I think we owe it to our readers to make a specific point in a post and to stick to that point in a thread. Posting a link to disinformation can even be productive if we can also provide data that demonstrates that it’s disinformation. For instance, if Laurent had posted the lies about the destruction of fish populations and then provided links to the material that Jeff shared that rebuts the lies then it would have been a real gem of a post. Thanks for the positive content, Jeff.
The corporate world order has always based its parasitic rule on lying and hiding from us so they’re heavily vested in getting us to even lie for them without knowing it. My email box is fairly stuffed every day with packaged lies that originate in one or another sewer rat agency and are religiously spread by unwitting people who think they’re ‘providing alternative news.’ It’s easy to appeal to titillation, so most disinformation is presented this way. Before the internet this wasn’t as much of a problem because the only way to get information or ‘alternative news’ (disinfo) was in books. There’s something about the speed of internet access to this stuff that caused a sort of explosion in its availability.
Here’s another curious development: disinformants recently started referencing genuine information providers in their presentations. Wikipedia is quoting Eustace Mullins since his murder a couple of years ago, for instance, and Alex Jones sells BEHOLD A PALE HORSE, by William Cooper. Cooper outed Jones as a CIA disinformant in the 1990s and Mullins would probably turn over in his grave if he knew that this ‘free’ CIA rag was quoting him.
The murder of activists is another subject, I think, and deserves another thread, Silvio–this is a subject many of us like to pursue. When Mullins got poisoned a year before his death we managed to get a zapper to him and he recovered. He sent me a copy of all his books to reciprocate (only one of which got stolen, later, before I could finish reading it [Image Can Not Be Found] ) but he was killed within a year. If he’d been more careful and perhaps also adopted some of the information on donebydooney.com he’d probably still be alive.
Steven J Smith evidently developed another free energy engine and got murdered by the NSA a few years ago. Carol and I had met him the a year and a half before that but he was too suspicious to work with us. I’m absolutely sure we could have helped him avoid death if he’d been willing to network a bit. Lots of other free energy inventors are ready to market their stuff but are afraid, of course. The fellows who had some free energy tech on theabhakingdom.com seem to be offline but they’re okay as far as I know. I think they need someone who can move the tech into a marketable form but their safety is probably due to having given away the information instead of trying to keep it proprietary, as the late Wilhelm Muller and many other murdered free energy device inventors had done over the years.
I suppose the point I’m hoping to make here is that whenever we post something we need to consider whether it’s going to encourage our readers along their own paths of discovery by opening another door to empowerment.
Silvio, it seems clear to some that the actual murder of an activist by the sewer rats usually only happens after they’ve managed to isolate that person, first. Telling about troubles in any public forum seems to provide a lot of protection. I regularly post about activists who are being isolated by the $#!+birds and this seems to be productive.
In July of 2011 the sewer rats started a campaign to erase many of us (vendors listed on this forum) and that was best indicated by a sudden drop in sales for each of us. I think this was one stage of the isolation process and that the ultimate goal was our deaths. We managed to turn that around within six months and I see that some of us are selling more stuff than ever, by now. Francisco was hit from even more directions after his successful sea-gifting campaign in September, 2012–he even got besieged by the tax gestapo in Spain while the sewer rats were interfering with his products enroute. I hate to think what would have happened to him if we hadn’t all supported him etherically and if he hadn’t reported the transgressions, here. The tax people just went away after that.
We have a lot of fun here but EW’s purpose is as serious as a heart attack, hence the word, ‘warrior,’ in its title.
I’d also like to see more reports of what we’ve done in the past and these are good reminders for our readers that we’re here for a common purpose. It’s also useful for the public record because all of the reports prior to 2008 (I think) were destroyed by NSA and other agency hackers. We’ve only had continuity here since Azti took charge of hosting the forum in a secure environment. A few months after he did that the NSA tried to burn down the facility in the middle of the night but he was there to put out the fire, thankfully. I think that was the last physical/hacker assault on this forum–was it Christmas Eve? A previous physical assault on EW’s server also happened on Christmas Eve. That was in Montreal (2005?) and they also cut the fiber optic cable under the street that led into the server facility at the time.
I think it ought to be understood that since EW has become a much harder target the $#!+bird agencies are trying harder than ever to appeal to their old residual programming (which we in the West all have) in order to vitiate the content of EW with offhanded postings of their disinformation, which of course carries fearmongering and hopelessness with it.
These days, it’s harder than ever to exercise discernment on account of the tide of disinformation that the sewer rats are capable of generating and spreading on the web. I think most of us are weaned from television and newspapers by now.
That said, even newspapers are still capable of providing empowering info but it’s usually in spite of editorial policies. For instance, when Laurent and Marco had cleaned up Lake Geneva in Switzerland with their orgonite they were featured in the main local newspaper and given credit for doing that. The lake had become horribly polluted and people were noticing the sudden improvement. Somehow, that report happened in spite of ‘editorial [read: dictated corporate party line] policy,’ and some disinformation was later provided by the same paper. The same thing happened a few other times and all of those are worth reporting here and repeated as reminders, as I’m doing right now.
~Don