WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY USE IS DECREASING EXPONENTIALLY REGARDLESS OF CULTURE OR GEOGRAPHY
Great positive changes are underway at every level of our reality. They began in earnest in 2012, and have been increasing in speed and magnitude. I began writing this series of articles, entitled “Positive Changes That Are Occurring”, in July of 2013.
These historically-unprecedented positive changes are being driven by many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of simple, inexpensive Orgonite devices based on the work of Wilhelm Reich and Karl Hans Welz.
Since Don Croft first fabricated tactical Orgonite in 2000, its widespread, ongoing and ever-increasing distribution has been unknitting and transforming the ancient Death energy matrix built and expanded by our dark masters, well, all the way back to Babylon, and before. And, as a result, the Ether is returning to its natural state of health and vitality.
One of those changes is that wearable technology use is decreasing exponentially regardless of culture or geography.
That’s because the populace has recognized that the purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation from what we collectively refer to as “Technology” is, in fact, quite deadly.
In July 2013, bizjournals.com said “Dell “Exploring” Wearable Technology Market as PC Sales Drop”.
Where “drop” is general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here. Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
Here, in 2013, Bizjournals is pushing wearables, the then-new gimcrack being pushed in the collapsing confidence game that is Technology.
July 2013 is the when I started writing these articles.
In December 2013, on the front end of the great Technology Confidence game, BGR said “Wearable computers look set to take the market by storm”.
Where “take the market by storm”, while lurid and sensational, is general.
The author said “look SET” as a thinly-veiled reference to the god Set, whom the folks in charge have worshipped under various names all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Set, also known as Seth and Suetekh, was the Egyptian god of war, chaos and storms, brother of Osiris, Isis, and Horus the Elder, uncle to Horus the Younger, and brother-husband to Nephthys. It’s where we get the word “Satan”.
The repugnant god Set, the repugnant Jar Jar Binks, and the repugnant god Set. Generational Satanist George Lucas figured the rubes would never notice)
“Take the market by storm” is a thinly-veiled reference to the “Lord of Storms” that the folks who are about to no longer be in charge have worshipped under various names, well, all the way to Babylon, and before. Those variants include “Set”, “Zeus”, “Jupiter”, “Ba’al”, “Enlil”, and many others.
In April 2015, Tech Advisor widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “Tablet sales drop 20% as wearables rise”.
Where they used “rise” because it’s softer than “increase”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the Atonist Black-Sun cult that’s ruled things in all the nations all the way back to Babylon, and before.
Most importantly, they used “rise” because it’s general. Since the wearables market was doing poorly even in mid-2015, the propagandist has put forward a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, “rising wearable sales”, to convince you that the bottom was not, in fact, falling out of the wearable market.
(Child with Death Energy Delivery watch)
In April 2016, propakistani.pk said “Apple Watch Sales Fall as Hype around New ModelBuilds Up”.
The word “fall” was used because it’s softer than “drop”, and also as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost”, by John Milton, 1667)
But the main reason it was used is because it’s general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the phenomenon.
“Hype around new model” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward because many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In December 2016, TechCrunch said “U.S. wearables market is doing much worse than expected”. Which queasily implies that wearables are doing great in unmentioned nations that don’t include the U.S.
Where “much” worse and “expected” are both general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any specific statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
Since sixty to seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, it goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” the fact that the public has recognized that technology has been weaponized against it.
Fitbit sales decreased 67% in the second quarter of 2017, from 5.7 million units to 3.7 million units. The Business Insider I got that statistic from said “Smartwatches are experiencing a slow, painful death”. Where “a slow, painful death”, while lurid, is only-general.
They deviously described a sudden, quantum decrease in sales as “slow”.
Did I mention I had to do the math to learn the statistic?
The Business Insider article said “The idea that the wearables can become a new kind of computing platform is dead as developers abandon making apps for smartwatches and pull their apps from stores.”
Can you see how they hedged the platform back from being dead to only the IDEA being dead?
Garmin’s fitness revenue decreased 15% in the 2nd Quarter of 2017, year-over-year, citing 'Market Declines’.
In July 2017, Engadget wrung its hands and wailed “The wearables battlefield is strewn with casualties”.
Where “strewn with casualties”, while lurid, and accurate, is also general. The international news blackout that is in place on this subject forbids the use of any statistics in headlines that would provide insight into the magnitude of the trend I’m documenting here.
It bravely but falsely implies that there are winners on the battlefield - that the wearables market is not in a state of wholesale collapse, as is, in fact, the case.
In August 2017, brazenly denying the wholesale collapse of the wearables market, Gartner said international wearable device sales would increase 17% in 2018.
In August 2017, Dynepic gushed “The Kid’s Wearable Market is About to Explode***!***” to describe a wearable market collapsing at freefall speed into its own footprint like WTC-7. The hideous exclamation point brings an extra cadre of mouth-breathing, wholly-credulous rubes into the sideshow tent.
(Wearable technology zombies)
In December 2017, ABS-CBN News widened its eyes to simulate honesty and lied bald-facedly “ ‘Wearable’ sales to double in next few years: research”.
Where “research” is a brazenly false claim that the doubling the author mentions isn’t a completely made-up claim by a charlatan attempting to prop of the failing Ponzi scheme that is technology.
In December 2017, the ludicrously named respondfast.com widened its eyes to simulate honesty and said “Smart speakers are taking sales away from smartwatches and other wearables”.
Where “smart speakers” is a bullshit plausible-deniability excuse, put forward to obscure the wholesale collapse of the wearables market because many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw to remain off the hook of personal responsibility. In November 2018, an article I can no longer locate said “Smart speakers have so far disappointed as marketing channels or platforms.” With the latter a hedge, to imply that there was some unmentioned way in which they have not disappointed.
Fitbit’s revenue decreased 7% in Fiscal Year 2018. It was Fitbit’s lowest sales year since 2014.
FitBit’s revenue decreased 15% in the 2nd quarter of 2018, year-over-year.
In April 2018, fighting a desperate rearguard action against the collapsing wearables market, Bloomberg said “Apple’s Stumbling HomePod Isn’t the Hot Seller It Wanted”.
Where “isn’t the hot seller it wanted” is Mil-speak for “isn’t selling at all, to anyone, ever”. In propaganda terms, Bloomberg is using hated Apple as a “lighting rod”, in an attempt to obscure the collapse of the entirety of the wearables marketplace. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
In April 2018, Fitbit announced a partnership with Google to “innovate and transform the future of digital health and wearables, leading to positive health outcomes for people around the world.”
You can see how the governmental arm known as “Google” used your tax dollars to buy out Fitbit, which had collapsed. Someone on Don Croft’s old forum once said “Google is the NSA’s clown name”.
(Self-absorbed woman with ear buds wearing a Death Energy delivery “fitness” watch)
In May 2018, the Motley Fool wrung its hands and wailed “Will Fitbit Catch a Break With Its Latest Smartwatch***?***”
Where “catch a break” implies that the problem is somehow not with the hated, soul-enslaving product that nobody wants.
In August 2018, Fortune bravely averred “Fitbit’s Sales Drop 15% as New Versa Smartwatch Sells Out”.
The article continues: “Fueled by Smartwatch Sales, Fitbit Says It’s on the Comeback Trail”
Only a literally-blood-drinking generational Satanist could say with a straight face that “booming” sales of a sold out new product could lead to a 15% decrease in sales, and only a mouth-breathing Coincidence Theorist could accept such a premise. But the propagandist knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
In December 2018, yahoo.com said “Walmart Drops Prices on Apple Watches and Other Fitness Trackers”.
Price drop either when supply increases, demand decreases, or both.
Can you see how “Walmart drops prices” is general. As you may recall, generality is a hallmark of propaganda.
The propagandist from Yahoo is using a hedging generality to blunt and defray against your getting any specific idea of the magnitude of the decrease.
In January 2019, in the face of exponentially decreasing sales of wearable technology, the U.K.’s Telegraph explained “The best kids smart watch for parents to buy”.
They’re trying desperately to keep the purportedly-harmless non-ionizing radiation flowing, ideally starting that flow at as young an age as possible.
Jeff Miller, Pittsburgh, PA, July 26, 2021
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
