The plot thickens, in that the state of Utah completely omits any data on any of their purportedly-assiduous stocking of the walleye. So I jumped to Texas, and found the data I’ve presented below.
I think I’m going to keep going on the walleye for the moment.
THE WALLEYE IN TEXAS
The USGS lists the walleye as non-native to Texas.
From 1956 to 2017, there are sixty nine examples of the walleye on record in Texas: 66 from 1985 to 1988 in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow, one in Georgetown Creek in 1989, and one in the Bear River in 2017.
If we reject fish without any data, that brings the number down to two: one in Georgetown Creek in 1989, and one in the Bear River in 2017. It’s like sightings of the Great Orm of Loch Ness, or Sasquatch, only far rarer.
In 1956, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Bear River in Texas at some obfuscated weight and length. Despite just a single example, and the the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. While they withheld any data on the fish, they added “this fish was presumable stocked as a fry in 1952 in Hyrum Reservoir and travelled 80-96 km”. Despite the lack of any evidence of any stocking in Hyrum Reservoir, then to now. In 1956, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River in Texas. It would remain absent for sixty one years, until it winked back into existence there in 2017 at a length of 8.2 inches and a weight of 2.9 ounces. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
From 1974 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Town Lake Reservoir in Texas. While, in 1974 and 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked an identical 1,014,000 walleye there, for a total of 2,028,000. The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing-identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1974 and 1975 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
From 1976 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Austin Reservoir in Texas. While, from 1976 to 1985, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 40,400 walleye fry in the Austin Reservoir (an identical 20,200 in 1976 and 1985).
The fact that the stocking of 40,400 walleye fry produced zero examples of the walleye proves either that the stockings in 1976 and 1985 did not take place, or those stockings suffered 100% mortality rates for some unexplained reason.
A species with zero examples cannot be defined as established, and so, thus, the USGS’s claims that the walleye was established in Austin Reservoir in 1976 and 1985 are both false.
From 1979 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Travis in Texas. While, in 1979 and 1986, the 1,275,065 walleye stocked in Lake Travis were identical. The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1979 and 1986 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
From 1985 to 1988, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected 66 walleye in the Colorado River at the Lake Powerll Inflow in Texas (RK 316-326). Since they’ve withheld data on the fish, we’ll formally need to reject them from the analysis as fraudulent table entries on the part of the USGS. But we’ll keep our eyes on them.
In 1985, if we allow examples for which no data has been provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow in Texas (RK 316 to 326). It would remain in existence there for just over five years, when it disappeared again in 1985, or soon after, and remains absent to this day.
Despite the fact that there has never been any walleye stocking there, and these are the only examples of the walleye on record there, the USGS listed the walleye as “established” in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow in 1985, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there from 1985 to 1988 is false.
In 1988, or soon after, after just over five years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow, and remains absent to this day.
In 1989, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Georgetown Creek in the Atacosa drainage in Texas at a weight of 3.01 pounds, and a length of 23 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1989, or soon after, In 1989, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Georgetown Creek, and remains absent to this day.
In 1989, or soon after, In 1989, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Georgetown Creek, and remains absent to this day.
In 1993, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in Colorado River, above the confluence of the Green River (RK 0-80). They withheld its length and weight. This means we should reject it as a fabricated table entry.
In 1999, in “Management of non-indigenous aquatic fish in the U.S. National Park System, in the context of a single undocumented example of the walleye there in 1993, and in the absence of any stocking of the walleye there, author J.T. Tilmant said “No data on abundance within (Arches National) park. Residency: breeder”. The USGS table entry lists the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
The fact that there has been a single undocumented example of the walleye in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
In 2017, after an absence of 61 years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Bear River in Texas. It was 208 mm (8.1 inches) in length and weighed 82 grams (2.9 ounces). Despite just a single example, and the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
THE WALLEYE IN TEXAS BY WATER BODY
AMISTAD RESERVOIR
From 1954 to 1976, the walleye is absent from the record in Amistad Reservoir in Texas. While, from 1954 to 1976, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 10,000 walleye fry there in 1954, 5,250,000 more in 1975, and another 5,100,000 in 1976.
Either the stockings did not take place, as alleged, or all of the stockings had a mortality rates of 100% for some unexplained reason.
A species with zero examples cannot be defined as established, and so, thus, the USGS’s claims that the walleye was established in Amistad Reservoir in 1954, 1976 and 1976 are all false.
In 1954, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 10,000 walleye fry in Amistad Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 5,250,000 walleye fry in Amistad Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The walleye is absent from the record in Amistad Reservoir from 1953 to 1975. A species with zero examples cannot be defined as “established”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Amistand Reservoir in 1953 and 1975 is false.
In 1976, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 5,100,000 walleye fry in Amistad Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The walleye is absent from the record in Amistad Reservoir from 1954 to 1976. A species with zero examples cannot be defined as “established”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Amistand Reservoir in 1954 and 1976 is false.
In 1977, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 2,033,000 walleye fry in Amistad Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The walleye is absent from the record in Amistad Reservoir from 1954 to 1977. A species with zero examples cannot be defined as “established”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Amistand Reservoir in 1953, 1976 and 1977 is false.
In 1978, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 5,033,000 walleye fry in Amistad Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
I’ll need to add for the record that the number 33 is very important to the literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist Freemasons that I’m taking to task, here, which is why they gymnastically included it in their fraudulent walleye stocking numbers here in Texas in 1978.
The walleye is absent from the record in Amistad Reservoir from 1954 to 1977. A species with zero examples cannot be defined as “established”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Amistand Reservoir in 1953, 1976, 1977 and 1978 is false.
In 1978, the USGS said “No evidence of natural reproduction”. So we’ll have to thank them for their honesty here, at last, and move on.
AUSTIN RESERVOIR
From 1976 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Austin Reservoir.
From 1976 to 1985, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 40,400 walleye fry in the Austin Reservoir (an identical 20,200 in 1976 and 1985).
The fact that the stocking of 40,400 walleye fry produced zero examples of the walleye proves either that the stockings in 1976 and 1985 did not take place, or those stockings suffered 100% mortality rates for some unexplained reason.
A species with zero examples cannot be defined as established, and so, thus, the USGS’s claims that the walleye was established in Austin Reservoir in 1976 and 1985 are both false.
In 1976, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 20,200 walleye fry in Austin Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Yet there are no examples of the walleye in Austin Reservoir from 1976 to this writing in 2003. Thus, the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established in Austin Reservoir in 1976 is false.
If stocking is the source of the walleye in Austin Reservoir, and Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 20,200 walleye fry there in 1976, then why are there no examples of the walleye there from 1976 to 1985?
Either the stocking did not, in fact, take place, or that stocking had a mortality rate of 100% for some unexplained reason.
In 1985, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 20,200 walleye fry in Austin Reservoir. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Yet, there are no examples of the walleye in Austin Reservoir from 1976 to this writing in 2003. Thus, the USGS’s assertion that the walleye was established in Austin Reservoir in 1985 is false.
BEAR RIVER
From 1956 to 2017, the walleye is absent from the record.
From 1956 to 2017, there are two documented examples of the walleye in the Bear River, only one of which we have data for, in 2017.
In 1956, in the absence of any stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in the Bear River in Texas at some obfuscated weight and length. Despite just a single example, and the the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. While they withheld any data on the fish, they added “this fish was presumable stocked as a fry in 1952 in Hyrum Reservoir and travelled 80-96 km”. In 1956, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River in Texas. It would remain absent for sixty one years, until it winked back into existence there in 2017 at a length of 8.2 inches and a weight of 2.9 ounces. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
In 1956, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in the Bear River. They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. While they withheld any data on the fish, they added “this fish was presumable stocked as a fry in 1952 in Hyrum Reservoir and travelled 80-96 km”. We’ll put a bookmark here, and investigate this claim against examples of the walleye in Hyrum Reservoir.
In 1956, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River in Texas. It would remain absent for sixty one years, until it winked back into existence there in 2017 at a length of 8.2 inches and a weight of 2.9 ounces.
In 1963, in the Utah Department of Fish and Game’s “Fishes of Utah”, W.F. Sigler and R.R. Miller said that the walleye was “spreading throughout the drainage” in the Bear River. This within the context of a single example of the walleye there in 1956.
In 2017, after an absence of 61 years, the walleye winked back into existence in the Bear River in Texas. It was 208 mm (8.1 inches) in length and weighed 82 grams (2.9 ounces). Despite just a single example, and the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
On August 24, 2017, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in the Bear River, at mile 213. It was 208 mm (8.1 inches) in length and weighed 82 grams (2.9 ounces).
They listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. Despite just a single example, and the lack of any stocking there, the USGS nevertheless brazenly listed the species as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
A species with just two examples from 1956 to 2017 cannot be referred to as “established”. The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in the Bear River in 1956 and 2017 are false.
In 2017, or soon after, the walleye disappeared from the Bear River, and remains absent to this day.
COLORADO RIVER AT ARCHES NATIONAL PARK
In 1993, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in Colorado River, above the confluence of the Green River (RK 0-80). They withheld its length and weight. This means we should reject it as a fabricated table entry.
In 1999, in “Management of non-indigenous aquatic fish in the U.S. National Park System, in the context of a single undocumented example of the walleye there in 1993, and in the absence of any stocking of the walleye there, author J.T. Tilmant said “No data on abundance within (Arches National) park. Residency: breeder”. The USGS table entry lists the walleye as “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
The fact that there has been a single undocumented example of the walleye in the Colorado River at Arches national park proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
COLORADO RIVER, LAKE POWELL INFLOW
From 1985 to 1988, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected 66 walleye in the Colorado River at the Lake Powerll Inflow in Texas (RK 316-326). Since they’ve withheld data on the fish, we’ll formally need to reject them from the analysis as fraudulent table entries on the part of the USGS. But we’ll keep our eyes on them.
In 1985, if we allow examples for which no data has been provided, the walleye winked into existence in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow in Texas (RK 316 to 326). It would remain in existence there for just over five years, when it disappeared again in 1985, or soon after, and remains absent to this day. Despite the fact that there has never been any walleye stocking there, and these are the only examples of the walleye on record there, the USGS listed the walleye as “established” in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow in 1985, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there is false.
In 1985, or soon after, after just over five years in existence there, the walleye disappeared from the Colorado River at the Lake Powell inflow, and remains absent to this day.
GEORGETOWN CREEK, ATACOSA DRAINAGE
In 1989, in the absence of any walleye stocking there, the walleye winked into existence in Georgetown Creek in the Atacosa drainage in Texas at a weight of 3.01 pounds, and a length of 23 inches. It would remain in existence there only briefly. In 1989, or soon after, In 1989, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Georgetown Creek, and remains absent to this day.
Despite just a single example, and the absence of any stocking there, they nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Georgetown Creek in 1989 is false.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Georgetown Creek proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there in 1989 is false.
On July 1, 1989, in the absence of any stocking there, Texas Parks and Wildlife collected a single walleye in Georgetown Creek in the Atacosa drainage in Texas. It weighed 3.01 pounds and was 23 inches long.
Despite just a single example, and the absence of any stocking there, they nevertheless brazenly stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The USGS’s claim that the walleye was established in Georgetown Creek in 1989 is false.
The fact that there has never been any walleye stocking in the Georgetown Creek proves that the USGS’s assertion that stocking is the source of the walleye there in 1989 is false.
In 1989, or soon after, after less than a year in existence there, the walleye disappeared from Georgetown Creek, and remains absent to this day.
LADY BIRD RESERVOIR
In 1974, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 2,500 walleye fry in Lady Bird Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 1,011,500 walleye fry in Lady Bird Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”. However, they added that the status was “failed”.
LAKE TRAVIS
From 1979 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Lake Travis in Texas. While, in 1979 and 1985, the 1,275,065 walleye stocked in Lake Travis were identical.
The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1979 and 1985 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
In 1979 and 1985, the 1,275,065 walleye stocked in Lake Travis were identical.
In 1979, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 1,275,065 walleye fry in Lake Travis. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1985, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 1,275,065 walleye fry in Lake Travis. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
TRAVIS RESERVOIR
In 1976, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 190,000 walleye fry in Travis Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1977, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 3,666,925 walleye fry in Travis Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
I’ll need to note for the record that 666 is the “number of the Beast”, and vitally important to the literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist Freemasons which I am taking to task here, hence their gymnastic inclusion of it in their fabricated stocking numbers.
In 1977, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 4,391,640 walleye fry in Travis Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1979, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 4,391,640 walleye fry in Travis Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”, and added that its status was “failed”.
TOWN LAKE RESERVOIR
From 1974 to this writing in 2023, the walleye is absent from the record in Town Lake Reservoir in Texas. While, in 1974 and 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked an identical 1,014,000 walleye there, for a total of 2,028,000.
In 1974, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 1,014,000 walleye fry in Town Lake Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
In 1975, Texas Parks and Wildlife stocked 1,014,000 walleye fry in Town Lake Reservoir. They stated the walleye to be “established” there, with a potential pathway of “stocked for sport”.
The lack of any walleye and the embarrassing identical stocking numbers prove that the stockings in 1979 and 1985 did not, in fact, take place, as falsely alleged by the USGS and Texas Parks and Wildlife.
