I wrote the following in an email. As the corporate order continues to dissolve the assaults on God’s Messengers oddly increase, which I think is reflected in general conversation. When somone repeats the rote, theosophy/masonry/rosicrucian ‘I Hate Religion’ programming to me (always presented as something that the individual arrived at on his/her own) I usually answer back in defense of religion in general, with the qualification that the corporate-sponsored clergy (most religions are controlled by these parasites and Christianity leads the pack) have always tried to weaponize God’s teachings, of course. Until very recently, theosophy/masonry was the ‘default’ ideology for people who believed themselves to be independent, sort of like how, during the creation of the dictatorships of the 20th century, communism was the popular default ideology for ‘thinking people’ who were repulsed by fascism. The old hippies are still pimping thinly-veiled stalinism in America, as the greenies are doing in Europe.
I’ve got my own response down to five average paragraphs and am trying to distill it a bit more:
Carol and I believe Christianity will become a nice religion, as intended, once the Magdalene traditions are revealed, perhaps concurrent with the dissolution of the Vatican before long. Islam is a wonderful religion when the clergy are not involved with it [Image Can Not Be Found] and anyone can see that Buddhism has always been a mostly positive influence. I’ve known people of just about every religion that have been my kindred spirits but I’ve rarely encountered genuine Christians (the few real ones are gems) and have never known a ‘devout’ theosophy-drone who seems tolerable. A terrific Jew did a masterful job of keeping my forum safe from the CIA, MI6 and NSA for a few crucial years, though the server in Chile where he had arranged to host the forum was destroyed along with the website at some point. He also shared some good exposé material on Zionism and visited us a couple of times. It’s pretty safe, now, hosted outside Wash. DC by a professional who knows the score about NSA/CIA sabotage.
I think that more and more people are figuring out that most popular ideologies, even with the ‘religion’ tag on them, are man made and are created in order to divide our species. The teachings of each of the Prophets have always had the opposite effect and it maybe it’s humanity’s dessert to receive the plague of clergy in the interim, on our way toward spiritual maturity and accountability. We’re heavily programmed, since the mid-20th century–theosophy’s heyday-- to mistake the historic criminality of the clergy for the influence of the Prophets and most of this programming came from theosophy, which has always aped genuine religion. I think it’s up to each of us to wrestle with issues like this and to discover what leads to our own abasement or exaltation. It’s not up to anyone else to determine how we explore reality but people who pimp the manmade ideologies all tend to act like brain police.
Theosophy programming even asserts that ‘everyone has his own reality.’ [Image Can Not Be Found] How absurd is that? Theosophy, which is the creation and weapon of the post-1600s British (Venetian) aristocracy who had plundered India and who still run the global dope trade, now, though they might actually merely be middlemen for the Triads since 2004 or so.
Theosophy was even promoted as ‘anti-rationalism’ in the late 1800s but they had to abandon that silliness as people in general continued to become more discerning. Their publishing house for the United Nations was ‘Lucifer Trust’ and that was changed to ‘Lucis Trust’ early on–still called that. Theosophy had claimed that HItler, Lenin, Stalin and Mao were ‘the return of Christ’ and that’s also something they no longer openly say. The biggest coup for theosophy has been to get people to believe that this programming was something that the individual came to on his own. I noticed this in the 60s, when the hippie types were repeating theosophy slogans in the same way that Mao’s cadre in China were quoting the Little Red Book at the same time [Image Can Not Be Found] . Mullins claimed that Bertrand Russell (genocide proponenteugenist; racist; hippy icon) had trained Mao in he early 1920s and I finally found some circumstantial evidence of that.
Most folks don’t like to look at how they came to believe as they do but ‘popular belief’ has always been synonymous with willful ignorance; it’s a lot more comfortable for most just to imitate others without questioning assumptions but I think this isn’t paying off so well, any more. I’ve always longed for this day. Most people who enjoy examining reality more independently were profoundly isolated until the internet showed up, then things changed.
I absolutely love to examine reality independently and I trust that more and more people are staring to share this simple pleasure. Now we can (and do) even talk to each other, thanks to the internet! We’ve come a long way since the ‘sixties’ when independent expression was crushed in an avalanche of theosophy regurgitations.
~Don
