Same ACTORS Over And Over Again

Etheric Warriors Archive Misc. section
1

thank grid We have the internet and I believe there is a great chance that enough People will wake up in 2012 to end all this falsehood…

all the same ACTORS used over and over again in an attempt to fool everyone, no wonder I never watch TV!

wow! will take about an hour to watch all parts and You
will see proof of dozens of staged false flag incidents including 9-11, columbine, virginia tech, disclosure project etc etc etc…

sure hope all these links work for You…

1

2a http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxz1hpiW

part 2b (verified)

part 2c

2

Interesting, although I have to admit that something seens wrong with the wellaware1.com website. That masonic square and compass on the website logo is just the kind of arrongance shitbirds like to display. But I can’t say anything for sure.

I think this video is interesting:

Found it on wellaware1.com home page. Says that Truther Girl is actualy Tina Fey
http://www.youtube.com/embed/4AqXeyp2uN4?feature=oembed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tina_Fey

This is what she thinks about wellaware.com (dallasgoldbug, Ed Chiarini)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_U3ZlVI

I’m not sure about anything, but there is something fishy overhere!

3

Gare, thanks for posting that–it’s nice to have this basic conspiracy info in video format. Hopefully, it will inspire people to go pick up a book and dig a little deeper, too

Edu, ‘Truther Girl’ interviewed Carol and I on the radio a couple of times but that one’s name is Sonia and she lives in Montreal. It’s obvious to us that she’s not Tina Fey. We didn’t smell a rat in her case and she probably can feel flattered if the CIA is trying to paint her as a fake. The first video looks kind of muddled to me. I see that Truther Girl is critical of the source that Gare provided. I don’t run from controversy but if someone is going to present it, here, it needs to be substantive instead of a character assault.

I’m encouraging people to read Joseph Farrell’s books, right now. Someone might come along and say that Farrell is CIA or something and that would kind of make me look like an ass if there’s any substance to the criticism but I’m constantly offering the caveat that I’m fallible and that everyone I promote is fallible.

I guess that what you posted, Edu, is not much more than gossip and that short circuits our discernment, a bit. I try to keep this forum from falling into controversy like that. If the source that Gare has shared (I asked him to do that when he sent it to me in an email) is less than legitimate then we’re big enough to see it in perspective and move on, grid willing but it always surprises me how few people are aware of the most basic conspiracy information, like the history of false flag attacks.

~Don

4

If the fellow who made the videos that Gare shared with us is dirty it’s okay if it adds to the ‘collective discernment’ to point it out. All of us get fooled from time to time. Someone who wrote a very good exposé about the current terrorism scam is Webster Tarpley. His starting and ending point is describing the details of the false flag assault on the World Trade Center but the book is very wide-ranging.

One of the features of a good reputation for a conspiracy author is that he’s/she’s referenced by other reputable writers. I only promote authors like that. I need to stress that I asked Gare to post that one. Some of us send around links and data that can’t be verified in any way but may be useful as bits of corroborative intel. That’s what Gare was doing when he sent me those links. There’s no harm in that but anything in the public record has a peculiar power and influence of its own so I’m particularly careful about the sources I recommend, personally.

Thx, Edu, and sorry for my kneejerk response!

~Don

5

When I posted it I already knew that you had been interviewed by her, and already imagined that she was OK, as I doubt that someone could fool you and Carol face to face. I was just curious for confirmation.

Since you know she’s Ok, one can say that wellware1 ins’t infallible hehehe.

Using the reverse argument, one good sign of disinfo is when authors start attacking each other, wich made me doubt about the source

Sometimes I may look overcritical, and if I do, sorry, but I’m just have to say when I notice something awry [Image Can Not Be Found] . This doens’t disqualify all the source neither who posted it. I’m not trying to look smart and I know people post stuff with best intentions. I’m just discussing it. I’m a meticulous person, wich doesn’t make me popular, but I do it with best intentions. Sometime people (inclunding me) post stuff of dubious source because we believe that something worths and it’s OK.

But to be honest I thanks the disinformants. I think they are part of the learning curve! Like many I started with disinfo once I decided to seek truth. I takes a while to separate what is good (1%) from what isn’t (99%, I only started finding solid information once I started seeking info associated with this movement).

Once you get rid off them you start to see that they all look the same, sharing variations of the same lies or dumping you with tons of uninportant information just for the sake of keeping their freak show alive.

By the way, I’ve just finished reading Babylon’s Bankster, thanks for the tip! Great book! Since it touches many subjects, I also think of it as great introductory book for conspiracies. His references are also very interesting. I’m looking forward to purchase other books from Farrell.

I read it while also reading Al Bielek interviews and it became clear that that the science that Al Bielek and Farell describes are the same. Too sad Al Bielek died this October. It also has great paralels (Chapter 8 ) with Alan Robert Krakower’s Human Design System, wich I look foward learning as well.

6

Edu, I asked Gare to post those links after I just sampled them. Of course there are loads of disinformants who pretend to oppose the corporate order and will share conspiracy info (almost always plagiarized, by the way) and it may be that if I’d taken the time to look more closely at this I might not have asked him to post the links. I’ll just be more careful in the future about recommending internet material by unknown sources to our readers.

Assaulting someone like Sonia’s character is certainly uncalled for, of course, and she was right to defend herself, in my opinion. When my detractors assault my character publicly I respond a little differently: I state their claims in posts, here, then answer back but I don’t mention who they are because I don’t want to fall into the trap that Sonia may have jumped into, which is to help the other side create the impression that defending one’s own character and reputation is nothing but a ‘personality conflict’ with disinformants.

I hope this underlines for our readers that it’s better to get conspiracy information from books than from the internet.

People often mistakenly assume that they can just ‘pick the good stuff’ out of a heap of disinformation and that’s only likely to happen when one reads books by disinformants. I suspect that the disinformation websites are loaded with subliminal imagery and frequency broadcasts, which may explain the dirty feeling we usually get (one needs to pay attention) when visiting them. Empowering information sites have the opposite, positive emotional effect which is very different in quality from the titillation that disinformants and their sponsors can sometimes trigger in their subscribers.

~Don

7

hello everyone,
It’s funny that Eric Carlsen posted a link to this info on Dec. 3, but no one commented. The video is somewhat troubling because Goldbug does name certain actors that appear in youtube videos for apparently good causes. There seems to be an involved psy-op going on where the predators actually campaign against the very dastardly deeds which they perform. a fascinating topic……
He has one vid on his channel that claims that famous Nazis are some of the powerful bannister types of today. like Maurice Greenberg is Joseph Mengela. He has pdfs of the vids on his site too. also he has a link to jeff Rense there. i know Don is very fond of that guy-ha ha
The truther girl vid is curious because she has the mannerisms and look of Tina Fey. Could be Fey has many alters, is a really good actor, or it’s just a mistake. Maybe this guy is part right and part wrong. most people are….or part of the same psy-op refereed to earlier.

8

Hi David,
Thanks for pointing out that this thread on wellaware1.com was already posted by moi a few weeks back.

My gut tells me that most of Ed’s videos and his observations are correct with respect to actors impersonating people and staged events.

Some of the people he links to as being other people I have a hard time with.

The latest being Obama acting as Osama in news releases before he was killed by the seal time in his hideout in Afghanistan.
My thought is the seal team take down of Osama(fiction) was a total op and a fiction. The lines are blurry as to how it
was staged, but Obama being Osama I still have to think about that one.
I do think that Omar Bin Laden is Tony Greenberg though and Omar’s wife being his real life wife in California.

Ed’s not to keen on Alex Jones and thinks he is a shill, so where Ed fits into it all I really don’t know.

Ed does a good job exposing the OWS movement as being all staged and a big set up. There really is something
not right about the whole Gabby Gifford’s event either, which he has also been exposing.

For now I’m going to be watchful of my b.s. meter while I watch wellaware1.com’s videos.

Eric
http://www.ultimatevision.us

9

The latest news with Ed Chirini and wellaware1.com is that YouTube deleted his account and
the hosting company for his website is blocking the site.
Ed’s facebook account is still up, so folks are getting updates there and he now has his videos uploaded on a file sharing
Site. Eric

10

yeah YOU TUBE did that 1 or 2 days after this post went up, missed Your earlier post Eric…
not only does My gut tell Me that the dallas gold bug(Ed Chirini) is real but I get a real bad taste
in My mouth when I look at Sonia!

yes SHE is promoting Don’s zapper but it is in conjunction
with it curing those bs GEO ENGINEERING crowds fiber disease! lol MORGALENS or
something like that…

might be wrong and it wouldn’t be the first time so?

11

Hey can I weigh in on this one a bit?

Eric wrote:
Thanks for pointing out that this thread on wellaware1.com was already posted by moi a few weeks back.

I had wanted to comment on thoses, but for some reason EW no longer works at my house, and the school library/computer lab was closed down for winter break.
EW is blocked from the public library. [Image Can Not Be Found]

There is a lot of good info in there, but my gut doesn’t quite jibe with everything he says. The video evidence of Columbine is pretty damning.
I would say that 90+ percent of “news” is fiction, and what is fact is spun with hypnotic messages and NLP to influence our thinking in certain ways.
I have not been able to view all of the videos, but there is good info in what I have seen.

David R wrote:
hello everyone,
It’s funny that Eric Carlsen posted a link to this info on Dec. 3, but no one commented.

I had seen his post during finals week, but was too busy to explore the links and comment. I had planned on commenting over winter break but again, EW is blocked at my house and no longer can I get to it.

Don wrote:

Of course there are loads of disinformants who pretend to oppose the corporate order and will share conspiracy info (almost always plagiarized, by the way)

I want to confirm this. Many people make conspiracy videos and don’t cite their sources, which may be other conspiracy videos. Even if they are not disinformants, it is unprofessional to not cite sources. It is easy to do and gives one’s work, written or film, legitimacy.

Don wrote:
People often mistakenly assume that they can just ‘pick the good stuff’ out of a heap of disinformation and that’s only likely to happen when one reads books by disinformants. I suspect that the disinformation websites are loaded with subliminal imagery and frequency broadcasts, which may explain the dirty feeling we usually get (one needs to pay attention) when visiting them. Empowering information sites have the opposite, positive emotional effect which is very different in quality from the titillation that disinformants and their sponsors can sometimes trigger in their subscribers.

Let’s just emphasize that, OK???!!!

EDU wrote:
By the way, I’ve just finished reading Babylon’s Bankster, thanks for the tip! Great book! Since it touches many subjects, I also think of it as great introductory book for conspiracies. His references are also very interesting. I’m looking forward to purchase other books from Farrell.

I wanted to mention that his following book, The Grid of the Gods, might have some actionable intelligence of places that would be good gifting targets. He points out that the one of the Mexican pyramids is exactly 180 degrees, or one third the circumference of the Earth from the pyramid at Giza! Could that be just a coincidence? Oh and yes, he cites a source on that. [Image Can Not Be Found]

Don wrote:
One of the features of a good reputation for a conspiracy author is that he’s/she’s referenced by other reputable writers. I only promote authors like that.

Don, do you also mean that they reference other writers, like Farrell does with frequent footnotes?

Oh and also, Farrell has a new book that just came out: Saucers, Swastikas and Psyops: A History of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies and Psychological Operations, I should get my copy in the mail soon.

OK I have some more comments to make but I guess this is the EW hacking that everyone experiences, the computer here in the lab is doing some really wonky stuff and it keeps going to the top of my comments everytime I write something, and not staying at the bottom so I can read what I am writing. I’ll add some more comments later if I can.

12

The nuclear cold fusion was not accepted as true but there are signs the military have developed ballistic weapons derived by it.

Uranium enriched with Deuterium (Hydrogen), in combination with the Bridgman effect, (researched from the '60 as in the
SPER Structure Breaking Electromagnetic Research – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Williams_Bridgman

This combinations bringing a controllable range for of micro nulcear reaction. Instead of using neutrons for the nuclear reaction is the gamma rays that are created in the cold fusion obtained making the deuterium exceded the critical mass due to the impact, the gamma rays that will start breaking the uranium atoms.

Scientist Emilio Del Giudice on new weapons

Or something like that

13

Sorry readers, as I totally barged in.
I done further viewing about Emilio Del Giudice. He reproduced cold fusion together with Giuliano Preparata.
This was done in Milan and in Frascati. The obatained a way to charge the Pallladium in just 5 minutes instead of 5 week as was done in the original way by Pons and Fleishman. The variation was using a higher resistance from a string, in the Frascati experiments they used a plate. The plate was sent to Peking for being tested and analyzed. The plate had become with spots like a leopard skin, in those area dots they found there had happened a nuclear reaction. This was a secondary recation, that is the atom had being shaken and the shells had become loose, the energy of the atomic glue becoming loose turned into gaama rays of into the structure coherent electromagnetif field. The gamma rays as a secondary effect. started breaking the shell particles of the atom and crated the nuvlear energy.

The team of Del Giudice and Preparata also wanted to start use Uranium, the word had come out or hinted. On a phone call Emilio Del Giudice asked the opinion directly to Fleishmann, since he understood the difficultu to answer openly he said this to Fleishman:" if you think my proposal is rubbish, end the phone conversation, otherwise stay connected", Fleishman did not end the conversation.

Why? Fleishman was not free to use Uranium element, the experiment with the Palladium was probably purposedly done in a incompetent doomed way, either to protect the secrecy of the real tecnology by publically trashing it or maybe for a secret conspiracy (Fleishman is 94yrs to this date
Indeed Fleishman had a contract with the British military regarding the corrosion of the torpedos in the submarines, so was controlled by them.