Positive Changes That Are Occurring

In the article below you’ll note that, despite a mainstream magazine’s brave efforts to counter the actual facts of the situation, even small children can readily see that it’s snowy, like when I was a kid. Wait, I mean the snowiest decade on record. In other hilarity, you may have noticed a research ship going to the South Pole to document ‘the impact of climate change’ was locked in the highest maximum for Antarctic Sea Ice Extent of all time and all hands had to be evacuated.

And have you noticed in weather reports how hard they make it to know the snowfall totals, anymore? They now break it down to ‘8 to Noon’, and ‘Noon to 4 p.m.’, etc., so the numbers seem smaller. When I advanced this thesis to my family this week they immediately became angry, which I suggest shows that my thesis is correct. The anger being the reaction of someone who realizes they’ve been conned, but are for that moment too proud to admit it.

http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/01/04/latest-storm-likely-to-make-the-2010s-the-snowiest-decade-in-the-east-in-the-noaa-record/)**

Latest storm likely to make the 2010s the snowiest decade in the east in the NOAA record

It was quite a storm. I have never seen Logan Airport report heavy snow with an air temperature of 1F (not wind chill) before. The ended up with 15.1 inches. Boxford had 23.8 inches.

Even as more cold and snow invades the central, near the east coast, the post storm blues have set in with the inevitability of an inside runner following rapidly on its heels. But snow loving friends, we have lived through quite a decade and the millennium so far has been a boon to snow lovers despite the continuing claims that snows are becoming rare and hurting winter sports as erroneously reported last week in Boston Magazine.

We here are using NOAA’s own NESIS scale – which we used to call the Kocin/Uccellini storms.

The Northeast Snowfall Impact Scale (NESIS) Overview

While the Fujita and Saffir-Simpson Scales characterize tornadoes and hurricanes respectively, there is no widely used scale to classify snowstorms. The Northeast Snowfall Impact Scale (NESIS) developed by Paul Kocin and Louis Uccellini of the National Weather Service (Kocin and Uccellini, 2004) characterizes and ranks high-impact Northeast snowstorms. These storms have large areas of 10 inch snowfall accumulations and greater. NESIS has five categories: Extreme, Crippling, Major, Significant, and Notable. The index differs from other meteorological indices in that it uses population information in addition to meteorological measurements. Thus NESIS gives an indication of a storm’s societal impacts. This scale was developed because of the impact Northeast snowstorms can have on the rest of the country in terms of transportation and economic impact.

This week’s storm was at least as impactful and covered a wide stretch back to the Midwest. If it joins the NESIS list, it will be storm 49 and make the 2010s the snowiest decade for the east coast in the record, surpassing the 1960s.

In the following article you’ll see how the populace is awakening to the fact that two wholly-controlled-and-coopted political parties are used to create the illusion that Democracy is practiced, here. It’s been clear to me since I was a kid that the people in charge, regardless of their political affiliations, do not have the best interests of the people at heart, as they profess, so I"m cheered to see an ever-growing number of people coming to the same realization. Because once we realize that an unwholesome parasite infests us, we can take the steps to get healthy and eliminate it. See: ‘going out of town on a rail’, previous. I guess baby-kissing and natty suits are enough to put many off the scent…or have been, until now.

The fact that an amazingly low percentage of Americans vote is often used to denigrate said Americans, when in fact it’s another marker that people are unsubscribing from a system in which they are being presented a choice between two State-mandated shills. Shill: “an accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or swindler who acts as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others.”

The us-versus-them polarization technique has been used with great success for a very long time. If you click the link to the article, you’ll see an amount of smoke, spin and sophistry dedicated to supporting that charade that is, to me, remarkable. But I’ve removed it, here, leaving only the un-spun moving parts.

Rejoice - humanity is waking up, waking up, and won’t be going back to sleep again.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx?ref=image)

Record-High 42% of Americans Identify as Independents

Forty-two percent of Americans, on average, identified as political independents in 2013, the highest Gallup has measured since it began conducting interviews by telephone 25 years ago. Meanwhile, Republican identification fell to 25%, the lowest over that time span. At 31%, Democratic identification is unchanged from the last four years but down from 36% in 2008.

Republican identification peaked at 34% in 2004. Since then, it has fallen nine percentage points. Democratic identification has also declined in recent years, falling five points from its recent high of 36% in 2008, the year President Barack Obama was elected. The current 31% of Americans identifying as Democrats matches the lowest annual average in the last 25 years.

Fourth Quarter Surge in Independence

The percentage of Americans identifying as independents grew over the course of 2013, surging to 46% in the fourth quarter. That coincided with the partial government shutdown in October and the problematic rollout of major provisions of the healthcare law, commonly known as “Obamacare.”

Americans are increasingly declaring independence from the political parties. The general trend in recent years, including the 2012 election year, has been toward greater percentages of Americans identifying with neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party.

The rise in political independence is likely an outgrowth of Americans’ record or near-record negative views of the two major U.S. parties, of Congress, and their low level of trust in government more generally.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thesalt/2013/12/18/255225227/theyre-back-chesapeake-oysters-return-to-menus-after-rebound)

The article that follows takes pains to avoid mentioning the general improvement in climate that is a large part of a rebounding oyster population. But the cheering trends it documents include a large positive change being driven by just a handful of individuals. You’ll also see that people are – amazing! – wanting to eat food that’s local to where they’re from. I guess our African friends or others where things are less ‘developed’ marvel that we accept having, say, apples shipped over from China, no particular offense meant to China. I mean, how hard is it to plant an apple tree, to pick an apple?

The world is changing, the conditioning is breaking down.

I proposed to my wife over Oysters…in the '70’s, when I was growing up, the Chesapeake’s doom was assured to us. Wow, what a great time to be alive it is, here, now:

They’re Back! Chesapeake Oysters Return To Menus After Rebound

December 20, 201311:03 AM

The history of the Chesapeake Bay oyster hasn’t always been a pure one. So you could forgive a chef for being skeptical about the big bivalve comeback being staged in D.C. and the surrounding area this winter as oyster season gets underway. But many mid-Atlantic chefs are actually cheering. That’s because a major public-private effort to re-establish the oyster as a quality local food product — as well as a weapon against water pollution — seems to be working.

“Almost every oyster you’re buying cleans the bay,” gushes Brian Stickel, corporate chef for Clyde’s Restaurant Group. Clyde’s runs 14 restaurants around Washington, D.C., including The Old Ebbitt Grill, famous for its raw oyster bar, which lures patrons day and night. Old Ebbitt sells more than a million oysters a year. Increasingly, some of those are coming from nearby waters. That local label, he says, is a big draw for customers.

“At our restaurants, we sell up to eight oysters at a time, but I definitely see people asking more for local oysters ,” Stickel says.

There’s also the matter of taste. “They’re very sweet. They’re creamy. It’s just very different than a northern oyster, which tends to have a higher salinity,” he says.

Stickel and many other chefs around the region are betting that distinct flavor will beckon oyster lovers — and perhaps even mint new ones: They are signing a pledge to put Maryland oysters back on the menu. So why did Chesapeake oysters disappear from menus in the first place?

Back in the early 1900s, the Chesapeake Bay produced most of the country’s oysters. They were so plentiful, they were considered food for the poor. “But like most things man touches… we screwed that up,” says Bart Farrell, director of food and beverage for Clyde’s. He has worked for the company for 30 years. He spoke to us at an event to publicize the local oyster pledge earlier this week.

The bay’s oyster population plummeted as overharvesting, disease and fraud all took a heavy toll. Infamous “ship and dip” hucksters would harvest oysters from warmer, more disease-prone waters down south and set them in the bay for an hour or a day, then pass them off to unsuspecting restaurants as “local,” he says.

By the 1990s, the haul had dropped to just 1 percent of what it was in the bay’s heyday. And reports of oyster-related illnesses were making headlines on a regular basis. So much so that when the owner’s daughter got food poisoning, Old Ebbitt Grill stopped selling oysters for a few years to develop safety standards.

When the bar reopened, it had replaced the local oysters on its menu with bivalves from well-established oyster harvesting areas on the West Coast, in Maine and on Prince Edward Island.

But in the past few years, as The Salt has reported, a handful of watermen have teamed up with scientists to repopulate the bay with oysters born in labs and planted on underwater farms. And the Army Corps of Engineers has been tasked with restoring the Chesapeake’s oyster reefs to pre-1900 levels.

Now those efforts are starting to pay off with this year’s harvest, says Tim Sughrue, vice president of Congressional Seafood Co. Inc., in Jessup, Md. The company works with oyster farmers and other seafood producers to sell seafood to restaurants, hotels and supermarkets from Richmond to Baltimore.

Oyster spat — the larvae — sell for a fraction of a penny, he says. But once oysters mature enough to harvest, each one can fetch 40 times that much, he says.

There are 13 oyster farmers in Maryland now, Sughrue says, and more than 300 have applied to the state for leases. “If we help make these 13 growers successful financially,” he says, "there will be hundreds, if not thousands, to come behind. And they in turn will grow millions and billions of oysters that will filter trillions of gallons of water."

One of those growers is Tal Petty of Hollywood Oyster Co. in Hollywood, Md. Petty says he got into oyster farming for fun. “This is a hobby grown amok,” he says. “I’ve been doing this for almost 10 years, and the company is three or four years old.” Petty named his signature oyster “Sweet Jesus.” And it does taste sweet — not briny.

Through a combination of working with wholesalers and old-fashioned legwork, he has convinced chefs to sell his oysters at several restaurants in Baltimore, including the hyperlocal-focused Woodberry Kitchen. Petty says recently he has been able to turn a profit and draw a salary.

But are there enough Chesapeake Bay oysters to make it worthwhile for more chefs to put them on the menu? More than enough, says Sughrue. In fact, about one-third of this year’s harvest has been shipped down to Louisiana, where the oyster industry was decimated after the Gulf oil spill, he says.

As the Chesapeake Bay oyster comes back, he says, the next step might be rebuilding the processing plants that once ringed the shoreline. “One-hundred-and-fifty years ago, the oyster industry employed 30,000 people around the bay, and gross revenues were $50 million a year. That’s in 1870. I can totally see where we can achieve that again,” Sughrue says.

You may have noticed how the widespread distribution of simple orgonite worldwide has coincided with a massive drop in hurricanes, tornadoes, and thunderstorms. And, and, as demonstrated within the article that follows, lightning activity.

Remember how the Greek god, Zeus, threw lighting bolts? Zeus simply a rebranding of the Canaanite Baal, the Lord of Storms. I’ve previously advanced the thesis that Baal pillars were the first death-tech, collecting and transmitting the Death Energy of sacrifices performed at their bases. Fast-forward to today, and you can note the worldwide network of antennaed and steepled structures festooning the World Grid. They are, all of them, simply newer- and newer-school Baal pillars. Or so I have subjectively concluded.

Baal was also known as ‘Lord of the Air’. It’s why the famous car and Southern California suburb are called ‘Bel Air’ (from B’el Air, Baal Air). It’s why you have shoes called ‘Air’, and why the big cell phone company’s advertising campaign was ‘Rule the Air’…all hail, Baal, our dark master.

Baal Pillers to cell towers, Lord of the Air to ‘Rule the Air’ – they figured the rubes would never figure it out. Well, we have, and, unfortunately for our ill-intended, erstwhile masters, we’ve also figured out that simple orgonite flips the polarity of these structures, and they become POR generators and transmitters.

In the article that follows, check out how the lightning death toll is half of the usual year’s average, and how, in 1943, 432 people died in one year from lightning strikes. That’s probably because they had the world grid pumped chock-full of Death Energy from their fabulously successful Death campain then underway that is euphemistically called ‘World War II’.

At the end the shill scientist hilariously tries to straight-facedly explain how a drop in thunderstorms does not correlate to a drop in lighting deaths. Yes, they think you are that stupid:

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/01/11/lightning-deaths-record-low/4411347/)

Twenty-three Americans died from lightning in 2013, the fewest since records began in 1940.

The year 2013 set a record for the fewest lightning deaths in a year in the USA. There were 23 fatalities directly attributed to lightning, according to data from the National Weather Service. The previous record low was in 2011, which had 26 deaths. Accurate lightning death records go back 73 years to 1940.

Over the past 30 years, about 52 people on average die each year from lightning strikes. Going way back, in the 1940s, hundreds of people were killed each year by lightning; in 1943 alone, 432 people died. “While we don’t like to see any lightning deaths, the continuing reduction in yearly fatalities is encouraging,” Jensenius said.

Why the huge drop in deaths, especially compared with decades ago, even though the population is more than twice what it was then? “Comparisons show that the decrease in lightning risk to people coincides with a shift in population from rural to urban regions,” wrote meteorologist Ronald Holle in an article in the Journal of Applied Meteorology .

“There were many, many more small farmers who were out working in fields,” Jensenius said, which resulted in many more chances to be struck by lightning.

Other reasons for the drop in lightning-related fatalities over the years:

•All phones were corded, and there were quite a few deaths due to people speaking on the phone.

•Better lightning protection, suppression and grounding in electrical and phone lines.

•More concern and awareness of lightning safety, due in part to advances in media communication.

•Medical advances in treating lightning strike victims.

Last year was also a relatively quiet year in the USA for severe thunderstorms , which produce large hail, tornadoes or very strong winds. Could this have been a factor in the record low number of lightning deaths?

“I have never tried to correlate the two; however, I doubt that there’d be much of a correlation,” Jensenius said. “Very few lightning deaths seem to occur during ‘severe’ weather. As for non-severe thunderstorms, overall, the number of thunderstorms doesn’t vary much from year to year across the United States, so I don’t think there’s much of a correlation there either.”

When I was growing up, Atlantic City, NJ was a really nice place, we vacationed there as a family. Then gambling arrived, with promises of transformation. And, boy, transformation sure did occur. Things have gotten much less nice, since then.

But, following, you’ll see a drop in Atlantic City casino revenue, which made me immediately think ‘hm, see, people are turning away from such things!’ The article works hard to blow smoke and chaff and convince the reader that it’s because of a rise in online gaming.

But I note that the brick-and-mortar revenue is in the billions, and the internet revenue is in the low millions. Remember, a billion is a thousand million. And, oh, by the way, their revenues have been dropping for seven straight years , and internet gaming is ‘fledgeling’, as they note.

So I’ll take this a positive:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ac-casino-revenue-3b-1st-time-22-years-21530284)

AC Casino Revenue Below $3B; 1st Time in 22 Years

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. January 14, 2014

Atlantic City’s casino revenue fell below $3 billion last year for the first time in 22 years , as increasing competition in the northeastern U.S. continued to shrink the market. Figures released Tuesday by the state Division of Gaming Enforcement showed the city’s casinos won $2.86 billion in 2013, down from just over $3 billion in 2012.

It marked the seventh straight year of plunging gambling revenue for Atlantic City , which won $5.2 billion in 2006. That was the year the first of what would become 12 Pennsylvania casinos opened, cutting deeply into a market the New Jersey resort town once called its own.

The casino saturation claimed its first New Jersey victim on Monday when the Atlantic Club Casino Hotel shut down, leaving Atlantic City with 11 casinos. “Obviously it’s disappointing to see another year where it’s a decline,” said Tony Rodio, president of the Tropicana Casino and Resort, and head of the Casino Association of New Jersey. “But hopefully with the addition of Internet gambling, I think you’re going to see an increase in 2014.”

The revenue figures showed the state’s fledgling Internet gambling industry being dominated by two main players: the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa, and Caesars Interactive, which together won $6.1 million of the $8.4 million that was taken in by the New Jersey Internet gambling sites over the final five weeks of 2013.

The Borgata, with its Party Poker online brand, took in more than $3.7 million in online gambling revenue since Internet betting began in New Jersey on Nov. 21. “Our network has attracted the largest pool of players in the New Jersey online market, allowing us to offer our customers a wide selection of games and table stakes at all times,” said Keith Smith, president of Boyd Gaming, which owns half of the Borgata. “This gives our network a significant competitive advantage and positions us for further success.”

He also said the initial figures answer one key question, at least for the Borgata: whether Internet gambling will bring in new revenue, or simply cannibalize existing brick-and-mortar operations.

“When matching our online and land-based databases, we found that 60 percent of online casino customers had not been to Borgata in over a year, and over 75 percent had made fewer than two trips to Borgata in the past year,” Smith said. “And on a combined basis, online and land-based poker revenue at Borgata was up more than 40 percent from our land-based play in December 2012. Clearly, online gaming is complementary to our land-based business, not competitive.”

Caesars Interactive, which runs sites including the WSOP and 888 brands, won nearly $2.4 million online from late November through the end of the year.

Other competitors lagged badly in the online market. The Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort and its ucasino brand, won $883,000. The Tropicana Casino and Resort won $748,000; Trump Plaza Hotel Casino and its Betfair online brand won $427,000, and the Golden Nugget, whose launch was delayed for weeks by technical problems, won $179,000.

I often send news stories to my close friends not so much to illustrate the point made in the story, but rather “and, yes, they conspire.” Check out the excuses in quotes below as to why gambling is dropping, and see if they resonate as truthful to you. My favorite is “9/11 did it”:

11/27/2013 – Lake Tahoe, Nevada – casino revenue across the state down 2.6 percent from October 2012. On the South Shore gaming revenue fell 23 percent.

10/8/2013- Northwest Indiana casino revenues dropped 7.3 percent in September as compared to the year-ago-month

10/11/2013 – Gaming revenues down by 10 percent on Las Vegas Strip

Oct 22, 2013 – Mississippi casinos won less money from gamblers in September for the 13th month out of 15

10/23/2013 – Baton Rouge, LA casino revenue dropped to $20.9 million in September, 17 percent less than the $25.2 million posted for September 2012

1/6/2014 – Pennsylvania: Statewide, $2.38 billion was generated from slot machine revenue in 2013. That figure amounts to 3.5 percent less than in 2012.

1/15/2014 – New Jersey gaming revenue falls despite introduction of online gambling

“gaming lobbyists blame smoking ban”

“more states compete for gambling revenue and jobs”

“Internet cafés are being blamed”

“attributed the drop in part to the early Labor Day weekend shaving one Saturday off the month.”

“Weather blamed for Erie casino’s December slot-machine revenue”

“air-conditioning breakdown.”

“a calendar quirk”

“a slow and painful economic recovery in the US”

“credit card companies that won’t allow their customers to use those cards for gambling”

“Some blame cost, others say the games aren’t as much fun.”

“A big decline in the play of baccarat, a volatile, high-roller game favored by Asian players, is largely to blame”

“Editorial: Is Nintendo to Blame for Gaming’s Drop?”

“That rate is bound to improve, however, as its online operation suffered technical glitches that delayed its launch”

“September 11th Blamed for Revenue Drop”

Boy, they’re sure not having it all their own way, anymore. See, following, that the gambit to quietly ban the incandescent light bulb is not succeeding. When I learned of the (attempted) ban, I thought “I’m going to buy a bunch, now, then continue ordering them from enterprising folks abroad, and also go back to even older-school technology, e.g. oil lamps, to augment my ‘modern’ lighting.”

The psychics may be able to help me, out, here, vis a vis etheric impacts, but I know that the compact flourescent bulbs are decidely deadly simply in the physical realm. Bet you a dollar they’ve got malefic crap built into their LED bulbs. But I’m content with ‘CFL’s are known to be horrible’ to advance my argument that those in power do not have our best interests at heart, as they profess.

The neurolinguistic programming spin of the article is remarkable, “century-old technology”, “simply can’t keep up”, “the market has marched forward”, “manufacturers…were going to comply anyway.” Yet, amidst all the smoke, chaff, huffing, puffing, and fuming in the article, there’s one key sentence: “Citing “ a continued public desire for these products ,” the Energy and Water Appropriations section of the bill would prohibit funds to implement or enforce the higher efficiency light bulb standards.”

Rejoice, as the fact of the matter is they have advanced…and been repulsed:

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/01/16/congress-offers-glimmer-hope-for-incandescent-light-bulb/)

The House’s passage of a $1.1 trillion spending bill Wednesday that dictates the budgets for all federal agencies may be a desperately needed lifeline for the light bulb.

The bill includes a prohibition on funding for “the Administration’s onerous ‘light bulb’ standard,” as Appropriations Committee chairman Hal Rogers (R., Ky) described it, which had sought to dramatically improve the energy efficiency of ordinary incandescent light bulbs but ultimately spelled the end of the road for the century-old technology.

A portion of that 2007 law, which finally took effect on Jan. 1, mandated that manufacturers improve their light bulbs: 40W bulbs must draw just 10.5W, and 60W bulbs must draw no more than 11W. The result is the effectively a ban: Incandescents simply can’t keep up with those twisty compact fluorescent (CFL) and newer LED bulbs.

But there’s hope for those glass globes yet, however: Citing “a continued public desire for these products,” the Energy and Water Appropriations section of the bill would prohibit funds to implement or enforce the higher efficiency light bulb standards.

“None of the funds made available in this Act may be used…to implement or enforce the standards established by the tables contained in section 325(i)(1)(B) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act,” reads section 322 of the bill.

Critics call the funding ban a nuisance, but said it likely won’t stop the shift toward more energy-efficient bulbs, according to USA Today.

“The market has marched forward despite this rider,” Franz Matzner, associate director of government affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council, told the paper. “The manufacturers have all been saying – we’re going to comply anyway.”

The demise of the incandescent bulb might come as a surprise to most Americans. A recent study by Lutron pointed out that fewer than 1 in 3 adults (just 28 percent) were aware of the planned phase out. A similar Socket Survey by Sylvania showed slightly more awareness – 4 in 10 were aware of the phase out, it revealed.

A quick check of Home Depot’s website indicates no shortage of incandescent bulbs; the company sells a six-pack for just under $10 – and for the born hoarder, a pack of 288 for $118. In late December, Home Depot told FoxNews.com it had a six-month stockpile before the supplies ran out.

You know how the food pyramid that was foisted upon you is exactly the opposite of what healthy eating is actually like? The demonization of butter is identical – tell them it’s deadly, then offer them actually-deadly margarine, my, how they must laugh.

Well, this post is about the ongoing breakdown of programming. See how the whole flock, the whole school of fish turns as one?

And note how the Big Corporation is toeing the line, abandoning the Death products they formerly endorsed so fervently. And the Feds are moving to ban Trans Fats! Wow. It’s because they don’t want to get left behind, or, more potently, go out of town on a rail, tarred and feathered.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/butter-is-now-winning-the-fat-wars-2014-01-20)

Butter is now winning the fat wars

Unilever: ‘We have been too obsessed, overly obsessed’ with margarine

Butter is back.

Despite years of being warned that butter is bad for you, Americans are looking the other way. Sales of the rich stuff now top $2 billion a year in the U.S. — a 65% increase since 2000. The American Butter Institute also reports that per-capita consumption is now at 40-year high of 5.6 pounds.

But what about margarine and other spreads made from vegetable oils? Apparently, they’re so 2012, according to Unilever the consumer products conglomerate that has been behind such butter alternatives as Country Crock and I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter. Last year, the company began promoting Rama, a butter-based spread. Antoine Bernard de Saint-Affrique, head of Unilever’s Food division, told investors last month that he sees a real shift in consumer taste and demand.

“We [at Unilever] have been too obsessed, overly obsessed” with margarine, said de Saint-Affrique. “I’m happy to say that this time is over and we have changed. And we have changed in a very significant way.” (Talk about obsessiveness: As recently as 2010, de Saint-Affrique was quoted as saying, “Some people say it’s bread and butter, but here we say, it’s bread and margarine.”)

The change in taste has more to do with just a literal change in taste, however. It also has to do with the ongoing discussions about the health benefits and risks of all types of fats, be they saturated (as is the case with butter) or trans fat (as is the case with some types of margarine). The bottom line: Many nutritional and cardiovascular experts are saying that butter may not be as bad as once suspected; some even say a little butter could be good in the diet. Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration is moving to ban trans fats altogether.

Just as important, says Ruggiero, the food blogger, there’s a growing awareness that a little butter goes a long way. Instead of slathering the butter on, as is still often the case at restaurants, home cooks are recognizing that a pat or two can provide just enough flavor. And it’s the kind of sumptuous flavor that margarine lacks, adds Ruggiero.

“I’d rather have a teaspoon of butter than four tablespoons of margarine,” she says.

The few control the many via pyramidal organizations in which dupes at the bottom wrongheadedly believe that the nattily-dressed, baby kissing sociopaths at the top who claim to have everyone’s best interest at heart.

Fortunately, more and more people around the globe are waking up to agree with this thesis, and are circling their wagons. Catalonia is trying to secede from Spain, a bunch of counties in Northern California are trying to form their own state…feel the shudder, the slip before the rock slide? This goes along with the ‘46% of Americans identify themselves as Independents, the highest percentage, ever’ story I posted a bit ago.

When NorCal, or Vermont, or Texas(!) sededes, those in control are going to have to grin uncomfortably and pretend to like it, or begin to attack those states – even more openly then they are attacking everyone in every state, right now. And, guess what? They’re already stretched – every grab for the brass ring wakes up more sleeping citizenry, whom will never go back to sleep again. Don’t mess with Texas.

http://www.vilaweb.cat/noticia/4168200/20140120/catalan-national-assembly-collects-235000-signatures-for-independence-in-one-weekend.html)

Catalan National Assembly collects 235,000 signatures for independence in one weekend

Success of the massive ‘Sign for a vote for independence’ campaign, which continues to collect votes

The Catalan National Assembly collected 234,481 signatures in favor of independence as part of their campaign ‘Sign for a vote in favor of independence’ in the span of just two days, during the weekend of January 11-12. The campaign was carried out among 827 different booths throughout Catalonia. The campaign continues with stands and booths and a second massive collection campaign planned for March 22-23, according to the ANC, who called the results ‘much higher than they expected’.

At the same time as they released the figures, the ANC published a video that sums up the ‘Sign for a vote for independence’ campaign and which features, in addition to various people signers, Carme Forcadell, the ANC president, Rosa Alentorn, campaign coordinator, and lawyer Magda Oranich, along with the speeches that they made during the Catalan Way 2014: ‘What we need to do to win our independence’.

A Plan B for the referendum This plan is one of the five most important projects that the ANC has planned for 2014. According to the initiative’s coordinator, Rosa Alentorn, ‘it’s a Plan B just in case the referendum cannot be held’.

The document that people signed asks Catalonia’s political leaders to ‘do as much as they can, that they exhaust all of the paths open to a referendum’. And, in the event that a referendum cannot be held, it asks that they consider each signature as if it were a vote in favor of declaring independence.

The collection of signatures began several months ago in a pilot program, in order to establish the procedures that need to be followed in order for the votes to be valid and to create a network of authorized individuals who can validate the data of each person who signs. Now there are 3000 such authorized signature takers throughout Catalonia.

Nature is recovering, blossoming, blooming, despite the diametrically-opposing view presented by the wholly controlled and coopted mainstream media. I guess they never read ‘the Boy Who Cried Wolf’.

This week NASA bravely said ‘one of the hottest years, ever!’ in the face of directly-experienceable evidence of the opposite, namely the coolest summer I can remember followed by a gorgeous fall and now into the coldest, snowiest winter I can remember. It’s like the research ship going to the Antarctic to document ‘the impact of climate change!’ and getting stuck in earlier- and thicker-than-expected sea ice, and having to be abandoned.

It’s going to be fun to watch the sorry con continue to unravel.

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/one-devastated-wild-turkey-populations-make-remarkable-comeback-2D11650347)

Nov. 25, 2013 at 2:45 PM ET

Wild turkeys are found in 49 of 50 states, an enormous turnaround after having disappeared from much of the country early in the 1900s.

In the early 1900s, wild turkeys seemed to be on the road toward extinction, as unregulated hunting and widespread logging had wiped them out over much of their range. In the last few decades, however, the birds have made an incredible recovery, reaching levels near those of their precolonial days.

The birds are now found in virtually all parts of their former territory, and some new places where they hadn’t been previously , said wildlife biologist Thomas Hughes of the National Wild Turkey Federation, an organization that has reintroduced the animals into the wild. They can be found in 49 U.S. states, with the only exception being Alaska, Hughes said. In total, about 7 million wild turkeys live in the United States; prior to 1500, an estimated 10 million turkeys existed, he added.

Nature is booming, recovering, worldwide…does anyone you know talk about it? I talk about it incessantly, and the looks on people’s faces when I do are priceless. Like startled deer, usually. That’s because they have been hypnotized, conditioned – but we are breaking that black magic spell, right here, right now.

Note, below, how scallops are sensitive to environmental degradation…and are steadily improving. Not also how it’s the locals, at the county level, who have to do the work of tracking the comeback, actually counting the scallops – because the barely-closeted Death worshippers who up until very recently ruled us are not in the business of spreading good news.

But we are, fortunately.

http://www.jrn.com/fox4now/news/213588341.html)

Scallops making a comeback in Pine Island sound?

Jun. 28, 2013

FORT MYERS, Fla.-

Lee County wants to do a scallop population count in the Pine Island sound, and they need volunteers. Commercial harvesting of sea scallops in southwest florida was forced to shutdown 25 years ago. But scientists are cautiously optimistic that Pine Island sound is proving to be a better host for sea scallops than in years past.

Their numbers seem to be improving …but the only way to know for sure is with a special population count… and that’s where you come in! Scallops are sensitive to environmental degradation. Water quality and health of the sea grass beds is critical.

Joy Hazell from University of Florida is in charge of keeping track of the scallop population in southwest Florida. She says "scallops are sort of the canary in the coal mine."

They were pretty much wiped out by the late 80’s in pine island sound. In 2005 a team re-introduced the population to the area. For the past three years, Hazell has led a team of volunteers to check on their progress. They’re finding that the numbers are starting to creep up, so she’s cautiously optimistic.

Hazell added that " because the sea grasses and the water quality in Pine Island sound has recovered somewhat … and we think its recovered to the point it will support a scallop population."

But Hazell has one reason to be concerned because “we had a red tide… so we don’t know how that is going to affect the scallop population.”

They will find out next month, when she leads another survey team to check on the scallops. She’s looking for 150 volunteers to help out, with their own snorkel gear, to swim and investigate designated areas. Anyone interested, who has snorkel gear, is encouraged to sign up.

Great post Jeff thank You… Yes I know exactly what You are talking about and I have spoke like You for a number of years

to everyone and it is actually amazing how many People, after I express pleasure of seeing how wonderful everything is coming along , a great number of People think for a minute and have to agree!

everything is changing, of course the easiest thing for everyone to see is the weather changes worldwide, They just don’t know yet is a result of massive Ogonite distribution worldwide!

in Thailand the media now is telling everyone to prepare for the possibility of snow when the winds shift to coming from myranamar(bema), southwestern CHINA is just north of there ;-). of course along with these snow warnings THEY always have

to give the rising DEATH toll from the cold winter but… THEY never mention how much less death there is now from cleaner skies and more breathable air! and We know who is responsible for that, Your’s truly, thank You….

Thanks for the positive feedback, Gare.

When I was a kid, in the '70’s, we went on a whale watch cruise off Provincetown, Mass. We saw, literally, one whale, and it was a huge event. Now literally hundreds are frolicking off the beaches of Provincetown, and scientists are ‘baffled’ and ‘puzzled’. When I was on the Big Island this past summer, where my wife grew up, a whale breached off Beach 69, where she’d gone since she was little. She’d never seen one there. Her dad said ‘that’s amazing, I never saw a whale out there.’

In the article that follows, I don’t know what’s better, the load of positive whale news, or how funny it is to watch the author and scientists fall all over themselves to try to spin it to the negative. I’m hoping that people who read this thread will see the media’s pattern of obfuscating the good news, and that they’ll wake up more quickly from the programming, no longer believing the Boy Who Cried Wolf.

In the article, you’ll note how far more Right whales are showing up in Provincetown than can be explained by the population increase. That’s either, A, cool and positive, or, B, shows the author and scientists are lying, and the Right whales’ numbers are even higher than the article allows. I’m going with ‘B’.

Note also how the whales are breeding in areas they didn’t used to – or more likely are breeding places they did throughout history, before the DOR matrix was so widely and deliberately expanded.

As you read you’ll see scientists bravely parrot how ‘global warming is causing it’!’ (despite the fact that the ocean is in fact cooling).

You would think a marine scientist would say something like ‘we’re seeing a boom in populations across the marine ecosystem, and strong growth in whale populations worldwide, which both map to this boom we’re seeing in the Right Whale population.’ But they don’t say that. Because they are the dupes of lying snake-oil salesmen, at best, and heartless, lying Machiavelles, at worst.

You’ll see how the article is riddled with neurolinguisting programming trigger words, to try to take the joy and hope out of the article. Like how they include 'but face new threats !’ even in the subhead.

You’ll see how, when listing why the increase is occurring, how they hold the actual, real reason the population is increasing (“a number of good feeding years”) until the very last.

I’m happy to point out that the calving turnaround is 2001, just about exactly when orgonite began to be deployed in earnest.

Rejoice, I say – It’s 1, 2, 4, 16…with the whale population, and everything else – dropping crime rates, dropping murder rates, nature healing…

Farewell, Death-worshipping former masters…

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/03/16/right-whales-make-comeback-after-centuries-decline/Cf8IdJe8ydpeLYLXr3ibTL/story.html)

Right whales in the midst of a revival

North Atlantic right whales, once the focus of dire extinction talk, have rebounded in recent years, but the once-hunted animals now face new threats

March 17, 2013

TWELVE MILES OFF PROVINCETOWN — The dark waters began to roil. Silently, two black, 70-ton leviathans emerged from the depths of Cape Cod Bay, skimmed the surface, then quickly slipped back into the sea. Scientists in a nearby boat tracked their “fluke prints” — the large surface swirls created from their underwater tail sweeps — but soon lost the watery trail of two of the world’s rarest whales.
For years, scientists have sounded a dirge for the North Atlantic right whale. Its population stalled around 300 in the 1990s, pushing some researchers to make mournful extinction predictions for the mysterious, 45-foot-long creatures that come to feed and frolic every spring off Cape Cod.
Now, the critically endangered population has hit 500 whales, probably for the first time in centuries — a poignant milestone for a marine mammal whose numbers dwindled to perhaps a few dozen after being hunted relentlessly for their oil and baleen from the 11th to the early 20th centuries. Researchers, while joyful, say that number is still tiny — and they remain deeply concerned about recent environmental changes, including global warming, that spell uncertainty for the creatures’ future.
“Five hundred whales make you want to sing,’’ said Charles “Stormy” Mayo, senior scientist at the Provincetown Center for Coastal Studies, which studies the whales. “But you have to hold your breath when you sing. We have a substantially changing ocean. We don’t know what the future holds.”
Last Monday, he and his staff aboard the research vessel Shearwater scanned the horizon for spouts from the whales’ blowholes. An airplane flew transects above, searching for dark shadows in the relatively small bay and radioing their locations to the boat.
Scientists don’t know what a healthy right whale population even looks like, but they suspect it is in the thousands or even tens of thousands. Today, the population is increasing about 2.5 percent a year — far better than the 1990s — but hardly the 6 or 7 percent researchers would like to see.

The reasons for the increase are likely myriad. Ships have slowed down and moved to avoid the creatures. Fishing lines have been developed that allow some whales to avoid being tangled. A number of good feeding years — the animals can consume tiny shrimplike plankton at a rate of 125 pounds an hour — probably helped with a dramatic increase in calves starting around 2001.

“We have built up a reserve . . . a buffer,’’ said Philip Hamilton, a research scientist with the New England Aquarium, which also studies the whales. He expects the population to decline again, but says the whales will be able to weather a hit better with larger numbers.

Once, hunters’ harpoons easily found the right whale, so named because they were the “right” whale to chase. Lumbering through the water and often feeding close to the ocean surface, they floated when they died — making it easy for hunters to tow them to shore to collect oozing oil from their blubber for lamps, and baleen from their jaws to make items ranging from combs to corsets.

In 1935, the League of Nations outlawed right whale hunting, but by then, few whales were left. Unlike fishing stocks that often rebound once fishermen stop fishing them, the Northern right whale never regained a footing once hunting ceased.

Because the whales are studied so intensely and there are so few of them, researchers can identify most members of the population by sight through distinctive whitened skin patches on their gigantic heads. In Mayo’s Provincetown lab, a wall is lined with whale diagrams and identifying numbers, often with accompanying nicknames such as Legato and Monarch. Researchers have tried virtually everything to understand the whales — including training dogs to sniff out their orange scat at sea to better understand their hormonal processes, their diseases, and what they eat.

In efforts to protect right whales, all boats must stay at least 500 yards away from them unless they have a scientific permit to study them, or risk a $10,000 fine.

Nonetheless, the gregarious and outgoing creatures often put on shows close to shore that delight beachgoers with their feeding, socializing, and breaching. Groups of right whales sometimes feed close to the beach between Race Point and Long Point in Provincetown.

Now, the animals are showing up in larger numbers in Cape Cod Bay — far more than can be explained by the population increase — and they are showing up earlier.

In 2012, whales began appearing in early December, the earliest in 30 years. They usually start appearing mid-January to May.

In 2011, around 200 were spotted in the bay, including 127 during one survey — an unprecedented number. This year, a well-known right whale, dubbed Wart, appeared with a calf, prompting stunned researchers to conclude that she had given birth off New England instead of in the warm waters off Florida and Georgia where the whales normally calve.

“We don’t know what is going on,’’ said Mayo in the cabin of the Shearwater, as Christy Hudak and Beth Larson took plankton samples to study the relationship between food and right whale behavior and health.

Mayo said it is not yet clear if plankton is especially good in the bay and is luring more whales, or if it is declining somewhere else and driving the animals here.

Scientists say warming waters are probably causing some of the changes they are observing: Waters are warming off the Northeast — last year was the warmest ever recorded — and Mayo and others hypothesize the heat is causing changes in plankton species and their bloom times, ultimately altering whale behavior.

That is worrisome. If conditions change too dramatically and quickly, the whales may not be able to cope, researchers say.

And other threats are growing. Research shows the ocean is becoming noisier from ships and construction that may be interfering with the whales’ ability to communicate. New wind farms and oil and gas leases along the East Coast may soon contribute to that noise. Funding to study and understand the whales is threatened.

“The stressors are coming from multiple approaches,’’ says Rosalind Rolland, senior scientist with the New England Aquarium. “We are trending in the right direction, but one disease,or one oil spill” could cause a setback. “We are far from out of the woods.”

http://wunc.org/post/atlantic-sturgeon-populations-are-recovering-along-coast)

11/28/2013

Atlantic Sturgeon Populations Are Recovering Along The Coast

The endangered Atlantic Sturgeon is slowly making a comeback along the North Carolina coast.

The ocean fish needs to come into coastal rivers to spawn. Dams and locks in many of the state’s waterways have made it difficult and, in some cases, impossible for the sturgeon to reproduce. But efforts to remove some of those barriers seems to be having a positive impact.

Joe Hightower is a US Geological Survey biologist and NC State professor. He says over-fishing and a thriving caviar fishery around the turn of 20th century took a toll on the sturgeon, but a fishing ban and endangered status could bring the population back.

“One long-term possibility would be to have a caviar fishery again, and its really just a matter of setting the harvest rate to be appropriate for a fish with this life history,” Hightower said. “We understand a lot more now about how long they live, how long it takes them to reproduce.”

Hightower says it takes females 10 to 12 years to reach reproductive maturity. He says there’s been an increase in the number of juvenile fish in Albemarle Sound over the past decade. A tagging program is underway in the Roanoke River.

http://news.mongabay.com/2013/0814-black-snub-nosed-monkey.html)

[Endangered Chinese monkey population recovering] http://news.mongabay.com/2013/0814-black-snub-nosed-monkey.html)

The number of black snub-nosed monkeys in southwestern China has increased by more than 50 percent since the 1990’s due to conservation efforts, reports Chinese state media.

A survey launched last month in the high elevation forests of China’s Yunnan Province and Tibet Autonomous Region indicates that there are now more than 3,000 monkeys, up from less than 2,000 in the 1990’s. Some 1,800 snub-nosed monkeys live in Yunnan’s Baima Snow Mountain Nature Reserve, a nine-fold increase over the population found in the protected area in 1987.
The species was close to extinction in the 1980’s due to hunting for food and their pelts. Since then, authorities have established protected areas, enacted a hunting ban, banned logging, and confiscated hunting guns.
The Yunnan golden or black snub-nosed monkey ( Rhinopithecus bieti ) dwells in the most extreme environment of any monkey: high-altitude evergreen forests at elevations from 3,000 to 4,500 meters (9,800 to 14,800 feet), where temperatures may fall below freezing for several months in a row.

But, wait, NPR told me Mother Gaia was dying, crushed by the combination of the virus-like burden of mankind and Global Warming wait I mean ‘Climate Change’

http://www.seafoodsource.com/en/news/supply-trade/25279-alaska-sets-record-with-2013-pink-salmon-harvest)

Alaska sets record with 2013 pink salmon harvest

20 January, 2014

Alaska recorded a total of 272 million salmon harvested in 2013, driven in large part by a record-setting 219 million pink salmon , according to the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI). The pink salmon harvest represented more than 80 percent of the total harvest, and was higher than the Alaska Department of Fish and game pre-season forecast for all five salmon species combined , according to ASMI.

“We’re proud of the heritage of our salmon fisheries and our commitment to their sustainability,” said Tyson Fick, ASMI’s communications director. “This year’s record-breaking harvest was especially exciting.” The total harvest is valued at USD 691.1 million (EUR 509.7 million), second only to the 1988 harvest, which totaled USD 724 million (EUR 534 million).

Dimly, slowly, people are figuring out that the nattily-dressed, baby-kissing politicians who profess to have the people’s best interests at heart have been and are baldfacedly lying.

In the article that follows you can see how Iceland let the banks fail, and now there’s 4% unemployment, and it’s heading lower, still.

Here in the U.S., ‘too big to fail’ was the ruse used to take the people’s tax money and give it to the robber baron bankers in the same secret-handshake club as the aforementioned politicians. Have you noticed how they took the money, haven’t lent any of it back out, and how ‘the economy’ is not recovering?

In Vermont, when seccession began to be discussed, people said ‘but what will we do without The Government ?’ Someone replied ‘we give them 75% of our money, currently, what exactly are we getting back?’

Catalonia seceding from Spain, Ukraine going its own way, Syria trying to throw off the shackles…

Iceland at 4% unemployment and dropping…

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-27/let-banks-fail-becomes-iceland-mantra-as-2-joblessness-in-sight.html)

Let Banks Fail Is Iceland Mantra as 2% Joblessness in Sight

Jan 27, 2014

Iceland let its banks fail in 2008 because they proved too big to save.

Now, the island is finding crisis-management decisions made half a decade ago have put it on a trajectory that’s turned 2 percent unemployment into a realistic goal.

While the euro area grapples with record joblessness, led by more than 25 percent in Greece and Spain, only about 4 percent of Iceland’s labor force is without work. Prime MinisterSigmundur D. Gunnlaugsson says even that’s too high.

“Politicians always have something to worry about,” the 38-year-old said in an interview last week. “We’d like to see unemployment going from where it’s now – around 4 percent – to under 2 percent, which may sound strange to most other western countries, but Icelanders aren’t accustomed to unemployment.”

The island’s sudden economic meltdown in October 2008 made international headlines as a debt-fueled banking boom ended in a matter of weeks when funding markets froze. Policy makers overseeing the $14 billion economy refused to back the banks, which subsequently defaulted on $85 billion. The government’s decision to protect state finances left it with the means to continue social support programs that shielded Icelanders from penury during the worst financial crisis in six decades.

Debt Relief

Of creditor claims against the banks, Gunnlaugsson says “this is not public debt and never will be.” He says his main goal while in office is “to rebuild the Icelandic welfare state.”

Though bank creditors, many of them hedge funds, are still trying to recoup their money, Iceland’s approach has won praise from the International Monetary Fund and from numerous economists, including Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman.

Successive Icelandic governments have forced banks to write off mortgage debts to help households. In February 2010, 16 months after Kaupthing Bank hf, Glitnir Bank hf and Landsbanki Islands hf failed, unemployment peaked at 9.3 percent. The rate was 4.2 percent in December, according to Statistics Iceland. In the euro area, unemployment held at a record 12.1 percent in November, Eurostat estimates.

“Even though the situation is a lot better here than in many other countries, having over 4 percent unemployment is something we don’t want,” said Gunnlaugsson, whose government was elected in April.

Welfare Spending

The government’s 2014 budget sets aside about 43 percent of its spending for the Welfare Ministry, a level that is largely unchanged since before the crisis. According to Stefan Olafsson, a sociology professor at the University of Iceland, the nation’s focus on welfare has been key in restoring growth.

The economy will expand 2.7 percent this year, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. That’s better than the average for the OECD-area as a whole, which will grow 2.3 percent, the Paris-based group estimates.

Still, Iceland’s efforts to resurrect its economy have been far from smooth, Olafsson said. Inflation, which peaked at 19 percent in January 2009, has hurt Iceland more than most other countries because most mortgages are linked to the consumer price index. Though the set-up protects investors, households see their debt burdens grow as prices rise. Inflation was 4.2 percent in December.

Inflation Pain

“Although we’re spending more on welfare matters today than before, we have to keep in mind that purchasing power has gone down since 2008,” Olafsson said in an interview. “On top of increasing spending in the health care and education systems, the government should place emphasis on increasing people’s purchasing power. That’s the biggest single task.”

Most of Iceland’s inflation has come via the exchange rate, which has been protected by capital controls since plunging 80 percent offshore against the euro at the end of 2008. Gunnlaugsson says any efforts to scale back existing currency restrictions will only take place at a pace that safeguards krona stability.

“It is a problem that can be solved, and can be solved quite fast,” Gunnlaugsson said.

The krona has appreciated around 10 percent against the euro over the past 12 months. Still, today’s rate of about 157 per euro compares with an average of 88 in 2007, a year before the island’s financial collapse. It slid 0.04 percent to 157.02 as of 12:50 p.m. in Reykjavik.

To support households, Gunnlaugsson in November unveiled a plan to provide as much as 7 percent of gross domestic product in mortgage debt relief. The government intends to finance the plan, which the OECD has criticized as being too blunt, partly by raising taxes on banks.

Capital Controls

Iceland’s hard-line against banks and their creditors has prompted warnings that the nation may struggle to find an investor base once capital controls are lifted. That hasn’t stopped the government issuing two dollar bonds since 2008.

Gunnlaugsson’s welfare pledge comes as other Nordic governments reassess their commitment to state-funded programs. Denmark has scaled back its universal welfare program as more citizens are means tested. In Sweden, a government that has delivered multiple rounds of income tax cuts looks set to lose elections this year as voters pine for a return to more state spending. Krugman this month cautioned Scandinavian governments against pushing through further cuts. According to Gunnlaugsson, government support and economic growth go hand in hand.

“First and foremost we of course want to see stability,” Gunnlaugsson said. “Increased political stability will mean more investment, more jobs, more creation of wealth, so that we can continue to maintain the Icelandic welfare state.”

I think I may have posted this one before. Voilent crimes a quarter of what they were before . Gun homicides cut in half since 1993. Talk about the sort of things that make one optimistic!

You can see that the neurolinguistic programming/Black Magic spellcasting of the media is, for now, effective, with just 12% of the populace grasping what I’d said previously. But the hundred monkeys are waking up, one at a time, and won’t be going back to sleep.

Spread the word…

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/09/bullet-point-gun-crimes-dropping-despite-public-perception/)

May 9, 2013

A spate of high-profile shootings has left Americans with the perception that gun crimes are on the rise, but a new study shows the opposite appears to be true.

A Pew Research poll released this week found that 56 percent of adults believe that gun crime is more common now than 20 years ago. But a report by the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics seems to show that crime involving firearms has fallen dramatically over the last 20 years, with the rate of homicides committed with guns cut in half since 1993. The rate of the violent crimes fell even more, and is now just a quarter of what it was.

“When people respond in opinion polls, it’s shaped from what they’re getting through the network news, the New York Times, the Washington Post."

  • Alan Gottlieb, The Second Amendment Foundation

In the Pew poll of 924 adults, just 12 percent correctly answered that gun crime fell over the last 20 years. Gun rights advocates say media coverage of gun violence has distorted the public perception.

The key word in this headline is ‘State’, you know, as in ‘State Secession’? Filed under ‘not having it all their own way, by any means, these days’: the S.S. Baal, which you may know as Google’s ‘mystery barge’, is being forced to move. I’ve dubbed it the S.S. Baal because it’s got BAL in its number code. They’ve got two of these supposed ‘glitzy product display centers’, lined with what the lying lapdog press calls ‘rows of flagpoles on top’. Oh, wait…now they’re telling me it’s an "interactive space for people to learn about technology.’ It’s an antenna-festooned DOR deployment platform, I think.

They probably had to develop something movable, on the water, because their Maginot Line-like land-based Death tech is so completely vulnerable to $3 chunks of resin and metal and crystal, otherwise known as ‘TB’s’. The other Google barge is in a remote area of Maine, where, you know, lots of Google gadget purchasers are feverishly awaiting to board it. Notice how the article doesn’t mention the one in Maine?

Anyway, the State is making them move it. Notice also how people are speaking up, e.g. ‘numerous complaints’. I guess they didn’t buy the cuddly image presented in that neat Google movie.

http://www.aol.com/article/2014/02/03/state-google-must-move-mystery-barge/20822132/)

State: Google must move ‘mystery’ barge

2/3/14

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) – Google must move its mystery barge from a construction site on an island in the middle of the San Francisco Bay because the permits are not in order, a state official said Monday

The notice came after the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission investigated numerous complaints about the construction of the floating, four-story building , commission executive director Larry Goldzband said. The investigation found that neither the Treasure Island Development Authority nor the city of San Francisco had applied for required permits for the work to be done at the site. Goldzband said Google can resolve the issue by moving the barge to one of the fully permitted construction facilities in the San Francisco Bay.

“It needs to move,” he said. Google did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Mirian Saez, director of the Treasure Island Development Authority, said, “we did not intend to violate or circumvent the process.” The authority will try to apply for the correct permits with the commission, she said, noting her agency has not spoken to Google about the issue.

Preliminary planning documents submitted to the port last fall showed plans for Google to build an interactive space for people to learn about technology. The documents ended months of speculation that the barge would be a party boat, data storage center or a store for Google to sell its Internet-connected glasses.

Google has had little to say about the barge or another vessel off the East Coast.In November, the company issued a statement that said, “Although it’s still early days and things may change, we’re exploring using the barge as an interactive space where people can learn about new technology.” Goldzband said the construction in San Francisco Bay was not authorized by the agency, and the Treasure Island Development Authority, which allowed the project, could face fines and enforcement proceedings.

The disclosure by the California agency marked the second set of permit problems for the barge project. Late last year, work was halted after the Coast Guard said additional permits were needed.

All the needles moving, moving…rising energy, rising frequencies…rising health…rising awareness…

The way the article’s author falls all over themselves to not mention the real reason is almost comedic – and a steady tactic seen ad infinitum within this thread. ‘Bad weather’, gee, I remember that being used as a reason behind the drop in gambling revenues, not long ago.

To their credit, they do, however, honestly mention that they have ‘lost some of their relevance’ with customers, and they also admit they’re trying to adapt to ‘shifting eating habits’. Note that they take pains to say that items are ‘positioned as’ healthy or fresh, versus actually being healthy or fresh, ah, mirth.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2014/02/10/mcdonalds-sales/5358845/)

NEW YORK — McDonald’s says bad weather hurt its U.S. sales performance in January, representing another setback as the fast-food chain fights to fend off rivals and get its menu right.

Company stock sank 1% to $94.97 per share in morning trading. The world’s biggest hamburger chain says sales fell 3.3% at established U.S. locations last month.

Its global sales figure rose 1.2%, however, lifted by improvements in Europe and the region encompassing Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

The decline in the U.S. is just the latest disappointment for McDonald’s , which has conceded that its kitchen operations got overly complicated by the pace of new menu offerings. CEO Don Thompson also recently noted that the chain has lost some of its “relevance” with customers. In hopes of attracting more diners, McDonald’s has been aggressively promoting its revamped Dollar Menu, which includes new burgers that cost more than a dollar. The rollout of the Dollar Menu & More was designed to help improve the company’s profit margins without alienating price-sensitive customers who’ve grown accustomed to the idea of paying just a buck for various items.

Still, rivals including Burger King and Wendy’s have been promoting their value menus and special offers as well. More broadly, McDonald’s is trying to adapt to shifting eating habits by introducing items that are positioned as healthy or fresh, such as its chicken wraps and breakfast sandwiches made with egg whites.

The efforts have yet to pay off. According to a regulatory filing, McDonald’s saw customer traffic at established locations decline 1.6% in the U.S. last year.