Well, you can tell by the way I use my walk
I’m a woman’s man, no time to talk
Music loud and women warm, I’ve been kicked around
Since I was born
And now it’s alright, it’s okay
And you may look the other way
We can try to understand
The New York Times’ effect on man
From “Stayin’ Alive”, by Morris Gibb, Robin Gibb and Barry Gibb, 1977
On January 2, 2024, the Washington Post questioned “Trying to break a phone habit in 2024 ? Skip the life hacks.”
Where author Shira Ovide’s question gives the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to answer “oh, my goodness, no!”, and turn the page.
Then Shira walked “addiction” back to “habit”, and redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
Shira said “skip the life hacks” which is Mil-speak for “don’t ditch your smartphone and get a flip phone”.
Here’s Shira Ovide’s picture, where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye:
(The Washington Post’s Shira Ovide)
On January 3, 2024, the Guardian planted the seed of doubt and questioned “Everyone is on their phones. But is it really phone addiction we’re experiencing?”.
Where author Simar Bajaj’s question gives the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to brightly answer “oh, my goodness, no!”, and turn the page.
Then redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
onus - noun - used to refer to something that is one’s duty or responsibility.
Simar said “experiencing” to walk phone addiction back a step from everyone actually, er, experiencing it.
He also walked “everyone is addicted to their smartphones” back to “everyone is on their phones”.
Here’s Simar Bajaj’s picture, with a Satanic purple background, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye:
(The Guardian’s Simar Bajaj)
On January 4, 2024, the Orwellian dazeddigital.com explained “6 ways to cure your crippling phone addiction”.
Where author Serena Smith redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
Here’s Serena Smith’s picture, in a Satanic purple top, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye:
(Dazed Magazine’s Serena Smith)
On January 26, 2024, the New York Times said “I Was Addicted to My Smartphone, So I Switched to a Flip Phone For a Month”.
Where, with “for a month”, author Kashmir Hill did what little she could to hedge by averring that the switch from smartphone to flip phone was only-temporary, and where the past-tense “was addicted” confirms that said addiction had been perfectly cured by the thirty day drying out.
Here’s Kashmir Hill’s picture, with Satanic purple hair, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye:
(The New York Times’ Kashmir Hill)
On February 12, 2024, the Harvard Business Review planted the seed of doubt and questioned “Do You Have a Phone Addiction ?”
Where author Alyson Meister’s question gave the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to brightly answer “oh, my goodness, no!”, and turn the page.
Alyson redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
Here’s Alyson Meister’s picture, with Satanic purple background highlights, and where she’s making a purportedly secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”:
(The Harvard Business Review’s Alyson Meister)
Now, for any Coincidence theorists lingering in the readership, here’s the LinkedIn profile picture of a Full Stack Developer, in a Satanic purple shirt, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye, where he’s looking left, and where he is making the same purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition” that Alyson Meister is in the photo we just reviewed.
(Full Stack Developer, in a Satanic purple shirt, looking left, and making a purportedly-secret Masonic “gesture of recognition”.)
On March 13, 2024, the Atlantic wrung its hands and decried “The Terrible Costs of a Phone-Based Childhood”.
Where author Jonathan Haidt redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
Then he stated that smartphones did not have a terrible cost after one reached adulthood.
Here’s Jonathan Haidt’s picture, where the image is constructed to focus attention on his left eye:
(The Atlantic’s Jonathan Haidt)
On March 30, 2024, thecut.com questioned “When Kids Are Addicted to their Phones, Who Is to Blame ?”
Where author Kathryn Jezer Morton redacted “smart” from “smartphone”, to take the onus off, and make the subject far less searchable.
Then she inferred that smartphones were not addictive one reached adulthood.
Here, with the grammatically-incorrect question “who is to blame ?”, Kathryn gives the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to brightly answer "oh, my goodness, “no one is to blame!”, and turn the page.
Here’s Kathryn Jezer Morton’s picture, in a Satanic green blouse, and where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye.
(Kathryn Jezer Morton)
On June 4, 2024, techreport.com said “50 Most Surprising Smartphone Addiction Statistics in 2023”.
Where “surprising” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”, and falsely implies that those surprises are pleasant.
Author Susan Laborde has bravely ended the headline of the article from mid-2024 with the disingenuous “in 2023”, to make the subject far less searchable, and to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, that’s just last year’s news!”, and turn the page.
disingenuous - adjective - not sincere, especially when you pretend to know less about something than you really do
She used the trigger word “statistics” to invoke the Coincidence theorist response of “oh, those people can make statistics say anything!”
As a propagandist, Susan knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsbility.
Here’s Susan Laborde’s picture, where the image is constructed to focus attention on her left eye:
(Techreport.com’s Susan Laborde)
On June 22, 2024, asahi.com said “VOX POPULI: Ultimate reality of smartphone addiction: It’s here to stay”.
Where the uncredited author’s use of “it’s here to stay” is an example of the propaganda technique known as a “fait accompli”.
fait accompli - noun - a thing that has already happened or been decided before those affected hear about it, leaving them with no option but to accept it.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
The uncredited Intelligence operative from the State propaganda organ known as asahi.com use of “ultimate” is an example of the propaganda technique known as “spin”, in this case positive.
They said “VOX POPULI” in latin to state firmly that they were of superior intellect, and put it in block capitals to terrify and cow the Coincidence theorist reader.
Nothing to shut a rube up like thundering at them in latin.
In all of the images above, the image is constructed to focus attention on the left eye because, to generational Satanist Freemasons, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included these pictures so that you could get a better idea of what generational Satanist Freemasons of marginal influence look like.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
It’s not like these people aren’t right up front about what they’re doing, and what they’re into.
We’ve just been conditioned, over literally Millennia, not to “notice” it.
Generational Satanists are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth.
It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to help speed the transition.
Jeff Miller, Honolulu, HI, June 26, 2024
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, please send me a note at [email protected].
