THE POPULACE HAS RECOGNIZED THAT SUNSCREEN HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED AGAINST IT
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that the populace has recognized that sunscreen has been weaponized against it.
That’s because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In retrospect, it will have taken roughly seventy years from the inception of this diabolical scam to its collapse. That scam being a product created specifically to increase skin cancer rates, while being advertised as preventing skin cancer.
As a bonus, it also drives breast cancer, destroys male fertility, shortens pregnancy, lowers birth weights and destroys coral reefs and marine ecosystems.
THE DATA
Sunlight is protective and palliative
The lag time on melanoma is as low as two years. Beaches in the United States were jammed on summer weekends in the 1930s. Why didn’t a melanoma epidemic hit the Depression generation 20 years later? Why did it take until the mid-1970s for the skin cancer epidemic to strike?
From 1981 to 2011, visitors to Cape Cod, Massachusetts decreased by 11%, from 4,978,838 to 4,454,771.
From 1981 to 2011, adjusted for population growth, U.S. visitors to National parks decreased by 10%.
From 1981 to 2011, melanoma cases in the United States increased by an annual average of 5.8%.
From 1981 to 2011, visitors to Cape Cod, Massachusetts decreased by an annual average of .4%.
From 1981 to 2011, U.S. visitors to National parks decreased by an annual average of .33%.
From 1981 to 2011, a .4% decrease in visitors to Cape Cod, Massachusetts was associated with a 5.8% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States.
If sun exposure is decreasing, and melanoma is increasing, then sun exposure is protective against melanoma.
From 1981 to 2011, a .33% decrease in visitors to National Parks in the United States was associated with a 5.8% average annual increase in melanoma cases there.
If sun exposure is decreasing, and melanoma is increasing, then sun exposure is protective against melanoma.
From 1998 to 2011, vistors to Cape Hatteras beach park in North Carolina decreased by 28%, from 2,737,640 to 1,969,711.
From 1998 to 2011, visitors to Cape Hatteras beach park in North Carolina decreased by an annual average of 2.2%.
From 1998 to 2011, a 2.2% average annual decrease in visitors to Cape Hatteras beach park in North Carolina was associated with a 6% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States.
Decreasing sun exposure, increasing melanoma.
The sun is protective against melanoma.
In 2014, women in Sweden who avoided lying out in the sun had mortality twice that of those who sunbathed daily.
Sunscreen is not protective against skin cancer
There is no evidence that sunscreen offers any real protection against malignant melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer.
Dermatologists get much of their information from the Skin Cancer Foundation.
The Skin Cancer Foundation is heavily supported by the sunscreen industry. A sunscreen manufacturer funds the Skin Cancer Foundations’s quarterly consumer publication, “Sun and Skin News".
In 1998, Epidemiologist Marianne Berwick of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said that “It’s not safe to rely on sunscreen.”
Researchers at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York concluded: “Sunscreens effective in the UV-B region…would not protect against melanoma.”
Suncreens can’t and don’t prevent melanoma, in that most sunscreens do not offer protection against UV-A, the harmful, longer-wavelength UV light that penetrates right through the outer skin—and through sunscreen—down to the melanocytes, the cells that become cancerous in melanoma cases.
If you just use a sunscreen that just protects against sunburn, you are effectively getting the same sun exposure as you would from a tanning bed.
Only avobenzone, is “clearly proven” to block UV-A sunlight. The FDA does not require its inclusion in sunscreens in order for manufacturers to claim that their products offer broad-spectrum protection.
U.S. consumers don’t have access to eight advanced European sun-filtering molecules because the Food & Drug Administration is not convinced they are safe for users. In May 2015, after more than ten years, the FDA would still not allow new sunscreens.
Sunscreen causes skin cancer and breast cancer
Avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule are absorbed from the skin into the bloodstream after a single day of sunscreen use.
After initial absorption, the concentration of these chemicals in the blood increases each day of application, and remain above FDA safety levels at day seven. Homosalate and oxybenzone remain above safety thresholds at day 21.
Oxybenzone, a known carcinogen, is absorbed into the body at a rate 50 to 100 times greater than any other sunscreen ingredient, where it acts as a photosensitizer and increases the release of free radicals.
In 2008, a study by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found oxybenzone in 97% of urine samples. A 2008 Swiss study found oxybenzone or one of four other sunscreen chemicals in 85% of breast milk samples,
Oxybenzone couples with another common sunscreen ingredient, Retinyl palmitate, which speeds the development of skin tumors and lesions when applied to the skin in the presence of sunlight.
Tumors and lesion development was 21% greater in lab animals coated in a sunscreen containing Retinyl palmitate than in controls.
UV stabilizers in sunscreen products have estrogenicity in an MCF-7 breast cancer cell assay as well as an immature rat uterotrophic assay.
Oxybenzone drives lower testosterone levels in adolescent boys, hormone changes in men, and shorter pregnancies and disrupted birth weights in babies.
Oxybenzone also drives contact allergies. A 10-year study found that 70% of people had a positive patch test when exposed to oxybenzone.
Women 49 or younger have a higher probability of developing melanoma than any other cancer, except breast cancer (which is also driven by sunscreen), or thyroid cancer.
Until around 1950, melanoma was rare. Then its incidence increased slowly until the mid-1960s, when it accelerated into the current epidemic.
From 1972 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by 3,510%, from $19 million to $686 million.
From 1972 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 87.8%.
From 1972 to 2012, an 87.8% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 4.6% average annual increase in melanoma risk in the United States.
From 1972 to 1996, international sunscreen sales increased by 2,531%, from $19 million to $500 million.
From 1972 to 1996, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 106%.
From 1972 to 1996, a 106% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 4.6% average annual increase in melanoma risk in the United States.
From 1972 to 1996, every 1% increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 4.3% increase in melanoma cases in the United States.
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma risk is increasing, then sunscreen drives melanoma.
From 1980 to 2024, melanoma risk in the United States increased by 200%, or tripled, from 1 in 250, or .4% to 1 in 84, or 1.2%.
From 1980 to 2024, melanoma risk in the United States increased by an annual average of 4.6%.
In 1980, an American’s lifetime melanoma risk was 1 in 250, or .4%.
From 1981 to 2011, the 6.6% average annual increase in sunscreen-driven melanoma cases in the United States was 53.5% greater than their 4.3% average annual increase from 1972 to 1980.
From 1981 to 2011, melanoma cases in the United States increased by 173%, from 26,000 to 71,000.
From 1981 to 2011, an 87.8% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 5.8% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States.
From 1981 to 2011, every 1% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 6.6% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma cases are increasing, then sunscreen drives melanoma.
From 1982 to 2015, white women in the younger age groups in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark have a greater incidence of melanoma than men.
Excess melanomas were found in women younger than 45 years in all populations (eg, IRR for 20-24 y age group, 0.3 in Denmark and 0.7 in Australia).
From 1982 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by 192%, or nearly tripled, from 26,000 to 76,000.
From 1982 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by an annual average of 6%.
From 1982 to 1996, a 106% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 6% average annual increase in melanoma in the United States.
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma is increasing, then sunscreen drives melanoma.
From 1996 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by 37%, from $500 million to $686 million.
From 1996 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 2.3%.
From 1996 to 2012, a 2.3% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 6% average annual increase in melanoma in the United States.
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma rates are increasing, then sunscreen drives melanoma.
From 1983 to 2014, the 6% average annual increase melanoma cases in the United States was 30.4% greater than the 4.6% average annual increase in melanoma risk in the United States from 1980 to 1982.
Melanoma cases in the United States are increasing exponentially, going forward in time. The variable is unscreen use.
From 1982 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by an annual average of 6%.
In 1999, M. Bigby published “the Sunscreen and Melanoma Controversy” in ArchDermatol, in which he stated “Previous case-control studies have suggested that sunscreen use is associated with an increased risk of melanoma”.
In 2000, P. Autier, M.D. published “Sunscreen and Melanoma Revisited” in ArchDermatol., in which he said "For the last 20 years, epidemiological data have suggested that sunscreen use could increase rather than decrease the risk of cutaneous melanoma.
Epidemiologic data suggest that behavioral issues could be involved in this association between high-factor sunscreen and melanoma."
Where “behavior issues” is general.
As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
From 2006 to 2015, the incidence rate of melanoma in the United States increased by 14.5%, from 200.1 to 229.1 cases per million person-years.
From 2006 to 2015, the incidence of melanoma in the United States increased by an annual average of 1.6%.
From 2012 to 2014, the 6% average annual increase in melanoma rates in the United States was 3.5% greater than its 5.8% average annual increase from 1981 to 2011.
From 2013 to 2023, the number of new invasive melanoma cases diagnosed annually increased by 27 percent.
From 2013 to 2023, the 68.8% positive variance in the average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States versus 2006 to 2013 was 1,866% greater than the 3.5% positive variance in same from 2012 to 2014 versus 1981 to 2011.
From 2013 to 2023, the 2.7% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States was 68.8% greater than their 1.6% average annual increase from 2006 to 2013.
On July 2, 2014, the University of Buffalo’s Marcene Robinson said “Fear, not data, motivates sunscreen users, research shows”.
The article goes on to say “Frequency of sunscreen use varied, with 32 percent reporting ‘‘never’’ using it, and 14 percent ‘‘always’’ using it.”
In 2015, the 30% of women who regularly used sunscreen was 114% greater, or more than twice as great as the 14% of men who did the same.
In 2024, an American’s lifetime melanoma risk was 1 in 84, or 1.2%.
The populace has recognized the deadly nature of sunscreen.
From 2001 to 2011, the percentage of U.S. teenagers using sunscreen decreased by 12%.
From 2001 to 2011, sunscreen use by teenagers in the United States decreased by an annual average of 1.2%.
From 2001 to 2011, sunscreen use decreased by 17.1%, from 67.7% of study respondents to 56.1%.
From 2001 to 2011, sunscreen use decreased by an annual average of 1.7%.
In 2001, 67.7% of study respondents used sunscreen.
From 2005 to 2016, the 5.4% decrease in melanoma rates among female adolescents in the United States was 22.7% greater than the 4.4% decrease among their male peers.
From 2005 to 2016, melanoma incidence rates among female adolescents in the United States decreased by 5.4%.
From 2005 to 2016, melanoma incidence rates among male adolescents in the United States decreased by 4.4%.
From 2005 to 2016, the 3.7% decrease in melanoma among male young adults in the United States was 2.7% greater than the 3.6% decrease among their female peers.
From 2005 to 2016, melanoma incidence rates among male young adults in the United States decreased by 3.7%.
From 2005 to 2016, melanoma incidence rates among female young adults in the United States decreased by 3.6%.
From 2005 to 2011, the 1.2% average annual decrease in sunscreen use by U.S. teenagers was associated with a 3.7% decrease in melanoma incidence among male young adults and a 3.6% decrease among females.
From 2005 to 2016, melanoma incidence rates among male young adults in the United States decreased by 3.7%.
From 2009 to 2024, Americans who did not use sunscreen increased by an annual average of .4%.
In 2009, 31% of Americans did not use sunscreen.
From 2013 to 2023, the 2.7% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States was 53.5% less than their 5.8% average annual increase from 1981 to 2011.
In 2014, 32% of study participants never used sunscreen.
In 2014, 14% of study participants always used sunscreen.
From 2015 to 2022, regular sunscreen use in the United States decreased by 13.6%, from 22% to 19%.
From 2015 to 2022, regular sunscreen use in the United States decreased by an annual average of 1.9%.
From 2015 to 2020, the 12.1% decrease in regular sunscreen use by men in the United States was 266.6% greater than the 3.3% decrease among women.
From 2015 to 2020 regular sunscreen use by men in the United States decreased by 12.1%, from 14% to 12.3%.
From 2015 to 2020, regular sunscreen use by women in the United States decreased by 3.3%, from 30% to 29%.
In 2015, 30% of women in the United States regularly used sunscreen.
In 2015, 22% of the populace in the United States regularly used sunscreen.
In 2015, 14% of men in the United States regularly used sunscreen.
In 2020, 12.3% of men and 29.0% of women aged ≥18 years always used sunscreen when outside on a sunny day for >1 hour.
In 2021, 19% of study respondents used sunscreen on a daily basis.
In 2022, 56% of study participants in the United States, rarely or never used sunscreen.
In 2022, 35% of study respondents in the United States did not use sunscreen.
In 2022, 21% of study respondents in the United States wore sunscreen once or twice a year or less.
From 2022 to 2023, the 28.9% decrease in daily sunscreen use in the United States was 1,421% greater than the 1.9% average annual decrease in regular sunscreen use in the United States from 2015 to 2022.
From 2015 to 2022, regular sunscreen use in the United States decreased by an annual average of 1.9%.
From 2022 to 2023, daily sunscreen use in the United States decreased by 28.9%, from 19% to 13.5%.
In 2021, 19% of study respondents used sunscreen on a daily basis.
In 2022, 19% of study respondents in the United States wore sunscreen on a daily basis.
From 2023 to 2024, study participants in the United States who did not wear sunscreen at all increased by 200%, or tripled, from 11% to 33%.
From 2023 to 2024, the 200% increase in Americans who did not use sunscreen was 48,899% greater than their .4% average annual increase from 2009 to 2024.
In 2023, 11% of study participants in the United States did not wear sunscreen at all.
In 2023, 13.5% of study participants wore sunscreen daily.
At this writing in July 2024, Hawaii, the Pacific nation of Palau and Key West have all banned sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate, because they cause coral bleaching and are dangerous to marine ecosystems.
From 2009 to 2024, Americans who did not used sunscreen increased by 6.5%, from 31% to 33%.
From 2009 to 2024, Americans who did not use sunscreen increased by an annual average of .4%.
In 2009, 31% of Americans did not use sunscreen.
In 2024, 33% of study respondents did not use sunscreen.
In 2024, the 42% of men who did not use sunscreen were 68% greater than the 25% of women who did not use sunscreen.
In 2024, 25% of women did not use sunscreen.
THE SUN DOESN’T CAUSE SKIN CANCER, IT PREVENTS SKIN CANCER
Big Lie number one: “the sun causes skin cancer”. Over the years, numerous studies have confirmed that appropriate sun exposure actually helps prevent skin cancer. For example, A Swedish study from 2014 showed that women who avoided lying out in the sun had mortality twice that of those who sunbathed daily.
At the most basic level, sunscreen prolongs people’s time in the sun by preventing the only natural warning system human skin has—sunburn.
The only proven way to prevent melanoma is to cover up. Our forebears did so in the days before sunscreen. Clearly it worked because melanoma was so rare. Queensland province, in northeastern Australia, has the highest melanoma rate in the world. In 1981, public health authorities in Queensland, Australia began a big-budget PR campaign promoting sunscreen. A few years ago, they shifted the campaign’s focus to strongly encourage people to cover up and stay in the shade, and melanoma rates there began to flatten.
SUNSCREEN DOES NOT PREVENT SKIN CANCER
Big Lie number two: “sunscreen protects you from skin cancer”. Sunscreen causes skin cancer. There are only four prospective studies that examine sunscreen’s role in preventing skin cancer, and none of these studies examine the efficacy of sunscreen in preventing skin cancer in otherwise healthy individuals.
There are three main kinds of skin cancer: basal cell, squamous cell, and malignant melanoma. The first two are common (about 1 million cases a year) and almost always medically minor. The American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute don’t even count them in the nation’s cancer statistics. Melanoma is much less common (40,300 diagnoses last year), but often fatal (7,300 deaths).
The truth is that suncreens can’t and don’t prevent melanoma, in that most sunscreens do not offer protection against UV-A, the harmful, longer-wavelength UV light that penetrates right through the outer skin—and through sunscreen—down to the melanocytes, the cells that become cancerous in melanoma cases.
In one study that proved this point, researchers at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, induced melanoma in fish by exposing them to both UV-B and UV-A sunlight. They concluded: “Sunscreens effective in the UV-B region…would not protect against melanoma.”
In 1998, Epidemiologist Marianne Berwick of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, said that there is no evidence that sunscreen offers any real protection against malignant melanoma, the most dangerous form of skin cancer. “It’s not safe to rely on sunscreen,” Berwick told the press.
The Skin Cancer Foundation promptly refuted her findings in a press release, telling consumers that “sunscreen should continue to be an integral part of a comprehensive program” to prevent melanoma. That’s what most people will likely hear from their dermatologists as well. What they won’t learn is that dermatologists get much of their information from the SCF, and the SCF, in turn, is heavily supported by the sunscreen industry. A sunscreen manufacturer even funded SCF’s quarterly consumer publication, “Sun and Skin News. No wonder the foundation doesn’t give much credence to the growing number of studies showing that even so-called broad-spectrum sunscreen doesn’t prevent melanoma.
To prevent melanoma, sunscreen must do more than block UV-B rays—it must also protect against UV-A. As a result, sunscreen makers have tinkered with their formulas, and now most claim that their products provide broad-spectrum UV-A and UV-B coverage. Sounds good, but it’s actually another sleight of hand on the part of sunscreen manufacturers. Only one ingredient, avobenzone, is “clearly proven” to block UV-A sunlight, and according to FDA spokeswoman Ivy Kupec, the FDA doesn’t require its inclusion in sunscreens in order for manufacturers to claim that their products offer broad-spectrum protection. (“I guess there’s an inconsistency,” she notes.) Kupec added that manufacturers “could still say [their product] protects against UV-A, because they can do it until we tell them not to.” So much for regulatory protection.
Unlike in Europe, U.S. regulations allow sunscreen makers to sell products that filter out UVB to prevent sunburn, but provide less protection against DNA-damaging UVA. In the U.S., we let the UVA that causes malignant melanoma right through, and make sure that the most deadly and absorbable of the ingredients, oxybenzone, is included.
In May 2015, Chemical & Engineering News said “After More Than A Decade, FDA Still Won’t Allow New Sunscreens”.
The article goes on to say “U.S. consumers don’t have access to eight advanced European sun-filtering molecules because the Food & Drug Administration is not convinced they are safe for users. Chemical and cosmetics industry executives counter that people are being denied potentially lifesaving protection. Despite legal efforts to break the stalemate, the wrangling could go on for many more years.”
Here, under the false guise of keeping you safe, we see that the Feds are doing everything they can to make sure that you are not safe - all the while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
“If you just use a sunscreen that just protects against sunburn,” said David Andrews, a senior scientist at the nonprofit Environmental Working Group, which recently published a comprehensive report on sunscreens, “you are effectively getting the same sun exposure as you would from a tanning bed.”
Even if sunscreen blocked UV-A completely, almost no one uses it in the way that grants real protection against sunburn. For sunscreen to live up to its hype, you have to slop it on real thick and reapply it every few hours. We’re talking at least one full bottle per person per day at the beach. Meanwhile, the vast majority of sunscreen users apply a thin layer once or twice.
SUNSCREEN CAUSES SKIN CANCER
Four popular chemical sunscreen filters often used in commercial products – avobenzone, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and ecamsule – are absorbed from the skin into the bloodstream after a single day of use. Oxybenzone is absorbed into the body at about 50 to 100 times higher concentration any other sunscreen ingredient.
After initial absorption, the concentration of the six chemicals in the blood increases each day of application, and remain above FDA safety levels at day seven. Two of the chemicals – homosalate and oxybenzone – remain above safety thresholds at day 21.
Sunscreen causes skin cancer because the hormone-disrupting chemical oxybenzone, a known caricinogen, penetrates the skin and enters the bloodstream, and acts as a photosensitizer, increasing the release of free radicals. That couples with another common sunscreen ingredient, Retinyl palmitate, which speeds the development of skin tumors and lesions when applied to the skin in the presence of sunlight.
Retinyl palmitate is a form of Vitamin A, and was selected by the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition for photo-toxicity and photocarcinogenicity testing, which showed that tumors and lesions developed 21% faster in lab animals coated in a vitamin A-laced sunscreen than animals treated with a vitamin-free cream.
Oxybenzone drives lower testosterone levels in adolescent boys, hormone changes in men, and shorter pregnancies and disrupted birth weights in babies. Of all of the sunscreen ingredients, oxybenzone is known to be the most common cause of contact allergies; a 10-year study found that 70% of people had a positive patch test when exposed.
A 2006 study from the University of California, Riverside, showed that certain sunscreen ingredients caused more free radicals to form than no sunscreen at all.
In 2008, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention analyzed urine samples collected by a government study and found oxybenzone in 97% of those samples.
A 2008 Swiss study found oxybenzone or one of four other sunscreen chemicals in 85% of breast milk samples, sparking concern that newborns could be exposed. A 2010 study found another of the studied chemicals, octinoxate, in breast milk.
In 2011, David Andrews, a senior scientist for the Environmental Working Group, or EWG, a consumer organization which advocates for sunscreen safety, said “It is outrageous that over a decade ago, nearly every American tested by CDC had oxybenzone in their blood, an ingredient linked to hormone disruption, and still manufacturers have resisted safety testing,” he added.
EXPONENTIALLY-INCREASING MELANOMA RATES ACCOMPANIED BY EXPONENTIALLY-INCREASING SUNSCREEN USE AND DECREASING SUN EXPOSURE
Research indicates that the lag time on melanoma could be as low as two years. Beaches around the country were jammed on summer weekends in the 1930s. Why didn’t a melanoma epidemic hit the Depression generation 20 years later? Why did it take until the mid-1970s for the epidemic to strike? Sunscreen promoters offer no clue.
If melanoma has a 20-year lag time and sunscreen is protective, the melanoma rate should have started to level off by now. Instead, it’s climbing. In 1980, an American’s lifetime melanoma risk was 1 in 250. Today, it’s 1 in 84.
“Sunscreen” was first introduced in the early 1940s as tanning lotion. The idea was that if you could stay in the sun without burning, you’d tan. A few years later, the melanoma rate began to rise. Improved tanning lotions came on the market in the early 1960s, and a few years after that, the melanoma rate zoomed up. Public health authorities became concerned, and melanoma became news. Seeing a commercial opportunity, the makers of tanning lotions repositioned their products as “sunscreen,” and the now familiar sermonizing began. Since then, melanoma has become the nation’s fastest-rising cancer and sunscreen sales have continued to climb.
Until around 1950, melanoma was rare. Then its incidence increased slowly until the mid-1960s, when it accelerated into the current epidemic.
From 1972 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by 3,510%, from $19 million to $686 million.
From 1972 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 292.5%.
From 1972 to 1996, international sunscreen sales increased by 2,531% from 1972 to 1996, from $19 million to $500 million.
From 1972 to 1996, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 106%.
From 1981 to 2011, a 292.5% average annual increase in sunscreen sales in the United States was associated with a 5.8% average annual increase in melanoma cases in the United States.
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma cases are increasing, then sunscreen increases melanoma.
From 1981 to 2011, melanoma cases in the United States increased by 173%, from 26,000 to 71,000.
From 1981 to 2011, visitors to Cape Cod decreased by 11%, from 4,978,838 to 4,454,771.
From 1981 to 2011, adjusted for population growth, U.S. visitors to National parks decreased by 10%
From 1981 to 2011, melanoma cases in the United States increased by an annual average of 5.8%.
From 1982 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by 192%, or nearly tripled, from 26,000 to 76,000.
From 1982 to 2014, melanoma rates in the United States increased by an annual average of 6%.
From 2012 to 2014, the 6% average annual increase in melanoma rates in the United States was 3.5% greater than its 5.8% average annual increase from 1981 to 2011.
From 1982 to 1996, a 106% annual increase in sunscreen sales was associated with a 6% average annual increase in melanoma in the United States.
If sunscreen sales are increasing, and melanoma is increasing, the sunscreen drives melanoma.
From 1996 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by 37%, from $500 million to $686 million.
From 1996 to 2012, international sunscreen sales increased by an annual average of 2.3%.
From 1996 to 2012, a 2.3% average annual increase in international sunscreen sales was associated with a 6% average annual increase in melanoma in the United States.
The two-year delay or lag time for sunscreen’s protection does not accommodate these statistics. If sunscreen helped prevent skin cancer, we would have seen melanoma rates decrease years ago.
From 1998 to 2011, vistors to Cape Hatteras beach park in North Carolina decreased by 28%, from 2,737,640 to 1,969,711.
From 1998 toi 2010, the population of the United States increased by 15%, from 270 million to 310 million.
This clearly documents a population with significantly decreasing sun exposure and hyper-exponentially-increasing sunscreen use that experienced a near-tripling of melanoma. With the theory being that the tripling of melanoma is being driven by sun exposure. You can’t make this shit up, folks. That is unless you are a literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist.
From 2000 to 2010, squamous cell carcinoma among the general populace in the United States increased by 45%.
From 2000 to 2010, squamous cell carcinoma among the general populace in the United States increased by an annual average of 4.5%.
From 2000 to 2010, the 26.3% average increase in squamous cell carcinoma among women in the United States was 484% greater, or nearly six times greater than its 4.5% average annual increase among the general populace during the same time period.
From 2000 to 2010, squamous cell carcinoma among women in the United States increased by 263%. Women 30-49 experienced the greatest increase.
From 2000 to 2010, squamous cell carcinoma among women in the United States increased by an annual average of 26.3%.
From 2007 and 2014, sunscreen sales in the United States increased by an annual average of 4.2%.
That’s a cumulative increase of nearly thirty percent over a period of just seven years. That means that, in just over seven years, thirty percent more sunscreen was being applied.
From 2007 to 2014, a 4.2% average annual increase in sunscreen sales in the United States was associated with a 4.5% average annual increase in squamous cell carcinoma among the general populace and a 26.3% average annual increase among women, with the greatest increase among women from 30-49.
In June 2015, realnatural.org said “Melanoma Rates Double as More Use Sunscreen, Fewer Sunbathe”.
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and “puzzled” are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled and coopted Political, Academic, Scientific and Media establishments wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those variants is “surprised”. That’s why the article goes on to say “Of all types of cancer in the United States, skin cancer is the most common. This might come as a surprise to many.”
I had to read the rest of the article and do the math to learn that Melanoma cases in the United States increased by 173% from 1982 to 2011, from 26,000 to 71,000.
The realnatural headline says “rates DOUBLE”, when the truth is that rates have close to TRIPLED.
From 2011 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by 7%, from 71,000 to 76,000.
From 2011 to 2014, melanoma cases in the United States increased by an annual average of 2.3%.
In June 2018, Science-Based Medicine widened its eyes to simulate honesty and asked “Do Sunscreens Cause Cancer ?”
The article goes on to say “Elizabeth Plourde thinks sunscreens cause cancer rather than preventing it. She blames sunscreens for everything from coral reef die-offs to autism. Neither her evidence nor her reasoning stand up to scrutiny.”
Science-Based Medicine is a State propaganda organ, using conscious deception while retaining the firmness of purpose that goes with complete honesty.
Knowing that hysterical helicopter moms driving their kids to the bus stop and then standing there to witness them safely getting on the bus are also willfully pretending that they have no idea any of this is happening is a key part of the dilemma facing us as a species.
SUNSCREEN DRIVES BREAST CANCER
In 2017, a study published in the Journal of Health Science by the National Institute of Health Sciences in Japan examined UV stabilizers used in food packages as plastic additives. They found that some UV stabilizers in sunscreen products have estrogenicity in an MCF-7 breast cancer cell assay as well as an immature rat uterotrophic assay. They tested a total of 11 UV stabilizers. 20 kinds of benzophenones were tested using the same assay to demonstrate their estrogenic activity.
IT’S SUNSCREEN, NOT “WARMING OCEANS” THAT IS DESTROYING CORAL REEFS
As a bonus, not only do sunscreens drive the skin cancer that it is claimed they prevent, they also destroy coral reefs. The “reef bleaching” that’s tirelessly blamed on “global warming” is actually driven by sunscreen use.
The chemicals in sunscreen are toxic to coral reefs. Just a small amount of certain chemicals is enough to cause corals to bleach, losing their symbiotic algal energy source and become more susceptible to viral infections.
That’s why Hawaii, the Pacific nation of Palau and Key West have all banned sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate, because they cause coral bleaching and are dangerous to marine ecosystems.
Parabens such as the commonly used methyl paraben and butyl paraben are fungicides and anti-bacterial agents that extend the shelf life of a product. Phenoxyethanol was originally used as a mass fish anesthetic.
An estimated 14,000 tons of sunscreen is believed to be deposited in oceans annually.
THE COLLAPSE OF THE CONFIDENCE GAME
At this writing in July 2024, Hawaii, the Pacific nation of Palau and Key West have all banned sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate, because they cause coral bleaching and are dangerous to marine ecosystems.
From 2001 to 2011, the percentage of U.S. teenagers using sunscreen decreased by 12%.
As of 2015, only a third of the public used sunscreen.
