward in time, as well as fish numbers increasing to levels that have also never been seen previously. And, despite ceaseless, hysterical propaganda to the contrary, that includes tuna.
It’s a demonstration of the fact that the size, fertility and longevity of any organism varies directly with the half of its etheric environment.
That’s why Papua New Guinea’s tuna exports more than tripled from 2013 to 2019. Put another way, tuna production in New Guinea increased over 300% in the last six years.
The volume of bigeye tuna production in the Philippines increased 89% from 2005 to 2018. Put another way, the number of tuna caught in the Philippines close to doubled in the last ten years.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why a qz.com article from January 2015 reads “This fish sold for $37,000 at auction in Tokyo—two years ago it would have fetched $1.7 million”.
Can you see how the author from qz.com blatantly and brazenly substituted the word “fish” for “tuna”? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”. It makes the subject drastically less searchable. Not that it stopped me from finding it, of course.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. And the words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. That’s why an NPR article from June 2015 wrung its hands and wailed “Why Is This Fisherman Selling Threatened Bluefin Tuna For $2.99 A Pound***?***”
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why a National Fisherman article from January 2014 reads “If the past decade’s trend in pricing continued, this year’s first tuna would surely fetch more than a million dollars. But the Tsukiji fish market bucked tradition this weekend and sold its first tuna to Kimura, yet again, for a mere $70,000.”
The author is playing it like it’s a one-off…as if the Tsukiji fish market had acted alone. They’re trying to obscure the realization that tuna prices are dropping precipitously, regardless of geography, because of the unprecedented number of tuna at market.
Which is why tuna was selling for $2.99 a pound in San Diego in July of 2015. That’s because prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. And the words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything.
That’s why a seafoodlegacy.com article from October 2016 reads “$1.8M Tuna to “Affordable” $1 Tuna Sushi—The Mystery of Japanese Tuna Industry”.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why the article goes on to say “In the past, industry officials have described the steady or rising price of tuna as the result of scarce supply. And indeed, the wholesale price of the fish has fluctuated. But according to the May 2015 Food Outlook of the United Nations Food & Agriculture Organization tuna prices had dropped considerably in 2014: “tuna prices declined significantly due to excess supply, with frozen skipjack prices hitting a 6-year low.”
The Yellowfin tuna fish catch in Oman increased 47% from 2017 to 2018.
The Solomon Islands recorded a $57.5m trade surplus in the 1st Quarter of 2017, “the increase mainly attributed to $52.1m of fish loin exports to Italy.”
To understand the deception, we must understand that more than 90% of the Solomon Islands marine product exports have usually comprised tuna and tuna-related products. Which demonstrates that the author substituted the bizarre, general “fish loins” to obscure the great increase in the tuna population in and around the Solomon Islands. That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “compartmentalization”. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
Prices increase either when supply decreases, or demand increases, or, lastly, when price-fixing is implemented. The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Those variants include “funny” and “riddle”. That’s why a Washington Post article from May 2017 reads “ Here’s the funny thing about canned tuna: Even as Americans lost their taste for the fish and demand dropped steadily for years, the price of a can seemed to hold steady or rise. For some, it was an economic riddle.”
For those late to the party, Capitalism as it has been described to us does not, in fact exist.
In an article from Australia from September 2017, the Daily Mail said “Record numbers of huge bluefin tuna fish caught in Sydney” and that “Amateur anglers are cashing in on record numbers of enormous bluefin Tuna migrating across the east coast of Australia.”
That author of the article doesn’t offer any suggestion as to what has caused there to be more tuna than there ever were in history in Australia, and there’s no mention of the fact that tuna numbers are increasing regardless of geography. Nor is there a mention as to why they are, well, enormous. Those are all examples of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
The Daily Mail is a State propaganda organ, doing what it can to support the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. They’re desperate to keep you from realizing that the health, size and longevity of any organism varies directly with the health of its etheric environment.
In 2018, skipjack tuna prices dropped to a two-year low in Bangkok. That’s because prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both.
An article from August 2018 said that there were “far more” tuna at fishing tournament in Maine, and that the tournament’s quota increase “reflects a tuna resurgence seen on the water for some time.”
Where “far more”, “resurgence” and “some time” are all general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
In November 2017, NPR asked “Is It Time To Catch The Wave Of Rebounding Atlantic Bluefin Tuna***?***
“Fishermen up and down the New England Coast” said it had been “decades” since they’d been able to catch “so many” Atlantic bluefin tuna “so fast”. The author said that, once severely depleted, populations of the prized sushi fish “appear to be rebounding”.
Where “decades” and “so many” and “so fast” are all general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “incredible”. That’s why Walter Golet, a jointly appointed researcher at the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and University of Maine, said that the increase had been “incredible, just incredible”.
Another one of those variants is “difficult to say”. That’s why Clay Porch, a federal scientist who leads bluefin stock assessments for the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, or ICCAT, said “It’s really difficult to say clearly what environmental changes could have led to this current increase in abundance”.
Where “increase” is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
The pending Washington state record bluefin tuna, caught in August 2019, is 152% percent larger of a prior record holder, caught in 2012. The species well more than doubled in size in the last seven years.
(The current Washington state record bluefin tuna, from 2019 - well more than double the size of the previous record holder from 2012)
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. Two of those variants are “unusual” and “monster”. That’s why the headline of the outdoorline.com article on the subject reads “Lots of unusual fish being caught in the ocean off Washington including a monster-sized blue fin tuna.”
Where “MONSTER-sized”, while lurid, is general, and downplays against the stronger and more accurate “state record tuna”.
In the article, the author provided the weights of the old and new records, but carefully hedged by omitting the percentage increases between them. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So I had to do the math. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins. Here the record stood for almost a decade and then was broken by a gigantic, historically-unprecedented margin.
In December 2017, a huge bluefin tuna weighing 350 pounds was caught off the Devon coast in the UK. The author said that there were more bluefin tuna in British waters “due to climate change heating the ocean and changing the path of currents, researchers expect more to be accidentally caught in the future.”
In December 2017, the Vietnam News Agency said “Vietnam’s Seafood Exports Up But EU’s Warning On IIU Fishing Raises Concern”.
Where “up” and “seafood” are both general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
“The Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (VASEP)’s aim to reach US$524 million in tuna exports this year has already been achieved with exports hitting US$541 million as of November, the Vietnam News Agency (VNA) reported.”
There’s an international news blackout in place on the subject, which is why the author substituted the general “seafood” in the headline for the tuna exports that the article is actually about. That’s an example of a propaganda technique called “compartmentalizations.
“According to the General Department of Vietnam Customs, in the 11 months, Vietnamese tuna’s three major markets were the US, EU and ASEAN. However, Vietnam had faced difficulties following a “yellow card” issued by the EU as a warning for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing.”
Here, this “yellow card” technique is the Establishment’s “harrying the opposition” to punish the Vietnamese for breaking the rules of the Confidence Game – for upsetting the artificial scarcity which keeps prices at their highest and underpins the “Poor Mother Gaia is Dying” ruse in every nation.
In January 2018, xinhaunet.com said “Vietnam makes bigger seafood export earnings in 2017”.
Where “bigger” is general. The author knows that sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and thus this tactic “compartmentalizes” the information, and makes the great positive change harder to discern.
“MAKES bigger earnings” plays the ruse that they simply worked harder at it, versus the truth, that the marine environment has undergone a wholesale positive transformation that has led to record populations regardless of species or geography.
The article continues: “Vietnam gained seafood export turnovers of nearly 8.4 billion U.S. dollars in 2017, up 18.5 percent against 2016, the country’s Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development said on Tuesday. Regarding three key seafood items, prawns and shrimps, and tuna, prawn and shrimp exports surged 20 percent to over 3.8 billion U.S. dollars, with exports to major markets, excluding the United States, growing considerably.”
Can you see how, in journalistic parlance, “Tuna” is buried last, here, behind prawns and shrimp? Then they give you data on prawns and shrimp, but remain scrupulously silent on tuna. The great explosion in the tuna populations is a death-blow for the Poor Mother Gaia is Dying confidence game, which has as a plank “96% of the tuna in the Pacific are gone”.
They’re faking like everyone in the U.S. suddenly got 20% hungrier for seafood, and acted on it, which led the Vietnamese to fish 20% more assiduously, to meet that demand. When the truth is that they caught 20% more fish, and sold all they caught. We can’t know the volume, of course, because they’ve assiduously hid it from us to blunt and defray insight into the trend I just described.
When, in history, has there been a 20% year over year increase in seafood production value? There hasn’t. It’s a huge, historically-unprecedented positive change, which is being steadfastly denied by the controlled press, as I’m demonstrating.
The article continues: “The country gained a total seafood output of more than 7.2 million tons in 2017, up 5.2 percent against 2016, the ministry said, noting that roughly 3.4 million tons came from catching, up 5.3 percent, and over 3.8 million tons came from aquaculture, up 5.2 percent.”
Where “GAINED an output” once again plays the ruse that it was increased fishing effort that led to the historically-unprecedented harvest of marine life from the waters surrounding Vietnam. This is the very last paragraph in the article, so they’ve again deliberately “buried” the volume numbers.
When, in the history of Vietnam, has there been an across-the-board, 5% year over year increase in seafood production volume? There hasn’t. It’s a huge, historically-unprecedented positive change, which is being steadfastly denied by the controlled press, as I’m demonstrating
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why an article from Australia’s Adelaide Now from March 2018 is headlined “Easter fish: Adelaide fishmongers see drop in alternative fish prices”.
You have to read the article to learn that they’re talking about “Atlantic salmon, kingfish, king salmon, blue fin and yellow fin tuna.” Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon I’m documenting here. Can you see how the author put tuna at the very end? In journalistic parlance, that’s called “hedging” or “downplaying’.
Prices drop either when supply increases, or demand decreases, or both. That’s why an Undercurrent News article from July 2018 reads “Bangkok skipjack prices drop to two-year low”. Can you see how, under the false guise of familiarity, the author omitted the word “tuna” from the headline? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In August 2018, an AP News article described “A controversial comeback for a highly prized tuna”.
Can you see how they used the general “highly prized” to obscure the name of the fish? It’s the Atlantic bluefin tuna.
The article reads “Shana Miller, The Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation, said a quota increase of hundreds of thousands of pounds was a bad idea “because of a possible return to overfishing, and because of concerns that increasingly warming oceans could retard the fish’s reproduction”.
Well, if that’s true, why does a New York Times article, from just a month earlier, in July 2018, describe a “Dramatic fall in North Atlantic heat content”? The article goes on to say “surface and subsurface temperatures of the North Atlantic have fallen to their lowest levels in in more than 30 years.”
It’s not true. Shana Miller, the Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation, is demonstrably lying bald-facedly about the temperature of the Atlantic Ocean in which bluefin tuna are booming and burgeoning to levels never seen previously. I’ve exposed her duplicity through what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
The New York times bravely did what they could to hedge by describing a steep and sudden cooling of the North Atlantic with the Mil-speak “fall in heat content”. They said “in more than 30 years” so they could avoid saying “have decreased to their lowest level in history”.
Here’s Shana’s picture:
(Shana Miller, the Ocean Foundation’s program manager for global tuna conservation)
I’ve included her photograph so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like. Did you notice that she’s wearing a natty Satanic green and purple dress?
The current Virginia state record bluefin tuna, from 2020, which weighed 708 pounds, and was 17% larger than the previous 606 pound record holder from 2015.
(Jake Hiles, with his new Virginia state record bluefin tuna, from 2020. It weighed 708-pounds, and was 17% larger than the previous 606 pound record holder from 2015.)
Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as the organism will necessarily grow at a slower and slower rate as it approaches its maximum possible size.
The current Mississippi state record yellowfin Tuna, from 2020, weighed 236.6 pounds, and was 15% larger than the previous 205.8 pound record holder from 2001.
(Mike McElroy III, with his new Mississippi state record yellowfin tuna, from 2020. It weighed 236.6 pounds, and was 15% larger than the previous 205.8 pound record holder from 2001. The record stood for almost twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin.)
The record stood for almost twenty years, and then was suddenly broken by an exponential margin. Such records are usually broken by tiny margins, as the organism will necessarily grow at a slower and slower rate as it approaches its maximum possible size.
Note the 15% and 17% increases in size in these two records. Those increases are very close to one another.
The primary driver of the size, fertility and longevity of any organism is the health of its Etheric environment.
