Thanks for posting about the article, Dirk! It’s very nice that the article was informative, rather than critical.
In case some of our readers don’t know, Meta Kumer, in Slovenia, has been positively featured in print and broadcast media in Slovenia for her cloudbusters. She’s posted that, here, but it was over a year ago.
Georg Ritschl in South Africa has also been featured in national media for his work.
Carol and I were interviewed on a couple of international broadcasts, some years ago, one of which caught the attention of our friend and gifting associate, Dr Paul Batiibwe, in Uganda, who is the first Black African to have built a cloudbuster. He posts as DrP, here.
Jeff Rense attacked this unorganized network repeatedly on his website and on his syndicated radio show during December, '93, and January, '94, but stopped doing all of that kind of suddenly, after his residential property was gifted. Trevor Constable was a guest assailant on a couple of those programs.
Constable, who has done a lot of good work with Reich’s version of the cloudbuster, is a friend of Ken Adachi, who coined the term, ‘chembuster’ for our invention, the orgonite cloudbuster. I wish I had a nickel for every time I had to explain to enquirers, in email, that ‘chembuster’ is a misnomer for this device, especially since it does so much more than simply disable chemtrails. Ken told us that he didn’t want to ‘offend Trevor Constable’ by using our term. Of course, Dr Reich’s name has been coming up in a positive vein in public, more and more, since this network started spreading six years ago. Before that, I think the sewer rats figured that they’d erased that phenomenal pioneer from human awareness and otherwise caused him to be damned by association with crackpots, cultists and noissome academic chestpounders.
Did you know that there are federal laws prohibiting the sale and use of orgone-related technology? Can you imagine what would happen to the US Government if these sly traitors tried to enforce any of that on us? I’m not sure whether they made those laws before or after they murdered Dr Reich. I ought to publish them, though, just for a kick.
Steeve and all, I want your radionics efforts to succeed beyond your imaginings but please, please keep your posted references in a rational and specific context, okay? I think it’s the only way, in the long run, to gain the respect and attention of intelligent folks. I like to believe that the readers of EW are stable and intelligent, not sycophants or sensationalists. The reason this grassroot network continues to expand is because everything we do, though sometimes seemingly miraculous, is understandable and explainable rather than mystifying and abstruse. You, Steeve, are very good at explaining this stuff to an audience, I noticed when you gave that talk in Ottawa, three years ago.
You guys clearly have the potential ability to wrest radionics from the grip of the irrationalists, self-seekers and sensationalists who are now discrediting it by association. This is exactly what we’ve been doing for Dr Reich’s reputation, so the pioneers in radionics, including Dr Ruth Drown, who approached that science and art with their rational faculties fully engaged, deserve the same respect, don’t you think?
If you want to insert your radionics references in a thread, for instance, as you’ve done here, please explain to our readers what you’re doing, and why. I hope you can show that it’s being done in the context of the thread’s subject matter. I also assume that if you’re going to help someone or even to support someone’s thread with what might seem like nonsequiturs, you’ve first extended the courtesy of having gotten his/her expressed permission to do so.
For the record, if you want to post some of your radionics references in my threads, you’re very welcome to do so under the stated conditions, above.