THE POPULACE HAS RECOGNIZED THAT TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED AGAINST IT
"Sauron was become now a sorcerer of dreadful power, master of shadows and of phantoms, foul in wisdom, cruel in strength, misshaping what he touched, twisting what he ruled, lord of werewolves; his dominion was torment.”
From “The Silmarillion”, by J.R.R. Tolkien, 1977
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Orgonite devices based on Wilhelm Reich’s work.
Since Don Croft fabricated the first simple, inexpensive tactical Orgonite devices in 2000, their widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of these changes is that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
As kids, we played with walkie-talkies, and were amazed and thrilled for a minute, then put them aside.
The instant the “cell phone” appeared, I and many others clearly discerned it for the plague that it was and is, simply because of the asshole factor. And that was without knowing the deadliness of the non-ionizing radiation driving the cell phone.
There was (and is) simply no reason to carry a communicator around with you, such as the ones they used in the old Star Trek television show. Now, a phaser you could send on stun and use to instantly incapacitate asshole cell phone users in restaurants? That, my friend, is a technology I could get behind.
If a pre-cell-phone population in the midst of the barely-covert international release of a State-fabricated weaponized pathogen suddenly had “smart” phones released upon it, in turn, the negative impact of the phones would be seen to dwarf that of the engineered virus, whose Death rate is seen to be roughly that of the seasonal flu when exaggerated and outright-fabricated numbers are removed from the analysis.
This is cheering, and inspiring, in that this chapter documents the demise of the wireless “cell” phone, which has been driving ruin and woe on innumerable levels of society for a solid twenty years. While the wildly-exaggerated impact of the engineered virus is, at the societal level, minuscule by comparison.
So, while it’s not the most positive time right now, there are still gigantic positive changes taking place on a societal level that dwarf the negativities that we’re currently experiencing. And one of them is that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
We’ll start out with some softball examples, such as “Heavy internet use is associated with mood disorders, poor sleep quality, low self-esteem, impulsivity, suicide, lower levels of physical activity, and health problems (migraines, back pain, obesity).”
The amount of time employees spend on their smart phones during the work week accounts for $15.5 billion in lost productivity in the U.S. Or did, anyway, before we were locked down in our homes. How do you think productivity has been doing since then?
The mere presence of smartphones damages cognitive capacity – even when the device is turned off.
There is a significant relationship between Problematic Cell Phone Use and alcohol abuse.
There is a significant multiplicative interactive effect of phone addiction and depressive symptoms with alcohol use.
SO-CALLED “SMART” PHONES DRIVE NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE
In 2002, just four years after the literal forest of “wireless communication” infrastructure sprang up virtually overnight in all the nations, neurosurgeon and researcher Dr. Leif Salford exposed over 1600 experimental animals to low level microwave radiation. His results were consistent and worrisome: microwave radiation caused the blood-brain barrier to leak.
Dr. Salford repeated the experiment in 2003 on 32 additional animals; they waited this time 8 weeks before “sacrificing them”–and found “up to two percent of the neurons in all areas of the brain were shrunken and degenerated.” Dr. Salford called the potential implications ‘terrifying’.”
That’s why Alzheimer’s deaths increased 54.5% from 1999 to 2014.
The non-Ionizing radiation from Technology is driving an exponential increase in neurodegenerative disease, regardless of geography. And, while they are the most efficient Death energy delivery vehicle yet devised, it’s not just from cell phones. It also includes microwave Television transmissions, and microwave oven emissions, high tension power lines, and countless other sources. It’s a long list, that also includes good old fashioned ionizing radiation.
(Nursing home for Alzheimer’s patients)
It’s starting to happen to my mom. I just moved her into such a facility.
It doesn’t matter where the radiation comes from, or what kind of radiation it is. The damage from radiation is cumulative and dose-dependent.
”But don’t take my word for it. Back at the dawn of the cell phone era, in 2003, the BBC said “Cell Phones ‘May Trigger Alzheimer’s Disease”.
And it’s why, in 2017, the Journal of the American Medical Association said, re: Alzheimer’s: “(The blood-brain barrier) becomes leaky, letting in undesirable agents and hindering the clearing of the amyloid.”
THE NON-IONIZING RADIATION FROM WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY CAUSES CANCER
A study in 2015 showed cellphone radiation causes cancer. That’s why new cancer cases increased more 10 Percent from 2009 to 2014.
From 1975 to 2007, oral cancer increased 28% among people 18 to 44 years of age. Among white people in this age group, the incidence increased 67%. The largest increase, 111%, was seen among white women.
The increase in oral cancer among white women from 1975 to 2007 was over three times that seen among the general population. While white males had an incidence of oral cancer over twice that of the general population.
White people from 18 to 44 years of age had exponentially higher amounts of mouth cancer because their addiction to the non-ionizing radiation-generating Death brick they hold up to their mouths is the greatest. With white women, the highest users, having by far the highest increase in mouth cancer. Phone addiction is 150% higher among women than it is among men.
Colon cancer deaths in the U.S. decreased 38% from 1970 to 2004. While Colon cancer deaths in the U.S. increased 9.3% from 2004 to 2014, but only among whites.
Young whites were the only group to see an increase in colon cancer because that colon cancer was driven by the phones they carried in their back pockets, directly over their colons.
Breast cancer increased 25% from 1975 to 2017. White women have the highest rate of breast cancer.
White women, the ones 150% more phone-addicted than everyone else.
This is not rocket science, people.
In April 2017, in a landmark ruling, an Italian Court found that cancer was linked to cellphone use.
In 2017, it was shown that California government buried the truth about cell phone radiation causing brain cancer.
The number of Swedes under age 70 who died of a brain tumor “of an unknown nature” increased 1,071% from 2008 and 2013. The folks in charge in Sweden began to put conspiratorially pile all the additional brain tumor deaths into new bucket, “of an unknown nature”, so that the exponential increase wouldn’t show up in the official cancer numbers.
In May 2017, “Natural Blaze” widened its eyes to simulate honesty and sowed the seed of doubt with “Deadly brain tumour rates on the increase in the UK, US, Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden, is it attributable to mobile phones***?***”
In October 2017, Science Daily said “World’s ‘better’ countries have higher rates of cancer”.
Where “HIGHER rates of cancer” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. By “better” countries, they mean “countries with the highest amount of wireless communications infrastructure”.
Contrary to the false dogma of the barely-closeted Death worshippers who have ruled us all the way back to Babylon, and before, both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation are deadly, and their effect is cumulative, and dose-dependent.
In 1990, the National Institute of Health said “There is no evidence that radiogenic breast cancers appear during the first 10 years following exposure, but after this time the number of such cancers appears to increase rapidly. On the relative-risk scale, the data suggest that the incidence peaks at 15 to 20 years after exposure and the mortality about 5 years later. Observations to date indicate that the absolute risk continues to increase until 50 but may decrease at older ages.”
Thus, it takes ten to fifteen years for the breast cancer caused by the ionizing radiation used in purportedly “helpful” breast exams to reveal itself.
Cancer in children increased 40% from 2000 to 2016. The article I got that statistic from an article that said “Modern life is killing children…”. Where “modern life” is a half-truth, a hedging generality put forward to cover up the specific driver, the non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology.
If we take 1998 as the beginning of “wireless technology”, a non-ionizing radiation-driven increase in cancer began in 2000, just two years after implementation, in the most sensitive humans, namely children. Those increases in cancer appeared a year after suicide and mortality did in 1999, just a year after wireless technology was implemented seemingly overnight in all the nations.
Increases in suicide began at the same time in both the U.S. and in the U.K.
SMART PHONES MAKE YOU WANT TO KILL YOURSELF
The suicide rate in the ten highest smart phone penetration nations is 50% higher than that in ten lowest smart phone penetration nations.
I should quit writing these articles and just print T-Shirts with that on them. I thought of another shirt the other day: “Isn’t it time we moved past Sham Democracy?”, with a picture of both candidates on it flashing the same Illuminist hand sign. But I digress.
The suicide rate in the ten highest smart phone penetration nations is 50% higher than that in the ten lowest smart phone penetration nations because Internet addicts have a 47% higher rate of suicidal thoughts within a week, a 23 percent higher rate of lifetime suicide attempts, and a 5 percent higher rate of suicides attempt within a year.
The non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology makes you want to kill yourself. That’s why teenagers who spend 5 hours a day on electronic devices are 71% more likely to have suicide risk factors than those with one-hour use. And It was the time spent on the device, not the content, that mattered most.
Web-addicted individuals have a 65% higher rate of psychiatric morbidity.
The rate of suicidal ideation is 12% higher, and the rate of suicide attempts is 8% higher in phone-addicted adolescents.
The suicide rate in the U.S. increased 33% from 1999 to 2017. If we take 1998 as the beginning of “wireless technology”, then a non-ionizing radiation-driven increase in suicide rates appeared just a year later, in 1999.
Suicide began to increase in the U.S. and the U.K. in the same year, 1999, just a year after “wireless communication infrastructure” was suddenly thrown up seemingly overnight in all the nations in 1998.
THE NON-IONIZING RADIATION FROM WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY IS DEADLY
Overall mortality for 25 year old white women in the U.S. increased 45% from 1994 to 2014. While overall mortality for 25 year old white men increased 29% during the same time period.
The phone addiction rate among females is 150% higher than that of males.
34% of teen girls ages 14-17 say they mostly go online using their cell phone, 10 percent higher than teen boys the same age. This is notable since boys and girls are equally likely to be smartphone owners.
Female college students spend an average of 10 hours a day on their cell phones, while male students spend nearly eight. Since the deadly effects of non-ionizing radiation are cumulative and dose dependent, those extra two hours are bell ringers.
The increase in overall mortality for 25 year old white women was far higher than that of males the same age because those women logged far more hours on their devices. The deadly impact of the non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology is cumulative and dose-dependent.
Overall mortality didn’t begin to decrease in the U.K. until 2011. This shows that it took a good ten years for the malefic effects of wireless technology to reveal themselves across the community at large in terms of decreased mortality. That’s the same ten years required for the ionizing radiation from breast exams to produce breast cancer, as those machines were specifically designed and built to do.
THE DEMISE OF THE “SMART” PHONE - THE POPULACE HAS RECOGNIZED THAT TECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN WEAPONIZED AGAINST IT
Loren Brichter, who in 2009 designed the pull-to-refresh feature now used by many apps, said “Smartphones are useful tools, but they’re addictive. I regret the downsides.”
Chris Marcellino, who was hired by Apple to work on the iPhone in his early 20’s, is now in the final stages of retraining to be a neurosurgeon. He stresses he is no expert on addiction, but says he has picked up enough in his medical training to know that technologies can affect the same neurological pathways as gambling and drug use. “These are the same circuits that make people seek out food, comfort, heat, sex,” he says.
In January 2012, it was stated “Technology is Destroying the Quality of Human Interaction”.
A Gizmodo article from March 2013 stated “Dumbphones Are Not the Answer to Smartphone Addiction”.
In September 2013 HuffPost wrung its hands and asked “Will There Be a Backlash Against Technology?”
In October 2013, Saybrook University asked “To connect or disconnect, that is the question”.
An article from 2013 said that smartphones were “transforming society into a sea of stupid”.
In November 2013, Showbams said “Live music artists ignite the dawn of a smartphone backlash”.
In a Chinese study from 2014, 21.3% of smart phone users were found to be addicted to their phones.
In May 2014, Computerworld said “Smartphone prices are dropping, and will continue to dip through '18”.
Where “dropping” and “dip” are both general. “Dip” implies a shallow descent, followed by a shallow increase.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Can you see how they replaced dropping sales with dropping prices? While what they’ve said is technically true, what they’ve done in propaganda terms is “walk it back”.
People were getting wise and ditching their Death-brick phones six years ago, in 2014.
In December 2014, we saw a “Trend alert: Influential celebs driving ‘retro chic’ comeback for flip phones”.
A CNBC.com article from 2015 was headlined “The demise of the smartphone is inevitable, and necessary”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State is trying to confine the collapse of technology merely to the so-called “smart” phone.
In February 2015, a Chinese teenager chopped off their own hand in an attempt to cure their Internet addiction.
In May 2015, the Wall Street Journal quibbled “Is Technology Making People Less Sociable***?***”
In July 2015, HuffPost offered “8 Ways To Disconnect From Technology And Get More Done!”
In July 2015, “A raft of celebrities and politicians have been seen using flip phones”.
Celebrities and Politicians, ah, mirth, is there anything they can’t do? They’re working “the set up”. They’re trying to socially engineer the collapse of technology so that it’s just confined to phones.
In September 2015, “Odyssey” stated that “the disconnect” was “How Social Media Is Making Us Anti-Social”.
Here, the rearguard action is “keep the phone, ditch the social media!”
An article from September 2015 asked “Smartphone Stupidity: Does Anybody Pay Attention to Each Other Anymore?”
In September 2015, the moronically named Fudzilla said “Ebook sales fall as old technology hangs on”.
The word “fall” was used because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
In October 2015, Time Magazine said that Google dropped their “Don’t Be Evil” motto, averring that it was Google’s “Parent Company”.
In October 2015, it was stated “Why it’s time to put your smartphone down. Seriously.”
Where “put your smartphone down” is a defensive hedge against “get rid of your smartphone”. Which is, in turn, a hedge against “get rid of the Internet”.
An article from New Zealand from January 2016 was headlined “Life without a smartphone is liberating”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State has tried to socially-engineer the collapse of technology so that it is confined merely to the demonized “smart” phone.
An article from the U.K. from January 2016 was headlined “Ditch the smartphone, find your soul”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State has tried to socially-engineer the collapse of technology so that it is confined merely to the demonized “smart” phone.
An article from Minyanville’s Wall Street from April 2016 talked of “The Anti-Smartphone Revolution”, and said “There’s a rising backlash against the smartphone dominant culture we find ourselves living in these days and that backlash is finally catching on.”
Where the Mouthpiece of the State has tried to socially-engineer the collapse of technology so that it is confined merely to the demonized “smart” phone.
In April 2016, in a fantastic bit of Mil-Speak, USA Today said “IBM sales fall as turnaround comes slowly”.
Where “slow turnaround” is USA Today’s description of the public’s recognition that technology has been weaponized against them.
IBM’s sales were said to “fall” because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
In April 2016, BBC News stated “How disconnecting the internet could help our identity”. That’s an early trial balloon for the “taking humanity back to a pre-technological reality” gambit that’s brewing as I write this.
Humanity is recognizing that technology is deadly, and that it was designed to be. And, further, humanity is using technology to upend the Great Big Conspiracy I’m exposing here. So technology has to go, and the folks in charge are going to socially engineer you there without your even knowing it.
However, I guess they’ll want to keep the two-way Telescreens in place, a la Orwell.
A TurboFuture article from May 2016 was headlined “Why You Should Switch to a Dumb Phone”.
For now, they’re fighting a rearguard action, trying to keep you attached to a microwave brain heater, web-enabled or no, versus having you escape back to a land line.
In May 2016, Infographic explained “Why You Really Need to Unplug While on Vacation”. While an article from March 2017 is headlined “Some Companies Encouraging Employees to Disconnect During Vacation”.
Where “vacation” is used as a defensive hedge against permanent disconnection in both examples.
The meme is repeated again in a story from April 2017” “Disconnecting to Reconnect: A Break from Technology”.
In July 2016, URJ Camp George said “Disconnect to Connect: A New Perspective”.
In August 2016, computerweekly.com said “Mobile phone sales drop as smartphone buyers bide their time”.
“Smartphone buyers biding their time” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
“Drop” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here, namely that the populace has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon. In August 2016, an article spoke of “Digital detox: 11 easy ways to take yourself offline this weekend.”
Where “this weekend” is a defensive hedge against “take yourself offline permanently”.
In September 2016, in a rare example of truth in journalism, the Courier Mail said “E-book sales fall as the printed word makes a comeback”. But can you see how they used “the printed word” in place of “books”, to make the subject far less searchable?
The word “fall” was used because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer. But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
A 2017 study showed that Fitbits discouraged teenagers from exercising.
In 2017, the smart phone was said to be “ruining your mental health.”
In 2017, a book was published entitled “Who Can You Trust?: How Technology Brought Us Together and Why It Might Drive Us Apart”.
Author Rachel Botsman is fighting a desperate, hopeless rearguard action against a populace that has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
An “Enterprise Irregulars” article from January 2017 spoke of “The Coming Tech Backlash”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State is fighting a furious rearguard action, talking about a backlash that got underway five years previously as if it hadn’t started yet.
In January 2017, a new law in France barred work e-mails after hours. theverge.com said “France’s ‘right to disconnect’ is a nice idea, but it’s also pretty vague”. It’s not in any way vague. The author has Satanically inverted it.
An article from February 2017 spoke of the “ wisdom” of Nokia’s Dumbphone, and said that “the smartphone’s ubiquity has made it boring and oppressive.”
In March 2017, Forbes widened its eyes to simulate honesty and assured “Why Intel Is Now Tech’s Undervalued Stock”.
An article from March 2017 said that smartphones were “‘Irresistible’ By Design”, and that “It’s No Accident You Can’t Stop Looking At The Screen”.
An article from March 2017 said that “we don’t need to disconnect from our technology to live a healthy life”.
An article from March 2017 Benjamin Parry furrowed his brow and sternly asked “Smartphone vs Dumbphone - where’s the middle ground***?***”
“Here’s my thoughts on dumbing down the smartphone … a general consensus that this is the start of the “backlash” against device addiction.”
He’s asking for a middle ground where there isn’t one. The online connection makes the smart phone evil, period. As a Mouthpiece of the State, he’s furiously slow-playing the situation, speaking as if the backlash that had started five years previously was just getting underway.
An article in April 2017 said that “one day, not too soon — but still sooner than you think — the smartphone will all but vanish, the way beepers and fax machines did before it.”
In April 2017, BBC News said “Book sales hit a record as children’s fiction gains in popularity”.
Where “HIT a record” and “GAINS in popularity” are both general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
In journalistic parlance, the author has “buried” the statistics in the body of the article below:
“Children’s fiction helped drive UK book sales to a record £3.5bn last year, the Publishers Association (PA) has said.”
The author takes care not to mention what the previous record was, or when it was set. However we can see that book sales were at their highest level in all history in 2017, during what was claimed to be the height of e-book popularity and the demise of “old technology.”
The author continues: “The 6% rise came despite the waning popularity of ebooks, which saw sales fall by 3% to £538m last year. Sales of children’s books rose 16% to £365m, with the increase due mainly to the purchase of printed works.”
They used “rise” because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. They used “fall” because it’s it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
Can you see how the author carefully walked “printed BOOKS” back to “printed WORKS”, to make the subject less searchable?
Most cheeringly, it is children leading the charge back to a sane, healthy reality and away from the Death energy distributing “e-book”.
An article from April 2017 was headlined “How to disconnect from technology, hint: it’s not as hard as you might think”.
An article from April 2017 said “Break free from social media with this minimal phone”.
In April 2017, Ghana News said “Ebook sales drop as readers favour non-fiction books”.
Now, that’s one bizarre piece of propaganda! To imply that there’s a lack of non-fiction e-books is farcical, but the propagandist knows that the subconscious of many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon in which the public has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
An article from April 2017 said that the smartphone was changing the human race in “surprising” ways.
In May 2017 doctors in Denver, Colorado sought to ban smartphone sales to preteens.
An article from May 2017 asked “Youth Social Media and Smartphone Use: A Problem or Tool for Good?”
An article from May 2017 said “Our smartphone addictions have led us to a rather odd cultural moment”.
A Citilab article from May 2017 was headlined “The Case for the Disconnected Commute”.
The Mouthpiece of the state is trying to help socially engineer the collapse of technology so that people don’t disconnect entirely.
In June 2017, Newstalk explained “Why it’s important to disconnect from social media”.
The Mouthpiece of the state is trying to help socially engineer the collapse of technology so that people don’t disconnect entirely.
An article from June 2017 from the U.K. asked “Want to stop being connected 24/7***?*** Try this 'dumbphone’”
This “new” dumb phone? Flip phones never went anywhere. It’s a hit-piece, playing you to ditch your smartphone, versus disconnecting from the Internet entirely.
An article from July 2017 is bizarrely headlined “Internet connects the unconnected, but disconnects the connected”. That’s a Satanic inversion. It’s also an example of doublespeak, and doublethink.
In July 2017, the Jewish Federation stated “Why Disconnecting from Tech Is Good for Kids”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State is trying to keep the pullback from technology confined to “kids”.
A story from July 2017 from India truthfully says “The good old dumbphone is slowly replacing your do-it-all smartphone”.
While the public is so conditioned that they cannot discern such things, the author is fighting a desperate rearguard action to keep people from going back to land lines.
An article from July 2017 declaims, “Why you’re addicted to your phone … and what to do about it”. You may be assured that “get rid of your phone” is not on the list.
In August 2017, Rick Steelhammer asked “Should ‘smartphone zombies’ be coddled or cited?”
He’s pretending to be a hardass, but he puts “coddled” first, so everyone pro smartphone can grab that one first and move on.
An article from August 2017 spoke of “The importance of disconnecting from tech”.
In August 2017, the psychotically-named HealthyWay explained “9 Ways Your Smartphone Is Destroying Your Health”, without one of them being “non-ionizing radiation”.
In September 2017, the U.K.’s Daily Mail published “STEPHEN GLOVER: Oh, how I hate my damned iPhone”. It’s actually a Samsung commercial.
There’s a strict rule in journalism that you don’t use brand names unless there’s some salient, required reason for doing so. The use of the brand name “iPhone” clearly implies that, if Mr. Glover switched to a Samsung, or some other brand of phone, his troubles would vanish.
In September 2017, the U.K.’s Guardian said “‘There’s more time to look and listen to what’s around you’: readers on life without a mobile”
Where the author did what little they could to hedge by replacing “smart phone” with “mobile” at the end of the headline, so that the subject would be far less searchable.
An article from September 2017 said “Disconnect to reconnect with one of these digital detox holidays”.
Where the Mouthpiece of the State is trying to keep the pullback from technology confined to “holidays”.
In September 2017, Gizmodo said “I’m Going to Buy the iPhone X, and I Hate Myself for It”. It’s actually a Samsung commercial.
In September of 2017, it was questioned if we were “raising a generation of unhappy, non-resilient adolescents”.
In September 2017, Inc. desperately tried to keep you from ditching your smart phone with: “Want to Remember More? Set Down Your Smartphone.”
An article from September 2017 said that the stock market ended “lower”, “tech drops, North Korea threatens”.
They’ve inserted a false driver “North Korea threatens” to try to water down the completely technology-driven drop in the market.
A story from October 2017 says that “Technology destroys interpersonal communication”.
A story from October 2017 said “Technology is Disconnecting Families”.
A story from Samsung from October 2017 is headlined “A Dare for Developers: Infuse Technology with Humanity”. As if infusing technology with Humanity were possible.
An article from October 2017 said “Backlash against social media as children would be ‘happy’ if it did not exist.
It’s a hit-piece. “Social media” is demonized. It’s perfectly okay to spend eight hours a day anywhere else on the Internet…
In October 2017, Bloomberg said “Smartphones Are Killing Americans, But Nobody’s Counting”.
The Mouthpiece of the State maintains that it’s just the phones, specifically, that are killing Americans, vs. the truth, that it’s non-Ionizing radiation in general that is doing so.
A story from October 2017 asked “Tech backlash or peak smartphone?”, and said that young people of Gen Z spending “less” time on smartphones for the first time.
It’s the most conservative possible view of the plague of non-Ionizing radiation. The fallback is “less smartphone”, and disconnection from technology in general goes deliberately unmentioned.
A New York Post article from October 2017 said “Your smartphone is upsetting you, study says”.
They’ve include the snide “study says” so that your subconscious can grasp the straw of “oh, it was just one study!” But it’s a hit-piece - if you buy it, you fall for “ditch the phone, keep the Internet connection.”
An article from October 2017 said that smartphones were “draining our brain power”.
In October 2017, Gear Patrol said “I Spent $1,100 on the iPhone X – And Now I Hate Myself”.A Thrive article from November 2017 stated that “When it comes to technology detoxing, ditching your smartphone is akin to achieving nirvana.”
In October 2017, popscie.com said “Your smartphone is hijacking your brain. Here’s how to stop it”.
The list of plausible-deniability techniques does not include “get rid of your smart phone”.
An article in November 2017 said “Teen depression, suicide and smartphone use are up”.
In November 2017, a city in Colorado voted “yes” to city-run broadband, kicking out Comcast.
In November 2017, the New Zealand Herald said “Principal tells parents: You’re not cool, you’re kidding yourself”.
The article continues: “Bad pupil behaviour influenced by disintegration of the parent network and smartphones.”
An article from November 2017 is headlined “Disconnecting from technology sometimes.” Where the Mouthpiece of the State is trying to confine the pullback from technology.
A “Thrive” article from November 2017 says “Balance Your Life with These Technology-Ditching Strategies”
An article from November 2017 from “Greatest” explains “Why Everyone Should Unplug More Often.”
The Mouthpiece of the state is trying to help socially engineer the collapse of technology so that people don’t disconnect entirely.
A “What To Think” hit-piece from the U.K. from September 2017 says “How getting rid of my smartphone revolutionised my life”, and that “The devices are a cause of, and remedy from, the high-anxiety precarious life under late capitalism – and are rewiring our brains to resemble computers
Earnest sincerity may be off-brand, but my smartphone-induced anxiety was real, and so I got rid of my smartphone nine months ago. While still using the internet often, I had large portions of each day “unplugged” from feeds and message threads. (Being able to part with a smartphone is undoubtedly a privilege, not possible for huge numbers of people because of their job, their family or their security).
The effects were radicalising. The first, most immediate change was an acute widening of my emotional register. I felt emotions in a deeper, more wholesome sense than I had in years.
Can you see the clear play attempting to have technology not be eliminated entirely?”
In November 2017 it was shown that Google has been collecting user location data on Android smartphones even when location services were turned off.
Knowing the game was just about up, an article from 2017 abandons the position and says “Your smartphone may be ruining your relationships, even when it’s off”.
It’s a hit-piece, playing you to ditch your smartphone, versus disconnecting from the Internet entirely.
An article from November 2017 said that sSmartphone adoption in the US was strongest among older people.
In November 2017, the U.K.’s Daily Mail said “‘Dumbphones’ with basic functions could be next big trend”.
Where they’ve added “with basic functions” so that they could keep the phone connected to the deadly Internet, and keep the deadly clouds of non-Ionizing radiation in place.
In November 2017, it was asked “Will Social Media Addiction Trigger a Smart Phone Backlash?
Where, knowing the game is up, they’re put forward “social media” and “smart phones” as scapegoats, hoping to preserve PC’s, Tablets and Internet use and, more importantly, the deadly clouds of non-Ionizing radiation their machinery generates.
In November 2017, USA News Group said “Viacom expects affiliate sales to drop in 2018”.
Let’s review the hedging:
Viacom sales to drop by X% in 2018
Viacom sales to DROP in 2018
Viacom EXPECTS sales to drop in 2018
Viacom expects AFFILIATE sales to drop in 2018
The general “drop” is used to blunt and defray any specific insight into the magnitude of the trend.
In December 2017, Wayronica promised “smart ways to get rid of your child’s smartphone addiction”.
Those ways did not include taking away the child’s smartphone.
In December 2017, Android Central wheedled “Do you prefer curved or flat smartphone displays?”
In December 2017, the U.K.’s Guardian said “We’re all addicted to smartphones. Are flip phones the miracle cure?”
They’re desperately trying to keep you from recognizing that the non-ionizing radiation that drives both smart phones and flip phones is deadly in both cases. They’re trying to keep the public from going back to land lines.
In January 2018, money.cnn.com said “GoPro quits the drone business, slashes staff”.
It’s clear in the Black-is-White headline that GoPro are just “quitters”, leaving an otherwise excellent drone business, and that they are furthermore horrible “staff slashers”.
In January 2018, MarketWatch said “Warren Buffett prefers flip phones — and he’s not alone”.
In January 2018, Money.cnn.com said “Even the iPhone’s designer is worried about phone addiction”.
“Our smartphone ‘bottle’ needs to tell us we’ve had enough.” He continued that Google, Facebook and Twitter have "gotten so good at getting us to go for another click, another dopamine hit. They now have a responsibility & need to start helping us track & manage our digital addictions across all usages …
In January, 2018, the terrifyingly-named scarymommy.com said “I Don’t Want To Be A Smartphone Zombie Anymore.”
CONCLUSION
You can see how the awareness that technology is deadly began to reveal itself in 2012 and 2013, right when the great positive changes that I’m documenting here got underway in earnest.
Awareness is inexorably rising as the Orgonite-driven improvement in the etheric environment at-large continues, because moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
I would ask readers at this time to please not forget that there are not bodies stacked up like cordwood because of the Chinese bat virus with four amino acids added to it for improved transmissibility to humans. I can walk right in the front door at Wegman’s and buy a bunch of lobsters - after having driven by the “socially distanced” people standing in the four-block-long line to get in the Park Slope Food Co-Op. Their penance is wholly-voluntary.
It’s horrible, like you when you see a bear being made to ride a bike, but it pales in comparison to shooting a bear.
We can have our dignity back whenever we collectively agree that we deserve it.
“Covid 19” is a dark religion, a Black magic spell that holds an ever-dwindling percentage of the population in its thrall. It’s a confidence game, in which an ever-dwindling population of wholly-credulous, duped rubes is “fleeced” by people whom they’ve come to trust: nattily-dressed, teleprompter-reading people they have confidence in.
Given that some fixed proportion of our populace are bloodline-linked generational Satanists, that proportion is going to vote “Party Line”, as it were. Supporting every last Establishment ruse there is, that there is, in every article, every interview. In my country, it’s R’s and D’s putting on a Punch and Judy show, covering both sides of the forcibly-polarized populace.
You know, the supporters quoted in the mainstream news articles. And the shills writing the mainstream news articles. And the co-conspirators that they’re writing the articles about. All real, actual people, with physical addresses, all putting their pants on one leg at a time so they can drive down to the human sacrifice on Saturday night. In every city, town and village on Earth.
It is, wait for it, a Great Big Conspiracy.
We’re going to have to face this and get past it. And we are, and we will.
I think we’re at a standoff, at the moment. It’s like when you’ve decided to boot your asshole roommate, only you haven’t told them, yet.
This time that we find ourselves in is uncomfortable and tumultuous, but births always are. The I Ching speaks of Chaos, where great dreams begin.
It’s December 2020, and we’re leaving technology behind, along with the people who created it, and pushed it forward upon us to enslave us and work us woe.
Please consider sending them highest love energy as you read this.
Jeff Miller, Brooklyn, New York, December 16, 2020
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
You can access these articles online at https://forum.orgones.co.uk/c/positive-changes-that-are-occurring/
