“How great is the power of truth! How easily it can defend itself, unaided, against the ingenuity, craftiness and cunning of human beings, and against their lies and plots!”
From “In Defense of Caelius”, by Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C.
“Yet why should I be urging you, when I already know that you have sent a force ahead to wait for you under arms at Forum Aurelium, when I know that you have agreed on a prearranged day with Manlius, and when I know that you have also sent ahead the silver eagle to which you have dedicated a shrine at your house, and which I trust will bring only ruin and disaster to you and all your followers? How, after all, could you go without the object to which you used to pay homage each time you set out to commit a murder, when you could touch its alter with your sacrilegious right hand before using that same right hand straight afterwards to kill Roman citizens?”
From “In Defense of Caelius”, by Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C.
(Silver Eagle dollar, 1881)
(Silver Eagle bus, 1968)
In another landmark case in 70 B.C., his relentlessly efficient prosecution of Gaius Verres for corruption and extortion while governor of Sicily resulted in Cicero displacing Quintus Hortensius, Verres’s defense counsel, as Rome’s leading advocate. The high point of his career came in 63, the year in which he achieved the consulship, when, with help from the other consul, he put down the conspiracy of Catiline to overthrow the government. For this service the Senate honored him with the title pater patriae (Father of the Fatherland). Cicero was the first to be so honored, other than Julius Caeser in in 45 B.C., all later recipients of this illustrious title were emperors.
From “The Oxford Anthology of English Literature”, Edited by Peter E. Knox and J.C. McKeown, 2013
The words “mystery”, “baffled” and "puzzled are memes, used, among numerous similar variants, whenever anyone in the wholly-controlled-and-coopted Political, Academic and Media establishements wants to lie about, well, basically anything. One of those many variants is “remarkable”.
“Cicero’s rise to prominence in politics was remarkable, given the extremely conservative nature of Roman political life, which was dominated by men from patrician families."
From “The Oxford Anthology of English Literature”, Edited by Peter E. Knox and J.C. McKeown, 2013
Where the propagandists from Oxford University concealed the specific “bloodline-linked generational Satanist Freemasons” behind the general “patrician”.
“And even though he was regarded as too indecisive to be invited to join the conspiracy against Caeser, we know from a fragment of a speech by Mark Antony (quoted by Cicero in his Second Philippic) that Brutus immediately raised his bloody dagger in the air and called out Cicero’s name, congratulating him on the restoration of liberty.
The sequel brought out the best in him, as he tapped an unexpected vein of courage as he led the opposition to Mark Antony’s usurpation of Caeser’s powers. From September 44 B.C. until April of the following year, he attacked Antony with a long series of devastating speeches. At Antony’s insistence, he was killed on December 7, 43 B.C., by a man whom he had once defended at court. His head and hands were nailed to the Rostra, the speaker’s platform in the Roman Forum, from where he had denounced Antony so often."
From “The Oxford Anthology of English Literature”, Edited by Peter E. Knox and J.C. McKeown, 2013
Where the propagandists from Oxford University inferred that the man who had thrown down the previous rebellion “lacked courage” and was “indecisive”.
And where, after killing Caesar, Brutus yelled over to him “Hey, Cicero - you’re next!”
“Cicero’s reputation has largely recovered from the deeply unflattering portait by the nineteenth-century historian Theodor Mommsen in his History of Rome, which won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1902. His character is portrayed as somewhat spinless and whining in the television series Rome (2005-7), made for HBO - a legacy, perhaps, of Mommsen’s view of him as an unprincipled fraud”.
From “The Oxford Anthology of English Literature”, Edited by Peter E. Knox and J.C. McKeown, 2013
Where the generational Satanist Freemason won the Nobel Prize in Literature for unjustly denouncing Cicero, while the propagandists from Oxford University called the man who saved Rome from a Great Big Conspiracy “spineless”, “whining” and an “unprincipled fraud”.
But you’ll need to use your personal discernment to come to our own conclusions on the matter.
“My defense is over, members of the jury, and I have come to the end. You will now be able to appreciate the importance of the decision you have to make and the seriousness of the case before you.”
From “In Defense of Caelius”, by Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 B.C.
THE DATA
From 1975 to 1981, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School increased by 18%, from a majority of 55% to a near-supermajority of 65%.
From 1981 to 1992, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School decreased by 37.9%, from an all-time high of 66% to an all-time low of 41%.
In 1975, 55% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School.
In 1981, 66% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School.
From 1992 to 1999, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School increased by 34.1%, from 41% to 55%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage increase, referring to it only as “rose considerably”, and “the relapse period”.
They used the word “rose” because it’s softer than increased, but mostly as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun Cult which has ruled things under various names in all the nations all the way back to Babylon and before.
They didn’t offer any suggestion as to what had caused it the sudden, exponential increase in drug use among High School students.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “stonewalling”.
The Death energy delivered by the purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation from what we collectively refer to as “wireless technology” was taking its toll, and the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research was doing what it could to obscure the fact that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
In 1992, 41% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School, the lowest since record keeping began in 1975.
From 2020 to 2021, lifetime prevalence of any illicit drug use among High School students decreased by 22.2%, from 34.7% to 27.0%. It was the largest one-year decrease in history.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. said that the sudden, exponential decrease in drug use among High School students from 2020 to 2021 was “as the pandemic progressed”, but did not state specifically why.
The latter is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
From 2021 to 2022, the annual prevalence of any illicit drug other than marijuana among High School students decreased by 39%, from 9.2% to 5.6%.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine among 12th graders increased by 101.9%, or doubled, from 31% to 62.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and describing the doubling in abstinence among 12th graders from 2022 to 2023 only as “increased”.
From 2022 to 2023, 8th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 58.2%, from 11% to 4.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-60% decrease with “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine among 10th graders increased by 57.6%, from 48.8% to 76.9%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and lied bald-fadedly by describing the nearly two thirds increase in abstinence among 10th graders from 2022 to 2023 as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 10th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 75.7%, from 21% to 5.1%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-80% decrease with “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 12th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 76.8%, from 32% to 7.4%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-80% decrease with “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, use of narcotics other than heroin (including Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet, etc.) among 12th graders decreased by 50%, from 2% to 1%, an all time low.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, withheld the data from 2022, and said only that use had “decreased”.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine for 8th graders increased by 29.7%, from 67.1% to 87%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and lied bald-fadedly by describing the nearly one-third increase in abstinence among 8th graders from 2022 to 2023 as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, cannabis use among 10th graders decreased by 18.7%, from 19.5% to 17.8%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the statistic from 2022, omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by saying that the 18.7% decrease in cannabis use among 10th graders from 2022 to 2023 represented a “stable trend”, and “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 12th graders by decreased by 15%, from 27.3% to 23.2%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage, and said only that it “declined”.
From 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 10th graders by decreased by 14.1%, from 20.5% to 17.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage, and said only that it “declined”.
From 2022 to 2023, 12th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by 12%, from 51.9% to 45.7%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and said only that it “declined”.
From 2022 to 2023, cannabis use within the past year among 12th graders decreased by 5.5%, from 30.7% to 29%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by describing the near-6% decrease as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 8th graders decreased by 5%, from 12% to 11.4%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the statistic from 2022, omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by saying only that it “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 10th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by 1%, from 31.3% to to 30.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by describing it only as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 8th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by .7%, from 15.2% to 15.1%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by describing it as “remained stable”.
In 2023, the University of Michigan said “these data build on long-term trends documenting low and fairly steady use of illicit substances reported among teenagers—including past-year use of cocaine and heroin, and misuse of prescription drugs, generally." When, in fact, from 2021 to 2022, the annual prevalence of any illicit drug other than marijuana among High School students decreased by 39%, from 9.2% to 5.6%.
I have exposed the duplicity of the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
— From “Mein Kampf”, by British double agent Adolf Hitler, 1925
THE ARTICLES
On December 13, 2023, news.umich.edu said “Teen drug use remains below pre-pandemic levels”.
Where author Morgan Sherburne said “remains below pre-pandemic levels” because it’s general. As a propagandist, she knows that 70% of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the specific scope of the decrease in teen drug use which she is attempting to obfuscate.
The article goes on to say "We’ve been watching closely to see if the big declines in teen substance use after the pandemic would persist, or if substance use levels would bounce back when students returned to school. We’re glad to see that the declines have persisted,” said Richard Miech, team lead of the Monitoring the Future study at U-M’s Institute for Social Research. “These results support a growing body of evidence showing that a one-year delay in drug use during adolescence can lower future trajectories of drug use for years to come.”
Using a time honored propaganda technique, Morgan “buried” the data in a separate table below.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
If just 30% of readers make it past the headline, what percentage do you think manage to do a mathematical analysis on the data in the table?
Morgan chopped it up as well as she could. I’ll break down each category for you:
“Alcohol use remained stable for eighth and 10th graders, with 15.1% and 30.6% reporting use in the past year respectively, and declined for 12th graders, with 45.7% reporting use in the past year (compared to 51.9% in the previous year).”
Where Morgan redacted any data on eighth and tenth graders, so you couldn’t tell if her hedging generality “remained stable” was accurate or not.
So I had to look up the 2022 study, which said “Alcohol use remained stable for eighth and 10th graders (with 15.2% and 31.3% reporting use in the past year, respectively) but returned to pre-pandemic levels for 12th graders in 2022 (with 51.9% of 12th graders reporting alcohol use in the past year).”
Then I had to do the math to learn that, from 2022 to 2023, 8th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by .7%, from 15.2% to 15.1%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage, and described it as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 10th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by 1%, from 31.3% to to 30.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by describing it as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 12th graders who reported drinking an alcoholic beverage in the 30 day period prior to the survey decreased by 12%, from 51.9% to 45.7%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage, and said only that it “declined”.
The 2023 article continues:
“Nicotine vaping remained stable for eighth graders, with 11.4% reporting vaping nicotine in the past year. It declined in the older grades, from 20.5% to 17.6% in 10th grade and from 27.3% to 23.2% in 12th grade.”
Morgan omitted any information from 2022 on vaping for eight graders.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to look up a separate article, where I learned "(in 2022) Nicotine vaping remained stable for all three grades surveyed, with 12% of eighth graders, 20.5% of 10th graders, and 27.3% of 12th graders reporting vaping nicotine in the past year.
Then I had to do the math to learn that, from 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 8th graders decreased by 5%, from 12% to 11.4%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the statistic from 2022, omitted the percentage decrease, and said only that it “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 10th graders by decreased by 14.1%, from 20.5% to 17.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage, and said only that it “declined”.
From 2022 to 2023, nicotine vaping in the last year among 12th graders by decreased by 15%, from 27.3% to 23.2%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and said only that it “declined”.
The 2023 article goes on to say:
“Cannabis use remained stable for all three grades surveyed, with 8.3% of eighth graders, 17.8% of 10th graders and 29% of 12th graders reporting cannabis use in the past year. Of note, 6.5% of eighth graders, 13.1% of 10th graders and 19.6% of 12th graders reported vaping cannabis within the past year, reflecting a stable trend among all three grades.”
Where Morgan omitted any information on vaping for eight graders.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique. known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to look up a separate article, where I learned: “(in 2022) Cannabis use also remained stable for all three grades surveyed, with 8.3% of eighth graders, 19.5% of 10th graders, and 30.7% of 12th graders reporting cannabis use in the past year. Of note, 6.0% of eighth graders, 15.0% of 10th graders, and 20.6% of 12th graders reported vaping cannabis within the past year, reflecting a stable trend at the pre-pandemic level among eighth and 12th graders, and a small increase in reported use among 10th graders, though reported use among 10th graders in 2022 is still significantly below pre-pandemic levels.”
Then I had to do the math, three times, to learn:
From 2022 to 2023, cannabis use among 8th graders remained unchanged, at 8.3%. For any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, this is the only data point in Morgan’s article where she has presented the unvarnished truth, by describing it accurately as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, cannabis use among 10th graders decreased by 18.7%, from 19.5% to 17.8%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the statistic from 2022, omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by saying that the 18.7% decrease in cannabis use among 10th graders from 2022 to 2023 represented a “stable trend”, and “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, cannabis use within the past year among 12th graders decreased by 5.5%, from 30.7% to 29%.
The University of Michigan’s Morgan Sherburne omitted the percentage decrease, and lied bald-facedly by describing the near-6% decrease as “remained stable”.
The 2023 article goes on to say:
“Any illicit drug use other than marijuana also remained stable for all three grades surveyed, with 4.6% of eighth graders, 5.1% of 10th graders, and 7.4% of 12th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year. These data build on long-term trends documenting low and fairly steady use of illicit substances reported among teenagers—including past-year use of cocaine and heroin, and misuse of prescription drugs, generally.”
Here, the University of Michigan’s Morgan Serburne carefully omitted the data from the previous year.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to look up the previous year’s study, which said:
"(From 2021 to 2022) The comparable declines for using any illicit drug other than marijuana were 4.2 and 3.6 percentage points. They amount to relative declines from the previous year of 22% and 21%. These substantial one-year declines for the three grades combined are highly significant (p<.001).”
From 2022 to 2023, 8th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 58.2%, from 11% to 4.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-60% decrease with “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 10th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 75.7%, from 21% to 5.1%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-80% decrease with “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, 12th graders reporting any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year decreased by 76.8%, from 32% to 7.4%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, and then lied baldfacedly by describing a near-80% decrease with “remained stable”.
In 2023, the University of Michigan said “these data build on long-term trends documenting low and fairly steady use of illicit substances reported among teenagers—including past-year use of cocaine and heroin, and misuse of prescription drugs, generally." When, in fact, from 2021 to 2022, the annual prevalence of any illicit drug other than marijuana among High School students decreased by 39%, from 9.2% to 5.6%.
I have exposed the duplicity of the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true within itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
— From “Mein Kampf”, by British double agent Adolf Hitler, 1925
The 2023 study goes on to say:
"In 1975, when MTF began its annual reporting, the majority of young people (55%) had used an illicit drug by the time
they left high school. This figure rose to two thirds(66%) by 1981 before a long, gradual decline to 41% by 1992—the low point for 12th graders.”
Where the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage increase, and referred to it with “rose”, both as a hedging generality and as thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult which has ruled things from the shadows under various names all the way back to Babylon, and before.
From 1975 to 1981, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School increased by 18%, from a majority of 55% to a near-supermajority of 65%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage increase, referred to it only as “rose”, both as a hedging generality and as thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun cult which has ruled things from the shadows under various names all the way back to Babylon, and before.
From 1981 to 1992, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School decreased by 37.9%, from an all-time high of 66% to an all-time low of 41%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage increase, referring to it only as “a long, gradual decline”.
They didn’t offer any suggestion as to what had caused it the sudden, exponential decrease in drug use among High School students.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “stonewalling”.
In 1975, 55% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School.
In 1981, 66% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School.
In 1992, 41% of young people had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School, the lowest since record keeping began in 1975.
The study goes on to say “After 1992—in what we have called the “relapse phase” in the drug epidemic—the proportion using any illicit drug in their lifetime rose considerably to the most recent high point of 55% in 1999; it then declined gradually to 47% in 2009 and then remained fairly level through 2020, the last year before the pandemic hit.”
From 1992 to 1999, young people who had used an illicit drug by the time they left High School increased by 34.1%, from 41% to 55%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage increase, referring to it only as “rose considerably”, and “the relapse period”.
They used the word “rose” because it’s softer than increased, but mostly as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black Sun Cult which has ruled things under various names in all the nations all the way back to Babylon and before.
They didn’t offer any suggestion as to what had caused it the sudden, exponential increase in drug use among High School students.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique know as “stonewalling”.
The Death energy delivered by the purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation from what we collectively refer to as “wireless technology” was taking its toll, and the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research was doing what it could to obscure the fact that moral and mental health vary directly with that of the subject’s etheric environment.
The study goes on to say “In 2021 a sudden and sharp decline was observed in all three grades as the the pandemic progressed. The depth and
breadth of the declines in drug use in 2021 were the largest ever observed in this study since its inception forty-eight years ago.
In 2021 for the three grades combined, lifetime prevalence of any illicit drug use dropped from 34.7% to 27.0%—a decline of 7.8 percentage points, amounting to a relative decline in a single year of 22% (p<.001).”
From 2020 to 2021, lifetime prevalence of any illicit drug use among High School students decreased by 22.2%, from 34.7% to 27.0%. It was the largest one-year decrease in history.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. said that the sudden, exponential decrease in drug use among High School students from 2020 to 2021 was “as the pandemic progressed”, but did not state specifically why.
The latter is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
The 2022 study states:
“The annual prevalence of any illicit drug other than marijuana (lower right panel) dropped fairly steadily and gradually in all three grades in recent years and then dropped dramatically in 2021 in all three grades combined from 9.2% to 5.6%. This amounts to a decline of 3.6 percentage points or a
relative decline of 39% in just the one year p< .001.”
From 2021 to 2022, the annual prevalence of any illicit drug other than marijuana among High School students decreased by 39%, from 9.2% to 5.6%.
The 2023 study goes on to say ”Use of narcotics other than heroin (including Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet, etc.) decreased among 12th graders, with 1% reporting use within the past year (matching the all-time low reported in 2021 and down from a high of 9.5% in 2004).
From 2022 to 2023, use of narcotics other than heroin (including Vicodin, OxyContin, Percocet, etc.) among 12th graders decreased by 50%, from 2% to 1%, an all time low.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. omitted the percentage, withheld the data from 2022, and said only that use had “decreased”.
The 2023 study goes on to say “Abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine increased for 12th graders, with 62.6% reporting abstaining from any use of these substances over the past month. This percentage remained stable for eighth and 10th graders, with 87% and 76.9% reporting abstaining from any use of marijuana, alcohol and nicotine over the past month.”
Where the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022.
That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
So, I had to get the data from the 2022 study, and then do the math.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine for 8th graders increased by 29.7%, from 67.1% to 87%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and lied bald-fadedly by describing the nearly one-third increase in abstinence among 8th graders from 2022 to 2023 as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine among 10th graders increased by 57.6%, from 48.8% to 76.9%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and lied bald-fadedly by describing the nearly two thirds increase in abstinence among 10th graders from 2022 to 2023 as “remained stable”.
From 2022 to 2023, abstaining, or not using, marijuana, alcohol and nicotine among 12th graders increased by 101.9%, or doubled, from 31% to 62.6%.
The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., Richard A. Miech, Ph.D., Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., Patrick M. O’Malley, Ph.D., John E. Schulenberg, Ph.D., Jerald G. Bachman, Ph.D. withheld the data from 2022, withheld the percentage increase, and describing the doubling in abstinence among 12th graders from 2022 to 2023 only as “increased”.
Here’s a picture of the University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s first author, Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph.D., where the image is off-center, and his head is just slightly turned, to focus attention on his left eye:
(The University of Michigan’s Institute of Social Research’s first author Lloyd D. Johnston, Ph. D., who described a 58.2% decrease in any illicit drug use other than marijuana in the past year among 8th graders from 2022 to 2023 as “remained stable”.)
Now here’s a picture of the University of Michigan’s Public Relations Representative Morgan Sherburne, where the image is off-center, to focus attention on her left eye:
(The University of Michigan’s Public Relations Representative Morgan Sherburne, who said that the 18.7% decrease in cannabis use among 10th graders from 2022 to 2023 represented a “stable trend”, and “remained stable”.
The picture features their left eyes because, to generational Satanist Freemasons like Lloyd and Morgan, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included their pictures so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemason in positions of marginal influence look like.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, January 19, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected]
