Pointing out spray plane activity is not a gifting report. What’s the purpose of this post, please?
It’s in “Questions and Comments from Readers”, and you are a forum member.
It shows spray activity, discusses it briefly, and does not offer any solution to the issue.
If you had a body of posts documenting your gifting activity and discussed this picture within their context, it would perhaps be different.
The lead-in, the headline “Chem-trails dispersing in fluffy fullness” is hopeful, in that it includes the words " dispersing " and " fluffy ", which just barely might imply that Orgonite you distributed is dispersing the chemtrails, as Orgonite does…or it might not imply that. The reader can’t know.
My personal experience has been that chemtrails expand into a flat and greasy deck, and, in the presence of Orgonite, simply disappear, fade away. Puffy cumulus clouds, a separate subject, exist in a healthy, POR-rich atmosphere.
" The amazing thing is the ripples as it disperses, and here comes a new spray to fill in the gaps ."
The ripples you describe are a signature of scalar weather modification, from what I’ve gathered, so that’s not “amazing”, to me ( amazing having generally positive connotations), but is rather “disturbing”. From what I’ve gathered, Orgonite does not cause chemtrails to dissipate in a rippling fashion.
And even if it’s correct that there’s a vague inference that the distribution of Orgonite was helping the situation, dispersing the trails, that hope is dashed by " here comes a new spray to fill in the gaps ", which makes the whole affair appear a task of Sisyphus. “Might as well just give it all up.”
Perhaps I’m misreading things.