“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”
Matthew 7:15-20, from “The Holy Bible”, King James Version, 1611
Charles Alderton, who invented Dr. Pepper in 1885, was a Freemason.
(Charles Alderton, where the image is off-center to the left, to focus attention on his left eye.)
Charles Courtice Alderton (1857-1941), who created Dr Pepper soda, became a Mason at Waco Lodge June 25, 1908 Elected as Master June 1911.
John Stith Pemberton, who invented Coca-Cola in 1886, was a Freemason.
(John Stith Pemberton, where the images is off-center to the left, to give prominence to his left eye.)
(To the left is a statue of John Stith Pemberton, where the image is off-center to the left to give prominence to his left eye. To the right is his gravestone, with Masonic square and compass.)
Wikipedia - “his service in the Confederate Army and his membership as a Freemason…”
Caleb Bradham, who invented Pepsi Cola in 1898, was a Freemason.
(Caleb Bradham, where the image is off center to the left, and where his head is pointedly inclined, both to give prominence to his left eye.)
Caleb Bradham was elected steward of St. John’s (Masons’) Lodge No. 3 in 1895; he was later elected or appointed junior warden in 1898, senior warden in 1899, and Worshipful Master in 1900, 1901, and again in 1927. By the time of his death, Bradham had attained the 32nd degree of Scottish Rite, acted as grand commander in the York Rite, served as provincial grand master of the Order of Colonial Masters of North America, recorder and treasurer of the Sudan Shrine Temple, eminent commander of St. John’s Commandery, and master kadosh of Carolina Consistory No. 3. He also served as an exalted ruler of the New Bern Elks Lodge.
John J. McLaughlin, who invented Canada Dry Pale Ginger Ale in 1904, was a Freemason.
(John J… McLaughlin, where the images is slightly off-center to the left, to give prominence to his left eye.)
Member - Cedar Lodge No. 270, Oshawa, Ontario
Charles Lieper Grigg, who invented 7-up in 1929, was a Freemason.
(Charles Leiper Grigg, where the photograph is constructed to give prominence to his left eye.)
Charles Leiper Grigg was born in 1868 in Prices Branch, Missouri to Charles L. S. Grigg (1822–1883) and Mary Elizabeth Leiper Grigg (1839–1890).
1859 Proceedings - Grand Lodge of Missouri - C. L. S. Grigg
All of these images give prominence to the left eye because, to followers of the Left-hand path, the left eye is the “eye of Will” or the “eye of Horus”.
But don’t take my word for it:
‘The right eye is the Eye of Ra and the left is the Eye of Horus’.”
From “Freemasonry - Religion And Belief - The 3rd Temple”
Facebook: “Welcome to the Left-Hand-Path-Network, where Satanism is not about worship, but it’s study.”
I have included these photos so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist Freemason soft drink creator looks like.
They figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise roughly twenty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
How long do you think that these people have left in power, now?
Please consider doing what you can to help speed the transition.
THE DATA
The creators of Dr. Pepper, Coca-Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Canada Dry Ginger Ale and 7-Up were all Freemasons.
Drinking one soda per day increases stroke and dementia by 300% compared to drinking less than one soda a week.
Drinking soda causes an 87% increase of pancreatic cancer compared to individuals consuming no soda.
Among men, drinking one soda per day is associated with a 66% increase of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Among regular soda drinkers during In Vitro Fertilization, the formation of morphologies known as blastocysts increased by 39%.
Consumption of diet soda at least daily is associated with a 36% increase of metabolic syndrome compared with not consuming any. That’s because Artificial sweeteners produce an increase in blood-sugar levels in both mice and humans, by disrupting the balance of helpful gut bacteria. High blood-sugar levels, in turn, are the telltale sign of glucose intolerance, a condition which can evolve into diabetes and metabolic disease.
Among those who drank more than seven servings of soda per week, fertility was reduced by 33% in males and by 25% in males.
Depression is 30% greater among soda drinkers than it is among non soda drinkers.
Women who drank two or more sodas every day were 29% more likely to develop heart disease.
Women who drank two or more sodas per day were 23% more likely to have a stroke.
Consumption of seven servings or less of soda per week reduces fertility by 22% in males and by 19% in females.
Consumption of one soda daily is associated with a 14% increase of type 2 diabetes compared to those who drink water, coffee or tea.
Drinking soda causes the ends of chromosomes, known as telomeres, to shorten. The shorter the telomere, the less a cell can regenerate thus aging the body, and raising the risk of disease and early death.
From 2014 to 2020 calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 11.8%.
From 2014 to 2020, the average annual decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 2.36%.
From 2019 to 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%. Pymnts.com said it was because of “COVID resurgences and lockdown measures”.
In 2020, the 5.5% decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 133% greater, or well more than double its long-term average annual decrease of 2.36% from 2014 through 2020.
The great positive societal change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
In 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%. Foodbev.com’s Emma Upshall said it was because of “pandemic pressure”.
In 2020, calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 5.5%. Beverage Daily’s Rachel Arthur omitted the percentage from the headline, where she referred to it only-generally as “significant”. It was the largest decrease in history. Rachel did what little she could to hedge by saying it was “the largest since the start of the BCI”.
In 2021, Coca-Cola’s brand value decreased by 13%, year-over-year.
In the 4th Quarter of 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 5%, year-over-year.
In April 2021, in the midst of Coca-Cola’s exponentially decreasing revenue, the Motley Fool lied bald-facedly with “Coca-Cola Is Back to Growth. But Will It Last***?***” Remember, we just learned that Coca-Cola’s brand value decreased by 13% in 2021.
I have exposed the duplicity of the Motley Fool by using what was known in the old days as “fact checking”.
In the 4th Quarter of 2021, Coca-Cola’s pre-tax income decreased by 75%. The curiously-uncredited author from seekingalpha.com said that it was because of “a one-time non-cash expense”, that “there’s no reason to be alarmed” and that it was “an opportunity”.
Prices increase either when supply decreases, demand increases, or both. In the first nine months of 2022, in the face of exponentially decreasing demand, soft drink prices increased by 14%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest said it was because of an “elasticity bonanza”. Oh, it’s a Bonanza, all right.
As you can see, the law of supply-and-demand as it has been described to you does not, in fact, exist.
Say what you will about them, only literally-blood-drinking Illuminists could turn the screws to their dwindling pool of remaining addicts like this.
In the first nine months of 2022, Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 2.3%, while Diet Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 1%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest didn’t offer any suggestion as to what might have caused the decreases. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
THE ARTICLES
On February 10, 2021, foodbev.com said “Coca-Cola posts 11% drop in 2020 amid pandemic pressure”.
Where author Emma Upshall bravely said “posts 11% drop” to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone at Coca-Cola most have posted that incorrectly!” As a propagandist, Emma knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
She said “drop” because it’s softer than “decreased”, but mostly as a thinly-veiled reference to the fallen Lord Lucifer.
(The fall of Lucifer, from “Paradise Lost’, by John Milton, 1667)
The article goes on to say “The Coca-Cola Company has recorded a 11% decline in net revenue for the full-year, following ‘incremental pressure’ amid the pandemic during Q4.”
Where Emma brazenly tweaked it from “posts 11% decrease” to “recorded a 11% decline” to to give the subconscious of the Coincidence theorist reader the green light to say “oh, but someone at Coca-Cola most have recorded that incorrectly!” It’s a smorgasbord, you see. One of the hooks will be bitten upon.
As a propagandist, Emma knows that many or most readers will grasp virtually any straw, no matter how thin, to remain off the hook of personal responsibility.
As a bonus, she walked the “pandemic pressure” from the headline back to merely “incremental pressure”.
In 2020, Coca-Cola’s revenue decreased by 11%. Foodbev.com’s Emma Upshall said it was because of “pandemic pressure”.
On October 14, 2021, beveragedaily.com said “ ‘Significant reduction’ in consumer calories from beverages in the US”.
Where author Rachel Arthur said “significant reduction” because, as a propagandist, she knows that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and her hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential decrease in soda consumption which she is attempting to obfuscate. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
She put “significant reduction” into quotes to call it into question. Then she said “beverages” to redact the word “soda”, to make the subject almost unsearchable. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
Then, lastly, she said “in the US” to imply that everyone in all the other nations was still drinking lots of, er, beverages. As a propagandist, she’s attempting to “compartmentalize” the damage merely to the U.S.
In journalistic parlance, she “buried” this in the body text below: “calories per person from soda declined by 5.5% in 2020, leading to a total reduction of 11.8% since 2014.”
Then, for good measure, she “buried” this another few paragraphs lower down “it was the largest single-year reduction since the start of the BCI”.
Where Rachel bravely did what little she could to hedge by saying “since the start of the BCI”, all to avoid plainly stating “In 2020, calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 5.5%. It was the largest decrease in history.”
From 2014 to 2020 calories per person from soda in the United States decreased by 11.8%.
From 2014 to 2020, the average annual decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 2.36%.
In 2020, the 5.5% decrease in calories per person from soda in the United States was 133% greater, or well more than double its long-term average annual decrease of 2.36% from 2014 through 2020.
The great societal positive change is increasing exponentially, going forward in time.
Here’s Rachel Arthur’s picture, in a Satanic purple blouse:
(Beverage Daily’s Rachel Arthur, in a Satanic purple blouse. She figured that the rubes would never notice the coded visual imagery.)
I’ve included her photograph so that you could get a better idea of what a generational Satanist in a position of marginal influence looks like.
They are all related to one another through the maternal bloodline. They comprise between twenty and thirty percent of the populace, and are hiding in plain sight in every city, town and village on Earth. It’s how the few have controlled the many all the way back to Babylon, and before.
But they say that the hardest part of solving a problem is recognizing that you have one.
Don Croft used to say “Parasites fear exposure above all else”.
On February 4, 2022, seekingalpha.com said “Coca-Cola Consolidated: The Post-Earnings Drop Is An Opportunity”.
Where the uncredited author from seekingalpha.com said “post-earnings drop ” because, as a propagandist, they know that seventy percent of readers only read the headlines, and their hedging generality goes a long way toward “compartmentalizing” awareness of the scope of the exponential decrease in soda consumption which they are attempting to obfuscate. It’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “compartmentalization”.
For those unaware, anytime an author is uncredited, it is proof that said author is an Intelligence operative.
In journalistic parlance, they’ve “buried” this in the body text below:
“The Q4 results showed a pre-tax income drop of 75%. But there’s no reason to be alarmed as this was caused by a one-time non-cash expense.”
In the 4th Quarter of 2021, Coca-Cola’s pre-tax income decreased by 75%. The curiously-uncredited author from seeking alpha said that it was because of “a one-time non-cash expense”, that “there’s no reason to be alarmed” and that it was “an opportunity”.
On November 9, 2022, beverage-digest.com said “Soft Drinks at Retail: Pricing Up +14% Amid Elasticity Bonanza. Volume Drops -2.0%”.
In the first nine months of 2022, as manufacturers turned the screws to their steadily-dwindling pool of addicts, soft drink prices increased by 14%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest said it was “amid elasticity bonanza”.
In the first nine months of 2022, Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 2.3%, while Diet Coke’s sales volumes decreased by 1%. The curiously-uncredited author from Beverage Digest didn’t offer any suggestion as to what might have caused the decreases. That’s an example of the propaganda technique known as “stonewalling”.
How long do you think that they have left in power, now?
Remember, when Confidence games collapse, they do so in a rush, like a house of cards.
Jeff Miller, Libertyville, IL, January 22, 2023
If you’d like to be added to this free mailing list, or know someone who would be, please send me a note at [email protected]
