New Hampshire First State to Secede?

Liz, gifting on the Apache Reservation in Arizona & dodging federal psi bullets, sent the following link:

[http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legisla]

This is a pretty clear legislative document that might be the groundwork for a move to secede. It sees pretty obvious to me that they’re fed up with the criminals in Washington, DC.

I lived in New Hampshire for several years and these folks don’t generally bluff or bluster.

Any US State will fare better outside of the purview of this horrid, parasitic, murderous regime. My main wish for a secession movement is that the CIA and the FBI, with all their equally unlawful satellite agencies, will thus be destroyed. I think a side benefit is that the millions of federally-funded local, prison and state police will have to rely on local funds to operate, which is to say those forces will be drastically reduced as well as held accountable, finally. The release of millions of innocent people from the Gulag Archipelago will also be nice to see.

Here it is:

HCR 6 – AS INTRODUCED

2009 SESSION

09-0274

09/01

HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

SPONSORS: Rep. Itse, Rock 9; Rep. Ingbretson, Graf 5; Rep. Comerford, Rock 9; Sen. Denley, Dist 3

COMMITTEE: State-Federal Relations and Veterans Affairs

ANALYSIS

This house concurrent resolution affirms States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

09-0274

09/01

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and

Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;� and

Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and

Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, – delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and

That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,� therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and

That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;� and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press:� thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, and that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; and

That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,� and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof,� goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction; and

That a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolutions to the Legislatures of the several States; to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and union which it has manifested from that moment at which a common danger first suggested a common union: that it considers union, for specified national purposes, and particularly to those specified in their federal compact, to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the States: that faithful to that compact, according to the plain intent and meaning in which it was understood and acceded to by the several parties, it is sincerely anxious for its preservation: that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations solemnly agreed to in that compact, is not for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this State is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in no man, or body of men on earth: that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis), to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: that nevertheless, this State, from motives of regard and respect for its co-States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the compact, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it, Congress being not a party, but merely the creature of the compact, and subject as to its assumptions of power to the final judgment of those by whom, and for whose use itself and its powers were all created and modified: that if the acts before specified should stand, these conclusions would flow from them: that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism – free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. That this State does therefore call on its co-States for an expression of their sentiments on acts not authorized by the federal compact. And it doubts not that their sense will be so announced as to prove their attachment unaltered to limited government, whether general or particular. And that the rights and liberties of their co-States will be exposed to no dangers by remaining embarked in a common bottom with their own. That they will concur with this State in considering acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely as the cases made federal, (casus foederis,) but in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shall be exercised within their respective territories; and

That the said committee be authorized to communicate by writing or personal conferences, at any times or places whatever, with any person or person who may be appointed by any one or more co-States to correspond or confer with them; and that they lay their proceedings before the next session of the General Court; and

That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.

Wowee Zowee–this may be a lot bigger than we realized! I got the following from Jared:

hey don;

this sounds like exactly the kind of thing youv’ve been calling for: a general secession, or something along those lines

i only read the pdf (2nd link) but it sounds like its right up your alley

any thoughts?

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Jared xxxxxx
Date: Feb 4, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Sovereignty?

I’m a little excited about this.

[http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary]

here’s the document: [http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdo]

Along with these states:

New Hampshire
[http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legisla]

Arizona
http://www.azleg.gov/Formatdocument·asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm

Montana
http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm)

Michigan
[http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21rmji]
Missouri
[http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?in]

Oklahoma
http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/01 … ral-power/

Hawaii
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/

-Jared

This snowball is quickly gaining size and force as it rolls down the mountain [Image Can Not Be Found] (Thx, Liz in Colorado, for the article!):

Lawmakers in 20 states move to reclaim sovereignty
Obama’s $1 trillion deficit-spending ‘stimulus plan’ seen as last straw
Posted: February 06, 2009
11:50 pm Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon
NEW YORK – As the Obama administration attempts to push through Congress a nearly $1 trillion deficit spending plan that is weighted heavily toward advancing typically Democratic-supported social welfare programs, a rebellion against the growing dominance of federal control is beginning to spread at the state level.

So far, eight states have introduced resolutions declaring state sovereignty under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, including Arizona, Hawaii, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire [they did it on August 1, before O’Bomber was appointed [Image Can Not Be Found] ~Don], Oklahoma and Washington.

Analysts expect that in addition, another 20 states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California [I’ll believe that when I see it. ~D], Colorado, Georgia, Idaho [YEAH, Baby! [Image Can Not Be Found] ~D], Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania.

“What we are trying to do is to get the U.S. Congress out of the state’s business,” Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Randy Brogdon told WND.

“Congress is completely out of line spending trillions of dollars over the last 10 years putting the nation into a debt crisis like we’ve never seen before,” Brogdon said, arguing that the Obama stimulus plan is the last straw taxing state patience in the brewing sovereignty dispute.

“This particular 111th Congress is the biggest bunch of over-reachers and underachievers we’ve ever had in Congress,” he said.

“A sixth-grader should realize you can’t borrow money to pay off your debt, and that is the Obama administration’s answer for a stimulus package,” he added.

The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

The Tenth Amendment specifically provides, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Brogdon, the lead sponsor of the Oklahoma state senate version of the sovereignty bill, has been a strong opponent of extending the plan to build a four-football-fields-wide Trans-Texas Corridor parallel to Interstate-35 to Oklahoma, as WND reported.

Rollback federal authority
The various sovereignty measures moving through state legislatures are designed to reassert state authority through a rollback of federal authority under the powers enumerated in the Constitution, with the states assuming the governance of the non-enumerated powers, as required by the Tenth Amendment.

The state sovereignty measures, aimed largely at the perceived fiscal irresponsibility of Congress in the administrations of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have gained momentum with the $1 trillion deficit-spending economic stimulus package the Obama administration is currently pushing through Congress.

Particularly disturbing to many state legislators are the increasing number of “unfunded mandates” that have proliferated in social welfare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, in which bills passed by Congress dictate policy to the states without providing funding.

In addition, the various state resolutions include discussion of a wide range of policy areas, including the regulation of firearms sales (Montana) and the demand to issue drivers licenses with technology to embed personal information under the Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative and the Real ID Act (Michigan).

Hawaii’s measure calls for a new state constitutional convention to return self-governance, a complaint that traces back to the days it was a U.S. territory, prior to achieving statehood in 1959.

“We are trying to send a message to the federal government that the states are trying to reclaim their sovereignty,” Republican Rep. Matt Shea, the lead sponsor of Washington’s sovereignty resolution told WND.

“State sovereignty has been eroded in so many areas, it’s hard to know where to start,” he said. “There are a ton of federal mandates imposed on states, for instance, on education spending and welfare spending.”

Shea said the Obama administration’s economic stimulus package moving through Congress is a “perfect example.”
“In the state of Washington, we have increased state spending 33 percent in the last three years and hired 6,000 new state employees, often using federal mandates as an excuse to grow state government,” he said. “We need to return government back down to the people, to keep government as close to the local people as possible.”

Shea is a private attorney who serves with the Alliance Defense Fund, a nationwide network of about 1,000 attorneys who work pro-bono. As a counter to the ACLU, the alliance seeks to protect and defend religious liberty, the sanctity of life and traditional family values.

Republican state Rep. Judy Burges, the primary sponsor of the sovereignty resolution in the Arizona House, told WND the federal government “has been trouncing on our constitutional rights.”

“The real turning point for me was the Real ID act, which involved both a violation of the Fourth Amendments rights against the illegal searches and seizures and the Tenth Amendment,” she said.

Burges told WND she is concerned that the overreaching of federal powers could lead to new legislation aimed at confiscating weapons from citizens or encoding ammunition.

“The Real ID Act was so broadly written that we are afraid that it involves the potential for “mission-creep,” that could easily involve confiscation of firearms and violations of the Second Amendment,” she said.

Burges said she has been surprised at the number of e-mails she has received in support of the sovereignty measure.
"We are a sovereign state in Arizona, not a branch of the federal government, and we need to be treated as such, she insisted.

From the Sovereign Society. The Arizona quote is particularly juicy:

Dear A-Letter Reader,
This week, various state legislatures introduced bills intended to revive one of the most important gifts left to us by our forefathers…state sovereignty.
No, you won’t hear about this on CNBC or Fox News. In fact, we just got word of it a few hours ago. All the way from Hawaii to New Hampshire…Georgia and California, nine states have so far introduced bills that would reaffirm state sovereignty as laid out in the ninth and tenth amendments to the constitution.
Now – like I said – we just heard about this news ourselves. And we haven’t had enough time to really decide what it all means…but there is some strong wording in a few of these bills, to say the very least…
This from Arizona’s bill, “…if the President or any other federal entity attempts to institute martial law or its equivalent without an official declaration in one or more of the states without the consent of that state … individual members of the military return to their respective states and report to the Governor until a new President is elected…”

Thx a lot, John! This is a huge movement in the legislatures in spite of most of us never having talked to each other about it.

There are some implications Carol mentioned which may give us some pause if we’re inclined to cheer on these politicians

  1. The legistlators, themselves, are evidently personally threatened by the increasing tyranny of the feds

  2. They obviously know and are acting on information that we don’t have

  3. Even the bribes and extortion from the Rockefellers’ very, VERY deep-pockets, ‘Council of the States’ is not swaying them to embrace the Patriot Acts and other Hitlerian measures.

You might not even be aware of the Council of the States. I read about it in Gary Allen’s last book–the one he wrote and published right before his untimely demise. He’s the one who wrote, NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY, a few years before that one.

I don’t recall when the Council of the States was set up–seems like it was at the end of WWII. The purpose of this enormous organization has been to force each and every state legislature in the US to create and support legislation that favors the increasing hegemony of the federal government, which is to say that these legislators are forced to take away individual rights in favor of the corporate world order. Just like in Congress, legislators who won’t toe the line are either not re-elected or are taken down in scandals, often manufactured ones.

This is just one of the many aspects of the federal government’s corrupting influence. Another one is their funding of all of the police agencies in the US; that funding always conditional on the police supporting and promoting federal tyranny, of course. Yet another is the feds’ control over the healing trades, which I call The War on Healers

When you see the word, ‘federal,’ what ought to come to mind is ‘corporate,’ especially since a corporation took control of the US Gov’t in 1913 when the fake constitutional amendment was passed, giving the wealth of the country over to the Federal Reserve Corporation, which is majorly owned by Europeans.

Shall we discuss tghe largest Gulag Archipelago in the history of humanity? I think the worst aspect of this unspeakably vast prison system is how it has institutionalized racism so completely. What percentage of prisoners in America do you reckon have committed no actual crimes? I guesstimate about 80%.

Now is the time for accountability. Personal accountability among the populace automatically results in government accountability. I think that’s just a law of nature.

Carol also got a pretty strong impression that before the dust settles and the US Government has been unseated there will be some economic challenges for everyone on the planet, except maybe the pygmies in the Ituri Rain Forest.

She gets a kick out of wondering how China will like trading with individual states instead of the corporate, decaying, malleable (at least for the Chinese) federal government

Lest we forget, the $40+ trillion underground ‘civilization’ will still need to be neutralized with a few thousand earthpipes sooner or later. This might be the very last latent threat to humanity’s coming peace, freedom, unity and prosperity. We’re not worried at all about the Chinese gov’t because the rising prosperity and awareness of Chinese will probably turn that institution into a mere service organization, if that gov’t survives at all. Maybe the Chinese, in a timely, organic way will shed it like an old dragon skin
~Don

Don, not sure if you heard of this:

http://freestateproject.org/

It’s a very large movement of people moving to NH and working to ‘free’ it.

It makes sense with what you folks are dealing with in the chats.

~ Clay

1 Million Attend Tea Parties in 50 States

April 17, 2009

‘Obama has awakened a sleeping giant’

Aerial view of Alamo tea party protest in San Antonio, Texas (photo: Texas Tea Parties)

An estimated 1 million Americans participated in at least 1,000 tea parties, according to reports by organizers tabulating the nationwide numbers, with documented protests held in 50 states.

Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform told WND, “The Obama administration has awakened a sleeping giant.”

Tax Day Tea Party national event coordinator Amy Kremer told WND she has confirmed that more than 850 parties took place. She has at least 100 more reports in her e-mail inbox that have not been posted.

Sign a petition calling on Congress and the president to halt out-of-control spending

Asked how many people attended the events, she responded, “I would estimate it at over 1 million. I’m waiting on more numbers to come in from organizers right now. I can tell you it is absolutely over 750,000 right now.”

The largest protests occurred in Atlanta, Ga., with 15,000 participants. As many as 10,000 protesters participating in Sacramento, Calif., and Overland Park, Kan., according to data compiled by Americans for Tax Reform on more than 207 tea parties.

Americans for Tax Reform has established an Internet page on the group’s website where organizers of tea parties can submit attendance estimates to be included in the running tally.

Michael DePrimo, special counsel to American Family Association President Tim Wildmon, told WND that AFA’s tea party website, Tea Party Day, had 2,031 confirmations that tea parties were to be held in as many cities.

“Since yesterday, we have had 394 cities give us reports, many with photographs, about the tea parties that were held,” he said. “We have not been able to get all the information up. We expect more to come in as the days go by.”

Glenn Beck reported yesterday on his Fox News program that official estimates of the participation in the Tea Party held in San Antonio, Texas, reached as many as 20,000 people.

The Glenn Beck show broadcast on Fox News live on April 15, from the Tea Party held at the Alamo in San Antonio.

Tea partiers in Sacramento, Calif. ( WND photo / Chelsea Schilling)

“The establishment in Washington, D.C., is terrified,” Norquist said. “There were no such demonstrations four months into the administrations of Democratic presidents Carter or Clinton.”

Norquist told WND that the Obama administration was taken by surprise by the nationwide protests because the administration had calculated increased government spending was supposed to be the popular part of President Obama’s economic stimulus plan.

Instead, Norquist said, the tea parties held in every state on Wednesday proved Americans nationwide are demonstrating in anger and disappointment against Obama administration plans for massive deficit spending.

Tax Day protester in Kansas City, Mo., holds sign (photo: Posted to Tea Party Day)

“Imagine what happens when President Obama, House Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid begin to pay for their ‘spend-fest’ with higher taxes and inflation,” Norquist said.

Kremer said the mainstream media have completely neglected their duty to accurately report on this nationwide movement.

“It’s amazing that the mainstream media is reporting it the way that they are,” she said. “It’s just crazy. It’s basically just going to come down to us. We’re now reporting it ourselves because they are not reporting it accurately.”

Many say the mainstream media attempted either to ignore the protests altogether or characterized tea partiers as disgruntled Republicans unable to accept that “they lost” the 2008 presidential campaign or as “rich taxpayers” unwilling to pay their fair burden of taxes.

However, Kremer said she is constantly receiving reports from organizers about the movement’s resounding success.

“I think it was an absolute success,” she said. “We want to send a message to them: We hired them; we can fire them. They work for us. They seem to have forgotten that.”

She continued, “If it means we have to go after every incumbent in office from now until 2012, we will do that. But the American people are tired of sitting by, and they are starting to step forward and take notice.”

wnd.com/index.php

Thanks a lot for posting that, Laurent.

There has been a big attempt in our area to organize people around the issue of the survival of the collapse of the gov’t. As a rule, whenever organization is attempted in more than a very local way, we have to assume that the CIA is running it or will be shiortly.

The psychics have the impression that most of the state secession movements are also CIA operations; efforts to control outcomes and/or delay the inevitable, which is the dissolution of the federal gov’t and the international corporations/cartels that operate it.

Any state that secedes will fall out of the clutches of the Organization of the States, which is the agency that John D Rockefeller created, long ago, to make sure that all state legislators will vote in ways that will ‘serve and protect’ the corporate global agenda. that accounts for many billions of dollars in bribes, each year, and a whole lot of extortion. It’s really funny that a lot of PJ folks think that only Israel operates on legislators that way [Image Can Not Be Found] . That’s to say that nearly all state legislators, even if they manage to survive as government officials, will probably have to be expelled quickly in order to avoid turning that state into a disaster area. I think we can pull it off.

In fact, I’m pretty sure that most of the tax protestors are not ‘protensting Obama’s policies,’ but are rather protesting the unlawful nature of the US Government, itself. Unfortunately, none of them write articles for mainline press. People who write articles for mainstream press can be relied on to avoid saying things like that because they’d get fired if they did [Image Can Not Be Found]

The internet is making it possible for us all to talk about this stuff candidly, outside of the purview of the corporate press and corporate academia, finally, and we’re a global, unorganized grassrootl network of accountable individals, not merely a national group. Since all natinoal governments are merely enthusiastic puppets of the global corporate hierarchy the only appropriate view is to look beyond nation al issues, now.

I do think that these historic tax protests are more grassroot in nature than organized, though. That’s an incredibly hopeful and positive sign!

Globalization has been wiith us for nearly a century and the CIA and Tavistock hive have succeeded in making Pajama People afraid of that word. Grassroot globalization is a sign of progress for the species, too, and it’s happening in spite of poisonous corporate institutions like the UN and Council on Foreign Relations.

The sharp reduction in centralized power is the step we’re all taking, right now. Why would anyone fear that except the corporate parasites and their slimy politicians?

~Don

I am very glad to post good news like these and my intention is to post only good ones because we all know that bad news only add to negativity and it’s only nourrishment for OldnewWorld ORDUR and this is finished terminato kaput allé-au-r’voir

Orgonite does a lot to clean all that mess around!

Thanks, again, Laurent. Nobody is doing it better than you

New Hampshire is where the Browns lived and got abducted by the Tax Gestapo. Let’s see how easily these cowards will find it to abduct more non-criminals after last week’s massive demonstration against them

The news article indicated that ‘a milion people’ took part in this but in our little area, over 1,000 people showed up and there were a thousand such demonstrations, so if we extrapolate it’s probably fair to say that at least ten million people protested, rather than a million. No media outlet will say that; this news is only available on the internet.

Carol says that after my birthday, this year, I’m going to be held more accountable than ever for what I say and do. I’m a little chagrined because when people ask me about disinformants I’ve been kind of candid. Since disinformants more or less dominate the ‘news service’ on the internet (great job, NSA/CIA! [Image Can Not Be Found] ) and since most people who read those sites are clueless, so are easily induced to send around those links to their email lists, I’m finally learning that when I openly criiticize the fakers it’s an open invitation to them to play the lapwing card, which can damage my own reputation.

See, they are not held accountable for being liars but someone who strives for integrity is very dramatically held accountable (in the eyes of the clueless) by the liars for drawing attention to it. It absolutely does matter how the clueless see us because they’re the vast majority and can be weaponized against human progress ('Sieg, Heil!)

This forces someone in my position to grow spiritually in order to keep a good reputation. The alternative is to continue to call attention to fakery at the expense of my own credibility. My wife would say that directing attention to clever, well-promoted and funded liars interferes with others’ discernment process, which is something she’d rather cut her own throat than to commit. Good example for me [Image Can Not Be Found]

My birthday’s coming up in a couple of weeks and I’m already getting warning rumbles from some fakers who are evidently gearing up, together, to try to tear me a new one. I think I caught it in time, though, so next time some stranger emails me to get my opinion about one or another agency-employed/programmed disinformant on the web I’m going to dodge the bullet, grid willing.

~Don

Lapwing:

  1. an Old World crested plover (Vanellus vanellus) noted for its slow irregular flapping flight and shrill wailing cry

Ring a bell?

~Don

Orgones footer logo
About - Guidelines - FAQ - Privacy - Terms