“The shadow of that hyddeous strength, sax myle and more it is of length”
From “Ane Dialog”, by Sir David Lyndsay, 1555
(The quote introduces C.S. Lewis’ “That Hideous Strength”, from 1945, and describes the Tower of Babel)
A warm welcome to self-described long-time gifter M.C. Hager, who brings this mailing list to 35. He said he’s been “noticing my truths”. Here’s one:
I’ve broken the log-jam of obfuscation around what’s driving exponentially-increasing suicide regardless of culture or geography.
We learned previously that there is a statistically significant relationship of striking magnitude between excessive microwave radiation and schizophrenia.
Now we know that the 6% suicide rate among schizophrenics is 59,900% higher than the .01% suicide rate among the general populace.
THE DATA
In November 1963, H. Freedman, R.O. Becker C.H. Hoffman published “Geomagnetic Parameters and Psychological Hospital Admissions” in the journal Nature.
Where “a significant relationship was shown between psychiatric disturbance as reflected in hospital admissions and natμral magnetic field intensity”.
In 1965, H. Freedman published “Psychiatric Ward Behavior and Geophysical Parameters” in the journal Nature.
In it he said “statistically significant relationships of striking magnitude between cosmic ray indices and psychiatric ward behavior can be observed in the majority of schizophrenic patients.”
There is a significant relationship between microwave radiation levels and psychiatric disturbances.
Say it with me: “There is a statistically significant relationship of striking magnitude between excessive microwave radiation and schizophrenia.”
One of the hardest truths for mean-spirited Western materialists to assimilate is that non-ionizing radiation attacks on the spiritual level. “Schizophrenia” is a modern code meme for what used to be known as “demonic possession”.
Microwave radiation drives schizophrenia. That’s why, from 2011 to 2015, the incidence of schizophrenia in China increased by 38% , or by well over one third, from .71/1000 to .98/1000.
And it’s why, from 2011 to 2015, the prevalence of schizophrenia in China increased by 29% , or by just about one third, from .63% to .81%."
First author Yequing Wu omitted those percentages, and referred to the sudden, exponential increase in schizophrenia incidence in China from 2011 to 2015 only as “considerable”.
He offered no suggestion as to what might have caused the sudden, exponential increase in schizophrenia in China from 2011 to 2015. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
Microwave radiation drives schizophrenia. That’s why, from 2011 to 2015, aggression in schizophrenic patients in China increased by 31%, or by basically one third , from 30.7% to 40.2%."
First author Yequing Wu omitted the percentage, and referred to the sudden, exponential increase in schizophrenia incidence in China from 2011 to 2015 only as “substantial”.
Microwave radiation drives schizophrenia. That’s why a study in 2020 showed that living in cities is associated with a doubling of schizophrenia, an almost 40% higher risk of depression, and over 20% more anxiety.
The 6% suicide rate among schizophrenics is 59,900% higher than the .01% suicide rate among the general populace. In two separate studies published in lofty scientific journals, first authors Hairong He and Sherry Kit Wa Chan both omitted that percentage, and described it only as “substantially higher”.
Microwave radiation drives schizophrenia and suicide. That’s why, from 2000 to 2018, the US suicide for women of all ages in the United States increased by 50%.
And it’s why suicides among adolescent girls in the United States increased by 51% from 2007 to 2018, while suicides among boys the same age increased by just 5%.
The 51% increase in suicide among adolescent girls in the U.S. from 2007 to 2018 was 919% greater than the 5% increase among boys the same age.
The chickens have come home to roost for our phone-addicted women, I’m sorry to say. The damage from purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation is, in fact, cumulative and dose-dependent.
CREEPY
Creepy – adjective (informal) - Causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.
Wikipedia: The state of creepiness has been associated with “feeling scared, nervous, anxious or worried”, “awkward or uncomfortable”, “vulnerable or violated” in a study conducted by Watt et al. [6]:61 This state arises in the presence of a creepy element, which can be an individual or, as recently observed, new technologies.
The word goes back to Old Engl. crēopel and its doublet crypel (with y by umlaut from u, as in crupon, above). Obviously, in the remote past, creep had a broader meaning than it has today. Eorþcrypel meant “cripple” or “paralyzed person” (eorþ “earth”), someone unable to rise from the “earth.”
In July 2018, androidtech.com said “Creepy tech: Samsung phones are randomly sending users’ photos to contacts.”
In July 2018, rd.com said “Creepy Things Your Smartphone Knows About You”.
In September 2018, cnet.com said “10 years later, Google still has the creepy ability to remotely control a phone.”
In December 2018, the U.K.’s Sun said “Google and Apple selling creepy apps that let your lover spy on you, monitor your calls and search your internet history”.
In January 2019, detroitnews.com said “Home devices are getting smarter, creepier”.
January 2019, apnews.com said “Home Items Are Getting Smarter And Creepier, Like It Or Not”
[image]
(Twin girls from “The Shining”, 1980)
[image]
(Christina Ricci as Wednesday Addams in “The Addams Family”, 1991)
AWESOME
In August 2015, buzzfeed.com said “This Is Why Resting Bitch Face Is Totally Awesome”.
Awesome - adverb - 1. Scottish. In a manner which arouses or inspires awe; in a fearsome or horrifying way. Cf. awfully adv. 1 Obsolete.
[image]
(Actress Emma Watson’s Resting Bitch Face)
[image]
(Actress Anna Kendrick’s Resting Bitch Face)
THE ARTICLES
One of the hardest truths for mean-spirited Western materialists to assimilate is that non-ionizing radiation attacks on the spiritual level.
There is a significant relationship between microwave radiation levels and psychiatric disturbances.
In November 1963, H. Freedman, R.O. Becker C.H. Hoffman published “Geomagnetic Parameters and Psychological Hospital Admissions” in the journal Nature.
Where “a significant relationship was shown between psychiatric disturbance as reflected in hospital admissions and natμral magnetic field intensity”.
In 1965, H. Freedman published “Psychiatric Ward Behavior and Geophysical Parameters” in the journal Nature.
In it he said “statistically significant relationships of striking magnitude between cosmic ray indices and psychiatric ward behavior can be observed in the majority of schizophrenic patients.”
“Schizophrenia” is a modern code meme for what used to be known as “demonic possession”.
There is a statistically significant relationship of striking magnitude between excessive microwave radiation and schizophrenia.
In August 2018, the Journal of International Medical Research published first author Yequing Wu’s “Epidemiology of schizophrenia and risk factors of schizophrenia-associated aggression from 2011 to 2015”.
In it, he said “During the 5 years from 2011 to 2015, the prevalence of schizophrenia increased from 0.63% to 0.94% (P<0.001); the average annual rate was 0.81%. The incidence of schizophrenia also increased from 0.71/1000 in 2011 to 0.98/1000 in 2015 (P<0.001); the average annual rate was 0.79/1000 (Table 1).”
Did you notice that they gave you the numbers, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful perentage increase between them? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
He bent over backwards to avoid plainly stating “From 2011 to 2015, the prevalence of schizophrenia in the United States increased by 29%, or by almost a third, from .63% to .81%.”
And “From 2011 to 2015, the incidence of schizophrenia increased by 38%, or by almost a third, from .71/1000 to .98/1000.”
Well, will you look at that! There’s a strict rule in jounalism (and science!), where you list the largest number or percetage first, and then the rest in descending order. Here, first author Yequing Wu Satanically inverted it. In journalistic parlance, he “buried” the far larger incidence number below the far smaller prevalence number, to downplay and obfuscate.
I have exposed his duplicity by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
The study goes on to say “the prevalence and incidence of schizophrenia, and the proportion of cases displaying aggressive behaviour, increased considerably from 2011 to 2015.”
The study goes on to say “In addition, the incidence of aggression in schizophrenic patients increased from 30.7% in 2011 to 40.2% in 2015”.
Did you notice that they gave you the numbers, but carefully hedged by omitting the far more impactful percentage increase between them? That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Here’s how an honest person would have written it: “From 2011 to 2015, aggression in schizophrenic patients in China increased by 31%, or by basically one third , from 30.7% to 40.2%.”
First author Yequing Wu withheld the percentage, and described it with “the rates of aggression in schizophrenia patients increased substantially during these 5 years.”
In January 2020, first author Hairong He published “Trends in the incidence and DALYs of schizophrenia at the global, regional and national levels: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017” in the journal Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences.
Patients with schizophrenia have a substantially higher suicide rate, and their mean age at death is 15 years younger than the general population (Hjorthoj et al., 2017; Chan et al., 2018).
Hairong “buried” the statistic in a separate footnote, and described it with teh general “substantially higher”.
If you check the footnote, listed as 17, the article is incorrect. You have to review every footnote, and search for the author, to find “Association of an Early Intervention Service for Psychosis With Suicide Rate Among Patients With First-Episode Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders”, published by first author Sherry Kit Wa Chan in JAMA Psychiatry in 2018.
In it, she says “Patients with schizophrenia have a substantially higher suicide rate than the general public.”
Where “substantially higher” is general.
There’s no mention of the study as to what the rate of suicide is among the general populace, or how the two rates compare. The information is blacked out, and replaced with the only-general “substantially higher”.
In the scientific publication in the lofty journal, we learn “The suicide rates were 7.5% in the Standard Care group and 4.4% in the Early Intervention group”.
If you add those together and divide by 2, you get 5.96, or 6, rounded up. The suicide rate among schizophrenics is 6%.
At this writing, wikipedia says “The annual age-adjusted suicide rate is 13.42 per 100,000 individuals.”
Divide 13.42 by 1000, and you get .01342%
The 6% suicide rate among schizophrenics is 59,900% higher than the .01% suicide rate among the general populace. First authors Hairong He and Sherry Kit Wa Chan both omitted the percentage, and described it only as “substantially higher”.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, August 30, 2022
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
