Carlos in Portugal suggested to me that my attitude about China might be unrealistic, based on the criminal nature of that regime.
Ever since China evidently bought the Corporate World Order in a ‘fire sale’ near the end of 2004 I’ve been feeling very optimistic about the future. I don’t think that the London banksters who set up shop in the 1600s in order to create a corporate world empire really believed that China has the ability to enforce her mandates so I imagine that they were laughing among themselves when they took China’s money.
Greedy people are short sighted, though. I know it’s been said that ‘A rich man plans for future generations; a poor man plans for Saturday night,’ and the infrastructure for oppression and mind control that has been growing since the 1600s on a global scale looks pretty daunting, even now.
The Venetian banksters, who some say can trace their descent from the Babylonian banksters via Phoenicia (Aramaic was the Babylonians’ language of trade), had to leave Italy because the Turks had taken Constantinople in the late 1500s, so they moved their operation in a couple of stages to cold and dreary Amsterdam after that.
They were already successful at undermining Rome’s power in Northern Europe through their agent, Martin Luther. Constantinople had always been more powerful than Rome but the Byzantine Empire was mainly based on trade rather than oppression and conquest so they were a good and non-threatening buffer between Venice’s trade/exploitation and the Ottomans. Venice had financed the ruin of Constantinople via two ‘crusades’ that made a detour on their way to Palestine to destroy that city. It was the second destruction that weakened Constantinople enough to become irresistable to the Turks. Throughout the dark ages the only currency used in Europe was Byzantine coinage; not Roman money. This is another indicator that economic power trumps ideological, military and political power.
See how a parasite tends to destroy the host? If the Venetian parasite hadn’t been so greedy they could have remained at home
Oppression and mind control are costly and they require massive human resources to maintain. Peaceful empires have historically needed relatively few people to maintain them. When the Mongols ruled from the Pacific and Indian Oceans all the way to Austria and Palestine, for instance, they only had 100,000 warriors to keep order and maintain the trade routes. The populations appreciated the Mongols because they had economic and religious freedom for the first time. I think the NSA, alone, employs several times that many people and most of them are sewer rats.
it took the Black Plague to bring down the Mongol Empire. Some people assume that this was a biological weapon but that was beyond human capabiity in those days. I think it’s still beyond human capability because the chemtrail program was probably already a failure before thousands of orgonite cloudbusters ended the physical threat in 2002. The millions of people who were sickened by chemtrails didn’t die, for instance, except for a few. The cancer rate dropped then, too [Image Can Not Be Found] . Maybe most of them would have died if anthrax, smallpox, ebola, etc. had started dropping on them every day from the sky after that but the majority of people weren’t sickened by chemtrails.
The only obstacle to London’s ensuing parasitic ravaging of the planet, after that, was France, though France probably wanted it all for themselves, as China now does. France was a violent colonizer, though, and Peking (originally the seat of Kublai Khan and not the Chinese emperors) wants to be on top by prospering. The advantage China has is relatively cheap labor and good industrial infrastructure. The labor is getting more expensive, of course, because the Chinese middle class is expanding at an accelerating rate but it seems obvious to anyone who pays attention that the Chinese have been using robotics and nano tech in commercial manufacturing for a long time. In the West, nanotech is mainly used for weapons manufacturing and the related secret technology of oppression
Britain destroyed foreign economies by subsidizing British manufacturers so that they could sell their goods below their own cost and well below the cost of their targeted competitors abroad. This undermined entire industries in a systematic way and made people dependent on British imported goods. After the destruction, Britain raised their prices and this further impoverished the targeted nations. Meanwhile, the Venetian banksters were already past masters at manipulating currencies and the stock market so that they were easily able to exploit cycles of boom and bust to their advantage.
The cleverness of parasites probably shouldn’t be confused with genuine intelligence, of course. Real human intelligence is potentially a creative force and there’s nothing creative about the old corporate order, nor about their parasitic proxy governments around the world.
Present-day Tavistock Institute was set up in Ireland in the late 1600s to invent methods to undermine and then control the ideologies (thus the economies) of foreign nations. The reason most of the primary default mind control paradigm (Theosophy) includes a lot of Sanskrit terms and words is becuase Tavistock’s first challenge was to take India so that they could get enough opium to undermine and conquer China. Two centuries later the freemasons in America set up a similar institute (The Smithsonian) to infiltrate and conquer the Indian tribes from within so that their territories could be taken with less effort and violence. The ‘bullet proof shirt’ belief that Smithson’s masonic agents circulated throughout most of the western tribal secret societies is a good example of how they succeeded. Scottish Rite and York Rite freemasons have always been skilled at infiltrating other secret societies. This is also how religious fundamentalism became widespread, as you probably know.
Why else do you suppose there are only two mind control paradigms for people who become disenchanted with boring, mainstream beliefs? There were three but Communism eventually failed. Karl Marx was on Lord Thomas Huxley’s payroll and the London School of Economics was soon set up t design a strategy to create ‘international socialism.’ Huxley was the head of the secret service at the time. That was the forerunner of the murderous MI6 and MI5. The Venetians rewarded the criminal class in Britain for supporting their entry and establishment in London. They used Cromwell to ‘clean the pipes’ and take firm control of the monarchy.
These very basic history points ought to be common knowledge and they’re thoroughly documented by a variety of credible research journalists, after all. Each of us in the developed countries were well programmed in our childhoods to disregard history so I don’t think more than a few people will even read this. There always seems to be enough of us to expose and dislodge the ancient parasite periodically, though. I think the parasite is going to perish pretty soon because everyone is growing more aware, now. There are also enough of us who buy the books to provide a moderate livlihood for several genuine research journalists. Most empowering information needs to be bought, of course.
By the mid 1700s some of the American colonists had grown unhappy about their subservience to London and wanted independence. It started earlier than that, of course, but it eventually acquired a voice to oppose the tyranny of the parasite, as we’re now seeing again in America. Utterance has always had more power against parasites than bullets, of course, because their survival depends on hiding from the host.
Not all of us who take an interest in genuine history are content to just whine and pontificate about tyranny and everyone who tosses orgonite at death towers is undermining the power of the parasite in a substantial way. Using any zapper frees someone from the medical/pharmaceutical parasites in most cases, and ensures survival into a healthy old age. But talking about tyranny in a factual and fairly dispassionate way has to take place befre the parasite is fully exposed.
This happened in the American colonies in the mid 1700s. There seems to be a critical mass that’s required in order to tip the balance. Even during the Revolution most of the colonists supported Britain in a passive way and only two percent of the colonists actively supported the struggle or participated in it. In those days there was no internet and violent opposition was the only option, I think. Violence is no longer necessary and is counterproductive, which is probably why the secret police send people into protests and rallies to commit violence against the police and private property. Even that tactic has been sufficiently exposed so protest groups now take intelligent steps to exclude these agents, as we saw in Brazil, recently. The internet makes it possible for us to get this information in real time; in the earlier revolution againsty parasityism they only had the printing press. The parasite almost immediately infiltrated and recaptured the American Republic, of course, but the success of the Revolution changed the course of history in favor of real freedom.
The Revolution’s success was impossible without France’s help and the current move to destroy the US Government can’t be successful without China’s continuing (if unwitting) help.
France was taken violently by the banksters very soon after the success of the American revolution. All of the horrific characteristics of the French Revolution were repeated many times around the world, most notably in Russia in 1917 to 1920. The period between the American revolutyion until the sudden entry of China in 2004 is was the London parasite’s heyday. Millions of death towers were thown up around the planet (including throughout China) at the end of 2001 and the chemtrail campaign had weakened countless millions by then (starting in earnest at the beginning of 1999). Most of the weather warfare apparatus had already been working efficiently since the early 1990s.
I’m sure the parasite were burning with humiliation and with fury at France on account of the unexpected loss of the American colonies, though. They had already raped the colonies of its meager natural resources, by the way, and America was a third world country until the 1860s. America’s main resources at the time were trees and the forests that were easier to access were stripped for shipbuilding, to make charcoal for creating steel and to create pastures for sheep to supply Britain’s woolen mills. That’s why the more temperate eastern states have such beautiful fall foliage for instance. Most of the trees were evergreens, before that. What passes for intelligence with parasites is that they’re usually mindful to rape and pillage before they burn. Unlike Viking marauders, though, when the Brits took territory thy always intended to keep it, even after destroying the economy.
I think the reason China wasn’t worried about London’s ability to carry out their World War Three agenda is because real power has always been economic, rather than ideological, political or military. Due to humanity’s generally rising awareness, also because the parasite had failed to ruin the economy again, a la 1929, nobody really panicked about the Evil Axis’ terrorism scam. I thnk China had already locked London out of their economy because China’s money is debt free and the whole world is entirely dependent on Chinese manufactured goods and even a considerable number of ‘strategic metals.’ I hope you remember, a few years ago, when one of the Rothschild Prominent Parasites went begging for a loan from Peking in order to be able to exploit India some more. He was turned down. I wonder if the corporate order sent him to test the waters.
Peking itself is becoming more and more vulnerable to rising human awareness, by the way. Check out Ai Wei Wei’s story and the general use of Twitter to practice freedom of speech, there, because this is the most powerful confirmation of this fact. The internet itself became impractical because the chinese secret police were too successful at surveilling all of the users. The American NSA surveiles everyone on the planet that way but because we are still generally armed in America they aren’t capable of extorting us away from the web and the Chinese gov’t had done to that population. You can watch the documentary that some Europeans filmed with him a couple of years ago. He had spent much of his youth in America, by the way [Image Can Not Be Found]
I suppose the shorter version of my explanation about the parallel between France and China is that the French enabled the Americans to be free and China is enabling the entire planet to be free, now. Neither government wanted anyone to be free, of course [Image Can Not Be Found]
One of my favorite quotes from the Qur’an is: Men plot and God plots; and God is the best plotter.
Several accomplished Europeans on EW have indicated to me, privately that they think that my religious orientation is quaint and harmless. I think the present movement away from belief in a Creator is due to successful programming by the parasite over the past two centuries, well aided by corrupt clergy of course, who do their best to make the Prophets look bad by association. Most of us do have personal faith, though, and the dynamics of personal faith are the same regardless of what one’s belief paradigm might be. Tossing orgonite and paying attention to the results can build unshakable personal faith better than warming pew could ever accomplish
~Don
.
.
