THE POPULACE HAS RECOGNIZED THAT GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS WERE CREATED TO KILL AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich’s work.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is the populace has recognized that Genetically Modified foods were created to kill as many people as possible.
Genetically modified foods were first commercialized in 1996.
In January 2006, ambcnews.go.com said “Poll: Skepticism of Genetically Modified Foods”.
Where “skepticism” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The author put “poll:” on the front end of the headline to give the subconscious of the Coincidence Theorist the green light to say “oh, but that was just one POLL!” The propagandist from ABC news knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The article continues: “With safety concerns widespread, Americans almost unanimouslyfavor mandatory labels on genetically modified foods. And most say they’d use those labels to avoid the food. Barely more than a third of the public believes that genetically modified foods are safe to eat. Instead 52 percent believe such foods are unsafe…”Awareness that genetically-modified foods were created specifically to kill as many people as possible began to increase in 2013, the year I began writing these articles on the great positive changes that have been underway at every level of our reality since around 2012.
Here, in 2006, just ten years into the scam, two thirds of the populace know that the folks in charge in all the nations are trying to poison the populace of all of those nations.
Mexico banned genetically engineered corn in October 2013.
In 2013, the County Council for the island of Kauai passed a law that mandates farms to disclose pesticide use and the presence of genetically modified crops. The bill also requires a 500-foot buffer zone near medical facilities, schools and homes — among other locations.
In 2013, the big island of Hawaii County Council gave preliminary approval to a bill that prohibits open air cultivation, propagation, development or testing of genetically engineered crops or plants.
In February 2013, Food Navigator said “Campaign pushes Hershey’s, Mars to either label GMOs or drop them” and that “Hershey and Mars combined comprise nearly 70 percent of the U.S. chocolate market. The two companies also seem committed to their opposition to GMO labeling requirements if their political contribution patterns are any indication.”
Not all candy companies are led by generational Satanists, but rather just the great big ones up at the top of the candy control pyramid. Over time, they buy, take over any companies who are not “in the family”.
[image]
(Hershey CEO Michelle Buck, in a Satanic green suit, using “secret” Illuminist hand gestures she figures the rubes will never notice)
In regard to Michelle’s hand-gestures, here’s a LinkedIn profile picture of a rank and file generational Satanist using them:
[image]
(Full Stack Developer. Purple shirt. Redhead. Purportedly-secret Illuminist hand gestures)
In regard to Michelle’s hand-gestures, here’s another LinkedIn profile picture of a different rank-and-file generational Satanist using them:
[image]
(Full Stack Developer. Purple shirt. Purportedly-secret lluminist hand gestures. Looking left)
They figure the rubes will never notice.
Food Navigator is an organ of the State, doing what they can to prop up the collapsing GMO confidence game.
Russia completely banned GMO’s in 2014.
Ben and Jerry’s stopped using GMO’s in 2014.
In June 2014, BlueOregon succinctly described “Biotech’s Losing Game of Whack-A-Mole”.
In August 2014, Science said “China pulls plug on genetically modified rice and corn”.
Where “pulls the plug” conjures a heartless relative taking someone off life support to grab their inheritance.
In September 2014, helplessly watching the collapse of the Empire, the Smithsonian said “Sorry Hipsters, That Organic Kale Is a Genetically Modified Food”.
The international GMO crop area decreased 1% in 2015, then increased 3 percent in 2016, led by increased sowings in Brazil and the United States,
In 2015, GM Crops were banned in 39 countries. There are 195 countries on Earth. In 2015, Genetically modified crops were banned in 20% of the countries on Earth.
In January 2015, vox.com said “Poll: Scientists overwhelmingly think GMOs are safe to eat. The public doesn’t.”
Where the author put “poll” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one poll!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In journalistic parlance, the author “buried” the statistic in the article below. As a bonus, it was buried further in a table. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, the tactic goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the trend I’m documenting here.
57% of the public said it was generally unsafe to eat Genetically Modified foods, and 67% said scientists did not have a clear understanding of the threat of Genetically Modified foods.
The brazen lying of the generational Satanist Scientific establishment is coming into clearer and clearer view.
In February 2015, the deviously-named PolitiFact feigned ignorance and cast doubt by asking “Are GMOs causing monarch butterflies to become extinct***?***”
They’re a State-sponsored propadanda mouthpiece, who substituted “GMO’s” for “Roundup” to protect the confidence game they’re all running.
In March 2015, Technique played the bullying card with “Quit being afraid of GMOs”.
The funniest part of it is, GMO’s are properly terror-inducing among the upright.
In June 2015, The Hill said “Groups ramp up pressure on Costco to reject GMO salmon”.
Where “groups” is general. The Mouthpiece of the State is doing what little it can to hedge and defray.
In June 2015, bio.org said “Unhealthy Fixation: The War Against GMO’s”.
The article continues: “The war against genetically modified organisms is full of fearmongering, errors, and fraud. Labeling them will not make you safer.”
It’s a really insane thing to say. In that labeling them will definitively make you safer, if you are lucid and intelligent enough to read the label, and then go on to not consume the product you now know is deadly after doing so.
The author’s name is William Saletan. Here’s a photo of him using a “secret” Illuminist hand sign he figures the rubes will never notice:
[image]
(William Saletan, author of bio.org’s hit-piece entitled “Unhealthy Fixation: The War Against GMOs”, using a purportedly-secret Illuminist hand sign he figures the rubes will never notice)
[image]
(Historical depiction of Illuminists using purportedly-secret hand signs they figured the rubes would never notice)
I’ve included Mr. Saletan’s picture so you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
Such a nice suit, and tie! Did you happen to notice that his tie is a lovely shade of Satanic purple? I’ll be he got his teeth whitened recently. For those unaware, he’s reading a teleprompter, as they all do. He’s a bad actor, a suit, a shill, a confidence man. He’s a bit player in, wait for it, a Great Big Conspiracy. They’re all genetically-related to one another, and have worked this long con upon humanity, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
You can’t recognize them by their appearance, that is beyond their continuous use of purportedly-secret hand signs that, for literally Millennia, the majority of the wholly-credulous rube populace of all the nations has never noticed.
You can’t recognize generational Satanists by their appearance (that is beyond their almost-continuous use of supposedly “secret” hand signs).
[image]
(Donald Trump using purportedly-secret Illuminist hand sign, 1990’s)
[image]
(Donald Trump using the same purportedly-secret Illuminist hand sign, 2020’s; historical depiction of Satanic priest using the same purportedly-secret hand sign)
They’re hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth, figuring the rubes would never notice. You can only recognize them by the codified, highly-repetitive way in which they speak, and write. And of course the purportedly-secret hand signs.
We get the word “Satan” from their loathesome god Set, whom they’ve worshipped under various names and guises, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. Set, also known as Seth and Suetekh, was the Egyptian god of war, chaos and storms, brother of Osiris, Isis, and Horus the Elder, uncle to Horus the Younger, and brother-husband to Nephthys.
[image]
(The repugnant god Set)
[image]
(The repugnant Jar Jar Binks)
[image]
(The repugnant god Set. Prominent generational Satanist George Lucas figured the rubes would never notice that the fictional character Jar Jar Binks is an obvious simulacra of Set)
You know them only-generally as “the One Percent”. They are the distinct and separate race that we know as “Neanderthal”.
Here’s what you’re supposed to think a Neanderthal looks like:
[image]
(Museum depiction of a grinning Neanderthal)
[image]
(“So Easy, a Caveman Can Do it” ad)
Can you see how they’re smiling? When the cannibalistic, literally-blood-drinking Neanderthal invaded all the nations on Earth Millenia ago one by one, they were not smiling. They actually filed their teeth to points, back in those early days, prior to putting on “civilized” guise.
While this is what a Neanderthal actually looks like:
[image]
(King John I of England, the guy all the US Presidents are related to through their maternal bloodlines)
Apr 17, 2001 — Research leader Dr Rosalind Harding said: ‘It is certainly possible that red hair comes from the Neanderthals.’
2020 - “ScotlandsDNA believes that everyone who carries one of 3 variants of the red-hair gene is a direct descendant of the first redhead ever to have it”
January 31, 2008 - Blue-eyed humans have a single, common ancestor
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
It’s why the ruling bloodlines of all the nations have the lightest skin.
We’re obviously going to have to recognize and come to terms with this if we’re going to make progress as a species.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is realizing that you have one.
In August 2015, the New York Times wrung its hand and wailed “Why Do the Chinese HateG.M.O.s?”
Where the Chinese are not wisely observing self-preservation, but rather “haters”. This play is interesting, in that it positions godless Communist Red China as “the good cop”.
In August 2015, Scientific American explained “Why People Oppose GMOs Even Though Science Says They Are Safe”.
Where “science says safe” is a “yes set” of three S’s, three repetitions of the Serpent rune.
In November 2015, centerforfoodsafety.org said “Victory! Costco will not sell GMO Salmon”.
In June 2016, DW Africa said “Burkina Faso abandons GM cotton”.
Where “abandons’’ conjures the image of an orphan left out in a basket on a cold winter nigh
In February 2016, Debating Europe pretended to be confused and asked “Why are Europeans scared of GMOs?”
Where Europeans are not wisely observing self-preservation, but rather “scaredy-cats”.
The folks in charge are pissing, shitting hopping mad that the public has recognized that GMO foods have been weaponized against it. That’s why a kff.org story from March 2016 said “Zimbabwe’s rejection of GMO food aid is a humanitarian outrage”.
Since Black is White and Ignorance is Strength, genetically-modified foods designed to shorten the lives of those who consume them are referred to as “humanitarian aid”. It’s a true statement, after all, only they’re careful not to mention the fact that the aid the crops provide is in shortening the human lifespan.
In April 2016, the New York Times said “Acreage for Genetically Modified Crops Declined in 2015”.
Where they used “declined” because it’s softer than “dropped” or “decreased”, and to echo the word “recline”. Declines are shallow, and gradual.
The author attributed the decrease to “low commodity prices, which led farmers to plant less corn, soybeans and canola of all types, both genetically engineered and nonengineered.”
The reason for those low commodity prices goes unexplained, namely that record harvests in all the nations increasing supply and decreasing prices. You can see how the folks in charge simply started to contract the planted areas, now that the production per acre has reached levels never seen previously.
The article goes on to say “But the figures for the last few years show that the existing market for the crops has nearly been saturated.”
Where “market saturation” is Mil-speak for “the bottom has fallen out of the GMO food market”.
In May 2016, Reuters said “U.S. traders reject GMO crops that lack global approval”, and that “Across the U.S. Farm Belt, top grain handlers have banned genetically modified crops that are not approved in all major overseas markets, shaking up a decades-old system that used the world’s biggest exporting country as a launchpad for new seeds from companies like Monsanto Co.”
It’s a back-handed play - they put the onus on a lack of international approval, but are going along to get along, as literally no one will buy their poison product anymore.
In July 2016, the Fitbit Blog widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “Are GMOs Safe to Eat? Science Says Yes!”
The infantile exclamation point wouldn’t fool a 5th grader, however it would fool a large subset of Fitbit wearers.
“Safe to EAT” arrows in on the same grossly-ignorant reader, who thinks “yeah, it doesn’t poison you when you eat it - you don’t just drop right over!”
In July 2016, Uproxx played the Black-is-White, Ignorance-is-Strength mind-fuck with “Is Everything The Public Thinks It Knows About GMOs Wrong?”
In July 2016, AgriHQ said “Australia urged to drop GMO ban”. Urged by whom, pray?
AgriHQ is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, doing what it can to stay in lock-step with the international news blackout that is in place on this subject. They’re using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In August 2016, wakeupandeat.co guilefully asked “Is the FDA So Asleep it’s Dreaming all’s OK?”
Where the plausible-deniability excuse of “innocent bumbling” is put forward to mask the Feds’ clear position as the avowed enemy of humanity.
In November 2016, Cornell University feigned neutrality and asked “Do conflicts of interest negate scientific consensus on GMO safety***?***”
That’s a back-handed way of saying that having people on your payroll printing fake news about GMO Safety in no way negates the scientific consensus. And, if you think about it, they’re right. “Science” is unified in lock-step affirming the safety of the deadly creation that is Genetically Modified Organisms.
That’s because there is, wait for it, a Great Big Conspiracy.
In December 2016, Zocalo Public Square treated you like the child you are by ordering: “Go Ahead: Eat Your Genetically Modified Vegetables”.
In 2017, 93% said the federal government should require labels on food saying whether it’s been genetically modified, or “bio-engineered” (this poll used both phrases). Such near-unanimity in public opinion is rare.
In 2017, not one hectare was sown with genetically modified maize in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia. And in Portugal and in Spain, the surfaces [planting area] of transgenic crops decreased. All in all, throughout the European territory, this surface declined from 136,338 to 13,571 hectares, a decrease of 4%.
In January 2017, The Western Producer said “Consumers still opposed to GM food”.
Where “OPPOSED to GM food” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
You have to go down to the very last paragraph of the article to learn that 30 percent of Canadians distrust the federal government as a trustworthy source when it comes to GM foods. This compares to 46% percent of Canadians distrusting scientists working for food product companies and distrusting 50% of environmental activists.
Can you see how the populace in Canada has awakened to the fact that the environmental “activists” are in fact generational Satanist shills and agents provocateur?
In January 2017, Forbes said “These Moms Say The Girl Scouts’ Newest Cookie Rejects Science” and that “The Girl Scouts have caved to anti-GMO activist pressure with its new s’mores cookie.”
Where “rejecting science” is used to triggering terror in the reader similar to that created by the word “excommunication”. One simply believes Science about everything, in the firm conviction that Science never lies. It’s not scientific, at all, as it it alleged to be, but is rather a Religion, and a false one.
But the truth of the matter is that the populace has recognized that Genetically-modified foods were created specifically to kill as many people as possible.
In March 2017, the UK voted in favor of GMO’s, despite the majority of the European Union voting against them.
In March 2017, kff.org puffed and sputtered and howled “Zimbabwes Rejection of GMO Food Aid is a Humanitarian Outrage”.
Which is more than instructive, in the context of a USDA.gov article from July 2017 which reads “The Zimbabwean government estimates the national corn crop in the 2017/18 MY at around 2.2 million tons, up more than 300 percent from the 2016/17 MY’s corn crop of 512,000 tons and three times more than the 742,000 tons produced in the 2015/16 MY.”
Even though the barely-closeted Death worshippers are still in charge in both the United States and Zimbabwe, you can clearly see here how they’ve completely lost control of the game. It’s only the public is too stupid and conditioned to recognize the fact. And that’s great, great news.
Because, to be fair, if you only read the headlines, as 70% of readers do, all you know is that “children are starving in Zimbabwe”, vs. the truth, that the well-fed children are playing in gigantic piles of surplus corn.
I’m sure there are Coincidence Theorists reading this who narrowed their eyes and said bitterly, “yeah, wait until they withdraw that three-times as productive GM corn!”
So I’m going to have to note that a Xinhua.net article from September 2018 reads “Zimbabwe tobacco output hits record high”. And that an Africa.cgtn.com article from November 2020 says “Zimbabwe on course to record bumper wheat harvest.”
In the latter example, the author bravely said “on COURSE to RECORD bumper wheat harvest”, to give the subconscious of the Coincidence Theorist the out of saying “well, they’re on COURSE, but haven’t made it, yet!” and “oh, someone must have RECORDED that incorrectly!” The word “bumper” was cleverly inserted in place of the stronger “record harvest”, which of course means “most, ever, in all history.”
The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the food situation in Zimbabwe.
In March 2017, Dr. Mercola said “Market Rejection of GMOs Grows”.
The controlled-opposition Mouthpiece “Dr. Mercola” has used the only-general “grows” because the international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
The article continues: "This is because people understand this public health crisis has now spread worldwide, and this environmental crisis and its relationship to the climate crisis are all due to an out-of-control, industrial, chemical-intensive GMO agriculture. People are turning away…”
In March 2017, IFOAM EU said “Press Statement: Member States still reject GMO cultivation”.
Where “MEMBER states” is general. The author put “press statement” on the front end of the headline to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, the press must have STATED that incorrectly!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
EU nations aren’t rejecting GMO’s, you see, but rather are only rejecting GMO “cultivation”. And it infers the slur that they are “just not cultivated”.
In May 2017, ZME Science explained “Why people hate GMOs (when they shouldn’t)”.
Where “people”, “hate” and “shouldn’t” are all general. And where the trigger word “HATE” was used in place of “trust”. That’s because the justly-dropping trust in GMO’s signals the end of the confidence game.
In July 2017, Odyssey widened its eyes to simulate honesty and cooed “Don’t Believe The Media, GMOs Are Actually Harmless”.
Where “harmless” is general. The article continues: “Yes, you heard correctly, they aren’t actually bad for you.”
Can you see how they walked it back from “harmless” in the headline to “not bad for you” in the body text?
In July 2017, petfoodindustry.com said “GMO pet foods may be safe, but are rejected by pet owners”.
Every industry group, every media outlet, all lying brazenly and bald-fadedly. All in lock-step with the “Illuminist” party line.
In April 2017, “the UK Office of The World Foundation for Natural Science has written a strongletter to every member of the House of Commons – elected Members of Parliament – demanding the complete ban on any commercial or scientific GMO farming or research”.
This is a controlled-opposition Mouthpiece knowing the game has turned against GMO’s, and at least giving lip service to their ban. The tells that it is propaganda are “strong” and “demanding”. Can you see how the U.K. and the U.S. have locked arms, here?
In May 2017, Bloomberg said “China Pushes Public to Accept GMO as Syngenta Takeover Nears”.
“China will carry out a nationwide poll next month to test the public’s acceptance of genetically-modified food, a technology the government says would …”.
Even in godless Communist Red China, the literally-blood-drinking generational Satanists in charge there can’t push things so far as to where the populace rises up and pushes back.
And that’s the impasse the the horrific Death cult is facing in all the nations, where they’ve ruled without cease all the way back to Babylon, and before.
The article continues: “Syngenta AG, which produces genetically modified seeds for corn, is gearing up for rapid expansion in the country after shareholders accepted a $43…”
As if China, who controls the world’s economy, could be pushed around by any Corporation, let alone one from outside it’s vast borders.
In June 2017, a Kansas jury awarded $218M to farmers in a GMO suit against Syngenta.
In July 2017, petfoodindustry.com widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “GMO pet foods may be safe, but are rejected by pet owners”.
In August 2017, Face2Face Africa said “Ugandan Civil Society Groups Reject Pro-GMOs Law”, and that “Ugandans are divided over an attempt by some parliamentarians to introduce a pro-GMO law that seeks to improve food production in the country.”
The propaganda Mouthpiece “Face2Face Africa” is putting forward the ruse of “improved food production” as a ruse used to cover up the fact that genetically modified foods were developed specifically to kill as many people as possible.
In September 2017, the duplicitously-named Reason.com said “Europe’s Anti-GMO Stance Is Killing Africans”.
Well, if that’s true, why does a New York Times article from October 2016 read “Doubts About the Promised Bounty of Genetically Modified Crops”?
Because Genetically-modified crops, while effective at killing people, aren’t any more productive than natural counterparts, as is falsely alleged. The folks in charge are not your friends, and are lying to you about basically everything, including the productivity and harmlessness of Genetically-modified crops.
Reason.com is a State-sponsored propaganda outlet, doing what it can to defray rapidly increasing awareness that genetically modified foods were developed specifically to kill as many people as possible. They’re using conscious deception with the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
In November 2017, the Trusted Authority Figure Forbes widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Why Do GMOs Have Such A Bad Reputation***?***”
There is, indeed, a sucker born every minute, and a large percentage of them credulously consume Forbes.
In December 2017, the Oxford University Press commanded “Reject the “Gmo” Fallacy, In Terms Of Both Safety Concerns and Socioeconomic Issues.
As the world’s oldest University, founded in 1096, they’re right up the top of the Great, Big, pyramidally-architected Conspiracy of bloodline-related generational Satanists who have run things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before.
In June 2017, the hopefully—named Futurism said “The Public Doesn’t Trust Science. It’s 2017. We Need to Fix This.”
Where “doesn’t trust” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of statistics that would provide specific insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“We need to fix this” is like a reference to Winston being broken by the rats in Room 101 in George Orwell’s “1984”.
The article continues: “Despite scientists telling them otherwise, a significant number of people still believe genetically modified foods are unsafe to eat, others are worried that vaccines do more harm than good, and an alarming number of people aren’t convinced that climate change is a man-made phenomenon.”
Where “SIGNIFICANT number”, “others” and “ALARMING number” are all general.They’re used to blunt any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend.
“Do more harm than good” is Mil-Speak for “have been weaponized against the populace”.
Signally, Futurism’s hit-piece is breaking one of the key rules of propaganda, “compartmentalization”. Copping to this wider trend of multiple Confidence games collapsing at once shows you that they are in full retreat, a retreat that will soon turn to rout.
In June 2017, abcnews.go.com said “Poll: Skepticism of Genetically Modified Foods”.
Where the author put “poll” on the front end to give the subconscious of the reader the green light to say “oh, but that was just one poll!” The propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The general “skepticism” was used in the headline to defray against saying “93% say the federal government should require labels on food saying whether it’s been genetically modified, or “bio-engineered” (this poll used both phrases). Such near-unanimity in public opinion is rare.”
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, “burying” the statistic in the body text of the article goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the trend I’m documenting here.
In February 2018, geneticliteracyproject.org widened its eyes to simulate honesty and hopefully asked “Could 2018 mark the end of the anti-GMO movement***?***” It’s brave, it’s hysterical, it’s psychotic, in the context of 93% of the populace saying labeling should be required, and 57% of the public saying it was generally unsafe to eat Genetically Modified foods.
In March 2018, Cornell’s “Alliance for Science” published the hysterical “Russia Blamed For Anti-GMO Campaign”.
The vast majority of U.S. citizens want to know if there are deadly genetically modified organisms in the food that they are eating. Despite hysterical efforts to stop such labeling, the folks in charge in the U.S. are having to go along to get along, as you can see from the vermontbiz.com article from March 2018 which reads “US Senate rejects bill opposed to GMO labeling”.
The article goes on to say “Vermont Business Magazine Conagra has joined Kellogg’s, Mars, General Mills and Campbell’s Soup saying that it will label its products with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) nationwide in response to Vermont’s GMO labeling law, which goes into effect July 1. The US Senate on March 16 rejected a bill that would have prevented Vermont from implementing its GMO (aka, GE or Genetic Engineering) labeling law. Since then, major food producers have said they will label their foods. Campbell’s made its announcement before the vote in January.”
Those big Corporate names are falling into line because the supercomputer told them that their businesses would all collapse if they tried to stop labelling. It’s a great example how even a fantastically complex international conspiracy is helpless in the face of the will of the people.
In May 2018, Technology Review said “US will label GMO foods with smiley faces and sunshine”, and that “The USDA says consumers don’t need to know if food has been modified using CRISPR.”
The article goes on to say “Good vibes: The agency proposed a variety of smiley-face labels companies can use (they can also employ a QR code instead). The standards pre-empt a Vermont law that had food makers labeling their products “produced with genetic engineering.”
In May 2018, thecounter.org said – Whole Foods quietly pauses its GMO labeling requirements”. It paints the queasy picture that Whole Foods has stopped just for an instant, before continuing on again.
In October 2018, Forbes explained “How Technology Is Shifting The Way People Feel About Their Food”.
It’s a queasy, non-specific inference. The author knows that, since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, this hedging generality will go a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon I’m documenting here, namely the populace recognizing that genetically modified food has been weaponized against it.
In December 2018, in the face of a Nigerian populace that has rejected genetically modified crops, geneticliteracyproject.com said “Nigeria releases GMO cowpea, urges farmers not to reject technology”.
In January 2019, the University of Colorado at Boulder sneered “Genetically modified food opponents know less than they think, research finds”.
Can you see how “know less” is general? As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
In January 2019, attempter.com published “While Elitist Support Holds Steady, Democracy Increasingly Rejects GMOs”. Where the general meme “Elitist” hides the specific offender, so you don’t grasp that generational Satanist support holds steady, while democracy increasingly rejects GMO’s?
Who are these Elitists, pray? Who comprises this only-generally identified “One Percent”? You are to assure yourself that they all got there by coincidence, and that they never, ever, under any circumstances conspire amongst themselves about protecting and expanding their collective position.
Further, the correct headline is “While Elite Support Holds Steady”. Walking it back to “ElitistSupport” takes it from being a concrete, identifiable subset of the populace back to a philosophy.
In January 2019, homef.org said “Nigerians Reject GMOs: Refuses to be Used For Experiments”. Can you see how the author has hidden “have their lives shortened” has been walked back to “used for experiments”? Can you see how “experiments” is general?
It makes it seem like only Nigeria has had GMO’s pressed upon it, versus the truth, that every nation on Earth is being “experimented on in the same way”. Putting out this little hit-piece on Nigeria is an attempt to “compartmentalize” the issue.
In February 2019, europeangreens.com said “Italian courts reject GMO”. Where “Italy rejects GMO’s” has been walked back to “Italian courts reject GMO”? As a bonus, the author took GMOs, which is plural, and walked it back to “GMO”, which is singular. They’ve softened it, mitigated it.
The vast majority of U.S. citizens know that genetically modified organisms are deadly. And the folks in charge in the U.S. are having to go along to get along, as you can see from the foe.com article from April 2018 which reads “Kroger, Safeway join trend away from GMO food”. Where the propagandist from foe.com did what little they could to hedge by saying “join trend away from GMO food”, to imply that it was just a whim of fashion. “Trend away fromGMO food” is Mil-speak for “due to rejection of GMO food”.
In the future, grade school children will marvel that the folks in charge at this time mixed poison with grains, and forced those grains upon the public using the pretext that it was good for them.
As can be seen in the centerforfoodsafety.org article from March 2019 which reads “Monsanto Seeks to Expand Use of Devastating Herbicide to GMO Corn”.
It’s, like, you know, the flavor coating on the outside of Captain Crunch with Crunch Berries.
[image]
(Captain Crunch with Crunch Berries cereal)
In 2021, ec.europa.eu wrung its hands and asked “Why did approximately 26 countries refuse GMO’s?”.
The article goes on to say “Nineteen out of the 27 member state countries of the European Union have voted to either partially or fully ban Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). This comes after the European Commission called for each EU nation to vote if they wanted to opt out of having to grow GMO crops even if they were allowed to do so within the boundaries of the EU.
Several countries such as France, Germany, Austria, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Poland, Denmark, Malta, Slovenia, Italy and Croatia have chosen a total ban. Wallonia, the French-speaking region of Belgium has opted out, as well as Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Flemish region of Belgium, England and Romania are open to GMOs.”
Sixteen countries completely banned Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s). The unnamed author from the European Commission’s “European Green Capital” web page described 16 as “several”.
Several - determiner · pronoun - more than two but not many.
not many but more than one
“The under-ten or single-digit rule will suffice in most cases.”
- AP Style Numbers: The Ultimate Guide
You may have noticed that the propagandist from europa.eu typed out the sacred Illuminist number 19, then listed the rest of the countries, to avoid saying “as of 2021, 39 nations had completely banned Genetically-Modified-Organisms (GMO’s).”
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, August 30, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at Positive Changes That Are Occurring - Orgones Discussion Forums
