“The fact that it is a hypothesis specially uncongenial to the emotions of this investigator or that, is neither here nor there.”
― From “That Hideous Strength”, by C.S. Lewis, 1945
In June 2023, I began working my way through the USGS’s table for the walleye in Montana. It contains sixty watersheds, and as of August 3, 2023, I’ve completed my review of them
There are multiple examples in the data set of the walleye winking into existence simultaneously in numerous different geographies, and then disappearing from those same geographies, once again simultaneously.
I have proven, watershed by watershed, that the stocking of walleye fry by the USGS is not the source of the walleye in those watersheds.
It was toilsome, and highly-repetitive, however, it had to be done, and there was no one else to do it, so did it. And you’re reading it.
I have proven that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
From here, I’ll pick another state, and review, categorize and analyze the walleye data there.
Then, I’ll pick another fish species, and use Montana and that same other state and cross-reference the data from that species against the walleye.
THE WALLEYE - ALL THE DATA
In 1874, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, a single walleye was collected in the Sacramento River in California. In the absence of any stocking there, the USGS brazenly lists its potential pathway as “stocked for sport”.
From 1934 to 1955, the USGS stocked 1,225,000 walleye fry in the Tongue River in Montana, at mile zero, and listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. When, in fact, there are no recorded examples of the walleye in the Tongue River in Montana in history.
From 1947 to 1963, the USGS stocked 1,246,000 walleye fry in the Milk River in Montana, and listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. When, in fact, there are no recorded examples of the walleye in the Milk River in Montana in history.
From 1950 to 1951, the USGS stocked 1,075,000 walleye in Rainbow Lake on the Lower Flathead River in Montana (275,000 in 1950 and 800,000 in 1951).
From 1950 to 1994, the walleye is absent from the record in the Tongue River Reservoir.
On May 5, 1950, Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 1,250,000 0-inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir in the Upper Tongue drainage in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1951 and 1957, the USGS collected six and 14 walleye in Rainbow Lake on the Lower Flathead River in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. No data is provided on any of these fish - no weight, no length. It’s a fabricated entry, designed to give the false impression that stocking “established” the walleye in Rainbow Lake.
And, even it it were veritable, twenty examples of the walleye coming out of one million-plus stocked walleye fry does not represent a species which is “established”.
On May 22, 1951, the USGS stocked 200,000 0-inch walleye fry in the Yellowstone River in Montana, miles 15.4 to 389.8. The species was listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
From 1951 to this writing in 2023, there are no examples of the walleye in Lake Elena in the Upper Missouri drainage. If stocking in 1951 is the source of the walleye in Lake Elena, as alleged by the USGS, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1951 to this writing in 2023?
Either the stocking did not take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS, or the stocking had a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
On June 8, 1951, Montana Fish, Parks and Wildlife stocked 500,000 0 inch average walleye fry in Lake Elena in the Upper Missouri drainage in Montana. The species was listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
From 1956 to 2017, there are sixty nine examples of the walleye on record in Texas: 66 from 1985 to 1988 in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow, one in Georgetown Creek in 1989, and one in the Bear River in 2017.
If we reject fish without any data, that brings the number down to two: one in Georgetown Creek in 1989, and one in the Bear River in 2017. It’s like sightings of the Great Orm of Loch Ness, or Sasquatch, only far rarer.
In 1956, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Bear River in Texas at some obfuscated weight and length. Despite just a single example, and the the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. While they withheld any data on the fish, they added “this fish was presumable stocked as a fry in 1952 in Hyrum Reservoir and travelled 80-96 km”. In 1956, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River in Texas. It would remain absent for sixty one years, until it winked back into existence there in 2017 at a length of 8.2 inches and a weight of 2.9 ounces. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
In 1956, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River in Texas. It would remain absent for sixty one years, until it winked back into existence there in 2017 at a length of 8.2 inches and a weight of 2.9 ounces.
On May 24, 1957, the USGS stocked 9,000 0 inch average walleye fry in the lower Powder River in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If the source of the at best, five, but probably single walleye collected in the lower Powder River in Montana in May 2000 was stocking, and that stocking took place 43 years previously, then why aren’t there any examples of the walleye on the record in the Powder River in Montana from 1957 to 2000?
From 1957 to 1971, walleye is absent from the record in Fresno Reservoir, despite Montana Fish, Parks and Wildlife stocking 400,000 walleye in the Fresno Reservoir in 1957.
This shows either the stocking did not take place, at all, as alleged by the USGS, or the mortality of those stocked fish was 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1966, the walleye winked into existence in Ester Lake on Beaver Creek in Montana, remained in existence for twelve years, until it disappeared in 1979, or soon after. Then, after an absence of 14 years, it reappeared there in 1994. It would remain in existence there for just three years, until it disappeared again in 1997, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
From 1966 to 1967, the number of walleye collected in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana increased by 128.5%, from 7 to 16. The USGS listed the potential pathway as “stocked for sport”.
If the walleye collected in Ester Lake on Beaver Creek in Montana in 1966 and 1967 were the product of the USGS’s stocking 100,000 walleye fry there in 1956, as alleged by the USGS, then why are there no examples of the walleye in Ester Lake on Beaver Creek in Montana from 1957 to 1966?
In 1966, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana. It would exist there for roughly thirteen years, until it disappeared from the environment again in 1980, or soon after. It would remain absent for fourteen years, until it winked back into existence there in 1994. The walleye would remain in existence in Ester Lake for another three years, until it disappeared again in 1997. It remains absent to this day.
This disappearance of the walleye from Ester Lake in 1997 is a data point showing the sudden, deleterious effect of the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing radiation from what we collectively refer to as the “wireless communications infrastructure” that sprang up suddenly virtually over night in ever city, town and village on Earth in the late 1990’s.
From 1967 to 1969, the number of walleye collected in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana decreased by 31.3%, from 16 to 11.
From 1969 to 1979, the number of walleye collected in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana decreased by 72.7%, from 11 to 3.
On June 18, 1969, Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 92,480 2-inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir in the Upper Tongue drainage in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 1,442,480 walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir from 1950 to 1969, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1950 to this writing in 2023?
Either the USGS’s claim that the stocking took place is false, or those stockings in 1950, 1980 and 1969 had mortalities of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1971, the walleye winked into existence in Fresno Reservoir on the Upper Milk drainage in Montana, at an average threshold length of 14.6 inches. It would remain in extence there only briefly. In 1971, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Fresno Reservoir, and would remain absent for fourteen years, until it winked back into existence there in 1985 at an average threshold length of 17.5 inches, which was 19.9% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested in there 1971. Then, in 1990, or soon after, after five years in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from Fresno Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, until it winked back into existence there at a threshold length of 18.3 inches, 16.4% greater than the average length of 17.5 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1990. It would remain in existence another ten years, until 2010, or soon after, when it disappeared yet again. It remains absent to this day.
On June 28, 1972, the USGS stocked 15,000 2-inch average walleye fingerlings in Gartside Reservoir on the Yellowstone River in Montana. The species was listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If stocking is the source of the walleye in the Yellowstone River in Montana, and the USGS stocked 200,000 walleye fry in it in 1951, then why are there no examples of the walleye in the Yellowstone River in Montana from 1951 to 1972?
In 1973, the walleye winked into existence in the Tiber Reservoir at an average length of 11.5 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1973, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It remained absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there in 1979 at an average length of 13.9 inches, which was 20.8% greater than the 11.5 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1973. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 1979, or soon after, the walleye once again disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, until it winked back into existence there in 1989 at an average length of 14.25 inches, which was 2.5% greater than the 13.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1979. It would yet again remain in existence only briefly. In 1989, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, which is identical to its previous ten-year absence from 1979 to 1989. In 1999, the walleye winked back into existence yet again in the Tiber Reservoir, this time at an average length of 14.85 inches, which was 4.2% greater than the 14.25 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1989. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 1999, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for six years, which is identical to its previous six-year absence from 1973 to 1979. It winked back into existence there in 2005, at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
From 1974 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Town Lake Reservoir in Texas. While, in 1974 and 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked an identical 1,014,000 walleye there, for a total of 2,028,000. The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing-identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1974 and 1975 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
From 1976 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Austin Reservoir in Texas. While, from 1976 to 1985, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 40,400 walleye fry in the Austin Reservoir (an identical 20,200 in 1976 and 1985).
The fact that the stocking of 40,400 walleye fry produced zero examples of the walleye proves either that the stockings in 1976 and 1985 did not take place, or those stockings suffered 100% mortality rates for some unexplained reason.
From 1979 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Travis in Texas. While, in 1979 and 1986, the 1,275,065 walleye stocked in Lake Travis were identical. The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1979 and 1986 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
In 1976, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Frances on the Upper Dry Fork Marius River in Montana, at an average threshold length of 20.3 inches. Despite the absence of stocking, the USGS brazenly listed the walleye as “established” in Lake Frances, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
Then, in 1997, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Lake Frances on the Upper Dry Fork Marius River in Montana after existing there for twenty one years, and remains absent to this day.
In 1979, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Frenchman Creek, the Fort Peck dam tailrace, the Fort Peck dam cuts, the Nelson Dredge, and the Tiber Reservoir.
In 1979, the walleye winked into existence in the Frenchman Creek in Montana. It would exist there only briefly, and, in 1979, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Frenchman Creek in Montana. It would remain absent for twenty five years, until it winked back into existence there in 2004. I would, once again, remain in existence there only briefly. In 2004, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Frenchman Creek, and remains absent from that locale to this day.
In 1979, in the absence of any prior stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Fort Peck dam tailrace in the Prairie Wolf-Elk drainage, at a threshold length of 18.6 inches. The lack of any prior stocking notwithstanding, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Then, after existing there for less than year, the walleye disappeared from the Fort Peck dam tailrace in 1979, or soon after. It would remain absent for 27 years, until it winked back into existence there in 2006 at a threshold length of 18.1 inches, 2.6% smaller than the 18.6 inches at which it had last manifested in 1979. It would remain in existence there for less than two years, disappearing again in 2007, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
In 1979, the walleye winked into existence in the Fort Peck dredge cuts in Montana. In 1985, or soon after, after six years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Fort Peck dredge cuts. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there in 1991, at a threshold length of 16.2 inches, 1.9% larger than the 15.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1985. 1991, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye once again disappeared from the Fort Peck drainage cuts. It would remain absent for years, until it reappeared in 2004, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991. In 2004, after an absence of thirteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Fort Peck dredge cuts in Montana, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991. It would remain in existence for another seven years, until it disappeared again in 2011. It remains absent to this day.
In 1979, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Nelson Dredge in the Prairie Elk-Wolf drainage at an average threshold length of 14.8 inches. Despite the fact that there has never been any stocking of walleye in the Nelson Dredge, and three examples are the only ones on record in history, the USGS brazenly The species is listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Nelson Dredge is false.
In 1979, after an absence of six years, the walleye winked back into existence in Tiber Reservoir at an average length of 13.9 inches, which was 20.8% greater than the 11.5 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1973. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 1979, or soon after, the walleye once again disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, until it winked back into existence there in 1989 at an average length of 14.25 inches, which was 2.5% greater than the 13.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1979. It would yet again remain in existence only briefly. In 1989, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, which is identical to its previous ten-year absence from 1979 to 1989. In 1999, the walleye winked back into existence yet again in the Tiber Reservoir, this time at an average length of 14.85 inches, which was 4.2% greater than the 14.25 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1989. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 1999, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for six years, which is identical to its previous six-year absence from 1973 to 1979. It winked back into existence there in 2005, at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 1979, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Lake Ester, Flatwillow Reservoir, Lake Frances, the Fort Peck Dam spillway, the Nelson Dredge, the Fort Peck dredge cuts, and the Tiber. Reservoir. It remains absent from Lake Ester, Flatwillow Reservoir, Lake Frances, and the Fort Peck dredge cuts to this day. It reappeared briefly in the Fort Peck dam spillway in 2006, but, after existing there for less than two years, it disappeared again in 2007, and remains absent to this day. It reappeared briefly in the Tiber Reservoir in 1989, 1999, 2005 and 2008, then disappeared, and remains absent to this day.
In 1979, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Ester Lake on Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 1979, or soon after, after existing there for less than a year, the walleye disappeared from the Fort Peck dam spillway. It would remain absent for twenty seven years, until it winked back into existence there in 2006 at a threshold length of 18.1 inches, 2.6% shorter than the 18.6 inches at which it had last manifested in 1979. It would remain in existence for less than two years, until it disappeared again in 2007. It remains absent to this day.
In 1979, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Nelson Dredge, and remains absent to this day.
In 1979, or soon after, the walleye once again disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, until it winked back into existence there in 1989 at an average length of 14.25 inches, which was 2.5% greater than the 13.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1979. It would yet again remain in existence only briefly. In 1989, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir. It would remain absent for ten years, which is identical to its previous ten-year absence from 1979 to 1989. In 1999, the walleye winked back into existence yet again in the Tiber Reservoir, this time at an average length of 14.85 inches, which was 4.2% greater than the 14.25 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1989. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 1999, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for six years, which is identical to its previous six-year absence from 1973 to 1979. It winked back into existence there in 2005, at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
From 1980 to 1994, the walleye is absent from the record in Ester Lake on Beaver Creek in Montana.
From 1980 to 1985, the walleye is absent from the record in Montana.
In 1980, the walleye winked into existence in Beaver Creek in Montana. It would remain in existence there only briefly, until, in 1980, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Beaver Creek in Montana, and would remain absent for twenty five years, until it winked briefly back into existence there in 2005. It would disappear again shortly thereafter, and remains absent from that locale to this day. To be clear, I’m talking about Beaver Creek, proper, versus Ester Lake on Beaver Creek.
In 1980, the USGS alleges that that walleye was stocked in the Missouri River below the Fort Peck Reservoir. However, since no data is provided on the number of fry stocked, or the date of the stocking, we must presume that this is a fraudulent table entry, put forward to prop up the illusion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Montana.
However, for the sake of argument, if stocking is the source of the walleye in the Missouri River below the Fort Peck Reservoir, and the USGS stocked an indeterminate number of walleye fry there in 1980, then why are there no historical examples of the walleye in the Missouri River below the Peck Reservoir?
On May 23, 1980, Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 100,000 0-inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir in the Upper Tongue drainage in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 1,350,000 walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir from 1950 to 1980, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1950 to this writing in 2023?
Either the USGS’s claim that the stocking took place is false, or those stockings in 1950 and 1980 had mortalities of 100% for some unexplained reason.
On June 4, 1980, Julia Hurley caught the Alabama state record walleye in a farm pond. It weighed 10 pounds, 14 ounces.
In 1981, the walleye winked into existence in the upper Missouri River, miles 2,167.2 to 2,171.3 at an average length of 21 inches. From 1981 to 1999, the length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River, miles 2,088.3 to 2,171.3 decreased by 42.8%, from 21 inches to 12 inches. From 1981 to 1983, the average length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River decreased by 1.9%, from 21 inches to 20.6 inches. In 1983, or soon after, after less then three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for fourteen years, until it reappeared there in 1997 at an average length of 22.8 inches, 10.7% greater than the 20.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1983.
Then, from 1997 to 1998, the average length of the walleye collected in the upper Missouri River increased by 24.7%, from 19.8 inches to 24.7 inches. Then, from 1998 to 1999, the length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River suddenly decreased by 54%, from 24.7 inches to 12 inches. Here we see the walleye in the Upper Missouri being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. From 1999 to 2000, the average length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River decreased by 27.5%, from 12 inches to 8.7 inches.
From 1999 to 2000, the 27.5% decrease in length of the walleye in the Missouri River, miles 2,088 to 2,173.3 was 1,045.8% greater than its 2.4% average annual decrease in length from 1981 to 1999. The walleye in the upper Missouri River is being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. In 2000, or soon after, after just over three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there at a length of 14.6 inches, 67.8% greater than the 8.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2000.
It would remain in existence only briefly. In 2006, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. Then, in 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the fact that there was never any stocking of the walleye there in history, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there from 1981 to 2011, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the upper Missouri River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye there in 1981, 1983, 1997 to 2000, 2006 and 2011 is false.
On March 12, 1982, Al Nelson caught the Arkansas state record walleye in Greers Ferry Lake. It weighed 22 pounds, 11 ounces.
From 1985 to 1987, the USGS collected three walleye from the headwaters (mile zero) of the Big Sandy River in Montana (two in 1985 and one in 1987), listing the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1983, or soon after, after less then three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for fourteen years, until it reappeared there in 1997 at an average length of 22.8 inches, 10.7% greater than the 20.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1983. Then, from 1997 to 1998, the average length of the walleye collected in the upper Missouri River increased by 24.7%, from 19.8 inches to 24.7 inches. Then, from 1998 to 1999, the length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River suddenly decreased by 54%, from 24.7 inches to 12 inches. Here we see the walleye in the Upper Missouri being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. From 1999 to 2000, the average length of the walleye in the upper Missouri River decreased by 27.5%, from 12 inches to 8.7 inches.
From 1999 to 2000, the 27.5% decrease in length of the walleye in the Missouri River, miles 2,088 to 2,173.3 was 1,045.8% greater than its 2.4% average annual decrease in length from 1981 to 1999. The walleye in the upper Missouri River is being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. In 2000, or soon after, after just over three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there at a length of 14.6 inches, 67.8% greater than the 8.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2000.
It would remain in existence only briefly. In 2006, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. Then, in 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the fact that there was never any stocking of the walleye there in history, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there from 1981 to 2011, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1983, or soon after, after less then three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for fourteen years, until it reappeared there in 1997 at an average length of 22.8 inches, 10.7% greater than the 20.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1983.
From 1985 to 1988, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected 66 walleye in the Colorado River at the Lake Powerll Inflow in Texas (RK 316-326). Since they’ve withheld data on the fish, we’ll formally need to reject them from the analysis as fraudulent table entries on the part of the USGS. But we’ll keep our eyes on them.
In 1985, in the absence of any stocking at either location, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Big Sandy River and in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow. Despite the lack of walleye stocking, Montana and Texas both brazenly listed the potential pathway as “stocked for sport”. In 1985, the walleye also winked back into existence the Fresno Reservoir in Montana for the first time in fourteen years.
In 1985, or soon after, after six years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Fort Peck dredge cuts. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there in 1991, at a threshold length of 16.2 inches, 1.9% larger than the 15.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1985. 1991, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye once again disappeared from the Fort Peck drainage cuts. It would remain absent for years, until it reappeared in 2004, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991. In 2004, after an absence of thirteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Fort Peck dredge cuts in Montana, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991. It would remain in existence for another seven years, until it disappeared again in 2011. It remains absent to this day.
From 1986 to 2009, the USGS claims that stocking was the source of the walleye in the Holter Reservoir. The fact that there are no examples of the walleye in Holter Reservoir for which weight or length data is provided from 1986 to 2009, along with the fact that there has never been any stocking of walleye in Holter Reservoir, suggest that the USGS’s clams that there have ever been any walleye in Holter Reservoir are false.
From 1986 to 2000, walleye for which no data is provided are absent from the record in Holter Reservoir.
In 1986, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Battle Creek River, Lodge Creek, Canyon Ferry Lake, and, if we include fish for which there is no other data, Holter Reservoir. Despite the lack of any stocking in and of the three locations, the USGS said that the source of the walleye in Battle Creek River, Lodge Creek and Holton Reservoir was “stocked for sport”. Then, as a bonus, they said that the source of the walleye in Canyon Ferry Lake was “stocked illegally”.
The propaganda really breaks down hard under cross-examination, doesn’t it?
In 1986, or soon after, after less than a year in existence in both locations, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Canyon Ferry Lake, Lodge Creek and the Holter Reservoir in Montana, the latter if we allow fish without any weight or length data. It would reappear briefly in Canyon Ferry Lake in 2011, then disappear for good. It remains absent from Lodge Creek and the Holter Reservoir to this day.
From 1987 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the headwaters (mile zero) of the Big Sandy River in Montana.
In 1987, the walleye winked into existence in the Peoples Creek River on the Middle Milk drainage in Montana. Despite the fact that there has been no walleye stocking there in history, the USGS declared that the single walleye ever found in Peoples Creek River represented an established population, and that its potential pathway was “stocked for sport”. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1987, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Peoples Creek River, and remains absent to this day.
In 1988, the walleye winked into existence in the H.C. Kuhr Reservoir in the Middle Milk drainage in Montana at a threshold length of ten inches. The species was listed as “established”, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Since the first and only stocking of walleye in the H.C. Kuhr Reservoir took place that same day, of 1,258 5 inch average walleye fingerlings, the 138 ten inch average walleye collected obviously cannot be the product of that stocking.
The USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in H.C. Kuhr Reservoir in 1988 is false.
The USGS theatrically did the stocking and the collection on the same day to make the Punch and Judy crowd think “stocking is the source of the walleye in the H.C. Kuhr Reservoir.” Then, from 1998 to 1999, it increased in length by 32%, from 10 inches to 13.2 inches. It would exist there for just six years. In 1994, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the H.C. Kuhr Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 1988, or soon after, after just over five years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow, and remains absent to this day.
In 1989, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Redrock Coulee River in Montana and in Georgetown Creek in the Atacosa drainage in Texas, and back into existence in the Tiber Reservoir in Montana for the first time in ten years, in the absence of any walleye stocking in any of those locations. Despite the absence of any walleye stocking, Montana and Texas both brazenly listed the potential pathway of the walleye in their states as “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Redrock Coulee River and the Tiber Reservoir in Montana, or in the Georgetown Creek in Texas proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in all three of those locations in 1998 is false.
In 1989, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Tiber Reservoir in Montana and from Georgetown Creek in Texas. It remains absent from Georgetown Creek to this day. It winked back into existence in the Tiber briefly in 2005 and 2008, and then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day.
In 1990, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Lyons Reservoir in Montana and in the Meredith River in Texas. They would both remain in existence in those locations only briefly. In 1990, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Lyons Reservoir in Montana and the Meredith River in Texas, and remains absent from both locations to this day.
In 1990, the walleye winked into existence in the Lyons Reservoir on the Middle Milk drainage in Montana. It would remain in existence only briefly. In 1990, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Lyons Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 1990, the walleye winked into existence in the Meredith River in Texas. It was caught by Hank McWlliams, Jr., weighed 11.88 pounds, and was 31.75 inches long. The USGS table for the species does not mention the Texas state record walleye from 1990. Why?
In 1990, the USGS table for the walleye in Montana says that the walleye was stocked in the lower Musselshell drainage in Montana. However there is no data as to how many walleye were stocked, but rather just a baseless assertion that stocking did, in fact, take place. The species is listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. The lack of any data proves that it is a fraudulent table entry, put forward to prop up the great fish stocking sham which I am exposing here.
On February 26, 1990, in the absence of any stocking there, Hank McWilliams, Jr. caught the Texas state record walleye in the Meredith River. It weighed 11.88 pounds and was 31.75 inches long. The USGS table for the species does not mention the Texas state record walleye from 1990. Why?
On June 12, 1990, Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 20,000 1.2-inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir in the Upper Tongue drainage in Montana. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 1,462,480 walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir from 1950 to 1969, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1950 to this writing in 2023?
Either the USGS’s claim that the stocking took place is false, or those stockings in 1950, 1980, 1969 and 1990 all had mortalities of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1990, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Lyons Reservoir in Montana and the Meredith River in Texas, and remains absent from both locations to this day.
In 1991, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Little Warm Reservoir and the Castle Rock Reservoir for the first time in history, and back into existence in the Fort Peck drainage cuts for the first time in six years.
In 1991, the walleye winked into existence in the Little Warm Reservoir on Beaver Creek in Montana, at lengths ranging from 8.7 inches to 14.5 inches. Since the Little Warm was stocked just two years previously, in 1989, and these lengths are 73.9% to 190% longer than the five inch maximum size of the species during its first five to six years, we know that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Little Warm Reservoir on Beaver Creek in Montana is false.
They existed in the Little Warm Reservoir for seven years, until they disappeared in 1998, or soon after, and remain absent from the geography to this day.
In 1991, the walleye winked into existence in the Castle Rock Reservoir, at a threshold length of 16 inches. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after nineteen years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Castle Rock Reservoir in the Lower Yellowstone-Sunday drainage in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
If stocking is the source of the walleye in the Castle Rock Reservoir, as alleged by the USGS, and the USGS stocked 755,00 walleye there from 1977 to 1990, then why are there no examples of the walleye in the Castle Rock Reservoir until 1991?
The USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Castle Rock Reservoir in Montana is false.
In 1991, after a six year absence, the walleye winked back into existence in the Fort Peck drainage cuts at a threshold length of 16.2 inches, 1.9% larger than the 15.9 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1985.
In 1991, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye once again disappeared from the Fort Peck drainage cuts. It would remain absent for years, until it reappeared in 2004, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991.
In 1992, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Bear Paw Lake in the Middle Milk drainage in Montana. It was 13.9 inches long. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1992, or soon after, after an existence of less than a year, the walleye disappeared from Bear Paw Lake, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the absence of any walleye stocking in the Bear Paw Lake, the USGS stated that the species was “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Battle Creek River is false.
A single historical example of the walleye in Bear Paw Lake in 1992 proves that the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established in Bear Paw Lake in 1992 is false.
In 1993, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in Colorado River, above the confluence of the Green River (RK 0-80). They withheld its length and weight. This means we should reject it as a fabricated table entry.
In 1995, in the absence of any walleye stocking there in history, the walleye winked into existence in the Missouri River in Montana, miles 1,683 to 1,700. It was the first walleye ever documented there. Despite the lack of any documented stocking there in history, the USGS nevertheless brazenly claimed the walleye to be “established”, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s claim that stocking was the source of the walleye in the Missouri River in Montana, miles 1,683 to 1,700 in 1995 is false.
It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1995, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Missouri River in Montana, miles 1,683 to 1,700. It would remain absent for nine years, until it winked back into existence there in 2004 at a threshold length of 23.8 inches. It would remain in existence for less than four years, disappearing again in 2007, and remains absent to this day.
On June 15, 1995, three years after the walleye had winked into existence there at a threshold length of 13.9 inches, the USGS stocked 5,000 1.3 inch average walleye fingerlings in Bear Paw Lake. The USGS stated that the species was “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If the walleye was established in Bear Paw Lake from 1992 through 1995, then why is there only a single historical example, from 1992?
The USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established in Bear Paw Lake from 1992 through 1995 is false.
If the source of the single walleye collected by the USGS in Bear Paw Lake in 1992 was stocking, as alleged by the USGS, why is there no record of walleye stocking in Bear Paw Lake prior to 1995?
The USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the single walleye collected by the USGS in Bear Paw Lake in 1992 is false.
In 1994, the walleye winked into existence simultaneousl****y in Fort Peck Reservoir, the Noxon Rapids Reservoir and the Marius River, and back into existence in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek after an absence of fourteen years.
In 1994, after an absence of fourteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana, at lengths of 6.5 inches and 8.4 inches.
In 1994, the walleye winked into existence in the Fort Peck Reservoir.
In 1994, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Marius River, Miles 150.1 to 154.9, at a tiny average threshold length of .75 inches. Then, in 2009, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Marius River after fifteen years in existence there, and remains absent to this day. Despite the complete absence of any walleye stocking in the Marius River, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there from 1994 to 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Marius River is false.
In 1994, the walleye winked into existence in the Tongue River Reservoir at an average length of 16 inches. Then, after less than a year in existence there, it disappeared in 1994, or soon after. It would remain absent for ten years, until it reappeared there in 2004 at an average length of 10 inches, 37.5% less than the 16 inches at which it had last manifested in 1994. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2004, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010, at an average length of 12.3 inches, % than the 10 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2004. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
If the source of the 53 walleye collected in the upper Tongue River Reservoir in 1994 was stocking, as alleged by the USGS, and Montana Parks, Fish and Wildlife stocked 1,462,480 walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir from 1950 to 1969, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1950 to 1994?
Either the USGS’s claim that the stocking took place is false, or those stockings in 1950, 1980, 1969 and 1990 all had mortalities of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1994, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir. It would remain absent for sixteen years, until it reappeared there in 2004 at a length of 10 inches, 23.1% less than the 16 inches at which it had last manifested in 1994. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir and remains absent to this day.
In 1995, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the Nelson Reservoir on the lower Beaver Creek, Big Horn Lake, and the Yellowstone River. It also winked into existence in Kerr Lake in Arizona. And, if we allow walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye also winked into existence simultaneously in Arizona’s Salt River at Blue Point, behind the Stewart Mountain dam, and in the South Canal above the barrier.
In 1995, 15 walleye were collected in Fort Peck Reservoir.
In 1995, the Montana state record walleye was caught in the Fort Peck Reservoir. It weighed 16.29 pounds. The USGS table for the walleye in Montana omits the 1995 Montana state record walleye.
In 1995, the walleye winked into existence in the Nelson Reservoir on the Lower Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 1995, the walleye winked into existence in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
In 1995, the walleye winked into existence in the Yellowstone River in Montana, miles 15.4 to 30.5. From 1997 to 2000, the length of the walleye collected in the Yellowstone River in Montana increased in length by 56.9%, from 12.3 inches to 19.3 inches. Then, from 2004 to 2009, the walleye collected in the Yellowstone River decreased in length by 13.3%, from 15 inches to 13 inches. From 2009 to 2012, the number of walleye collected in the Yellowstone River increased by 366%, from 9 to 42, their minimum length increased by 74.6%, from 5.9 inches to 10.3 inches, and their maximum length increased by 38.6%, from 21 inches to 29.1 inches. However, from 2012 to present, the walleye is absent from the record in the Yellowstone River in Montana. Did it disappear in 2012, or soon after?
In 1995, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Jerrod Lingle caught the Arizona state record walleye in Kerr Lake. It weighed 12 pounds, 10 ounces.
The USGS table for the species does not mention the Arizona state record from 1995. Why?
In 1995, R.W. Clarkson claims that three walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service behind the Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye at Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River in Arizona in 1995 is false.
In 1995, R.W. Clarkson claims that seventeen walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the South Canal on the Salt River above the barrier in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the South Canal above the barrier on the Salt River in Arizona in 1995 is false.
On March 26, 1995, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Jerrod Lingle caught the Arizona state record walleye in Kerr Lake. It weighed 12 pounds, 10 ounces.
The USGS table for the species does not mention the Arizona state record from 1995. Why?
In 1995, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River and from the Salt River at Blue Point, and remains absent from both of those locations to this day.
In 1995, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Salt River at Blue Point, and remains absent to this day.
In 1995, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from behind the Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River in Arizona, and remains absent to this day.
In 1996, if we allow walleye for which no data is provided, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Arizona Canal and the South Canal, both on the Salt River in Arizona. Despite the fact that there has never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the potential pathway in both locations as “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye in both the Arizona Canal and the South Canal on the Salt River is false.In 1996 one walleye was collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
In 1996, if we allow for walleye for which no data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Arizona Canal on the lower Salt River in Arizona, at some undocumented length and weight. It would remain in existence only briefly. In 1996, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Arizona Canal, and remains absent to this day.
In 1996, if we allow for fish for which no data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the South Canal on the Salt River in Arizona. It would remain in existence there only briefly.
In 1996, R.W. Clarkson claims that two walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the Arizona Canal on the lower Salt River in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Arizona canal proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arizona Canal is false.
In 1996, R.W. Clarkson claims that two walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the Arizona Canal on the lower Salt River in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Arizona canal proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Arizona Canal is false.
In 1996, R.W. Clarkson claims that a single walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service behind the Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye at Stewart Mountain dam on the Salt River in Arizona in 1995 and 1996 is false.
In 1996, R.W. Clarkson claims that a single walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the South Canal on the Salt River in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the South Canal on the Salt River in Arizona in 1996 is false.
In 1996, R.W. Clarkson claims that eight walleye of undocumented length or weight were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the South Canal on the Salt River above the barrier in Arizona. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Salt River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the South Canal above the barrier on the Salt River in Arizona in 1996 is false.
In 1996, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage in Montana (to reappear briefly in 2006 and then disappear again for good) and from Arizona’s Salt River from the Arizona Canal, from behind Stewart Mountain dam, and from the South Canal both above and below the barrier. It remains absent from all of those Arizona locations to this day.
From 1997 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek in Montana.
From 1997 to 2011, the number of walleye collected in the Flatwillow Reservoir on the Elk Creek in Montana increased by %, from 8 to 31.
From 1997 to 2011, the walleye is absent from the record in the Flatwillow Reservoir on the Elk Creek in Montana.
From 1997 to 2001, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by 50.8%, from 61 to 30.
From 1997 to 2001, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by an annual average of 2.1%.
From 1997 to 2000, the USGS stocked 5,500 walleye fry in the Kolar Reservoir on the Arrow river in Montana, and listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Yet there are no examples of the walleye in the Kolar Reservoir. It is proof that the stocking is a colossal sham, being executed down through time.
From 1997 to 1998, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by 44.2%, from 61 to 34. Here, coincident with the sudden erection of a literal forest of wireless communications infrastructure thrown up suddenly virtually overnight in every city, town and village on Earth, we see the just as sudden, catastrophic in decrease in numbers of walleye in Fort Peck Reservoir in Montana.
In 1997, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the Yellowstone-Sunday River, Ester Lake, Flatwillow Reservoir, the Marius River miles zero to six, and the Upper Missouri River.
In 1997 the walleye winked into existence in the Flatwillow Reservoir on the Elk Creek in Montana. It would remain in existence there only briefly, disappearing in 1997, or soon after.
In 1997, in the absence of any stocking there, in history, the walleye winked into existence in the Yellowstone-Sunday River in Montana, at a threshold length of 14 inches. The species was nevertheless brazenly listed as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. The USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Yellowstone-Sunday River in Montana is false. Then, from 1997 to 1998, it increased in length by 35%, from 14 inches to 18.9 inches. In 2011, or soon after, after fourteen years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Yellowstone River, and remains absent to this day.
In 1997, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Marius River, miles zero to six, at an average threshold length of 12.2 inches. Then, after existing there only briefly, it disappeared again in 1997, or soon after, and remained absent for thirteen years, until it reappeared again in 2010 at a length of 13.9 inches, 13.9% greater than the 12.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1997. Then, after less than a year in existence there, it disappeared again, and remains absent to this day.
In 1997, after an absence of fourteen years, the walleye reappeared in the Upper Missouri River at an average length of 22.8 inches, 10.7% greater than the 20.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1983.
In 1997, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Lake Ester, Flatwillow Reservoir, Lake Frances and the Marius River miles zero to six. It remains absent from Lake Ester and Lake Frances to this day. It remained absent from Flatwillow and the Marius River for an identical thirteen years, reappeared briefly in 2010 in both locations, and then disappeared again, to remain absent from both locations to this day.
On March 6, 1997, in the absence of any stocking there, Montana Fish, Parks and Wildlife collected three walleye in the Marius River, Miles zero to 6, ranging in length from 5.4 inches to 19 inches. Despite the complete absence of any stocking, they nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
From 1998 to 2001, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by 11.7%, from 34 to 30.
In 1998, 34 walleye were collected in Fort Peck Reservoir.
In 1998, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the Lower Bighorn River, the Milk River, the Missouri River in the Bullwhacker-Dog drainage, River Miles: 2,022.5 to 2,028.5. in Lake Ester on Beaver Creek, in Little Warm Reservoir, and in Lake Josephine.
In 1998, the walleye winked into existence on the Lower Bighorn River in Montana. The USGS lists its potential pathway as “stocked for sport”, however neither the lower Bighorn River, nor the Bighorn River have ever been stocked. Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River had been stocked eight years previously, however that is 158 miles away. The walleye would remain in existence there only briefly, until it disappeared from the Lower Bighorn River in 1998, or soon after, and remains absent from that geography to this day.
In 1998, the walleye winked into existence in the Milk River in Montana, at a threshold length of 1.9 inches. Then, from 1998 to 1999, it increased in length by 900%, from 1.9 inches to 19 inches. In 2003, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Milk River in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
In 1998, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Josephine on the upper Yellowstone Lake basin in Montana at an average length of 13.2 inches. Then, from
1998 to 2001, it increased in length by by 68.6%, from 13.7 inches to 23.1 inches. Here, as in countless other examples within this study, we see the species wink into existence, and then expand exponentially in size over a short period of time. Then, in 2001, or soon after, after less than four years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Josephine, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lake Josephine, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lake Josephine proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Lake Josephine in 1998 is false.
From 1999 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Placid Lake in the Blackfoot River drainage in Montana.
From 1999 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Salmon Lake in the Blackfoot River drainage in Montana.
In 1999, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Placid Lake, Salmon Lake, Prickly Pear Creek, and back into existence in the Tiber Reservoir after a ten-year absence.
In 1999, in the absence of any stocking there in history, the walleye winked into existence in the Prickly Pear Creek at an average threshold length of 12.1 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Prickly Pear Creek River, and remains absent to this day.
In 1999, after a ten year absence, the walleye winked back into existence yet again in the Tiber Reservoir, this time at an average length of 14.85 inches, which was 4.2% greater than the 14.25 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1989. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 1999, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for six years, which is identical to its previous six-year absence from 1973 to 1979. It winked back into existence there in 2005, at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 1999, in “Management of non-indigenous aquatic fish in the U.S. National Park System, in the context of a single undocumented example of the walleye there in 1993, and in the absence of any stocking of the walleye there, author J.T. Tilmant said “No data on abundance within (Arches National) park. Residency: breeder”. The USGS table entry lists the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
The fact that there has been a single undocumented example of the walleye in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence in each location, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Placid Lake, Salmon Lake and Prickly Pear Creek.
In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Placid Lake in the Blackfoot River drainage in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Salmon Lake in the Blackfoot River drainage in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Prickly Pear Creek, and remains absent to this day.
In 1999, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for six years, which is identical to its previous six-year absence from 1973 to 1979. It winked back into existence there in 2005, at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 2000, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the South Sandstone Reservoir, the Poplar River, the lower Powder River, Redwater River and back into existence in the Fresno Reservoir for the first time in ten years, and in the Holter Reservoir for the first time in fourteen years, if we allow fish for which no weight or length data is provided.
In 2000, the walleye winked into existence in the South Sandstone Reservoir in the O’Fallon drainage in Utah at an average threshold length of 19 inches. It would remain in existence there for seven years, until it disappeared in 2007, or soon after.
In 2000, in the absence of any documented stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Poplar River in Montana. It would remain in existence there for nine years until it disappeared in 2009, or soon after, driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “wireless technology”. It remains absent to this day.
In 2000, the walleye winked into existence in the lower Powder River in Montana, at a threshold length of 19 inches. Then, in 2000, or sometime soon after, the walleye disappeared from the lower Powder River in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
In 2000, after a ten year absence, the walleye winked back into existence in the Fresno Reservoir at an average threshold length of 18.3 inches, 16.4% greater than the average length of 17.5 inches at which it had last manifested there in 1990. It would remain in existence there for another ten years, from 2000 to 2010; in 2010, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Fresno Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 2000, if the USGS’s unverified claim of a single walleye of indeterminate length can be believed, the walleye winked into existence in the Redwater River. In the absence of any stocking of walleye in the Redwater in history, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the species to be “established’ there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Another single unverified exampled would be collected in 2004, and then three more in 2006. Finally, in 2011, two examples were collected, which the USGS said “Size - 71.1-81.3 inches”. Since the world record walleye was 41 inches long, this is obviously incorrect. I’m going to have to go with 7.1 to 8.3 inches, for an average of 7.7 inches.
All examples were brazenly categorized as “stocked for sport”, despite any stocking of the walleye on the Redwater River in history.
The lack of any stocking of the walleye on the Redwater River in history is proof that the USGS’s claim that stocking was the source of the walleye from 2000 to 2011 is false.
Then, in 2011, after eleven years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Redwater River, and remains absent to this day. Given the lack of data on the fish from 2000 through 2006, and the USGS’s “Size - 71.1-81.3 inches” statement in 2011, the Redwater can easily be dropped from the list of walleye manifestations in Montana, and chalked up to fabricated data designed to prop up the false assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye in Montana. However, we’ll leave it in place for now.
In 2000, if we discard the objection that there is no data on them, the walleye winked back into existence in Holter Reservoir after an absence of fourteen years, at some obfuscated length and weight. As it had in its last incarnation in 1986, it would once again exist there only briefly. In 2000, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, it disappeared again, and would remain absent for another nine years, until it winked back into existence briefly in 2009. Then it disappeared again, in 2009, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
On September 1, 2000, in the absence of any stocking there in history, the USGS collected four walleye in Holter Reservoir on the Upper Missouri River in Montana, while studiously withholding any length or weight data on the fish. This most probably means that it is a fabricated table entry. Can you see how they childishly pretended that the number of fish collected increased from two in 1986 to 4 in 2000? That’s to give the Punch and Judy Crowd the false impression that the walleye is established there and expanding at a rate of 100%. When, in fact, the table entries from 1986 and 2000 are both fabricated, or, at the very least, must be rejected from the study as heresay, given that they contain no actual data, but rather only the assertion that X and Y number of fish had been collected.
Despite the absence of any previous stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 2000, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Redwater River and the Upper Missouri River.
In 2000, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Redwater River, and remains absent to this day.
In 2000, or soon after, after just over three years in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there at a length of 14.6 inches, 67.8% greater than the 8.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2000. It would remain in existence only briefly. In 2006, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. Then, in 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
From 2001 to 2005, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by 96.7%, from 30 to one.
From 2001 to 2005, the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir decreased by an annual average of 24.1%.
From 2001 to 2005, the 24.1% average decrease in the number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir was 1,047% greater than its 2.1% average annual decrease from 1997 to 2001.
The number of walleye collected in Fort Peck Reservoir is decreasing exponentially, going forward in time, because the species is being driven out of existence there by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”.
In 2001, 30 walleye were collected in Fort Peck Reservoir.
From 2000 to 2021, the 8.4% increase in size of the Montana state record walleye was 320% greater, or well more than four times greater than its 2% increase from 1995 to 2007.
The growth rate of the walleye in Montana is increasing exponentially, going forward in time. That’s scientifically impossible, at least according to the rapidly-collapsing false Orthodoxy which holds that organisms increase in ever-smaller increments to a genetically-programmed maximum size, and that there is “no such thing as the ether”.
The truth is that the size, fertility, longevity and very existence of any organism vary directly with the health of its etheric environment.
Further, given that fish grow continuously until they die, this increase in growth rate also means an increase in lifespan.
The great ages of the Biblical Patriarchs, the fact that there were “giants in those days”, and the great size reptiles, insect, fish and mammals in ancient times were the all the results of a far-healthier etheric environment.
From 2000 to 2021, the Montana state record walleye increased in size by 8.4%, from 16.63 pounds to 18.02.
From 2000 to 2021, the Montana state record walleye increased in size by an annual average of .4%.
From 2000 to 2005, the number of walleye collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana decreased by 95.7%, from 140 to 6.
From 2000 to 2003, the number of walleye collected in the Milk River from miles 419 to 437 decreased by 80.5%, from 36 to 7.
In 2000, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the lower Powder River, Fort Peck Reservoir, Big Horn Lake, Spotted Eagle Lake on the lower Tongue River, in the Noxon Rapids Reservoir on the Clark Fork River, and in the Milk River.
In 2000, the walleye winked into existence in Milk River, miles 333 to 437, in the Milk River drainage in Montana. Then, in 2003, or soon after, after existing there for just three years, the walleye disappeared from the Milk River, and remains absent to this day.
The walleye collected in the Milk River in 2000 were the first examples of the walleye ever collected in the Milk River, which had or has never been stocked with walleye, before or since. Nevertheless, the USGS brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in Three Mile Reservoir is false.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in the Three Mile Reservoir from 2000 to 2003 is false.
In 2000, the Montana state record walleye was caught at Fort Peck Reservoir. It weighed 16.63 pounds and was 31.5 inches long.
In 2000, 149 walleye were collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
In 2000, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana. It would remain in existence for five years, until it disappeared again in 2005.
In 2001, or soon after, after less than four years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Lake Josephine, and remains absent to this day.
In 2002, the walleye winked into existence in the Bailey River, at an average threshold length of 25.7 inches. It would remain in existence there for nine years, until it disappeared in 2011 at a length of 20.1 inches, 21.8% smaller than the 25.7 inches at which it had first manifested, and remains absent to this day.
From 2003 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Flathead Lake near Glacier National Park in Montana.
In 2003, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Lower Noxon Reservoir, Flathead Lake, the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and in the Upper Yellowstone River. It would remain in existence in those locales only briefly. It disappeared from Lower Noxon Reservoir and Flathead Lake in 2003 or soon after, and remains absent to this day. It reappeared in the Tongue River in 2006, then, after perhaps less than two years in existence, it remained absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after perhaps less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day. It disappeared from the upper Yellowstone in 2005, reappeared briefly in 2008, and then disappeared in 2009, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Tongue River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye there in 2003, 2006, 2007 and 2010 is false.
In 2003, the walleye winked into existence in Lower Noxon Reservoir on the Clark Fork River in Montana. The USGS claimed that it was “stocked illegally”. If the walleye was and is established all over the state of Montana, and the potential pathway of those walleye is the USGS stocking them for sport, then why would someone go to the trouble of stocking them illegally in this single location in 2003? The USGS’s assertion that the walleye was stocked illegally in the Lower Noxon Reservoir on the Clark Fork River in Montana is false. In 2003, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Lower Noxon Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 2003, the walleye winked into existence in Flathead Lake near Glacier National Park in Montana, in the absence of any stocking there.
In 2003, the walleye winked into existence in the lower Musselshell drainage in Montana, at some obfuscated threshold weight. Then, from 2005 to 2010, its length increased by 220%, from 3.9 inches to 12.5 inches. Then, in 2011, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the lower Musselshell drainage in Montana, and remains absent to this day.
In 2003, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207 at a length of 22.4 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2003, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. It would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2006 at a length of 19.9 inches, 11.1% less than the 22.4 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2003.
In 2007, after just over two years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. It remained absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010 at a length of 8.1 inches, 61% less than the 20.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2007. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after perhaps less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the absence of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Tongue River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye
there in 2003, 2006, 2007 and 2010 is false.
In 2003, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the upper Yellowstone River, miles 3018 to 314.1 at a length of 19.2 inches. Then, from 2003 to 2005, it increased in length by 46.6%, from 19.2 inches to 28.15 inches. Then, in 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the upper Yellowstone River. It remained absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008 at a length of 24.2 inches, 14% less than the 28.15 inches at which it had last manifested in 2005. Then, from 2008 to 2009, it decreased in size by 1.5 inches, from 24.2 inches to 22.3 inches. This 1.5 inch decrease in length was 15.4% greater than its 1.3 inch average annual decrease in length from 2005 to 2008. The decrease in size of the walleye is becoming greater, going forward in time, because the walleye is being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”, Then, in 2009, or soon after, after just over four years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the upper Yellowstone River, and remains absent to this day.
Despite that absence of any stocking of the walleye in the Yellowstone River, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Yellowstone River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye there in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2009 is false.
In 2003, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Milk River, Flathead Lake and the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. It remains absent from the Milk River and Flathead Lake to this day. It winked back into existence in the Tongue River in 2006, then, in 2007, after perhaps just over two years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. It remained absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010 at a length of 8.1 inches, 61% less than the 20.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2007. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after perhaps less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day.
From 2004 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Fool Hollow Lake in Arizona.
In 2004, the walleye winked back into existence in the Frenchman Creek after a twenty five year absence, simultaneous with its winking back into existence in the Missouri River, miles 1,683 to 1,760 after a nine year absence, in the Fort Peck dredge cuts after a thirteen year absence, and in the Tongue River Reservoir after a ten year absence.
In 2004, after a twenty five year absence, the walleye winked back into existence in the Frenchman Creek in Montana. The USGS brazenly lists its potential pathway as “stocked for sport” in the absence of any walleye stocking there in history. The walleye would exist there only briefly, and, in 2004 or soon after, it disappeared from the Frenchman Creek in Montana, and remains absent from that locale to this day.
In 2004, after an absence of nine years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Missouri River in Montana, miles 1,683 to 1,760. It would remain in existence there for less than four years, until it disappeared again in 2007, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
In 2004, after an absence of thirteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Fort Peck dredge cuts in Montana, at a 19.4-inch length 19.7% greater than the 16.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1991. It would remain in existence for another seven years, until it disappeared again in 2011. It remains absent to this day.
In 2004, after an absence of ten years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Tongue River Reservoir at an average length of 10 inches, 37.5% less than the 16 inches at which it had last manifested in 1994. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2004, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir. It would remain absent for six years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010, at an average length of 12.3 inches, % than the 10 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2004. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
On June 27, 2004, in the absence of any stocking there, Denny Noel caught the Arizona state record walleye in Fool Hollow Lake. It weighed 12 pounds, 13 ounces and was 33 inches long. It was 1.5% larger than the previous 12 pound, 10 ounce walleye caught by Jerrod Single I Altus-Lugert Lake on March 26, 1995.
The USGS table for the species does not mention the Arizona state record walleye from 2004. Why?
In 2004, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Frenchman Creek and the Tongue River Reservoir in Montana and from Fool Hollow Lake in Arizona. It remains absent from Frenchman Creek and Fool Hollow Lake to this day. It reappeared ion the Tongue River Reservoir briefly in 2010, disappeared, and remains absent to this day.
From 2005 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Beaver Creek in Montana.
From 2005 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Deadmans Basin Reservoir.
From 2005 to 2011, the number of walleye collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana increased by 916%, from 6 to 61.
In 2005, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Deadman’s Basin Reservoir and back into existence for the first time in 25 years in Beaver Creek, and for the first time in six years in Tiber Reservoir.
In 2005, after an absence of twenty five years, the walleye winked back into existence in Beaver Creek in Montana. It would exist there only briefly, and, in In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Beaver Creek in Montana once again, and remains absent to this day.
In 2005, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Deadmans Basin Reservoir in the Upper Musselshell drainage at an average length of 17 inches. Despite the lack of any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from Deadman’s Basin Reservoir and remains absent to this day.
In 2005, after an absence of six years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Tiber Reservoir at a length which the USGS obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. As in every other manifestation in the Tiber, it would remain in existence only briefly. In 2005, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and would remain absent for three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2008, at a length which the USGS once again obfuscated, to blunt awareness of the fact that the walleye was decreasing exponentially in size as it was driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 2005, 6 walleye were collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
In 2005, one walleye was collected in Fort Peck Reservoir.
In 2005, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Beaver Creek, Fort Peck Reservoir, Deadmans Basin Reservoir, the upper Yellowstone River and Tiber Reservoir. It would reappear briefly in the Tiber Reservoir in 2008, then disappeared again, and remains absent to this day.
From 2006 to 2007 the number of walleye collected in the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage in Montana increased by 400%, from 1 to 5.
In 2006, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Wadsworth Lake, and back into existence in the Charlie/Little Muddy drainage for the first time in ten years, in the Upper Missouri River for the first time in six years, and in the Tongue River for the first time in three years.
In 2006, after an absence of ten years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage in Montana.
In 2006, the walleye winked into existence in Wadsworth Lake. It would remain in existence there for less than two years, disappearing in 2007, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
In 2006, after an absence of six years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Upper Missouri River. It would remain in existence only briefly. In 2006, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. Then, in 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
In 2006, after a three year absence, the walleye winked back into existence in the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. In 2007, or soon after, after perhaps just over two years in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again. It remained absent for another three years, until it winked back into existence there in 2010 at a length of 8.1 inches, 61% less than the 20.7 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2007. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after perhaps less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day.
In 2006, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared once again from the upper Missouri River. Then, in 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
From 2007 to 2009, the walleye is absent from the record in Montana.
From 2007 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the Dry Fork Reservoir and in the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage, both in Montana.
From 2007 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Dry Fork Reservoir in the Big Sandy Creek River in Montana.
From 2007 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage in Montana.
From 2007 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage in Montana.
In 2007, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in the Dry Fork Reservoir, Big Sandy Creek River, and Tiber Reservoir in Montana, and in the Brush Hollow Reservoir in Colorado.
In 2007, the walleye winked into existence in Dry Fork Reservoir in the Big Sandy Creek River in Montana, at a length of 20 inches. The species is listed as “established”, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”, however the USGS did not stock walleye in the Big Sandy Creek River in Montana until 2009, and that was in Boneau Reservoir.
In 2007, after an absence of two years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Tiber Reservoir at a weight of 17.75 pounds, 44.9% larger than the previous state record holder from Fort Peck Reservoir in 2000.
In 2007, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Brush Hollow Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in Brush Hollow Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Brush Hollow Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 56 walleye collected there in 2007 is false.
In 2007, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 56 walleye in Brush Hollow Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Brush Hollow Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 56 walleye collected there in 2007 is false.
On November 20, 2007, Bob Hart caught the Montana State Record walleye in the Tiber Reservoir. It weighed 17.75 pounds, was 35 inches long, and had a 22-inch girth. Montana Outdoor News said it “unseated Dan Spence’s previous record by more than a pound. Spence’s walleye was caught in Fort Peck in 2000.” Dan’s fish weighed 12 pounds, 3 ounces.
The USGS table for the species doesn’t mention the Montana state record walleye from 2007. Why?
In 2007, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Montana’s Missouri River’s Charlie/Little Muddy drainage, Beaver Creek, the lower Tongue River, the Sandstone Reservoir, the Fort Peck dam powerhouse spillway, Wadsworth Lake and the Missouri River, miles 1,683 to 1,760, and the Brush Hollow Reservoir in Colorado, and remains absent from all of those locales this day. It also disappeared from the Tongue River in Montana, miles 180 to 207, reappeared briefly in 2010, then disappeared yet again, and remains absent to this day.
In 2008, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the upper Yellowstone River and in Colorado in Estes Lake, Lake Loveland and Boulder Reservoir. It would exist in those locations only briefly. In 2008, or soon after the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Estes Lake, Lake Loveland and Boulder Reservoir in Colorado, and remains absent from all of those locations to this day.
In 2008, after an absence of three years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Upper Yellowstone River at a length of 24.2 inches, 14% less than the 28.15 inches at which it had last manifested in 2005. Then, from 2008 to 2009, it decreased in size by 1.5 inches, from 24.2 inches to 22.3 inches. This 1.5 inch decrease in length was 15.4% greater than its 1.3 inch average annual decrease in length from 2005 to 2008. The decrease in size of the walleye is becoming greater, going forward in time, because the walleye is being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”, Then, in 2009, or soon after, after just over four years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the upper Yellowstone River, and remains absent to this day.
Despite that absence of any stocking of the walleye in the Yellowstone River, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Yellowstone River proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the walleye there in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2009 is false.
In 2008, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Estes Lake, the headwaters of the Big Thompson River in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2008, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Carter Lake Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 46 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2008, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Lake Loveland in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in Lake Loveland, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2008, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lake Loveland proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 30 walleye collected there in 2008 is false.
In 2008, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Boulder Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Boulder Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 91 walleye collected there in 2008 is false.
In 2008, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 5 walleye in Estes Lake, the headwaters of the Big Thompson River in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2008, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Estes Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 5 walleye collected there in 2008 is false.
In 2008, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 30 walleye in Lake Loveland in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2008, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lake Loveland proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 30 walleye collected there in 2008 is false.
On August 25, 2008, Montana Fish, Parks and Wildife collected a single walleye in the Tiber Reservoir. Its length is not provided by the USGS. That’s because they’re doing what little they can to obfuscate the fact that the walleye is decreasing exponentially in size at it is being driven out of existence by the purportedly-harmless non-Ionizing microwave radiation from what we collectively refer to as “technology”. To my point, in 2008, or soon after, after less than two years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tiber Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In October 2008, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 91 walleye in Boulder Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Boulder Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 91 walleye collected there in 2008 is false.
In 2008, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from the Tiber Reservoir in Montana, and from Estes Lake and Lake Loveland in Colorado, and remains absent from all of those locations to this day.
From 2009 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in the lower Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 2009, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Montana in the lower Beaver Creek, the Missouri River, miles 2,226.1 to 2,228.8, and, if we accept fish examples without any weight or length data, Montana’s Holter Reservoir. In Colorado, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Boyd Lake, Carter Lake Reservoir, the Lon Hagler Reservoir, the Lone Tree Reservoir, the Douglas Reservoir, Martin Lake, Trinidad Reservoir, Union Reservoir, Pueblo Reservoir, John Martin Reservoir, Neegronda Reservoir, McPhee Reservoir and Vallecito Reservoir in Colorado. It would remain in existence all of those locations in Montana and Colorado only briefly. In 2009, or soon after, the wallye disappeared simultaneously from all of these locales and remains absent to this day.
In 2009, the walleye winked into existence in the lower Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 2009, after no appearances of the walleye there in history, and with no stocking of the walleye there in history, the walleye winked into existence the Missouri River, miles 2,226.1 to 2,228.8, at an average threshold length of 14.3 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Missouri River, miles 2,226.1 to 2,228.8, and remains absent to this day.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked back into existence in the Holter Reservoir after a nine year absence. Then, after less than a year in existence there, it disappeared again, in 2009, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Boyd Lake in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Boyd Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the sixty walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Carter Lake Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Carter Lake Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 46 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Lon Hagler Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Lon Hagler Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lake Loveland proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 2 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Lone Tree Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Lone Tree Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Lone Tree Reservoir Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 36 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in Douglas Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Douglas Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 8 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Martin Lake in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Martin Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Lone Tree Reservoir Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the single walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Trinidad Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Trinidad Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Trinidad Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 8 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Union Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Union Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Union Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 22 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Pueblo Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Pueblo Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Pueblo Reservoir Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 160 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in John Martin Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2008, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in John Martin Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 46 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Neegronda Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in Neegronda Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Neegronda Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the six walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in McPhee Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in McPhee Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the McPhee Reservoir Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the eleven walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, if we allow for walleye for which no weight or length data is provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Vallecito Reservoir in Colorado, in the absence of any walleye stocking there. Despite that lack of any walleye stocking in the Vallecito Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Vallecito Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 8 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected two walleye in Lon Hagler Reservoir. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lon Hagler Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 2walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 8 walleye in Douglas Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Douglas Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 8 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 84 walleye in Boulder Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Boulder Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 84 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009**,** in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 46 walleye in John Martin Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in John Martin Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 45 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected six walleye from Neegronda Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Neegronda Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Neegronda Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the six walleye collected there in 2009 is false.In September 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 36 walleye in the Lone Tree Reservoir. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Lone Tree Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 2walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected a 11 walleye from McPhee Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in McPhee Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in McPhee Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the single walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 8 walleye from Vallecito Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Vallecito Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Vallecito Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the eight walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 60 walleye in Boyd Lake. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Boyd Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the sixty walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 46 walleye in Carter Lake Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Carter Lake Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 46 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected a single walleye from Martin Lake in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Martin Lake, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Martin Lake proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the single walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 8 walleye from Trinidad Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Trinidad Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Trinidad Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the eight walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected 22 walleye from Union Reservoir in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Union Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Union Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 22 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In October 2009, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the Colorado Division of Wildlife collected a 160 walleye from Pueblo Reservoir on the Arkansas River in Colorado. Despite the fact that there had never been any walleye stocking in Pueblo Reservoir, the USGS nevertheless brazenly lists the species as “established” there in 2009, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They did not provide any length or weight data on these fish.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in Pueblo Reservoir proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking was the source of the 160 walleye collected there in 2009 is false.
In 2009, or soon after, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Montana’s lower Beaver Creek, the Marius River, Poplar River, and upper Yellowstone River, in Montana, and, if we accept fish without length or weight data, the walleye also disappeared from Holter Reservoir in Montana, and remains absent from all of those locales to this day. If we accept fish without length or weight data, in 2009 the walleye also disappeared simultaneously from Colorado’s Boyd Lake, Carter Lake Reservoir, the Lon Hagler Reservoir, the Lone Tree Reservoir, Douglas Reservoir, Martin Lake, Trinidad Reservoir, Boulder Reservoir, Union Reservoir, Pueblo Reservoir, John Martin Reservoir, Neegronda Reservoir, McPhee Reservoir and Vallecito Reservoir. It remains absent from all of those locations in Montana and Colorado to this day.
In 2010, the walleye winked into existence simultaneously in Nelson Reservoir (after an absence of fifteen years), in the Marius River, miles zero to six (after an absence of thirteen years), the Big Dry, the Tongue River Reservoir (after an absence of __ years), in the Tongue River after an absence of three years.
In 2010, after an absence of fifteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Nelson Reservoir on the Lower Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 2010, the walleye winked into existence on the Big Dry Creek in Montana.
In 2010, after an absence of six years, they winked back into existence in the Tongue River Reservoir, at an average length of 12.3 inches, 23% greater than the 10 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2004. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River Reservoir, and remains absent to this day.
In 2010, after a three year absence, the walleye winked back into existence in the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207. Then, in 2010, or soon after, after perhaps less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day.
In 2010, after an absence of 13 years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Marius River, miles zero to six, at a length of 13.9 inches, 13.9% greater than the 12.2 inches at which it had last manifested in 1997. Then, after less than a year in existence there, it disappeared again, and remains absent to this day. In 2010, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Marius River, miles zero to six, and remains absent to this day.
In 2010, the average length of the walleye in the Marius River, mile zero to six was 13.9 inches.
On June 22, 2010, Montana Fish, Parks and Wildlife stocked 50,000 1.5 inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir. The USGS listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
If stocking is the source of the walleye in the Tongue River Reservoir and Montana Fish, Parks and Wildlife stocked 50,000 1.5 inch average walleye fry in the Tongue River Reservoir in 2010, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 2010 to this writing in 2023?
Either the USGS’s assertion that the stocking took place is false, or the stocking had a 100% mortality rate for some unexplained reason.
On August 8, 2010, in the absence of any stocking there, the USGS collected four walleye in the Marius River, miles zero to six. Despite the complete absence of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. They ranged in length from 254 mm (10 inches) to 450 mm (17.7 inches).
In 2010, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Big Dry Creek, Battle Creek, the Noxon Rapids Reservoir, the Cooney Reservoir, Castle Rock Reservoir, Fresno Reservoir, the Missouri River, miles 2,226.1 to 2,228.8, and the Tongue River Reservoir, and remains absent from all of those locales to this day. It also disappeared from the Tongue River, miles 180 to 207, and remains absent to this day.
From 2011 to 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
From 2011 to 2015, the walleye is absent from the record in Montana.
In 2011, the walleye simultaneously winked back into existence in Flatwillow Reservoir for the first time in fourteen years, and into existence for the first time in history in both the Upper Noxon Reservoir, the Redwater River, the Milk River and the upper Missouri River.
In 2011, the walleye winked back into existence in the Flatwillow Reservoir on Elk Creek in Montana after an absence of 14 years. It would remain in existence there only briefly, and disappeared in 2011 or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
In 2011, the walleye winked into existence in the Upper Noxon Reservoir on the Clark Fork River in Montana. The USGS maintains that it was stocked for sport”, despite the fact that the only stocking that’s ever purportedly taken place (in the Upper Noxon Reservoir) was illegal, in 2003.In 2011, 61 walleye were collected in Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River in Montana.
In 2011, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence the Milk River, miles zero to 130, at a threshold length of 21.8 inches. Nevertheless, the USGS brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The lack of any walleye stocking in the Milk River proves that the USGS’s claim that stocking is the source of the walleye in the Milk River in 2011 is false. It would remain in existence there for less than a year. In 2011, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Milk River, miles zero to 130. It remains absent to this day.
In 2011, after an absence of five years, the walleye winked back into existence in the upper Missouri River at an average length of 17.9 inches, 22.6% greater than the 14.6 inches at which it had last manifested there in 2006. It would once again remain in existence only briefly. In 2011, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared yet again from the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent to this day.
In 2011, the walleye disappeared simultaneously from Montana’s Big Horn Lake on the Big Horn River, Upper Noxon Reservoir on the Clark Fork River, Flatwillow Reservoir on the Elk Creek, the lower Musselshell drainage, the Yellowstone River, the Fort Peck drainage cuts, the Redwater River, the Milk River, Bailey River, and the Upper Missouri River, and remains absent from all of those locales to this day.
In 2015, the walleye winked into existence in Swan Lake in the Lower Swan River in Montana. The Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission declared them to have been stocked illegally, and approved killing all of them.
In 2017, after an absence of 61 years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Bear River in Texas. It was 208 mm (8.1 inches) in length and weighed 82 grams (2.9 ounces). Despite just a single example, and the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
In 2021, after an absence of sixteen years, the walleye winked back into existence in Beaver Creek in Montana.
In 2021, the Montana state record walleye weighed 18.02 pounds.
In 2021, the 2007 Montana state record for walleye was broken by 1.46%, increasing from 17.75 pounds to 18.02 pounds.
On May 17, 2021, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Trevor Johnson caught the Montana State Record walleye in Holter Lake. It weighed 18.02 pounds, was 32.25 inches in length, and 22 inches in girth. The USGS table for the species does not include the Montana state record walleye from 2021. Why?
