In the last few weeks I’ve gotten a flurry of preaching emails from newagers who read EW postings, some of whom are gifters.
I answer back to anyone who preaches any ideology to me and I’m kind of candid, without being abusive, even though I loathe preaching and preachers in general, just like Dr Reich did.
Each one of them insists that he/she Is Not A Newager but I get smothered with saccharine representations of various Theosophical dogmae in the process. It’s kind of like getting knocked down by surf when one isn’t watching for
Their arrogant complacency is in the forefront in the first email/wave, which is usually a veiled condemnation of my personal style. After two or three responses, that complacency is replaced by a ‘hurt feelings,’ crocodile tears volley, then eventually a Dear John email with a lot of finality in it, never having addressed the simple, obvious issues I bring up in the process.
I’m patiently waiting for a newager to follow through with this process and simply start communicating in a heart-felt, genuine way instead of throwing pithy mind control mantras at me. One old hippie (his term, which he later denied using) actually got to the stage of genuineness before dumping me. The rest, if they want something from me, simply drop the subject and go on as though the conversation never took place. It’s the nature of their programming, which is essentially duplicitous and even obsequious when they don’t get the upper hand.
Another feature of these folks is that nearly all of them introduced themselves as obvious candidates for this forum in their introductory emails. Can you imagine the saccharine, disempowring cess pit this forum would quickly become if I allowed any single ideology to predominate here? I still can’t seem to impress on these faux-passifists that we actually wage war with this board. I also try to show them that they’re actually waging war against me.
Christian fundamentalists, who use exactly the same behavior modification tactics as these newagers do, stay away in droves because they can’t stand the heat of questioning the Gospel, which is chock full of some pretty creepy, even diabolical stuff, in spite of the raw, unbridled power of Jesus’ Revelation.
Theosophy, I say again, is the official, default ideology for anyone who has become disaffected of religion or atheism in the West and we’re all profoundly programmed not to ever openly question or criticize this default programming, which is exactly why I do so at every opportunity.
I hope that more people will start reading reputable conspiracy literature in books instead of being so lazy and trying to get it off the internet. The wonderful service that someone performed to put NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY online is on par with what we’re doing here in this forum, in my opinion, becuase it’s the best primer on conspiracy that I know of.
Here’s the link: [http://www.ethericwarriors.com:2095/3rd
My wonderful wife often reminds me that dogmae like reincarnation, which nobody in the West would be parroting if not for Theosophy, give people hope and I can’t deny that, nor would I ever do anything to discourage anyone. My advice to go beyond this artifact and have a glimpse at the indescribable vastness and intricacy of the human soul is rather my own small effort to generate a more profound hope and confidence in the durability of our consciousness. No iedology or dogma can contain anything that’s genuine. All of that is just man’s lazy attempt to compartmentalize reality for the sake of the finite mind.
We can’t yet even figure out how orgonite works
The problem with wearing one’s ideology on one’s sleeve is that one tracks etheric dog$#!+ into every exalted gathering. I urge everyone to scrape that old stuff off our shoes for a change and to be open to the possibility that we don’t actually need to have all the answers at the moment. Haven’t you noticed how newage preachers, just like any other proselytes, explain everything but can’t really answer anything? Their own shallow belief has to rely on your acceptance, or at least on your not answering back in an intelligent way.
They consider your silence to be compliance. Do you?